Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

Featured
article
nominations
FA-Icon

This page is for Featured article nominations. A Featured article is an article that is of complete quality and represents the best a Wookieepedia article can be. It is for fully fleshed out subjects that go beyond the limited content of Good and Comprehensive articles. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe are ready to be reviewed to achieve Featured status.

The article-nomination process is not a way to showcase your favorite articles, but rather articles that are of high quality. Articles placed on this page will be extensively reviewed by experienced editors, including the presiding Inquisitorius review panel. The nomination process will require the article nominator to respond to objections and improve the article until the requisite number of users supports the nomination.

In undertaking a nomination on this page, the nominator is taking responsibility for their nominated article. This means they need to thoroughly read the following instructions, implement them into their nominated article, and respond to given objections. Nominators are encouraged to ask more experienced editors for guidance and assistance, but self-sufficiency is a requirement of the article-nomination process. It is not inherently the job of reviewers to rewrite elements of an article, but rather to guide nominators to be able to fix issues themselves.

Your nomination is your responsibility. Nominations that severely neglect the following rules or otherwise fall idle after two weeks will be subject to immediate removal.

READ THIS FIRST!

A Featured article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, with a neutral point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …be stable during and following the review process. This means the article does not change significantly from day to day with new content and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism or other administrative edits, such as page protection.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article is preferred but not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section or subsection.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …provide an introduction that gives a good summary of the topic.
  13. …be at least 1000 words long. This word total counts the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, but not captions, quotes, headers, etc. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
  14. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.
  15. …be nominated by a user who has promoted at least one article to Good article status. Exceptions can be made for a Good article nomination that, due to objections post-nomination, has gone over the Good article word limit, so long as the number of words added during the Good article nomination process is 250 or fewer.

How to nominate:

  1. Select an article you feel is worthy of Featured status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{FAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Featured article status previously, you will need to specify the number of the nomination as a parameter (e.g. {{FAnom|second}}). To automatically generate an index upon nomination, use {{FAnom|index=1}}.
  3. Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Other users will object to the nomination with issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
  7. The nominator should then adjust the article until the objections are satisfied. The objector is responsible for striking their objection when it has been addressed, not the nominator. Additionally, reviewers will often copy-edit the article themselves as desired to fix any issues.
  8. Following their review, other users will vote to support the nomination. Users may not vote on their own nomination.
  9. Each user (except for members of the Inquisitorius) shall be limited to four active Featured article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations will be subject to immediate removal.
  10. Users must successfully complete one Featured article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the FAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful FA nominations before they can have three, and three successful FA nominations before they can have four.

How to review:

  1. To review an article, users should read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. The article should be reviewed with the criteria listed above, and any issues should be placed under the Object section of the article's nomination page. Objections should be clearly explained, and detail how the article can be improved.
  3. Objections should then be addressed by the nominator. Once the objector is satisfied, they should strike their objection. The nominator should not strike reviewers' objections for them.
  4. Once a reviewer is satisfied with the article, they can vote to support it. Please note that in order to support a nomination, you must have 50 mainspace edits.

Result:

  1. If a nomination has been active for over two days and has no active objections, it may pass with a total of either five Inquisitorius votes, four Inquisitorius and two user votes, or three Inquisitorius and four user votes.
  2. Once the nomination is successful, the article will be considered a "Featured article." As such, an Inquisitorius member will archive the nomination using JocastaBot in Wookieepedia's Discord server and place the article on the Featured articles page. Only members of the Inquisitorius are allowed to perform these archiving tasks.
All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to immediate removal by Inquisitorius vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.


Featured article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Dathomirian/Legends

  • Nominated by: AmazinglyCool Nightsisters symbol - JFO (talk) 17:46, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: After 5 months, I finally found the time to finish the source list :P
  • Word count at nomination time: 4071 words (377 introduction, 2017 body, 1677 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:ALIENS, WP:NOVELS, WP:TCW

(0 Inqs/4 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. D MCCG D MCCG (chat) 07:32, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
  2. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 17:18, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
  3. Stake black msg 12:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  4. StarWarsFan327Talk 15:17, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Object

