Talk: Cade Calrayn

Hello, <insert name here>, and welcome to my talk page! If you have any source requests from my collection of books and guides, or if you have something else you need to talk to me about, please contact me on Discord or leave me a message and please sign it with four tildes. (~~~~).

Cade, master of bots

LucaRoR (Talk) has awarded you a Wookiee Cookie! for creating (yet another) amazing bot and for slowly making us useless. :P

To our Lord and Savior, the exalted Dark Wizard of Regex and Other Assorted Sorcery

Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) has awarded you the Pit Droid Award of Diligence! No existing award can match your hard work, but please except this token of gratitude from one of your (organic) admirers.

Why do the Xim stories keep getting removed?

~~Hagane no Saiyajin~~

Darth Malak

Hey Cade! Can you revert the edit on the Darth Malak page? I was trying to fix the LEGO set he appeared in but it got reverted https://lego.com/en-us/product/r2-d2-75379 Elijah Palmer (talk) 20:02, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Redirecting but not merging

Hey Cade, thanks for cleaning up article names recently and redirecting redundant or unconfirmed ones into the proper articles. I just want to ask if when you redirect, if you could add the information from that article into the one you're redirecting it to. For example, I just had to re-add all the info from Lioaoin cruiser into heavy cruiser, Lioaoin patrol craft to patrol ship, etc. and will be going through some of the new ship redirects to add that info into the parent pages. Thank you and happy holidays. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 05:48, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Republic tugboat vs TUG-314

Hey Cade, wanted to get some clarification on your redirect of Republic space tug into TUG-314. You mentioned that the two ships are the same in the reasoning, however, they are actually completely distinct vehicles. The Republic space tug appears to be larger, and has a completely different bulkier hull design that features a different bridge than the TUG-314. This hull also has a large central ridge from the bridge to the engines that feature engine flaps, port and starboard docking tube clamps, and lacks the radar dish and antennas. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 06:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

• I've attached a link here for the Republic space tug concept and here with TUG-314. Clearly, they are different vehicles. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 06:19, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Category:R-series astromech droids

Why did you delete the category? I was trying to help. Elijah Palmer (talk) 22:40, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

The Betrayal of Darth Revan

Could I ask about The Betrayal of Darth Revan adventure? I tried looking for it online and could not find it, I found the book on archive.com and it was not there, I've heard that's it supposed to be a Web Enhancement, but I've tried to looking at the back up Web Enhancement pages on this page but no dice.

Could you by of any help?

Thanks

Hagane no Saiyajin (talk) January 1, 2025, 9:29 (est)

• It was an unlicensed adventure released outside of WOTC's purview, and thus is excluded from the media timeline, and that's also why it's not available online; it was only done at an in-person convention and never on the WOTC website. Cade Calrayn 02:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

For the Short Story, Light and Shadow, that is available online even though it is unlicensed, so should it be included in the Media timeline?

Hagane no Saiyajin (talk) January 2, 2025, 11:16 (EST)

• Unlicensed media is not included, full stop. The timeline is used to maintain overall ordering for all appearances sitewide, and unlicensed media is not listed in the main Appearances section. Cade Calrayn 04:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

When I look at the Legends timeline, I'm just wondering why everything between Episode III and Episode IV is put under "Rise of the Empire era". Hasn't the Empire already risen or already taken over by then? There seems to be no need to rise anymore. I think putting that stuff under a title of "Age of the Empire era" or "Empire era" seems more appropriate. Hagane no Saiyajin (talk) January 3, 2025, 17:59 (EST)

• The headers are the official publishing eras used by Lucasfilm and Del Rey. The Rise of the Empire era does in fact extend all the way to ANH. Cade Calrayn 23:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

What category do books such as The Jedi Path: A Manual for Students of the Force (real-life book) and The Journal of Master Gnost-Dural (real-life book) fall under? Promotional material? Adventure/scenario? Gamebook? or novel? Hagane no Saiyajin (talk) January 3, 2025, 17:59 (EST)

• Reference material. I spent a good month recently adding every viable appearance to the media timeline, and it is now maintained and tracked by an automated system, so anything that's not on there is not supposed to be on there. Cade Calrayn 20:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

