Talk: Cade Calrayn/Talk Archive 11

Portable infoboxes: the return!

Hey Cade! Hope you've been well since Community Connect!

Just wanted to hit you up about portable infoboxes. It looks like most of the discussion and development here at Wook happened before CC, so I just wanted to see what we could do to restart the conversation and production.

I think you ran into a few questions back in the summer that may never have been answered, but I wondered if you could restate the problems you believe still exist, in case conditions have changed for you since August.

Ideally, we'd like top work with you to finish the work of conversion in the next few weeks, so you should know you have the total attention of the engineering staff. I'll be running point on communication, so please gimme whatever questions you have, and I'll get answers back to you in a jiffy. I think you probably have one of my cards from Community Connect, so do feel free to email me directly, if you'd find that more convenient. Thanks!
czechout ☎ ✍  21:03: Tue 10 Nov 2015

• Sorry, I've had a busy week; I'll take a look today. Cade Calrayn 16:01, November 17, 2015 (UTC)

No worries; we all have those :) Let me know if there's anything I can do to help speed the process.
czechout ☎ ✍  16:05: Tue 17 Nov 2015

• So, I've taken a look and with my addition of a footer, there's only two issues really still there:
  • There's no way to reproduce the functionality of the imageBG parameter, which lets us put a background behind images that are partially transparent or not large enough (see Category:ImageBG). I'm checking on how widespread/if the width parameter is still used.
  • Our {{Imagewidth}} template is unusable with the portable infoboxes, and the image quality improvement from its resizing is lost. Cade Calrayn 21:35, November 18, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, man :) Lemme look into these issues and I'll be back with questions, solutions, or maybe even both :)
czechout ☎ ✍  21:42: Wed 18 Nov 2015

I can tell you immediately that the general way in which infobox images are handled in PIs with respect to your first point is to simply add code to the CSS which does a max-width of 100% (to stop super wide images from escaping the infobox boundaries) and then to do a height of 100%. In other words, it automates the width-setting process in a way that doesn't change the aspect ratio of the image, and therefore obviates the need for individually setting widths. It also would eliminate the need to find a background. The images that typically would be most dis-served by this process would be ones that are less than 100px wide. Do you have such small images being used in infoboxes here?
czechout ☎ ✍  21:47: Wed 18 Nov 2015

Yeah, the imageBG parameter's only used when an image is less than 250px wide, which is the standard (and maximum) width of the vast majority of our infoboxes. A lot of WEG and comic images are like this, and it's not always a white or black background. Corinna A'Daasha, Kandria A'Daasha, Akanseh, and Alph are a few examples from Category:imageBG (though it seems there a few unnecessary uses in there). There's also instances where parts of the image is transparent, like Adelhard, Tani Ab'yla, and AccuTronics. Cade Calrayn 21:58, November 18, 2015 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for that greater detail. Another question, is {{imagewidth}} actually working? I've tried several different infoboxes, and no matter how wide or narrow I set my browser width, the image width stays the same. As always, forgive me for asking dumb questions, but I'm just trying to quickly come up to speed here. :)
czechout ☎ ✍  22:08: Wed 18 Nov 2015

It won't be affected by your browser width; all infoboxes images are loaded at 250px regardless. What it does is load the image itself at a larger size than 250px wide (not too large, and scaled to the actual size of the image) and then has the infobox's CSS automatically resize it to 250px wide, thus maintaining the quality that you'd have at the larger size. Cade Calrayn 22:11, November 18, 2015 (UTC)

Do you have maybe an example or two infobox images where {{imagewidth}} kicks in? Or does this happen to every infobox image?
czechout ☎ ✍  22:26: Wed 18 Nov 2015

Everywhere, yeah. Cade Calrayn 22:28, November 18, 2015 (UTC)

You may remember Shareif from Community Connect. He and I have been examining {{imagewidth}} for the past little while and I'm not sure we're properly understanding it. In the last few minutes I've built a little demo of it at User:CzechOut/ImageTest, where I've put a standard [[File:whatever|250px]] call directly on top of an infobox-processed version of the same image. Presumably, because the image is within {{character}}, it must be flowing through {{imagewidth}} as well. But I can't see any difference between the two sets of images. Am I misunderstanding something?

I'm not asking to challenge or dispute you, by the way. Rather, Shareif is so intrigued by the notion that there might be a trick he's missing in improving infobox image quality, that we might want to build your code, or something very like it, into the basic infobox code itself. So the more we can understand about what's going on, the more likely it is that we can just make "Wookieepedia standard image handling" into "Wikia standard image handling".

If you have a better example of where image quality is definitely enhanced over Wikia's/MediaWiki's standard file calls, we'd be very much interested to see it.
czechout ☎ ✍  23:40: Wed 18 Nov 2015

Hey Cade! :) Shareif and I are still very interested in what imagewidth is actually doing under the hood, but so far have only been able to see that it's increasing page load time. If you could give us a clearer example of where it's making a big difference as to image quality, we'd love to see it, as we'd love to improve infobox image quality for all of Wikia, if possible. Thanks!
czechout ☎ ✍  20:20: Mon 23 Nov 2015

To be honest, I'm no longer actually able to see a difference between the two. I remember it being visible at one point, but I'm not really seeing it anymore. Cade Calrayn 00:06, November 24, 2015 (UTC)

So, just to confirm, imagewidth is no longer a concern for you? And you spoke before of checking on how widespread the imageBG parameter actually is. Were you able to get an assessment of how significant that usage was so that we can determine how much of a blocker it really is?
czechout ☎ ✍  22:35: Mon 30 Nov 2015

Yeah, I don't think Imagewidth is a dealbreaker. However, ImageBG is widely used; I've gone through some more of Category:ImageBG, but it seems like there's at least several hundred, if not around a thousand, cases where the parameter is definitely in use and is needed. Cade Calrayn 16:56, December 1, 2015 (UTC)

Infobox

Thanks for the heads up about the hide button; I was kinda scratching my head over that one. Well, this example infobox is almost ready to debut at User:CzechOut/Ship. Coupla questions for you:

1. I need to alter some of the CSS. I put my changes in MediaWiki:Infoboxes.css and was just going to add a little @import line over at Common, while also redacting the PI code at the bottom of Common. My thought was this would keep all the tedious interstitial editing out of Common's history. Does that seem like a reasonable plan of action to you?
   • Go ahead.
2. I understand from Brandon that you guys need, as a matter of course, a week's debate on the sample infobox before we get underway with more full-scale conversion. How would you like to handle that debate period? Do you want to introduce the designs for approval, or should I do it? Or would you like to pass it around more informally in the Wookieepedia IRC channel?
   czechout ☎ ✍  03:12: Tue 08 Dec 2015
   • The general IRC consensus is that no, this wouldn't need a CT; it's a behind-the-scenes change with minimal visual changes, just like the previous template rework when I converted them to metatemplates. One minute though, we're still discussing it. Cade Calrayn 03:24, December 8, 2015 (UTC)

Cool. Just remember that the CSS in Infoboxes.css will square the circle on a lot of the differences between the non-PI and the PI. I can implement those now, if it'd help the debate.
czechout ☎ ✍  03:28: Tue 08 Dec 2015

Actually, now that we look at it, your ship example page definitely shows a difference in the image quality, and that was a sticking point for a few people when the quality changes first came about. Also, some other issues: the image on the portable infobox links to the actual image and not the File: page, which is a significant issue for us, and it'd be nice if the row label text could be centered vertically. Cade Calrayn 03:35, December 8, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback!