ThrawnChiss
Lew
  • Is there really no relevant quotes for the body sections that don't have any? A side note, the top quote in the history section should be moved from its current position to a different place Lewisr (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
  • The paragraphs in the "The Nightbrothers Two" section (especially the last two) are rather chunky and I think you can probably split them, and subsection that part Lewisr (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
  • If pictured in The New Essential Chronology then its IU depiction in The New Essential Chronology (in-universe) should be noted Lewisr (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Should already be there in the "Genocide" section AmazinglyCool Nightsisters symbol - JFO (talk) 19:47, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
      • So it is, thanks! Lewisr (talk) 05:32, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
SteakShack742
  • See this edit. Mostly minor changes and fixes in punctuation, MOS compliance, etc., but I also added context for certain media mentioned in BTS and reworded a number of sentences for flow. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 21:56, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Rookies (short story) is a red link in Appearances.
  • {{CardGameSet}} has some wonky formatting issues with Tatooine Limited.
  • Force Attax Series 1 isn't showing up.
    • Currently investigating these two, looks like a glitch is happening with some of them. AmazinglyCool Nightsisters symbol - JFO (talk) 22:46, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
      • Both this and the CCG display are fixed. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 14:22, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Is the Insider 137 "Red Five" title cut off? SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 08:20, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
SWFan
  • On the index page, there's a bunch of redirecting links that should be corrected. Also, the top of the index page has a redlink to CargoBay listings to check/Other. Is this supposed to be [Category:CargoBay listings to check]? StarWarsFan327Talk 14:14, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Under "Society and culture," the links to the Main Articles currently link to the canon pages for Nightsisters & Nightbrothers. I'm assuming you meant to link these to Nightsisters/Legends and Nightbrothers/Legends? StarWarsFan327Talk 14:14, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • I think Zanbar being a swamp planet should be cited to its Encyclopedia entry. StarWarsFan327Talk 15:40, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
    • Everything should look good. When it comes to the category, I'm not sure but it looks like another category the mods created for maintenance and there's other stuff in there, so I'd rather not touch it. AmazinglyCool Nightsisters symbol - JFO (talk) 14:29, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments


Rhinnal/Legends

  • Nominated by: Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 04:20, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: *audible creaking noises* be kind to me, I'm old
  • Word count at nomination time: 2166 words (272 introduction, 1808 body, 86 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:TOR, WP:AST

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Mor
  • I believe some images could be spread throughout the article.
  • Early history should be sectioned a bit more, it has 6 paragraphs when sections should only have 2-3 or sometimes 4 paragraphs. Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 04:29, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
  • The end of the first paragraph in Early history is unsourced Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 04:54, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Done. Will work on images. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 04:10, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Fred strikes back
  • Uh oh, he's back. :P First off, per Mor with more images, but also current ones should be enlarged, and the first image has a white border that should be removed. Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 04:47, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Done. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 02:58, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
      • Images are still closer to monobook size. We average around 300px for most widths these days. Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 04:27, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Dani
  • The top quote seems like it's fit perfectly in Locations. Is there another quote for Locations/Top? NBDani TeamFireballLogo-Collider(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 11:19, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Added another quote to Locations; the top one is the best overall. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 02:58, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Imp
  • How do we know that the correct Coruscant and the Core Worlds image is the one in Rhinnal's entry and not the one in Ralltiir's?
    • Ralltiir has been depicted in other sources and it looks significantly different from the Core Worlds image; Ralltiir isn't an ice world. I'll check the Far Orbit Project for additional images though. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 02:33, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
  • The Canon article's BTS has more relevant info that should be added onto this article as well.
  • Please note the authors of the 1stm and the 1st.
  • The release dates for the Adventure Journal issues and for Coruscant and the Core Worlds are self-sourcing, and 2008 is also noted as the copyright date for The Force Unleashed Campaign Guide. Imperators II(Talk) 14:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • That the atmosphere is "Type I" is infobox-exclusive (body only mentions breathable).
  • Galactic Basic Standard is also infobox-exclusive.
  • "In 22 BBY, the Allied Tion Historical Society's..."—generally, pretty much all of the HNN stuff requires a GrS date conversion like here for any BBY inclusion in prose since those themselves don't support it outright.
  • Tython, Ord Mantell, and Ruan should have context as a planet or a world.
    • Done.
  • I spy Jedi vs. Sith in the sources, which does have an IU book and is mentioned as a 40 ABY compendium like other diegetic works in other SAs. Just wanted to briefly check to see what the nature of Rhinnal's mention was in that because it's likely eligible for a similar note. It seems like Platt's Smuggler's Guide also has an IU equivalent.
    • Added JvS, but Rhinnal's mention in Platt is in the OOU character development section as a possible homeworld, so not applicable. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 23:11, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Regarding the quote caption in locations; ending punctuation in quote attributions is generally disallowed since they're not allowed to be full sentences
  • Regarding the two links to characters in the top quote attribution; would be unneeded as both are linked elsewhere below
  • Does Episode I Adventures 1: Search for the Lost Jedi support a flatcite to 33 BBY without additional referencing? I took a quick peek at the book's page and it seems to say it was 32 BBY. But even if it was 33 BBY, curious if the book itself has that somewhere in there, as its fairly unusual for a narrative book to self-support its dates.
  • I also wanted to check up on the 27 ABY flatcite for Star by Star's date; we've had some nominations in the past come through from that and most of them include The Essential Reader's Companion date notes.
  • Regarding Mara Jade Skywalker's linking in the quote caption, it would be standard to include some form of context for her in the quote attribution if thats the only place she's introduced, like a rank or role.
  • There's definitely room for a BTS image perhaps of the Adventure Journal cover or of any of the other milestones media mentioned there.
  • Its generally not standard to include publishers for children's books (in this case Scholastic) without referential need. I also don't think the month is needed there as its the only 1999 source being discussed.
  • Its standard to introduce a link to both the series and the issue when referring to magazines, in this case something like "fifth issue of the Star Wars Adventure Journal" includes both, but as long as both links are somehow included that works too.—spookywillowwtalk 17:05, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
    • Tackled most of these, but I pulled my back and am going to go lay down. Will try to fix the planets & BTS image later. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 22:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to strike objection (Inq only)