• How come the The Betrayal of Darth Revan was re-added into the Media Timeline even though as said above, it's unlicensed and unavailable and shouldn't be included? Hagane no Saiyajin (talk) January 4, 2025, 17:59 (EST)

Life Day Treasury - Appearances

I noticed the short story collection Life Day Treasury is listed on User:C4-DE Bot/Canon Missing. All of the short stories are included on the Timeline. Is this just being captured by the bot because there is an Appearances section for that book? There probably should not be, as there are none for other short story collections. Thanks! Rebelcrimsonbear (talk) 19:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Using the {{Top}} template on another Wiki

Hello, I came here to ask you if I could use the {{Top}} template on a Wiki I partake in editing, w:c:HypixelSkyblock, I would like to use its tabs as it could be useful in countless of pages on our wiki, but I would first like the blessing to use code someone else wrote. It originates in 2008, so I don't think I will get a response from its original creator, but you are an active editor and an Admin, which is why I reached out to you.

With Thanks, Voball (talk) 14:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Me upon seeing all my edits getting removed

https://tenor.com/view/seinfeld-sienfeld-newman-what-took-you-so-long-cigarette-gif-22317108

Hagane no Saiyajin (talk) January 9, 2025, 16:26 (EST)

Editorial issue with renaming the MC80 to MC80A

It has recently come to my attention that the MC80 page regarding the Home One Type has been renamed the MC80A Home One Type Heavy Star Cruiser. I understand that this name has been used at least once in the past 40 years of sources. What I don't understand is why the change from one canonical name to another is necessary when it causes so many problems. This is a very old page and often linked to. We'll have to fix every single link to this page to accommodate the new name. It is a massive undertaking and will require time that frankly could be used better elsewhere. The second issue is readability. Wookieepedia is ultimately a library of information. It is paramount that when permitted by canonicity we do not make things more convoluted than necessary. In this regard I believe we have made a mistake. The name MC80 Home One type Star Cruiser was simple because it gave the intentioned impression that it was one of two types of MC80. Simply calling it a cruiser sidesteps the issue of inconsistent classifications. Originally this page referred to this type of vessel as a battleship and that would be canon too. To make matters more confusing for the reader the new name has been confused with the actual MC80a Star Cruiser This is a different and newer series of standardized warships. The letter 'A' distinguishes these cruisers from the Liberty Type and Home One Type and its successor which is distinguished by a 'B'. But including both the 'A' and Home One-Type will we only succeed at causing more confusion. I understand the sentiment to emulate the other continuity. But they are incompatible. As the behind-the-scene section of the canon article: "In the old Expanded Universe, the MC80a and MC80 Home One type Star Cruiser were two separate models. This was changed, however, in the canon book Star Wars: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know, Updated and Expanded, which describes both designations belonging to the MC80" Since Legends is not beholden to Disney Canon I must recommend that we reverse the name change focus on keeping these continuities internally coherent rather than try to bridge the divide. I fully admit that I don't know the thought process behind your decision. But I hope that we can discuss this further. RC-0407 (talk) (CET 22:55 09/01/2025)

• I don't really see the issue. Firstly, the article you linked to is the canon page, which has not been moved. Secondly, the name was used by an official Legends source, full stop. And in regards to your point about links, the vast majority have already been fixed. Per our naming policy, we use the most formal name, and that's the MC80A. End of story. Cade Calrayn 22:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
  • This is not the end of the story. We must all be accountable for our work. Since you outrank me as an administrator I'll abide by your final decision. But I've read the Wookieepedia:Naming policy and it doesn't specify which name is more official. Both are used in the legends sources. One arguably more than the other. But I don't buy the argument that the protracted name takes precedence because of a personal preference. There is nothing that makes it more official than the other. If you have more insight to this issue please then I wish to learn. RC-0407 (talk) (CET 23:33 09/01/2025)

Sources Project

NanoLuukeCloning Facility has awarded you a Wookiee Cookie! In recognition of your hard work all around, and especially in regards to the Sources Project. No thanks would be enough to express how amazing this tool is, and how much progress we made thank to you.