• The labels are now centered vertically.
• The bottom of the box now has a bottom border radius
• I'm not too sure what you mean about linking to the image rather than the file page. Whether at Millennium Falcon or either box at User:CzechOut/Ship, the infobox image seems to do the same thing: bring up a light box and show the image. Could you please define a little more what behaviour you'd like to have happen?
• I'm still not able to see a difference between the PI image and the non-PI image. Could you maybe provide screenshots which demonstrate the lack of quality in the PI image?

Sorry if these last two points seem tedious to you, but I wanna get it right for you, and I just can't see what's actually wrong.
czechout ☎ ✍  05:19: Tue 08 Dec 2015

For one thing, the portable infobox image is loading at 270px wide and isn't being resized at all, so it's leaking over the edge. Here is a comparison of the two at their proper dimensions; I'd upload it but it seems there's something up with our abusefilter. As for the other image thing, it's in Monobook—clicking on the image should lead you to the File: page and not here. Cade Calrayn 14:47, December 8, 2015 (UTC)

You should find the "leaking-over-the-edge" phenomenon to now be fixed. (You may have to ?action=purge the URL to see the changes.) Is that all that you were meaning — an image dimension issue — or was there some other image quality metric that was troubling?

As for the Monobook thing, I'll take a look. Thanks for defining that better!
czechout ☎ ✍  15:42: Tue 08 Dec 2015

Thanks to Grunny's quick help, the Monobook issue you described has been fixed. As always, you may need to ?action=purge your URL to see the change working. Were there any other outstanding issue that you and the gang have? I'm at your disposal to fix things (or ask more and smarter people to help), so please don't be shy about making requests!
czechout ☎ ✍  16:21: Tue 08 Dec 2015

Hey, I've checked more on the imageBG issue youy described earlier, now that we have a more or less working prototype infobox. Turns out that a significant number of the things in category:imageBG are sort of false positives. It took me around 50 random clicks before I found one that failed to extend to the limits of the infobox, and therefore showed the background.

However, there are indeed still some images where the background shows up. One thing we can do in the very short term is to change the default background to white, which would eliminate even more things as false positives.

Then I can work with our engineers to see if there's something we can do to accommodate switching the background for that fraction of category:imageBG that really needs it. In other words, I suggest we continue to look for a fix for this issue, but not let it block deployment of PIs, since it affects relatively few pages. Does that seem reasonable?
czechout ☎ ✍  02:50: Wed 09 Dec 2015

Infobox image quality

I think that we've managed to fix most of the problems you mentioned above, but I've looked again at User:CzechOut/Ship I finally figured out that the image resolution of the PI was crapping out when you zoomed in with your browser. The non-PI doesn't do this.

But the thing is, when viewing the infobox at the normal resolution, you'd be very hard-pressed to tell, particularly because the natural width of the PI is smaller than the non-PI. And not all pictures demonstrate this flaw as prominently as the Falcon. As you noted it with the images at User:CzechOut/ImageTest, you can't see the difference, no matter what the zoom level.

We've entered a period now where engineers are scarce as we wind down into the holidays. So I guess the question I have for you now is just how much of a problem this is for you guys? Is it going to prevent us from deploying the new PIs in time for The Force Awakens?
czechout ☎ ✍  21:49: Thu 10 Dec 2015

• Chiming in here to reinforce Shawn's point very directly: given the fact that this only happens when you zoom in, I can count on one hand the amount of people who this would actually impact. So considering the benefits far outweigh this very minor issue, let's not consider this an actual blocker. Let's move ahead with the portable infobox conversion, with the understanding that, after the holiday, engineering will be able to look into and address this problem one way or another. - Brandon Rhea^(talk) 22:45, December 10, 2015 (UTC)

Overnight, a gang of not-yet-holidaying engineers took a good, hard look at the portable infobox image quality issue. They have formulated a response that will improve image quality globally. It's based on your {{imagewidth}} solution, following your logic of increasing the width/resolution of the image from which the PI image is derived.

This plan is in code review now and will be deployed on Monday.

I've been getting updates all day on it, and I have absolutely no doubt that you're going to see satisfactory results Monday. It will completely obviate the need to continue using {{imagewidth}}, and, indeed, spread the logic of your template to the whole of Wikia.

Would it therefore be okay if we started doing infobox conversions this weekend, and allow the code that improves the images to go live ever-so-slightly after conversions have begun in earnest?
czechout ☎ ✍  20:20: Fri 11 Dec 2015

Honestly, I've been super busy this week with the final week of school and the bot work, so all my little free time has been put towards managing the bots. I'll be able to catch up on these messages tomorrow morning; thanks again for your patience and work. Cade Calrayn 20:22, December 11, 2015 (UTC)

Hey, hey :) Looks like you had quite the productive weekend round here. The Legends/Canon switch seems to have gone well. With that and school, I can totally understand why you didn't have enough time to get back to me on infoboxes. Still, I'd really like to get this wrapped up by Wednesday, so that all those people who are going to start flooding the site after Thursday night's showings of EpVII will be able to look on their phones (maybe even from the theatre lines!) and get the best possible viewing experience.

Towards that end, I've started dumping all the portable infoboxes I've created locally on my machine to /Draft pages here. You should know that we're still on track for a push, later today (or maaaaayyyyybeeeee tomorrow) to fix the {{imagewidth}} issue, and I think we've taken care of the vast majority of your objections. Do you think it'd be okay to start approving these drafts?
czechout ☎ ✍  17:19: Mon 14 Dec 2015

Give me three hours or so, I've got an exam in an hour, and then I'm clear to take a look. Cade Calrayn 19:04, December 14, 2015 (UTC)

Okay, now that I've resolved the variety of technological issues that just happened to pop up in the last six hours, I've got one outstanding issue with the infoboxes; namely the imageBG field. Was this ever implemented? Cade Calrayn 01:25, December 15, 2015 (UTC)

Hey Cade! Thanks so much for beginning to approve these /Drafts. You should know, if you haven't already noticed already, that there is some lag between when a /Draft is posted and when you can actually see the button to "see the draft" in Special:Insights. So you kinda have to just keep adding /Draft to URLs to figure out whether there's a /Draft there or not. Also, some of the template classification is a bit tricky. For instance, with {{Information}}, even though it's in an infobox category, it's actually "non-article" because it's only/principally used outside ns:0.
czechout ☎ ✍  01:27: Tue 15 Dec 2015

What about the imageBG parameter? Cade Calrayn 01:37, December 15, 2015 (UTC)

Sorry; we had an edit conflict. No, imageBG has not been addressed. As I pointed out earlier, it's something that affects only some of the ~1000 pages in category:ImageBG. There are:

• many straight up false positives in that list
• many others which have a white/transparent background, and so don't actually reveal any problems
• some which were a problem in the non-PIs, but are no longer a problem since PIs are narrower

I roughly estimate the number of pages with a genuine background problem at ~.05% of your total pages. Since it's such a small number, I was hoping we could work on that after Christmas. IF I have a misapprehension about the size of the problem, please let me know and I'll see what I can do about reprioritising it.
czechout ☎ ✍  01:40: Tue 15 Dec 2015

No problem, makes sense. I've got some serious back pain right now, so I'll be back in a bit. Cade Calrayn 01:52, December 15, 2015 (UTC)

Oh, one thing we do need to keep is the ParamCheck stuff from the bottom of the original versions; those are used for maintenance categories. Cade Calrayn 01:59, December 15, 2015 (UTC)

Heya :) I'm sorry to hear you're having back pain. I know how badly that sucks, so I don't want to overtax you. I've been trying to release a few new infoboxes every few hours, so as to minimise the time you had to spend at the computer doing approvals. I'm not sure that it worked, but that was my intent. I'm stopping for the evening now, so that should give you a definite break until morning.

