Welcome, Darth Hill!Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —Stake black msg 17:30, January 14, 2013 (UTC) |
Dathomir
Hi! Please stop rewriting the title of the image of Dathomir, thank you. --XXLVenom998 (Surprise me!) 17:34, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
Sorry. —Unsigned comment by Darth Hill (talk • contribs)
- Absolutely no problem, feel free to edit pages, but the article had to be restored. However, we are counting on You to expand Wookieepedia, too. Happy editing! :) Cheers, --XXLVenom998 (Surprise me!) 18:48, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
Wiki
Hi! First, I would like to ask you to sign your comments with the Signature button next time, as I wouldn't know who wrote the comment. About your question, I have no idea, seriously. Maybe there are some ways, but I don't know how promotion and all these things work, I am just an average user I think, maybe you should ask an admin about it. Good luck and happy editing! :) --XXLVenom998 (Surprise me!) 13:36, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
Unverified Information
Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. JangFett (Talk) 21:51, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
Warning
Please do not add nonsense to Wookieepedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the Jundland Wastes sandbox. Thank you. Cade Calrayn 
17:00, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Please do not continue to change the infobox image for Asajj Ventress. If you would like to propose a different image, please do so through the article's talk page; experimenting with different images as you are currently doing is not permitted and can be seen as vandalism. Thank you. Cade Calrayn
17:03, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
Dark Jedi
Darth Hill, "Dark Jedi" is not an organization nor could someone be affiliated to it. It is a term to describe someone. The Barriss Offee and Pong Krell's articles have already acknowledged this through the infobox. Thanks, JangFett (Talk) 19:14, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
- I'd like to echo Jang's message above. Dark Jedi is not an affiliation. Please don't add it. Thanks. 1358 (Talk) 19:24, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
Warning
As you have been warned previously, please do not continue to change infobox images to incorrect, old, or lower-quality images. Changes to the infobox images for characters such as Ahsoka Tano and Shaak Ti must be discussed on their respective talk pages, and if you would like an image to be changed, please ask there before changing it yourself. Thank you. Cade Calrayn 16:50, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
Lightsaber
As the article for Katooni's lightsaber has been trash compacted, please do not attempt to recreate it. Also, if you are unsure how to properly create an article, please use the Jundland Wastes sandbox for experiments rather than mainspace articles. Thank you, Cade Calrayn 17:18, March 20, 2013 (UTC)
Togruta
Please stop adding None to the hair fields in infoboxes; by and large the field should be left blank if the species doesn't have hair. Also, please don't double-link—if one color is already linked in the infobox, then please don't add another link to color in another field. Thank you. Cade Calrayn 12:59, July 30, 2015 (UTC)
Tivvy
- Hey Kyle03! I just thought I'd let you know that I've reverted the Tivvy article back to having pale skin color as this matches what's in the body of the article. Generally if you think a change should be made to a status article like Tivvy then it's a good idea to contact the nominator of the article and run the idea by them as they've passed the article through review and usually maintain it themselves. Sorry to bother you. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:30, December 18, 2015 (UTC)
Warning
While your edit is appreciated, the page you just edited currently has a template called {{Inuse}} at the top. This template means that someone is currently working on improving the article, and to avoid edit conflicts, no one other than the placer of the template should edit the page while the message is visible. Thank you for your cooperation. Also, stop adding unnecessary subheaders. None of the headers you've added today are needed. Cade Calrayn 17:47, February 13, 2016 (UTC)
Stop adding nonsense
Just because you put in a high-quality, good edit every so often does not excuse inappropriate, out-of-place nonsense edits to various pages around the wiki. Desist adding 'Pink' as the skin color of random Sullustians, or you will be blocked for vandalism. Thank you for understanding. - 
Commander Boots 17:26, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I don't know why you've reverted my edits. I only changed the skin color to pink because the source on the Sullustan page says they have either gray or pink skin, so therefore, clearly Sullustans such as Tivvy's pages should have the correct color of their skin! Also, I've not had any admins complain about this before and it's not spam, it's correcting a page. --Kyle03 (talk) 20:46, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, now I see where you were going with this! I'm dreadfully sorry if I came off as a bit harsh. I'd been reverting other vandal and more obvious nonsense edits for about half an hour before I saw yours, so you could say I was already in a bad mood and tired of people trying to defend adding 'deez nutz' to a Wook page. As for the Sullustian skin color, while I understand that Sullustians have both pink and gray skin colors, the Sullustians for whom you changed the infoboxes for clearly had gray skin coloring in the pictures, thus the 'skin color' field must reflect that fact. While I understand that it may feel prudent to add both Pink and Grey as skin colors, that info belongs with other societal Sullustian info on the respective Sullustian page, and not a page for an individual Sullustian. For example, if there was a black male human being, you would not say that they were also white. Instead, on the respective human page, you would say that humans could come in both light and dark skin coloring. I hope that helped!.
