Assistance Thanks for correcting the format on the Lula Sooger quote I added, my coding and formatting still isn't the best after all these years on Wikia. Think you could touch up the Quote on the Sturg Ganna page I heavily expanded? —Unsigned comment by Lord High Executioner (talk • contribs)
- No worries; and the Ganna one only had an extra pair of unneeded ' at the beginning. Imperators II(Talk) 15:33, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Economist/Legends
|
"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" |
|---|---|
| Economist/Legends has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Feel free to add the {{UserFA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 00:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC) |
Courtesy
Since I noticed you were the CA author of Talvaria system I thought it best to notify you as a courtesy and explain my edit to the page. Twinkle Twinkle attributes the "Talvor system" to Scoundrel's Luck which only features the Talvarian species. It also places the Talvor system in the Mahrusha sector, just in case further alterations are needed to bring the page back up to spec. I'm carefully working my through fixing the Twinkle Twinkle page and will let you know if I come across any further oddities which may cause concern. I hope this is helpful. Labyrinthine G0B-L1N (talk) 06:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Inquiry
Just saw Index:Jasper crystal pop up. Is there any documentation or discussion on how to best go about creating these types of pages? Didn't know we could add page numbers for citations! Labyrinthine G0B-L1N (talk) 09:35, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Moons of, etc.
Sorry, I don't really understand your edit comment. Forest moon of Endor, Garbage moon of Maher, etc. all orbit their namesake even if it's not specified to be a planet exactly, although it's more than obviously intended to be to the regular reader. In this case the "6" notation also corresponds to a moon, as Story Group has indicated they prefer such notation 99.99% of the time... Isn't it a given, I'm sure the author intends it to be as that is how any reader would interpret it. I've never struck this on other wikias (or elsewhere for that matter) before, so I'm a bit confused. Labyrinthine G0B-L1N (talk) 12:04, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Like I said, per the ambiguity inherent in this type of naming scheme, I don't think we should be doing any assumptions until we have a confirmation. We're only treating the Garbage Moon of Maher as orbiting Maher because we have indication of Maher independently existing; and of course same goes for Endor. (The numeral is also not really an argument since there are quite a few planets using an Arabic numeral instead of a Roman one.) Imperators II(Talk) 20:17, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
??? grid coord
I started adding "???" to locations only if it is used by TEAOC as the official grid coord (explained by Jason Fry as maintaining the "here be dragons" aspect of certain objects that are unlikely to ever be given a definitive grid coord by the Atlas, but have noticed status articles don't seem to include it such as Explume Minor. I figured if it's good enough for TEAOC then it should be included as it immediately informs readers that the general placement is known but unlocatable by traditional means but I'm hesitant to continue doing so if users are just going to constantly remove or revert it. Is there some sort of policy against this as I'm unsure why "N/A" from TEAOC seems to used but not "???". I only stumbled across this due to Category:Locations with invalid grid coordinates but they're not really invalid at all. Labyrinthine G0B-L1N (talk) 09:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- I don't really see a point in listing ??? - all it says is that we don't know a celestial body's grid square, which is the same as not listing it at all. Yes, it does indicate that an object was placed somewhere by the Online Companion - but so does the rest of the information of its article, i.e., the referencing in its infobox and its Sources section. As for N/A, as far as I'm aware, that directly translates to the Freestanding subsectors, which we notate as such. Imperators II(Talk) 09:27, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's not the same as leaving it blank as it's not that we don't know. It's that Lucasfilm doesn't know and that is the definitive ruling by them. By leaving it blank we are not being 100% encyclopedic. It also makes it difficult when sorting planets we don't currently know vs. planets that are unknown from an in-universe perspective at the time the maps exist in-universe. N/A occasionally does indicate freestanding subsectors when used in the sector column but when used in the grid column it's to denote celestial objects outside of the galactic, such as Ygziir, and now Kamino per Star Wars: Complete Locations, New Edition. Labyrinthine G0B-L1N (talk) 09:09, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- "Lucasfilm doesn't know" is an assumption that I'm not really seeing the basis for. The grid square for these locations was not revealed to us by putting a "???" in the grid square column, which I really don't see as being any different than their grid square not being revealed to us by any other means. As for sorting, neither the Appendix of the Atlas nor its Online Companion have been presented as in-universe documents, so dragging in the in-universe vs. out-of-universe distinction here is similarly misplaced. Imperators II(Talk) 10:03, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's not the same as leaving it blank as it's not that we don't know. It's that Lucasfilm doesn't know and that is the definitive ruling by them. By leaving it blank we are not being 100% encyclopedic. It also makes it difficult when sorting planets we don't currently know vs. planets that are unknown from an in-universe perspective at the time the maps exist in-universe. N/A occasionally does indicate freestanding subsectors when used in the sector column but when used in the grid column it's to denote celestial objects outside of the galactic, such as Ygziir, and now Kamino per Star Wars: Complete Locations, New Edition. Labyrinthine G0B-L1N (talk) 09:09, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Rick The door technician
Why is rick the door technician super-semi-protected? I am just asking because I would like to add several things. Have a great day. —Unsigned comment by Ignisumvuthi (talk • contribs)
- The article was protected due to it being a vandalism target. What were the additions that you had in mind? Imperators II(Talk) 11:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
My edits
What do you think of my Dark Side Adepts edits.
Syruss
Hi, it's because the Rebellion era started in 0 BBY. So the 0 ABY-4 ABY box is a bit too restrictive. Best, Hk 47 (talk) 13:19, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
RE: Kaliida Nebula in SWGE
I honestly don't remember where I got that info from. There were so many videos and blogs, etc, back then it's hard to keep track. --JMM (talk) 13:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Re: quotes
You are completely correct about that; I know the format of the quotes on this wiki quite well, so any mistakes were unintentional. I'll do my utmost to ensure nothing is omitted from now on. --Possess you. That is what I say when people sneeze. 😉–Nightlily 22:33, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Kaz's talisman
|
|
"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" |
|---|---|
| Kaz's talisman has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Feel free to add the {{UserFA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 00:29, 12 August 2025 (UTC) |
1stcm
Hello there, I was wondering if articles such as Sagma system or Uviuy Exen system should use {{1stcm}}. What do you think? —DKS MaXoO (talk) 02:30, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Essential Guide to Warfare map scans
Hey, I'm trying to get a good scan of the maps from The Essential Guide to Warfare, the official digital release has possibly the worse resolution I've ever seen and no other unofficial scans have been of very good quality. Are the images you've uploaded from scans you've done, or did you get those from someone else? Is there anywhere where I can get something on the same quality as the scans you've done? -MontztheMan02 (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, those are from my scans. Imperators II(Talk) 11:29, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Bichan's lightsaber
|
|
"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" |
|---|---|
| Bichan's lightsaber has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Feel free to add the {{UserFA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 16:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC) |
Leesa Chaffni pronouns
Hello, Imperators! Sadly, I do not remember specifically where the pronouns to Leesa Chaffni were mentioned in the audiobook Jaws of Jakku. Additionally, after checking my notes, I had not listed Chaffni to have she/her pronouns, so that may have been an error on my part. Although, I could have sworn the audiobook listed Chaffni's pronouns at some point. If you would like to remove the information, feel free to do so, and apologies for not being able to locate Chaffni's pronouns. Chipchip88 (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2025 (UTC)