Since you've already approved the basic style that all these take, we could just have Grunny finish up the initial approvals tomorrow, and then when you're feeling better, you and I can jointly go over any problems you detect in individual infoboxes. Or not. :) Whatever is easier for you to do. :)

If you can get to some approvals, there are a few that are super high priority.

Obviously, we'd like to get {{Character}} done , since it's the infobox on the most number of pages. Shareif has had this working for several months now, and I recently made a few tweaks to bring the styling to the same standard as the rest of the infoboxes. You can play around with the {{{type}}} variable in the example at {{tl|Character/Draft}} to discover how readily the colors change.

Other high-priority targets include {{Movie}}, {{Television episode}}, and any of the templates that are on more than 2000 pages.

Finally, I didn't see your request about ParamCheck stuff until a little while ago, after I'd uploaded several dozen more infoboxes. I'm a little confused about the ParamCheck code, since I only ran across it a few times. On a few occasions, it was delivered via parser functions; on others, by a Lua invocation. But by and large it was just absent, so those few times I came across it, I thought it was just experimental code and so didn't include it in the PI. Since it appears so inconsistently, emme ask you a couple of questions:

• Is it supposed to be on every infobox template, and people just never finished the job of adding it?
• If so, would you like to take this opportunity to just put it on every template? Or should I only put it back where it was?
• Do you prefer the Lua version or the parser function? (Personally, I think that since you've got the Lua code running well, it probably makes most sense to use that.)

Again, sorry for making a wrong assumption, but we'll get it cleared up soon enough. :)
czechout ☎ ✍  09:15: Tue 15 Dec 2015

Infobox approvals

It's probably time to start a new section, since we're not really talking about infobox image quality anymore.

As you may have discovered Special:Insights is somewhat slow to update, so I'm gonna try to keep you apprised of my uploads here. That way, you don't have to go hunting through the whole list, like I think you did when you started approving yesterday.

I'm now trying to release infoboxes in groups of 5-10, along categorical lines, so it's easier for you to study them as a group of related infoboxes. I've just finished uploading the entirety of spacecraft infobox templates and category:Vehicle infobox templates.

Still, the infobox that needs approving — really, ASAP today — is {{character}}. By far, the thing that most casual fans are going to want from their phones as they descend upon theatres this weekend is information about the characters from EpVII, so it's vital we get that going just as soon as you possibly can.

Thank you so much for all the work you've put in to improve Wookieepedia over the past coupla weeks. We're almost at the finish line where we can all relax into just being fans again.
czechout ☎ ✍  20:48: Tue 15 Dec 2015

• Thanks, I would've started again earlier today but I've been moving apartments. I was actually just going through your contribs, as like you said Special:Insights isn't the most up to date. I looked at Character last night, but it was an unfinished version (which appears to have been updated). I do have one issue—our Category:Event infobox templates actually have a width of 300px instead of the standard 250px, and I wasn't sure how/was too tired to figure out how to apply that to the portable versions. Any ideas? (also, it looks like they no longer do three/four columns across, but that was always a bit of a hack via an infobox within an infobox or something.) Cade Calrayn 23:22, December 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • Also, now that I've popped back into IRC, it's been pointed out to me that images aren't loading at the 250px max; see Xexto for example—it's loading at 240.918px instead, and thus we've got borders. Cade Calrayn 23:28, December 15, 2015 (UTC)

Lemme answer those questions in just a second. Just wanted to say Category:Media infoboxes (though perhaps not the subcats) is ready for your perusal as well.
czechout ☎ ✍  23:52: Tue 15 Dec 2015

Okay, sorry for the delay. Infobox widths are easily manipulated, but I wanna make sure I understand what you want. Are you saying that {{character}}, and {{character}} alone is supposed to be 300px, while the rest are at 250px?

No, just {{Battle}} and the rest of the infoboxes in Category:Event infobox templates; I forgot the colon to force a link above.

PIs absolutely can do four columns across, but since I couldn't find a natural 4-party war, I was thinking that was a pretty edge case that could wait on development until after this weekend. I think I'm right in saying that, far and away, the most natural form of the multi-party infobox is just the straight-up twofer, which these boxes I think do better than the originals. Nevertheless, there are a number of pathways to traverse with the >2 boxes, but it would be really helpful having several examples of a 3-party and 4-party conflict to experiment on.

Galactic War would be a 4-party war, though you're right, it's relatively rare. 3-party wars are more common. As long as it's still on the table for later, sure.

Finally, Xexto is very much an edge case, because the image is naturally very tall, and therefore to get a proportional version of the image, whilst at the same time sampling from an oversized image, the image does take up slightly less than 250px. These cases are extremely rare, but thanks for pointing it out. I can pass it up to the engineering team for further analysis. At least until January, when the engineering team are fully back at their desks, the basic rule of thumb is that if the height/width > 2, you'll probably see that the image won't fully extend the 250px width allotted to the infobox image. file:Gasgano.jpg has a h:w ratio of 2.07.
czechout ☎ ✍  00:09: Wed 16 Dec 2015

Hmm, okay. To be fair, we've generally had a (unofficial?) policy about very tall images, so we'll see how widespread it is. Cade Calrayn 00:23, December 16, 2015 (UTC)

The case of Xexto has indeed been pushed up the food chain, and is now well-ticketed with the engineering staff. I wouldn't expect many further such cases. Obviously, an easy solution for this one is just to resample the image so that it's (proportionally) just a little (like 20, 30px) wider. Again, as this image demonstrates, the magic number is a 2:1 height:width ratio. Anything below that is fine; anything above, and you'll likely see images not stretching full width (for now).
czechout ☎ ✍  00:31: Wed 16 Dec 2015

Okay, you should find {{tl|Battle/Draft}} (and the other templates that use the Battle and Event themes, after purging your browser's cache, are now 300px widths.
czechout ☎ ✍  01:00: Wed 16 Dec 2015

I didn't much like leaving you, even for very long, a whole class of infobox that unclearly presented its information. So one possible solution to the {{Battle}} multi-party issue is simply to make the thing wider whether you've got 2, 3 or 4 parties. I've now changed the width to 400px for the "Battle" theme, and given you a side-by-side look at the {{Battle}} page. I've also given you 300 and 350px widths for comparison there on the {{Battle}} page. Lemme know which one you think is the best!
czechout ☎ ✍  23:22: Wed 16 Dec 2015

Rest of the infoboxes

All the rest of the infoboxes are ready for your approval. As we know, Special:Insights is displaying more templates than that are actually infoboxes. But if you again use my contributions list — or better this list, you should be able to knock them out pretty easily. Obviously, even though the remaining unapproved templates are the "stragglers", the earlier in the day you can approve, the better. Might help us reach a few more people standing in line for Thursday's showings.