Young Readers book (YR) and Children's book (CB) in Legends Timeline

Hi! On Timeline of Legends media both of these are being classed together as "young" and therefore nothing shows up when you hide all categories but CB. The color associated with CB is being used for both categories. Not sure how to fix. Thanks! Rebelcrimsonbear (talk) 21:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Special Operations Brigade

It is canon that the Special Operations Brigade is an intelligent organization in the Grand Army of the Republic and later the Galactic Empire. If you do not want to accept that this is the case, that is your choice, as the Administrator, you have the final say. Also AnilSerifoglu is no longer an Administrator starting on January 19th. GormCyborg (talk) 06:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

just because commandos were involved doesn't mean it's a Special Ops Brigade unit.

man, can you read? Guide to the Grand Army of the Republic states that all clone commandos were part of the Special Operations Brigade.

• I am aware. That doesn't make every unit that a commando was involved with part of the Brigade. That's like saying every group that a Jedi ever worked with was a Jedi organization. Cade Calrayn 14:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

just because commandos were involved doesn't mean it's a Special Ops Brigade unit.

Michael, it seems that you don't want me on Wookieepedia, by deleting important categories and stalking my edits and claiming to no better because you are an administrator? You don't need to be jealous because I'm trying to clean up the mess on Wookieepedia. Well, i might leave Wookieepedia. Also, you saying (Overcategorization, and overassumptions/fanon used to populate it) doesn't make you so inclusive by making nonsense up and reverting my edits. You really should be more mature on Wookieepedia since you joined in 2010 15 years ago though...GormCyborg (talk) 16:18, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

• I'm sorry if it feels like I'm targeting you specifically, I am not. I stand by my reasoning behind the reversions, though; we have well-established sourcing rules and policies on assumptions and extrapolation such as you are doing. Cade Calrayn 16:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

• Oh, OK. Good to know, I guess. GormCyborg (talk) 16:34, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

RE: Dreadnaught/Dreadnought

If we are going to put so much effort into distinguishing between the canon and the legends cruiser even though neither continuity is consistent about the spelling then we should at least clarify the situation for the casual reader. On a regular page I would just add a You-may-be—looking-for…? Tag to point people in the direction of its opposite counterpart. But this is a category which already has a description. Alternatively we could try to add a top bar with a Canon and Legends box. Either way we have got to do something because two letters is too narrow a margin of error for the Standards of Wookieepedia. (CET 19:50 4/2/2025) RC-0407 (talk)

Debate on Z 95 Headhunter affiliation

Cade,in Star Wars Empire at War the Rebellion use the Z-95's until they were phased out in favor of the X Wings. Should it belong in the starship classes of the Alliance to Restore the Republic catagory? Warmaster 24 (talk) 05:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

B-84 Viper

Hi, short Question:

At the Ship B84-Viper is under Affiliation listened the Hutts, why is it wrong to add this ship to cathegorie "Hutt starship classes". Is it a ship class used by the Hutts or not?

Greetings

Gaba-18 airspeeder affiliation

Cade,it says The GAR(Grand Army of the Republic) used these recon speeders for frontline support operations and were used for scouting in advance of larger Republic vehicles during the Clone Wars. Should it belong in that catagory? Also you never messaged me back about the Z-95 Headhunter affiliation. I would like to hear your reply about the two subjects. Thanks Warmaster 24 (talk) 03:02, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Anakin's N-1 starfighter

Hi Cade! The official packaging lists it as Anakin's Naboo N-1 Starfighter. https://www.target.com/p/star-wars-n-1-starfighter-and-action-figure-playset/-/A-89101695 Elijah Palmer (talk) 21:46, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

DookuDarth

Thank you for striving to improve Wookieepedia.

i forget how to ping users. Do you have anything to say about DookuDarth being one word?