Commander Boots 02:09, March 24, 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, now I see where you were going with this! I'm dreadfully sorry if I came off as a bit harsh. I'd been reverting other vandal and more obvious nonsense edits for about half an hour before I saw yours, so you could say I was already in a bad mood and tired of people trying to defend adding 'deez nutz' to a Wook page. As for the Sullustian skin color, while I understand that Sullustians have both pink and gray skin colors, the Sullustians for whom you changed the infoboxes for clearly had gray skin coloring in the pictures, thus the 'skin color' field must reflect that fact. While I understand that it may feel prudent to add both Pink and Grey as skin colors, that info belongs with other societal Sullustian info on the respective Sullustian page, and not a page for an individual Sullustian. For example, if there was a black male human being, you would not say that they were also white. Instead, on the respective human page, you would say that humans could come in both light and dark skin coloring. I hope that helped!.
Header changes
Hi Kyle. I've noticed you make a lot of unnecessary header changes on articles, such as you did here on the Rey article. Adding "Growing her skills" as a sub-header of "Early life" is unnecessary; it doesn't need to fall into that section. Additionally, "Awakening the Force" is a more appropriate term for the Episode VII section than "First Order-Resistance conflict," as the former more accurately reflects her character growth and story. Thanks. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 17:53, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
- Looks like we messaged each other around the same time. In regards to the speculation, you didn't source what you added. If there's a tweet where Pablo Hidalgo says Rey learned about the Force from Kylo's mind, please provide it. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea(talk) 17:55, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
- Also, all of the other pages say "First Order-Resistance conflict" in that section of their article just like characters who were around during the Clone Wars have a heading saying "The Clone Wars" and characters who were around during the Galactic Civil War have a heading called "Galactic Civil War", that's why I changed it. Should I add that as a heading and keep Awakening of the Force aswell? Thanks. --Kyle03 (talk) 18:00, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
- Nope, it's not necessary. There is no official standardization that's required here. Sometimes "The Clone Wars" is an appropriate header if someone fought in many, many engagements of the war. Such a header would be appropriate on a page like Anakin Skywalker or Ahsoka Tano. But in the case of Rey, "Awakening the Force" is more appropriate for her as a character. Another example is the Kylo Ren page revamp I am working on here, where you can see that I'm using the header "The search for Skywalker." Go with what works best for the character/subject in question. That being said, adding a catch-all "First Order-Resistance conflict" header might be appropriate eventually, but that will depend on the events of Episode VIII onward. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 18:04, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for telling me! --Kyle03 (talk) 18:14, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
- Nope, it's not necessary. There is no official standardization that's required here. Sometimes "The Clone Wars" is an appropriate header if someone fought in many, many engagements of the war. Such a header would be appropriate on a page like Anakin Skywalker or Ahsoka Tano. But in the case of Rey, "Awakening the Force" is more appropriate for her as a character. Another example is the Kylo Ren page revamp I am working on here, where you can see that I'm using the header "The search for Skywalker." Go with what works best for the character/subject in question. That being said, adding a catch-all "First Order-Resistance conflict" header might be appropriate eventually, but that will depend on the events of Episode VIII onward. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 18:04, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
- Also, all of the other pages say "First Order-Resistance conflict" in that section of their article just like characters who were around during the Clone Wars have a heading saying "The Clone Wars" and characters who were around during the Galactic Civil War have a heading called "Galactic Civil War", that's why I changed it. Should I add that as a heading and keep Awakening of the Force aswell? Thanks. --Kyle03 (talk) 18:00, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
Hello!