Though I will remain available to you for further refinements of the infoboxes as we've already discussed, I did just wanna pause for a moment prior to TFA's official launch and thank you for your cooperation with the infobox project. I know you've had a lot of stuff going on in other areas of your life, but you've been a Wikia Super Star with all this. Thank you so much!
czechout ☎ ✍  09:17: Thu 17 Dec 2015 09:17, December 17, 2015 (UTC)

• Okay, we've got some issues with images:
  • As you can see here, captions aren't supported by the infoboxes, and it's dropping the image as well, resulting in a lot of hits in Special:UnusedFiles.
  • A lowercase f on the file is also causing the image to be dropped, as is any type of misspelling in File. Cade Calrayn 02:52, December 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • Has there been any further discussion about the size of the conflict/event infoboxes too? They are way too big, and it'd be good if we could get that resolved. If you haven't checked in the Wikia skin, Cade, please do so and you'll see what I mean. - Brandon Rhea^(talk) 23:43, December 21, 2015 (UTC)

Mining droid

Hey Cade, I moved Mining droid to Mining droid/Legends. Could RoboCade move all the links to the Legends page? Thanks! Cwedin^(talk) 23:35, February 1, 2016 (UTC)

Infobox help

I created a game infobox, but it lacks color and is unreadable. Can this be corrected? Cwedin^(talk) 21:59, February 2, 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks for the help! Cwedin^(talk) 03:00, February 3, 2016 (UTC)

This may be an ultra-newbie-ish question, with an obvious answer I can't see, but why did RoboCade delete my edit on the Aayle Secura article? 68.32.245.158 23:16, February 3, 2016 (UTC)

Infobox questions

Hey Cade :) Glad to see you back from your break! Here's what I got on your questions:

• {{Battle}} and other multi-column boxes do indeed expect for the values to line up. If there's a side1 and side2, there should also be a casualties1 and casualties2. Otherwise, it won't be easy to tell which casualties belong to which side. Put more simply, columns indicate a side. If you choose not to fill in casualties1, but do fill in casualties 2, then it will naturally stretch the whole width of the box, because that's what it's explicitly programmed to do. Why? Because you don't want a mess of empty boxes for side3 and side4. Nevertheless, I'm going to ask the question of engineers. They could be pondering some elegant code that they just haven't published yet. but I'm pretty sure the answer is going to come back that the best solution is for you to do what you're doing now: using <nowiki> wrapped around a space.

• As for the width of {{Battle}}, you may remember that I set up three sizes in your CSS before Christmas. I had proposed that we pick one of the three sizes, 300, 350 or 400 as the standard size. Currently, the CSS is set to 400, which is, to my eye, optimal for the 4-party conflict, but a bit large for ones with fewer sides. Since there are so few infoboxes with 4 sides, it might be a good idea to create a separate template for the plus-sized infoboxes. So we could create {{tlx|Battle4}} (or something similarly named), and have it set to 400 px width. Then we could set the width of the standard {{Battle}} to be either 300 or 350, both of which work well for either 2- or 3-party conflicts. (The difference between the two isn't really legibility, but just length of infobox. Obviously a 350 would be a shorter infobox.)
  • Quick response since I saw you trying the show=incomplete thing—if we combine that and this idea with a wrapper template that switches between a 2-column template, 3-column template, and 4-column template depending on whether any of the third or fourth column parameters are used, then we could solve the missing fields issue and the width issue. So all three templates would have show=incomplete, and if any of the fourth-column fields are used, it'd use the four-column template version, and same for the three-column. Cade Calrayn 15:34, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
    • And boom. Check out Template:Battle now; it's using Template:Battle2. Cade Calrayn 15:47, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

• Could you please refresh my memory, through a link to an example if possible, of the "captions in info on image fields" issue? Are you looking for captions to actually appear over the top of an infobox picture, rather than underneath it?

• I'd really like to get a handle on the exact size of the imageBG issue. I need a hard number that I can pitch to engineering to show the genuine scope. And for me, a hard number would be the number of infobox images that:
  • don't fill the entire space for the infobox
  • aren't transparent
  • are where a proposed new background would be inarguably better than the default "Wookieepedia blue" one.

That last one is a tricky one, but it's important. I can easily see that Galin Azzameen would be improved by a black background, because the image is transparent on black, and all sides of the image are therefore black. So it would seamlessly blend in with the black background.

What's less clear are things like Ewwen Glayyd. There are enough of these comic drawings on white that we could probably eliminate a lot of the need to change backgrounds by making the default background of the character infobox white. No image's natural background, after all, is "Wookieepedia blue". I'd be willing to bet that this single change would reduce the need for a background change by a hefty percentage.

Beyond that, though, you've got things like Ony Bobissia. Non transparent images like this offer no clear candidate for a particular coloured background. No matter which background you choose, some portion of the frame isn't going to look quite "right". So would white be wrong here? Maybe if you played with the default transparency of white, you'd find a look that works, in those rare cases where the image doesn't fill the frame.

Finally, depending on how many images actually are affected by this issue, you may find re-cropping to be an answer. Xexto isn't an example of this problem anymore because Darth Culator recut that image in mid-December.

So let's see how big an issue this really is. If you and your team could go through and remove the category from the images that don't belong in imageBG, that'd be a big start to figuring this all out!
czechout ☎ ✍  21:28: Thu 04 Feb 2016

Just to let you know, some of our engineers have already been in discussions on your first issue, above. They've at least been looking at whether there are better ways to get casual1 to produce a blank cell while at the same time preventing casual3-4 from showing up. Don't have any solutions to give you yet, but they are actively looking at it!
czechout ☎ ✍  16:07: Fri 05 Feb 2016

Hologram template

Hey Cade. I'm not sure how much work this will take, but is there any way you could change the hologram template so that instead of having to put {{Hologram|canon}} for canon pages you could just type {{Hologram}}, and for Legends pages you would put {{Hologram|legends}}? I changed the template myself however I realized that all the Legends pages would just link to the canon hologram page, so I changed it back. Is there anyway you could change this and all the Legends pages that link to the canon hologram page? If you can get it working fine for that template, could you do the same thing with the holocron template? Thanks. Cevan (talk) 22:48, December 18, 2015 (UTC)

Questions about {{Battle}}

Hey Cade. I'm not sure how familiar you are with the revamp of {{Battle}} a couple weeks back, but I figured you'd be the best person to ask. There are two errors with the template that I can't seem to bypass. The first is the fact that for two or more "sides" for the battle, if just one field is blank in the MediaWiki code, it is omitted when the page displays the template. An example is the battle of Haruun Kal: "casual2" is left blank, but instead of that field appearing as a blank field on the page, the data from the "casual1" field completely covers that row. The second error I ran into is that bullet indents don't appear to work within a field, i.e. the "forces1" field on bombing at the Jedi Temple. If you know of any workarounds to either of these errors, could you let me know? Thanks! CC7567 ^(talk) 02:13, January 5, 2016 (UTC)

• Hey Cade, just wanted to follow up with you regarding this and see if you might know what's up. If not, no worries. Thanks. CC7567 ^(talk) 21:54, January 29, 2016 (UTC)
  • I also have a GA nomination that is being held up as a result of this, so getting a fix would be appreciated—especially since the nomination is being held up for something outside of my control. - Brandon Rhea^(talk) 23:24, January 29, 2016 (UTC)
    • I've informed CzechOut as to the issues; I'm not seeing any way for me to personally fix the issues except for the bullet point ones—it's the fact that the rows are set to centered-text alignment. Cade Calrayn 14:43, February 1, 2016 (UTC)

Falleen

Hey Cade. In accordance with the naming policy, I've moved what used to be Falleen over to Falleen (species), and done the same for the Legends page. The planet pages still have to be moved, however could you possibly have RoboCade switch all links to "Falleen" to "Faleen (species)|Faleen"? Same goes for the Legends counterpart. I'd really appreciate it. Thanks. Cevan (talk) 15:53, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

• • Actually, Falleen is explicitly defined as one of the exceptions to the policy, along with Gand. Cade Calrayn 15:57, January 18, 2016 (UTC)
    • Gah, my mistake. Sorry about that. Cevan (talk) 16:29, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

Hair dye

Hi! I'm trying to make a canon article for hair dye. I moved the legends article to "hair dye/Legends", but when I try to create a new, canon hair dye page, it does not work - when I click "save page". nothing happens, because a page with that name, already exists (the legends page). Can you help me? --Nightlily (talk) 22:00, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

• Edit: Never mind; I figured it out; it was due to a redirect.