Wishing you safe, happy, productive editing, and may the Force be with us. --173.67.42.107 19:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

• Hi there. Yeah, if you saw OOM or me changing the title field after you did, that was us attempting to figure out how to fix the title display, because it looks normal on desktop but not mobile. I ultimately had to just hide the title field in general as it's typically hidden on mobile already. Thanks for bringing it to our attention. Cade Calrayn 19:57, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

The Wheel (Abrion system)

Could you please explain why you deleted the page I created. We have no confirmed location of the Abrion system in which Freemaker Wheel is located. The Legends/Canon Wheel may be at R-7 as sources confirm so, but no source confirms the Abrion system is one and the same as the Besh Gorgon system as far as I am aware, and given the Abrion sector/Abrion Major system is at S-15, there is a huge disparity as to where the Abrion system could possibly be located. Labyrinthine G0B-L1N (talk) 01:00, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

• I discussed this with the other LEGO-focused editors in the community, and the Wheel in the Freemaker Adventures is very explicitly the one from Legends. The show placing it in the Abrion system has no effect whatsoever on its canon/Legends placement, and also doesn't make it a different entity; it's just a detail that was changed as part of the non-canon Freemaker continuity. The Abrion system is non-canon and has no place on the canon (or Legends) galaxy map. Cade Calrayn 01:03, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
  • This all seems to be pure conjecture or personal head-canon on behalf of these small group of editors rather than presenting the facts as is. Don't get me wrong it'd be much neater if they were the same but they're not as far as sourcing is concerned. Could these LEGO-focused editors provide sources that the Wheel is explicitly the one from Legends and if this is the case why are we conflating it with the Canon Wheel? This appears to fly in the face of everything I've been told in recent weeks about policy and sourcing here. Labyrinthine G0B-L1N (talk) 01:13, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
    • And since we document other pages that are non-canon on their own pages, why can't the Wheel have it's own non-canon page? Labyrinthine G0B-L1N (talk) 01:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
      • By policy, we do not do that, actually. Non-canon versions of actual canon/Legends concepts must be covered in the Behind the Scenes sections of the canon/Legends article. That's why we cover Star Wars Infinities: Return of the Jedi in the BTS of Anakin Skywalker/Legends, not on a separate page for that version of the character. The /LEGO subpages are the only exceptions and they are edge cases for major characters in that continuity. Cade Calrayn 01:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
        • Apologies, if that is the case. It was confusing as anything with all the Canon/Legends tab mis-redirecting to unrelated locations on opposite sides of the galaxy I was just trying to untangle it all thought the best way was to present the info on it's own page. Labyrinthine G0B-L1N (talk) 01:26, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
          • Also, just so that I understand completely and to avoid any future inconvenience to yourself or me, you mentioned characters but location pages with "/LEGO" as part of the page name are only to be created if the location originated in a LEGO source prior to being canonized, correct? Labyrinthine G0B-L1N (talk) 02:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Binring Gamorrean

Hello Cade, just in regard to the deleting of the Binring Gamorrean page, I agree that the definition of them being a subspecies of Gamorrean was erroneous; however, even though Gorc and Voort saBinring are the only prominent named examples of the Binring Gamorreans, there were a substantial amount of other unnamed subjects according to how they were described in X-Wing: Wraith Squadron and X-Wing: Solo Command. With that in mind, would it be alright if either you or I transplant portions of the deleted Binring Gamorrean page and add it as a section of the Gamorrean/Legends page? This would be akin to how male boar Gamorreans are given a section within the page. Willpan20 (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

• Absolutely, go ahead. It's not that the content isn't worth covering, it's just that it belongs in the parent Gamorrean article. Cade Calrayn 13:40, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

WebCite backup links

'OOM 224' has awarded you the Pit Droid Award of Diligence! for emptying the category for pages with missing permanent archival links for WebCite

Sockbuppet block

• Hi there, I was just blocked for sockpuppeting but I didn't intend to sockpuppet, I just switched from editing at home to working at a cafe. If I registered an account, would it possible to be unblocked? - 172.56.104.190 02:08, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Fixing ref markup

Hi Cade, I don't know if you've noticed but I've been fixing the wikimarkup around here and I'm almost done with the main namespace. There is an issue with the ref name attributes and its quotation mark delimiters: they're all over the place! I have three lists: "Unquoted", "missing leading quotation mark", and "missing trailing quotation mark" (the largest by far). I have about 3 million more lines to search through for edge cases. Do you need a list of articles to work with or will regular expressions be fine? --PlNG (talk) 05:02, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Citation template not correctly printing a maintenance category?