Hello! I just saw you were active here only a few days ago? Good to see you're still on wikia.
-Decca03
Edits
I did because its not necessary to have so many headings for the articles, I'll make the same edits on the other two --Lewisr (talk) 23:03, March 3, 2018 (UTC)
Source
"movieweb.com" is not an official source. See WP:ATT and WP:Sourcing for more information on what constitutes an official, canonical source for in-universe information. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 12:41, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- The article literally includes a statement from Chris Terrio who co-wrote TRoS saying that Leia was a Jedi in IX. It's also pretty obvious from watching the film that Leia has taken up the mantle once again. I can't understand how a quote from a co-writer himself isn't an official source. It's not look like the article is speculative. Kyle03 ༼༽talk༼༽ 20:38, 5 July 2021
- It isn't that obvious, she isn't really a Jedi, she just was helping train Rey. And regardless of whether she was a Jedi or not, the Resistance infobox is definitely the more appropriate infobox type for Leia Lewisr (talk) 19:46, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry Lewisr but you're wrong. A big part of TRoS is Leia picking up her Jedi path once again after leaving it behind years prior and passing on all she's learned. She becomes Rey's Jedi Master and in the novel she joins the Jedi of the past in the battle against the Reborn Emperor. She becomes a Force ghost, a skill learned by Jedi Masters. The co-writer literally confirmed in the article that I linked as a source that IX is about Leia joining the Jedi pantheon. Other articles on Wookieepedia show the character's affiliation as what they were in their latest chronological appearance. In Leia's latest chronological appearance, she became a Jedi and fulfilled a legacy we've been waiting since RotJ to see on screen. Leia should be listed as a Jedi as that's what she is at the end of her life. Kyle03 (talk) 20:03, 6 July 2021
- Except that Anakin was never a Jedi Master and was able to become a Force spirit. Ahsoka was also part of the voices who helped Rey so that point doesn't really count for much. Leia is still first and foremost the leader of the Resistance, and therefore the Resistance infobox should be used for Leia Lewisr (talk) 19:11, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry Lewisr but you're wrong. A big part of TRoS is Leia picking up her Jedi path once again after leaving it behind years prior and passing on all she's learned. She becomes Rey's Jedi Master and in the novel she joins the Jedi of the past in the battle against the Reborn Emperor. She becomes a Force ghost, a skill learned by Jedi Masters. The co-writer literally confirmed in the article that I linked as a source that IX is about Leia joining the Jedi pantheon. Other articles on Wookieepedia show the character's affiliation as what they were in their latest chronological appearance. In Leia's latest chronological appearance, she became a Jedi and fulfilled a legacy we've been waiting since RotJ to see on screen. Leia should be listed as a Jedi as that's what she is at the end of her life. Kyle03 (talk) 20:03, 6 July 2021
- It isn't that obvious, she isn't really a Jedi, she just was helping train Rey. And regardless of whether she was a Jedi or not, the Resistance infobox is definitely the more appropriate infobox type for Leia Lewisr (talk) 19:46, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Force-sensitive
I saw, though I still feel its unnecessary. Status pages such as Tosan and Zett Jukassa don't for example, and neither do the pages of Darth Sidious, Ben Solo, and probably many more. But its being inconsistently applied so I won't fight it too hard Lewisr (talk) 19:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- For people like Maz I agree its necessary to include, but for Jedi or Sith I don't see it as necessary because by the very fact they were either they are Force-sensitive. For adding it to the status articles (Tosan and Zett) its not up to me to decide, that comes down to the authors of those articles. You can add them to other pages, but I can't promise that others won't remove it if they also felt it was unnecessary, but its upto you Lewisr (talk) 20:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Finn
Unless something actually says he was an owner of it, all we have it that he briefly used it, which is not the same as being an owner of the weapon. Lewisr (talk) 16:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'd imagine the source provided for Ben Solo actually said he was an owner or something like that, whereas as far as I know, nothing says similar for Finn, until then he should not be listed as an owner. Lewisr (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Previewing edits
I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wookieepedia. It is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. VergenceScatter (talk) 17:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Grogu