Hi Cade.

I was just wondering, in your opinion what would be some of the most powerful crystals to use of construction of a lightsaber to ever exist. 110.148.164.133 07:47, January 19, 2016 (UTC)

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Richard_Madenfort

Of course, 'anon' deleted the verify tag. The tag said to add sources. 'Anon' added sources. Therefore 'anon' deleted the tag. The tag did not say not to delete the tag, it said add sources. Sources were added. If it wasn't a proper source, why not put the tag back up so that 'anon' would know it was not enough and would continue to add more sources.

--98.235.110.31 20:13, January 19, 2016 (UTC)

• I'm looking at the exact text that was deleted, and there was no sources. You simply added an unnecessary reference for the actor's stage name, not for the statement that he appeared in the movie. We're not the Buffyverse or Taylor Swift wikis; we have standards. Cade Calrayn 20:54, January 19, 2016 (UTC)
  • again, if it wasn't a proper source, why not put the verify tag back on instead of simply deleting the page. --98.235.110.31 22:02, January 19, 2016 (UTC)

Mandalorian Neo-Crusaders/Legends

Hey Cade; sorry to bother you, but when you have some time do you think you could have RoboCade move Mandalorian Neo-Crusaders to Mandalorian Neo-Crusaders/Legends, and update all the links to the page? I noticed just a short while ago that all of the The Clone Wars episode guides from seasons one to three or four have been updated with trivia galleries (they were lacking these back when StarWars.com was updated). The trivia gallery for "Wookiee Hunt" lists off many of the trophies in the Trandoshan hunting lodge, including the Mandalorian Neo-Crusader helmet. I've already got a canon version of the page typed up and ready to paste in once the switch has been made. I was going to switch all the links over and move the page myself, but there are just far too many to do it manually. I'd really appreciate it if you could do this whenever you're able to. Thanks! Cevan (talk) 02:24, January 22, 2016 (UTC)

• Should we actually treat that as a canonical fact, though? The fact that it appears in a trivia gallery, rather than the episode gallery, suggests to me that it could just be saying it's a reference. Saying Neo-Crusaders are canon seems speculative. - Brandon Rhea^(talk) 18:06, January 22, 2016 (UTC)

Blue Squadron (Rebel Alliance)

There is a page called Blue Squadron (Rebel Alliance)/Canon. I'm guessing it should be moved to Blue Squadron.--Rakhsh (talk) 17:43, January 22, 2016 (UTC)

Shouldn't Blue Squadron (Rebel Alliance)/Canon be moved to Blue Squadron given the Legends to Canon switchover?--Rakhsh (talk) 00:33, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

Busy?--Rakhsh (talk) 15:50, January 28, 2016 (UTC)

Moving Military (Republic) to Republic military

It appears I do not have permission to do this since the page already exists as a redirect for the Legends Republic Military article. I'm not sure why I named the former article that in the first place (mistake on my part) but it appears it wouldn't have worked either way. The warning told me to contact an administrator. Will you help me out with this? Thank you! Reddyredcp (talk) 18:00, January 23, 2016 (UTC)

Using Ansel Hsiao's pictures

You recently said that Ansel Hsiao's pictures are only canon if they come from actual sources. Does this mean that they have to have been used in a book? I have seen other users put his pictures on the wiki with the only source being the fractal sponge website. Johnnyrocket64 (talk) 18:14, January 23, 2016 (UTC)

Merchant

Hey Cade, could RoboCade move Merchant and all links to it to Merchant/Legends? Thanks! - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 01:11, January 25, 2016 (UTC)

Wat Tambor's Voice Actor Episode II

Hi Cade Calrayn, I've posted a source where Matthew Wood talks about Wat Tambor and mentions that Burtt provided the voice. It's on Tambor's talk page on the Legends section.--Jade Cooper (talk) 18:01, January 26, 2016 (UTC)

Images of Sith Empire spacecraft

Hi Cade! Could you please move/rename Category:Images of Sith Empire spacecraft to something more appropriate so that that category can be used for images of the original Sith Empire spacecraft? Thanks! Imperators II^(Talk) 15:53, January 28, 2016 (UTC)

Sorry to bother, How did you added a "Canon image" on a Template Tab?. Just wanted to know.

Thrawn links

Hey Cade, when you have a moment, could you have RoboCade change all links to "Thrawn" to "Mitth'raw'nuruodo|Thrawn"? I had started to do it manually but many of them are on talk pages, and there are a great many of them. Thanks. Cevan (talk) 23:22, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

• Hi there again, Cade. Really sorry to add yet another thing I'd like you to do when you have the time, however I noticed that all links to Minister were not updated in the canon switchover; the Legends and canon pages for it were renamed, however all pages linking to them were not. Thanks again, I really appreciate it. Cevan (talk) 20:02, January 30, 2016 (UTC)
  • First I'm going to need to know why for the Thrawn thing. Cade Calrayn 14:04, February 1, 2016 (UTC)
    • Nevermind about the Thrawn thing, actually. At the time I posted that I was in a bit of a frenzy fixing several redirect links, and that one caught my eye as another offender; you don't have to worry about it, though. I would appreciate it if the canon and Legends Minister links could be fixed, however. Thanks Cade. Cevan (talk) 01:31, February 4, 2016 (UTC)

Chad

Where exactly is Chad mentioned in Star Wars: The Force Awakens: The Visual Dictionary? - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 21:02, January 31, 2016 (UTC)

SWTOR NPC Images

Hi Cade. I see you do a lot of work on SWTOR articles, so I figured I'd ask you. This isn't really what I devote most my time to on this wiki, but I do have some SWTOR images, and contribute those when I can. I was wondering if there any policy regarding using NPC images from Jedipedia. For example, Kaldeni was removed from SWTOR, so it's likely difficult to find a screenshot of her. Would it be permissible to use an image of her 3D model from the Jedipedia site, as seen here? StarsiderSWG (talk) 20:32, February 1, 2016 (UTC)

• I've got it covered; I haven't uploaded the images yet because I wanted to take the time to rewrite those one-sentence articles that Mauser crapped out, and I've been busy lately. At the moment, I've only missed.... 11? characters that were removed since launch. Cade Calrayn 20:36, February 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Cool, good to see someone is taking care of all those screenshots. StarsiderSWG (talk) 21:02, February 1, 2016 (UTC)

Data-tape: Behind the scenes

Hi, On the Wiki entry "http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Data-tape" there is a mistake. It says in the Behind the scenes paragraph that "At the time, tapes were considered a modern means of storing information, though they later became obsolete and as of 2015 have been supplanted almost entirely by other formats and generally available only secondhand." However this is false! Tapes are still used by most major businesses for long term storage and archiving since they reliability and possible storage time of tapes is far superior to that of any other media!