Hey Cade, I noticed something while editing, it seems like a citation template may be trying to print a maintenance category but it's not doing it correctly and it ends up coming out as plaintext. See Category:Archiveurl usages with Wayback URLs and as an example HoloNet News (original website) references. If you plug the term into a search engine and filter for the wiki, it comes up with many pages.--PlNG (talk) 13:35, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

• Fixed. Lua builder was missing the Category wrapper. Cade Calrayn 13:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Using

to add symbols on the same line as the titlepage

Hello Cade!

I'm reaching out as I'd like to implement part of the

{{Top}}

Template with what it's being associated with so that I can add symbols on the same line as the titlepage of an article. From what I've understood (sort of) it's doing more than that but this specific snippet part is what I'd love to add on a Wiki I'm taking care of.

Could you please help me out if you agree about it?

Have a good day.

Nyklaus von Abyss (talk) 00:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Visions

I apologizes on my behavior to this recent announcement on The Ninth Jedi series. I've been into Star Wars visions since 2021, and i never it could be a series like this. This will never happen again upon my surprising thought on how to get that page settled. I will wait til next year to see how many episodes are gonna be and how it'll play out. Crazybob2014 (talk) 06:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Request for Post deletion

Hi

Please delete the post tilted "Do you consider Revenge of the Sith to be a classic?".

Makman12994Makman12994 (talk) 19:55, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

I have noticed that my contributions are consistently being undone by Spookywilloww and Lewisr, regardless of their quality. The essence of a wiki is that collaborative efforts improve articles over time, rather than preserving an initial draft as the definitive version. Additionally, to prevent copyright issues, Star Wars texts should be paraphrased or rephrased rather than directly copied, as appears to be the case in the article in question. If there is an established preference to limit new contributions, I would appreciate clarity on whether Wookieepedia welcomes new editors.

Regarding the concern that my edit comments are perceived as rude, I would like to point out that my edits have often been reverted without any explanation. Providing a rationale when undoing someone’s contributions fosters a more constructive and welcoming environment. A lack of communication when reverting edits can inadvertently create an uninviting atmosphere. Once again, if new contributors are not encouraged to improve articles, I would appreciate a direct confirmation of that stance.

If the phrase "poorly written" is considered inappropriate, could you suggest a more acceptable way to convey concerns about writing quality?

Additionally, I respectfully disagree with the idea that a nomination should freeze an article. This reasoning was given for one of my edits being reverted, but my understanding is that the purpose of Rule 6 is not to prevent improvements. All it says is that if an article is still being improved, its consideration should be delayed. Is there a rush to consider a nomination or an important deadline that prevents improvements? If nominations truly warrant a freeze on edits, then articles should be locked immediately upon nomination.

Lastly, I believe it is important to ensure that edits are reverted only when there is a valid reason. I request that Spookywilloww and Lewisr be advised not to undo edits to their articles without justification. Transparency in revisions strengthens the collaborative nature of Wookieepedia.

Thank you for your time. I look forward to your clarification.

My edits

What do you think of my Dark Side Adepts edits.

Disney's Hollywood Studios

Hello there! I noticed the "Studio Backlot Tour" article was redirected, and for a fair reason, as it is similar to what was said to me by Bonzane10. I had thought there was enough content to warrant an article, but it appears I'm mistaken. Though if I may ask what you meant by "it's not unique to Star Wars and can just be covered on the park" via your edit summary leading to a redirect to Disney's Hollywood Studios. Does this mean that the content (albeit more shortened) is to be moved to the latter article, like in a section that covers all the lands and such? That is, presuming there isn't a set article layout as of yet? Forgive my confusion. -- J Fan^{On Stranger Tides} 14:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

To Jocasta

Imperators II(Talk) has awarded you a Wookiee Cookie! Cause you seriously rock, Jocasta.