Just because it was licensed that doesn't automatically make it a canonical image Lewisr (talk) 21:54, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- I asked on our dicord server and it seems we can't really use it on either article (not even in BTS) until we know its canon status Lewisr (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Ahsoka image vote
Heya, just to inform you that you are eligible to vote in your Ahsoka Tano infobox CT, and that if you can use the guidance notes on this page for help with setting up your signature. If you'd like any help with that, don't hesitate to ask me! OOM 224 (he/him) 21:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the support. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Kyle03 (talk) 21:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- If you use four tildes (~~~~) in the source editor—which I do recommend because it gives you complete control of the wikicode—it should automatically produce the code for your signature. You can switch to the source editor by selecting the "Source editor" option under "Preferred editor" on this page. If you would prefer using the Visual Editor, using the signature button on the editing toolbar (as shown on WP:SIG) should also produce your signature. OOM 224 (he/him) 21:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Edits
Hey! There isn't much need to list formerly etc in the infobox. It doesn't really look like that, in the same way that it doesn't look like Han was affiliated with all those organisations at the same time, it's just a chronological ordering of his partners/affiliations Lewisr (talk) 14:54, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Partner parameter
Hi Kyle. The partner parameter on Template:Character is only intended for listing life paterners such as ones living in the equivalent of common-law marriages, ones who had children together, or are actually married. The field was renamed to slightly reflect these types of committed relationships while still essentially being for familial relations only. Noticed on some recent edits of yours to Padmé Amidala, Quinlan Vos, and others that you've been adding to these fields with information for romantic interests/boyfriend/girlfriends, which isn't its intended usage. Would be amazing if you could keep this in mind going forward. Cheers, —spookywillowwtalk 02:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- Such a change would have to be discussed in the Senate Hall and brought to a vote afterward—as the original set of parameters/usages was agreed on by a vote prior. The field was actually renamed, not removed (to allow for some very specific edge case flexibility, as general romantic interests can often turn subjective), but was still supposed to follow the intent of the spouse parameter. But—the rename was indeed confusing, so there's an ongoing bot run adding a comment to clarify the field's usage for going forward. Cheers, —spookywillowwtalk 21:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Girard
Hey, thanks for your contribution on Wookieepedia. I saw your recent edit on Girard and I just want to remind you that gender can't be confirmed only via physical appearance. Cheers! Bonzane10 
(holonet) 19:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Ackbar
Is it actually stated to be Ackbar or is it just assuming to be Ackbar? Lewisr (talk) 22:05, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- It's entirely different, and there was nothing in the episode which referred to the character as an admiral or it being the High Command. It could be any other Mon Calamari, whereas we can easily identify Mon Mothma by her role, and the fact that it's clearly Genevieve O'Reilly. Until a source refers to the character as Ackbar we should reframe from treating it as him Lewisr (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Thongla Jur
Hey there, Kyle! I'm just letting you know that I reverted your edits on Thongla Jur. The reason is that the article in question is a status article, meaning that it has reached a certain level of quality. It's best to ask the editor who promoted the article if you want to make any changes to it and put it in the edit summary to let others know about the situation. Cheers! Bonzane10 (holonet) 13:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Lightsaber pages
Hi there, Kyle! I just wanted to let you know that I've redirected the Acolyte lightsaber pages to the character pages for now since, as you can see in previous community decisions (like these: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5), lightsabers are generally given their own page when they have a degree of notability by playing into the narrative, having a unique quality, etc., and not just being a mere tool, which is typically covered in the Equipment section on the character page. So it's too early to tell if any of those sabers will have one of these qualities. Hope this helps, 
AnilSerifoglu (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Revert
Your revert of my edit on the Koril page was incorrect. Koril has yellow eyes, not amber, and her tattoos are blue, not black. If it was just an issue with the eye color, you could have just changed the color back instead of reverting everything, you know? Andrewh7