Scources: www.lto.org/technology/what-is-lto-technology/ www.overlandstorage.com/blog/?p=323

Some broken infoboxes

Hi Cade! Maybe you've noticed, but the Star infobox does not display the "coordinates" field (examples: Ch'hodos's red sun, Coruscant Prime) and the "stations" field (example: Coruscant Prime), and the System infobox does not display the "stations" field (example: Empress Teta system). I hope that helps, and hope there's a solution for that. Imperators II^(Talk) 11:08, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

• The coordinates field was mis-sourced, though stations is fine in {{Star}} from what I can see. Stations readded to {{System}} too. Cade Calrayn 13:51, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Regarding the "stations" field in {{Star}}, I guess I mixed up Coruscant Prime with Coruscant system; of course, the "stations" field for the system infobox is visible now. Thanks for the help, Cade! Imperators II^(Talk) 14:15, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
• Since I see you're already in the midst of working through infobox issues, I figure I'd let you know that {{Law}} is also currently behaving strangely; the support and opposition headers are stacked atop one another, as opposed to being above their respective columns. Trayus^(Academy) 17:08, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Finally got it; change should start showing up soon. Cade Calrayn 18:57, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Aargonar

Alright, I'll move it back. CC7567 ^(talk) 20:18, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

Hi cade.I'm Nigel Ellis.I just want to ask why have you been deleting every single change I have made?You Have all ready deleted 2 of my articles,one of them very recent.Why have you done that.I can't make a big article in 5 seconds,i need to start small.So i would really appreciate it if you stop deleting all my articles.Thanks--Nigel Ellis (talk) 02:12, February 10, 2016 (UTC)

Hi cade.I'm Nigel Ellis.I just want to ask why have you been deleting every single change I have made?You Have all ready deleted 2 of my articles,one of them very recent.Why have you done that.I can't make a big article in 5 seconds,i need to start small.So i would really appreciate it if you stop deleting all my articles.Thanks--Nigel Ellis (talk) 02:13, February 10, 2016 (UTC)

Hi cade.Can you please stop deleting every article i make?please?Thanks--Nigel Ellis (talk) 02:14, February 10, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Images

Thanks for the warning. Is there any way to fix the image issues that have been cropping up in the inforboxes? - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 16:01, February 10, 2016 (UTC)

• The one described here, which I have personally experience on multiple articles. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 16:04, February 10, 2016 (UTC)

Programming stuff

I see you know Lua. What other programming languages do you know? Any tips for a pretty noobish programmer like myself? Will you be my mentor?

I'm not a troll, by the way; I ask you these questions with utmost sincerity. 216.235.235.146 16:33, February 10, 2016 (UTC)

What, do you think you're better than me? Well you're wrong! Too good to respond to an anon, eh? Filthy, wookiee peasant. 216.235.235.146 19:29, February 10, 2016 (UTC)

Canon articles

Can you please tell me the correct way to go about when creating canon articles for legends material? You reverted my edits for Dasha Sigweed, so I guess I did it the wrong way. --Nightlily (talk) 18:41, February 12, 2016 (UTC)

YT series

Hey Cade, when you have a moment, could you have all the links to "YT series" changed to "YT-series"? I'd like to make the YT canon page however there are a great many pages that link to "YT series." Thanks. Cevan (talk) 19:53, February 12, 2016 (UTC)

• Sorry to saddle you with another request, Cade, but I'd also greatly appreciate it if all links to "Imperial military" could be updated to "Imperial Military/Canon". Thank you once again. Cevan (talk) 20:13, February 12, 2016 (UTC)

Edit

I'm sorry. I should've checked! Thanks for telling me! --Kyle03 (talk) 17:50, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

Re: File links

Duly noted. I don't normally leave out the "file" part, but I've noticed that people started doing it these says, so i thought it was some kind of new rule I wasn't aware of. (I'm not really technically-inclined.) Thanks for letting me know! --LelalMekha (talk) 13:56, February 15, 2016 (UTC)

I Semmon

Hi I'm Semmon just joined this wiki . When it was founded ? Semmon (talk) 13:26, February 25, 2016 (UTC)

Sorry Yours Truly Valenthyne (talk) 23:34, February 25, 2016 (UTC)

I am sorry Cade Calrayn, but I am not making up species, the reconstituted Sith Empire had similar views on Humanocentrism compared to the Galactic Empire/Legends. Only Humans are allowed within the military and only Humans and members of the Sith species are usually allowed to become Sith Warriors. GUY1234 (talk) 05:51, February 27, 2016 (UTC)

New Order 66 info??

Is this Canon??http://www.starwars.com/news/kaminos-finest-captains-and-commanders-of-the-clone-army?cmp=smc%7C383621987&linkId=21814171 Pedronog (talk) 15:51, March 2, 2016 (UTC)Pedronog

• No. Cade Calrayn 15:53, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

Hey Cade!I wanted to upload an Image but it didn't let me..Why?

Canon/Legends

• Why the insistence on having the Dynamic hammer/Legends page as a /legends page when there is no canon content for it? Especially when there are hundreds of Legends only pages that haven't been given the same treatment? --WhellerNG (talk) 06:07, March 7, 2016 (UTC)

Xabar vs Xaban

The name we see in the game sure as hell takes priority over what the files says. When playing, it's the name we see there we get to know. No one sees the other one - which in this case is "Xabar". Your reasoning is a somewhat strange - and your argument is invalid really, since Aric's voice actor says "Xaban" not "Xabar".

And regarding Pashna; there is no evidence that he becomes a member of the squad. That is, if you haven't taken that from the "files" too. Dajax02 (talk) 15:39, March 9, 2016 (UTC)

• Good for you. They changed it recently. Now stop whining at me. Cade Calrayn 16:15, March 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • Evidence? Played it today and they hadn't changed it. And whining? You blocked me from editing the page instead of just saying I (apparently) was wrong. Dajax02 (talk) 16:21, March 9, 2016 (UTC)
    • *sigh* Please look at the Havoc Squad page. It's been changed. The developers updated the NPC's name relatively recently, as it's different in the release than it was a few days ago. Move on already. Cade Calrayn 16:23, March 9, 2016 (UTC)
      • Very well. I'll take your word for it. Moving on. But you still blocked me. Sasquatch.Dajax02 (talk) 16:28, March 9, 2016 (UTC)

Tactical Droid Umbara

Hello.

My brother worked as an editor for the Star Wars Clone Wars tv show and he became a close friend with Matthew Wood. My brother took me out to lunch with Mr. Wood and we talked about some clone wars stuff. When we were talking about Tactical droids, he noted the one in the episode "Plan of Dissent" in which he said he voiced the droid and named it TL-42. Now I don't know how I can get the name confirmed, but I can tell you I did have a conversation with him and he named the droid. If you could help me out I would be greatly appreciative. TY

SucasurSucasur (talk) 01:03, March 13, 2016 (UTC)

Inqmoot 77

Inquisitorius Meeting 77 will take place on Saturday, March 26 at 8 PM ET. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 12:52, March 13, 2016 (UTC)

25,053 BBY as the founding of the Galactic Republic

I have the The Journal of Master Gnost-Dural and the year 3653 BBY is chronicled as Year 21,390 since the founding of the Galactic Republic. I know that "3653 + 21390 = 25043", so wouldn't the founding date be 25,043 BBY instead of 10 years earlier?--Rakhsh (talk) 14:59, March 17, 2016 (UTC)

• I've encountered this issue before; I can't remember off the top of my head where I've recorded it (can't understand why it's not mentioned in the book's article) but the dates in the Journal are actually all off by 10 years. I'll see if I can find where the discussion took place/which articles cite this; I don't have it with me at the moment. From what I recall, if you match up the dates in the book with the Timeline ones, they're all off by ten—just look at Timeline 16: Founding of the Republic, which the website dated to 21400 BTC. Cade Calrayn 15:10, March 17, 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Cade. You're a true mensch.--Rakhsh (talk) 15:13, March 17, 2016 (UTC)

Issue with abuse filter

Hi there,

I have been getting two separate error messages when trying to add an image even though my account should meet the requirements for uploading. The message that I was initially getting was in broken HTML ("Due to upload abuse, adding or replacing files is limited..."); the one I got later informed me that "this action has been automatically identified as harmful, and therefore disallowed". Am I doing something wrong? --Wormie (talk) 15:44, March 17, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Revisions to the Liberator-class Cruiser

Hi Cade Calrayn, I made some edits to the Liberator Cruiser, and you reverted them. I am curious why you did so?