Imperators II^(Talk) 17:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

You cannot track me down forever, either

I think not, and never let you going to do that, but you're too late, Cade Calrayn. I already downloaded DuckDuckGo and the Norton Private Browser the anti-tracking apps. With these anti tracking apps you'll never recognize my edits and tracked me down, so you'll never ever trick me to block me indefinite every time. But there's nothing you can to do about it. So, don't even think about it to say is "Anti-tracking apps, hah! We'll see about that." especially, "You won't get away with this!" either. Since I waited for months for taking notes for the appearances on the comics for what have been missing and there's nothing you can do about it. Also, stop block me for 100+ to 1000+ places/alts while I'm editing to take care of my unfinished business to do. Especially for the update on the pages from "Star Wars: Timelines". You got that? Plus, just wait and see for more appearances of the Adaptation of the Marvel Comics of The Rise of Skywalker, literally.

One more thing, the time has come. Prepare to execute order 77 (Block Spookywilloww indefinite and make Lewisr a new administrator).12.247.191.82 19:39, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Republic Attack Dropship

While it is very much a riff on LAAT, I think it qualify as its own vehicle since it got all the toy gimmicks associated with it, not to mention it has various traits that sets it apart from the base LAAT. Anakin Skyobiliviator (talk) 03:26, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

• Same goes for the not-J-type I'd say. Unless all the toy-isms are to be directed towards their closest comparison? Anakin Skyobiliviator (talk) 03:31, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Admin Code of Conduct Workshop

Hello!

We’re putting together a new live workshop on Fandom’s Admin Code of Conduct (mentioned here!), & we’d love your help testing it out!

This workshop will go over the policy in more detail, including how to interpret some of the vaguer sections. Since this is our first run, we’re inviting Stars to join a trial session and give us feedback on what works, what could be better, & anything in between.

There will be two trial sessions to choose from:

Friday, June 27 at 10am Central Time

Monday, June 30 at 2pm Central Time

Please convert to your time zone here: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html

If you’d like to attend one of the sessions, please RSVP by June 26 using this form: https://forms.gle/DveooDfTpQezWWB49

Thank you, & we hope to see you there! pikushi ✧.* 19:57, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Creating pages

{{Rover paul (talk) 16:59, 29 June 2025 (UTC)} how do you create pages everytime i try it it says this is missing or that's missing 🤔 everytime I try to correct it it goes worse putting in the same text as everyone else but it still says it's wrong trying my best but it isn't working first day I tried it but it keeps going wrong {{Rover paul (talk) 16:59, 29 June 2025 (UTC)}

Cloak of the Sith Conspiracy/Cover-up

Your deletion of talk page comments and reversions of edits is nothing but an attempt to cover-up the hurtful actions of the <redacted personal attacks> If this talk page comment is also deleted, calling out your actions as bringing the rest of the adminship into disrepute is further proof that the current adminship has been infiltrated by the mean admins of the past. You all know damn well that the Cloak of the Sith is not a hyperlane and are just saving face rather than presenting factual information presented in LEGENDS and the most recent CANON sources. Good day! —Unsigned comment by 49.102.246.145 (talk • contribs)

• What's really funny is that I'm actually arguing for treating the Cloak of the Sith labeling of the trade route as an error in our community discussions in Discord, and I've even reached out to Jason Fry about this exact topic. The reason you were blocked and your personal attacks deleted is because you are unnecessarily aggressive and violate our basic civility policies. There is absolutely no reason to be this hostile to anyone regarding a fictional universe. Cade Calrayn 16:02, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Can i be admin in Wookieepedia?

I Am a HUGE Star Wars fan since my first movie it just feels right for me to be a admin… sincearly SuugleSuugle (talk) 22:25, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Bot request

Hello there! I was wondering if your bot could help me with {{RelatedCategories}}. I would like to give all astronomical objects/systems/sectors/regions (both in Legends and Canon) their relevant related categories. For example (with Naboo):

RelatedCategories
|Category:Battles of Naboo
|Category:Creatures of Naboo
|Category:Culture of Naboo
|Category:Naboo locations
|Category:Naboo residents
|Category:Organizations of Naboo
|Category:Plants of Naboo
|Category:Sentient species of Naboo

Here are the categories in question:

• Category:Battles by location
• Category:Creatures by location
• Category:Culture by region
• Category:Locations by region / by sector / by star system / by astronomical object
• Category:Individuals by planet
• Category:Organizations by location
• Category:Plants by region / by planet
• Category:Sentient species by location

Do you think that's possible? —DKS MaXoO (talk) 00:27, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Editing

(what are the errors so you saying I cant edit anything I'm doing the same as everyone else is doing (Rover paul (talk))

COTY

Hey Cade! Your bot italicized Leia Organa Solo on the COTY template.Elijah Palmer (talk) 15:10, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Bombing on Naboo bot edits

Hi, on my GA nom bombing on Naboo, I've noticed that C4-DE bot keeps changing the template(SWYoutube) for the first listed source to remove the link to the series, remove the starwars.com link, and include the warning in the YouTube title instead of just the title as listed on Starwars.com and Disney+. None of these changes really make sense to me, so I'm just wondering what the reason is or if there's some sort of database that needs to be updated or something? I'm not gonna pretend to know how the bot works. I believe this source (and the whole series) should be formatted like it is on the index page and on this page. Let me know. Thanks! Panther436 (talk) 16:18, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

• That would be controlled by the web subpages of the Masterlist, specifically Sources/Web/2025. Formatting and dates for the Source Engine are controlled by the site-side Masterlist pages and are free for anyone to fix if they see something wrong. Cade Calrayn 16:53, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  • Thank you so much! Figured there was probably a page like that. Def missed while when I was away Panther436 (talk) 06:23, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Jabba's Palace Pop-up Book

Hi Cade. I noticed that a few days ago you removed information sourced to Jabba's Palace Pop-up Book from a few pages relating to Jubnuk surviving his encounter with the rancor. I was wondering what your intent was here, since as far as I can tell the source does supply this information. Jubnuk's page mentions that Leland Chee called the logic of his survival into question, but that statement is unsourced. I'd like to work the Pop-up Book's story back into the text if we're able to. Thanks. RattsT (talk) 19:55, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Dedra affiliation type

Why did you add back the Galactic Empire affiliation type on the Dedra Meero page?Elijah Palmer (talk) 03:14, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Classes in Timeline of Legends Media

Hi! I just noticed that even though Young Readers and Children's Books both have categories in Timeline of Legends media, but only one class "young" is being used. This means that filtering does not work properly and both are assigned the same color. Not sure if this is by design. I know you had said these classes are sitewide. Rebelcrimsonbear (talk) 16:18, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

I don't understand why most of my categorizations are being reversed (many hours of work for nothing)

I am creating an encyclopedia of sentient species, and I have come across many cases where there is no written evidence of such classification. This is the case for many mammals, amphibians, aquatic, and airborne creatures. Furthermore, in the Wookieepedia pages “Elephantine” and “Pachydermoid,” ALL the species I categorized are mentioned; I did not make anything up, I simply created a category for the species cited in those articles.

Regarding mollusks, I am literally baffled: if a species is sentient, what sense does it make to put it in the “Mollusc” category instead of “Mollusc sentient species”? I really don’t understand. What I could somewhat understand is the case of gastropods or cephalopods, where it is indeed my speculation. I can accept that one doesn’t categorize them purely by appearance, but it’s contradictory because, as I said, a third or a quarter of the species have no written evidence of classification, and yet they are categorized based on looks. I simply followed the same example and categorized things that were obvious; I never intended to spread misinformation. I just wanted to classify them anatomically—for instance, if a species is an octopus, it is obviously a cephalopod; one doesn’t need to be very smart to reach that conclusion.

And cases like Aqualish, where it is said they have traits resembling both arachnoids and mammals, that does not mean they are mammals. It seems you haven’t even looked at what change I made or why.

I hope you can answer all my doubts, and I will gladly adjust my behavior if everything is explained clearly and without the inconsistencies currently present. Thank you very much in advance!