I removed the numbers of turbolaser and ion canons proposed by another wookieepedian because the numbers were speculative based on in-game ratings for weapons, and not on verifiable information. I used the encyclopedia entry from the game Star Wars Rebellion, which only mentions that the Liberator has heavy turbolasers, ion canons, space for 3 regiments of troops and can carry 6 squadrons of starfighters. In the Star Wars: Rebellion wookieepedia article, it admits that the stats used are not consistent to the canon (case in point, the Imperial II Star Destroyer has a shield value of 800 and turbolaser of 500, and the Interdictor cruiser has twice the shield value of an Imperial I Star Destroyer). It also stretches the imagination that the Liberator Cruiser would have significantly more turbolasers and ion canons than an Imperial Star Destroyer. I would appreciate it if my revision of the article to stand, unless I have made a mistake. If I had I would be happy to hear what I did wrogn or information I got incorrect.

Caamasijedi49 (talk) 16:15, March 18, 2016 (UTC)

I just created a page that was taken down despite me having not completed the contents. it is based on a character from the 2015 novel dark disciple. --GeneralZELITE (talk) 19:39, March 19, 2016 (UTC)

New canon pages

Hey Cade, when canon versions of pre-existing Legends pages are created is the /Canon kept or removed at a later date? -- Dr. Porter (Talk|Contribs) 22:58, March 19, 2016 (UTC)

Naga Sadow

Hey Cade, I need your special super access to the TOR files to find out what stuff about Naga Sadow there is in there. I know there's stuff about his tomb. Gracias. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 18:40, March 20, 2016 (UTC)

Star Wars: Obsession

Hello. Could we move Star Wars: Obsession in Timeline of Legends media from the end of the clone wars to between Star Wars: Republic: Dreadnaughts of Rendili and The Brink story from Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Volume 4. Because Padme ses Anakin's scar for the first time. I now Count Dooku betrayder Asajj Ventress, but we could say, Dooku not betrayed her.

Noam N. J.

Images

Of course they are I'm not sure what I was thinking. Just got to keen I guess, I'll mark them all for deletion. Ayrehead02 (talk)

Encyclopedia as canon?

Sorry for getting overzealous on the X-wing article, but you may understand why it's frustrating for a newbie to be looking at sources which are listed as being out of date in the actual article, some of which are no longer apparently even archived on the payback machine anymore, and have people insist they are canon because it was discussed in some unspecified place. I actually tried to bring this issue up for discussion a long time ago on the article Canon and never received any reply, so you could forgive me for assume=ing this was some kind of dead/forgotten about issue. Is there a list of officially canon sources somewhere that includes the Encyclopedia? Or a discussion somewhere showing some kind of rationale for considering it to be canon? Thanks for your help. Gonkgonkgonk (talk) 18:16, March 28, 2016 (UTC)

On A-wing, all I did was replace the Encyclopedia source, which is listed as obsolete, with a current Databank source for the exact same information. Can you please explain why it is preferable to source something like the length of an A-wing to the old site rather than the current site? Gonkgonkgonk (talk) 19:11, March 30, 2016 (UTC)

For Waru's sake, man. "link now obsolete" is referring to the link, not the source. It's Wookieepedia policy (and common sense) to list all sources, regardless of whether they're still accessible or not. Hence the entire purpose of the backup link in the Encylcopedia template. Cade Calrayn 19:19, March 30, 2016 (UTC)

That's not my point. My point is that the only piece of information on that page that was sourced to the Encyclopedia is the ship length. The same information is listed at the Databank, which is the current version of the web site. What is the point of using the old source instead of the new source for the exact same piece of information? This is not a question of canon, it's a question of a redundant source. (By the way, maybe I'm just a newbie, but the word "source" implies a source of information used to create the article. If a link does not contain any information used in the article, it's pointless, isn't it? Why are the B-Wing and Y-Wing Databank and Encyclopedia articles listed under sources, for example? There is no information about A-wings on that page, so it cannot possibly have been used as a source). Gonkgonkgonk (talk) 19:22, March 30, 2016 (UTC)

Look at my edit. The actual body and infobox of the article is sourcing the information to the Databank, just as you have clamored for numerous times. The Sources List is entirely different. The A-wing was mentioned in those Encyclopedia entries, so they're listed as Sources, period. Not every Source has to be used in a reference note. As for the other entries, I'm seeing Y-wing listed on the bottom of the page. Whether or not that's worth listing is an entirely different matter. Cade Calrayn 19:38, March 30, 2016 (UTC)

Apology

Sorry for editing all of those Malachor related articles. I know you had to find all of those and revert them. I was stupid and completely misunderstood the whole codex statement. Darth Ravigious (talk) 20:07, March 28, 2016 (UTC)

I'm a huge Star Wars geek, so I try my best to take pride in my pages. The pages I create need to be created, but I do not know some things about editing wikias and pictures and things like that. So sorry if it looks like I'm wimping out and am lazy.--RROGON (talk) 22:34, March 29, 2016 (UTC)

Just Wanted to Bring This To Your Attention

Hi. At a screening of the Rebels Season 2 Finale, Dave Filoni confirmed a fan theory about Rex, which is the fact he was a solider on Endor in Return of the Jedi: http://www.starwarsnewsnet.com/2016/03/star-wars-rebels-showrunner-dave-filoni-confirms-popular-fan-theory-about-rex.html

I haven't seen this information stated on the article, so will it be added? or will it not be?

Thanks

I'm Blue (Da Ba Dee)... (Message Wall) 13:54, March 31, 2016 (UTC)

Iumb

Hi :) I want to have hide/show system like you. Please, give me import classes. Reply to me. If you don’t know this codes, reply too :) — Mustafar29 _{Dyskusja • Przyjaciele!} 14:58, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

Hello! I have some questions

Hello Cade Calrayn! I am new to Wookieepedia as a user (though I have observed and searched through it since 2012). If it is not to much to ask, I have a few questions for you.

1. What happened to Vitiate/Valkorian's spirit after Arcann killed him? 2. What was the Revolt Against the Eternal Empire's outcome? 3. What happened to the Sith Empire? Obviously, it's gone before Darth Desolous's day.