User:ENOCH VK User talk:ENOCH VK 16:58, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

PS:I'm sorry, but now I'm really angry. I just saw that you've reverted absolutely ALL of my work these past few days. It's incredibly frustrating that even work that was undoubtedly well done has been reverted. Why can't the Bith be listed as "Craniopod sentient specie" when it's officially and literally stated? I mean, you're contradicting yourself. Now I'm really frustrated. I really don't understand your behavior. I thought it was logical and that I was wrong, but the fact that you've literally reverted EVERYTHING makes no sense.

PS:It's just incredible, even Bonzane10 is redoing my elephant species categorization. And he's an admin like you. Seriously, why are you reverting EVERYTHING that I did?

• Cade did not revert all of your edits, Enoch, so it isn't fair for you to shout at him. Per Wookieepedia:Attribution, the burden of evidence lies with the editor wishing to add or retain the material, so the original sources need to be consulted, rather than just relying on the text of existing articles as they may not be reliable. While it may be true that a species with certain traits can be described anatomically with a specific term, Wookieepedia's purpose is to document official information from official sources, so we should be cautious of any extrapolation, even if it may seem to make sense in the real world. OOM 224 10:02, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

I think that's fine if that's the case, but I don't think it's right that he even reverted the information I've listed. I created the Elephantine category and it completely erased EVERYTHING I classified there, and now, surprise, they've recreated that category and categorized all the species I categorized. That's a clear example of where Cade made a mistake, since I wasn't guided by appearances; literally, in the species I classified, there were clear references in the articles that they were indeed elephantine. That's all it is. I understand that as administrators you should correct things, and that's perfectly fine, but Cade's helplessness, having practically reverted all my edits this week, is unforgivable. He simply saw that I'd done some things wrong, and by the rule of thumb, he reverted everything that was correct. That's it. I'm not asking for more. I'm simply asking for consistency with what is done. You can't revert work well done just because the user has done other things incorrectly. Thank you.

PS: I never meant to shout at Cade. I'm sorry if that's what my previous comment came across. I only got angry when I saw another admin get my job back and I was muted for it. I think my anger is justifiable.

User:ENOCH VK User talk:ENOCH VK 10:41, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

CT:R3-D5

You can go ahead and close the CT. I understand now.Elijah Palmer (talk) 23:28, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

R5-D4

Why did you remove Hangar 3-5 and Clan Mudhorn from R5-D4's affiliations? BD-72 has Hangar 3-5 as an affiliation. Elijah Palmer (talk) 01:44, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, I've been a long time reader of the wiki and I'm a big fan of SWTOR, which I'm recently getting back into. I've noticed that you've got a lot of the more minor characters (one quest NPCs, that type of thing) missing from this wiki, so I was thinking of adding them. I've read through the layout guide and manual of style, and I have experience editing on other (admittedly much smaller) wikis. I'm planning on creating a sandbox article under my userpage for "Asharl-kin" Basterosa, who is encountered in Kessan's Landing: [Daily] Chain of Command, which can then be doubled checked to make sure I've done everything correctly before being moved to the mainspace. Would this be something you can do? AD Vortigern (talk to me) 15:42, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi again, just following up from this, I've created the sandbox page for you to look at here. AD Vortigern (talk to me) 15:59, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

What is wrong with the word I used?

Why is the word I selected not allowed? It was not used in a derogatory way. -Roland Cain

Manka cat image

Did you take the screenshot of the manka cat for the Legends article? If so, the Updated version of the Galactic Atlas traced over your image for their image of it. Just thought you'd find that amusing. -MontztheMan02 (talk) 22:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Question

Which page of The New Essential Chronology says that the comic strips happen after Star Wars #35? --GradoNite

Something wrong with Module:PrevNext (again)

Hi. Something wrong with Module:PrevNext again - this time it's Star Wars Adventures (2020) 6 (and other Adventures issues - not sure about the other comics). On the page it displays the next or prev text as "AdventuresAdventures (2020) 7" or "AdventuresAdventures (2020) 5" --Orgus Ordo (talk) 09:14, 27 November 2025 (UTC)