Argali1 High Ranking Harasser ^{(Send a messenger sheep!)} 22:51, April 5, 2016 (UTC)

Rogue One officer

What I had written in that article was not intended to be the final version. I was not putting in "little effort". As a matter of fact, once I had saved the article, I immediately returned to expand it. I do not understand how it is what you call "nonsense". He is clearly a character important to the film. Despite the fact that we know very little about him, that does not mean that we should not consider at least an exceptionally brief article. Darth Ravigious (talk) 16:05, April 7, 2016 (UTC)

• And as I said, patience. With the rate at which the Disney/Lucasfilm media machine moves, we'll get actual information about the character very soon. Regardless, your article was largely speculation - how do you know he's at all affiliated with the Death Star project? You also forgot multiple categories and the conjecture template, and the title was unnecessarily capitalized. Please, have patience, both in waiting for information and in writing articles—don't post something if you're not reasonably confident that you won't have to come back and fix egregious errors. Cade Calrayn 16:09, April 7, 2016 (UTC)

Reply

Hey Cade. Thanks for the head's up! Sorry for any occassion that I may have hit the AbuseFilter, so I used the Monobook as you suggested. Hope the edits from now on will be okay, can you let me know if there's anything more that I need to do from here on, thanks! --Lewisr (talk) 16:04, April 9, 2016 (UTC)

Star Wars knowledge question

Hey, Cade! I was just wondering, does Wookieepedia have a precise definition of what "intermediate" and "advanced" Star Wars knowledge is(for userboxes)? Is there a quiz or something? 'cause without a rubric, I don't know whether I'm SW-2 or SW-3. Thanks Geek'ari _Talk 15:25, April 14, 2016 (UTC)

Rey

what do you think Rey's Lightsaber will look like after her training with Luke skywalker is done. like what color of blade it is going to be what style stuff like that. --{{subst:Zen shadow}} 02:39, April 15, 2016 (UTC)

Crado in SWTOR

Is Crado mentioned in Star Wars: The Old Republic: Knights of the Fallen Empire? I just saw your recent edits to some Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi-related articles and I was wondering.--Rakhsh (talk) 13:16, April 18, 2016 (UTC)

• No, it's just Usar talking in generalities about the Cron Supernova. He mentions the "the weapon and its wielder" which are the Corsair and Aleema. Cade Calrayn 13:18, April 18, 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the info, Cade.--Rakhsh (talk) 13:40, April 18, 2016 (UTC)

New planet in Chapter 13 of SWTOR: KOTFE

Here's a tweet showing another new planet in {{TOR|Knights of the Fallen Empire}}. [1]--Rakhsh (talk) 01:25, April 19, 2016 (UTC)

• Yep, I've already mined the remaining chapters. Thanks. Cade Calrayn 01:33, April 19, 2016 (UTC)

Apology

Hello. I wanted to apologize for my recent edits being a bit sloppy. I am just a little confused about how to cite certain information. My recent edit on the Empire's Wrath wasn't intended to appear sloppy. I just noticed that the years in which the Sith Warrior served as Wrath were cited on Scourge's page but not on the Wrath's page. I tried to copy the sources from Scourge's page on the Wrath's page. Is that how you do it? I just need to be sure. Again, I'm sorry. I always forget to preview my edits right before editing, I'll try to be more careful in the future. Scout1534 (talk) 23:50, April 20, 2016 (UTC)

Verpine/Canon

Hey Cade, I was wondering if you could expedite the switch over of the Verpine and Verpine/Canon links, as I have nominated the latter as a CA. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 18:37, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

• Same story with Minos Cluster and Minos Cluster. Imperators II^(Talk) 18:03, April 24, 2016 (UTC)

Main page

Hey. FYI, since the main page CT was just closed, I'm going to build that out tomorrow. Telling you since you normally handle technical stuff, but since I built this version it's easier for me to put it all up. - Brandon Rhea^(talk) 01:37, April 29, 2016 (UTC)

what is an extension hook?

I Just want to know what an extension hook is because when I try to edit some articles it sometimes comes up with the message about extension hooks? So what are they and why do they appear? Jedi Knight Fett (talk) 05:23, May 10, 2016 (UTC)

Show/Hide buttons

Welcome,
Can you help me with copying on my wiki Show/Hide buttons for Iumbs? In Wookieepedia JS every piece is connected to each other and it's a bit confusing. Thanks in advance, SuperSzym Tablica/User talk Blog Fanons/Fanony 20:44, May 14, 2016 (UTC)

Inq Meeting 78

Inq Meeting 78 has been scheduled from May 28 at the usual time. Please leave notes or bribes if unable to attend. - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 22:05, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

Unidentified Nikto Jedi

Hi there Just curious why you reverted my edit on Unidentified Nikto Jedi, Is it necessary to have both a Legends and Canon article, even though the articles doesn't have a legends source?--Tetsu Aero (talk) 14:07, May 17, 2016 (UTC)

Dommu and Shommox

I've noticed that the vendors Dommu and Shommox came back with game update 4.2.--Rakhsh (talk) 08:46, May 19, 2016 (UTC)

Darth Acina or Empress Acina

Should Darth Acina be moved to Empress Acina or just stay where it originally was?--Rakhsh (talk) 00:47, June 17, 2016 (UTC)

Delete

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Sugi/Canon This needs to be deleted please. Maurriccee Talk to me! | Chat with me!
Contributions! 18:11, June 17, 2016 (UTC)

Harassment

A user known as Duke Remington keeps harassing me on my account here. I permanently banned from Disney Wiki for his ongoing disobedience, and now he's using my Talk page on here to harass me.

His Message
"The fact that you have ignored me and my wrath only proves that you're just another yellow bellied coward and immature teenaged crybaby like all the other Disney Wiki knuckleheads who refuse to come to their senses and listen! 😡--Duke Remington (talk) 04:17, June 28, 2016 (UTC)"

--Alex2424121 (talk) 17:09, June 28, 2016 (UTC)

Star Wars Celebration Presence

Hello. I'm going to be attending Celebration in London on July the 16th.

I believe Wookieepedia had some kind of booth at last years Celebration in Anaheim, so i wonder if the wiki will have any kind of presence at this years convention, and if so, when and at what times?

Thanks for the help in advance. I'm Blue (Da Ba Dee)... (Message Wall) 13:33, July 7, 2016 (UTC)

Cade calrayn I manage to figure out how big the new republic navy or starfleet is I tried to talk some sense into this guy name Lewisr but he is ignoring me and he is reverting the edit I know I do bad stuff some time but I have proof and this guy does not listion even when the facts are standing in front of him so I want you so want you to temperaly ban lewisr please (Neogundam)

Inq meeting 79

There will be a thing on the usual day at the usual time in one week. Come do the usual stuff. -- Darth Culator ^(Talk) 13:49, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

Hello! I want to know if I can use the information from the articles to make youtube videos. Here is an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZN_nYlhfu8

The link for the article is in the description + in the comment section below.

--Typical Russian Guy (talk) 12:13, August 1, 2016 (UTC)

Appearances in media pages

So for, that sort of thing, if a location is mentioned(i.e. endor in life debt), are you supposed to put the stuff that's above it(endor, endor system, moddell sector, etc)?--D9328 (talk) 21:53, August 7, 2016 (UTC)d9328

Are the Knights of Ren Dark Jedi? or Sith?.--Saori-1 (talk) 13:38, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

The Sith were killed with Vader and Palpatine so unless Kylo make his own sith order they are Dark Jedi--Dogsteeves (talk) 14:42, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Hello i need Help by Morags Lair when i will edit Picture and Template than appeared something went Wrong. the File is M3.png

Revan's Entry

I genuinely have no idea why you decided to remove all my content on Revan's Wookieepedia page. I understand you take pride in it, but your work was blatantly incomplete. It failed to cover various aspects of Revan's life. Furthermore, the power and abilities sections were certainly limited. My edit definitely contributed. Please consult me on issues you have with it before removing paragraphs of work that contribute to the page. Obviously also note that this is a free wikia that anyone can edit. —Unsigned comment by DarthAnt66 (talk • contribs)