  1. Inqvote For Mor's, hit 16 days. Pinged 6 days ago with no reply.—spookywillowwtalk 22:18, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 22:19, 6 July 2025 (UTC)


Samix sector

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 02:35, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Went over.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1106 words (145 introduction, 607 body, 354 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THRWP:ASTWP:COMICSWP:NOVELS

(4 Inqs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 2 user or 1 Inq vote required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 22:03, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 12:49, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote CometSmudge (talk) 18:57, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote OOM 224 16:36, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comet
  • I might be missing something, but why is the Bentora system being placed in the sector mentioned in the BTS CometSmudge (talk) 03:12, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
    • Tweaked a bit to specify; its sort of because Bentora and Daedus both simultaneously mark the first full appearance of the sector. Used to just be that Daedus was in the Bentora system, but now they've been said to be separate systems.—spookywillowwtalk 12:14, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Skye

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 12:55, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1054 words (157 introduction, 665 body, 232 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:ASTWP:NOVELSWP:THR

(3 Inqs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 2 user or 1 Inq vote required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 22:14, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote CometSmudge (talk) 00:43, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  3. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 04:54, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
  4. StarWarsFan327Talk 13:08, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote OOM 224 16:27, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

  • In Legends, the planet was placed in the Marat system by the Ultimate Alien Anthology. Also, I'm not sure that the name "Skye system" has ever been used in Legends.—DKS MaXoO (talk) 15:07, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
    • Appendix as thus linked on SW.com's essential atlas companion, which has "Skye" as a system column. Which in turn, in Legends, quantifies as a "Skye system" usage in some form at least within that. Though as for how that particular precedent developed is an Imp question, but it is widely done.—spookywillowwtalk 02:11, 5 July 2025 (UTC)


Nooroyo

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 18:29, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1028 words (209 introduction, 784 body, 35 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELSWP:ASTWP:CIS

(2 Inqs/2 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 Inq vote required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 03:43, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
  3. StarWarsFan327 (talk) 13:32, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote CometSmudge (talk) 19:01, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Fleur Ridleg

(2 Inqs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 23:36, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote CometSmudge (talk) 02:10, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  3. StarWarsFan327Talk 12:47, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Niamos

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:30, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Do check out this ongoing research I stumbled upon while looking into the BtS stuff. The folk at Open University are particularly interested in Star Wars related stuff.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1665 words (117 introduction, 698 body, 850 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB, WP:AST

(0 Inqs/3 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 Inq vote required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Stake black msg 13:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  2. StarWarsFan327Talk 01:31, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
  3. RocketLaunchJr1 Ever been to Ghorman? 23:09, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Stakeout
  • Galactic Britain II: Cassian's Travels names the beach Niamos Beach. Should maybe be created and linked to somewhere. Stake black msg 20:28, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
    • That's more of an umbrella term tbh, and the capitalisation is general practice across the titling. From the way it's described, Niamos is gonna have a lot of beaches, so it doesn't make sense to just name one Niamos beach, the same way we don't have an "Earth beach." Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 11:36, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Editor
Imp
Rocket

Comments

  • You might've done this already, but if not, could you check the following two links to see if every SW.com source has been added? [1], [2] Stake black msg 08:47, 25 July 2025 (UTC)


Chief gunnery officer/Legends

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Mor
  • Is there a relevant image that could be used in the BTS? Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 10:08, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments

  • A Guide to the Star Wars Universe coins weapons officer and specifically identifies the Y-wing's navigators (obviously seen in Return of the Jedi before that book) as being weapons officers. In terms of treating "weapons officer" and "chief gunnery officer" as not inherently the same except for the literal cases of pirate and privateer chief gunnery officers being interchangeably called weapons officers, I can think of numerous real life cases of inconsistencies where 2 different titles are interchangeable in one situation and separate in another. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:48, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
  • I have had direct exposure to Tenn Graneet, and the "gunnery chief" is a different position for Graneet's case. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:19, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
    • From checking things out, only the "head gunnery officer" Fact File issues are chief gunnery officers, and all other listed things (except for the already-included Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels chief gunner information, are different positions. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 05:35, 4 August 2025 (UTC)


Morlana One

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 22:11, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another biggun in my saga of Andor worlds.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1530 words (201 introduction, 1166 body, 163 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB, WP:AST

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Stakeout
  • I noticed this edit you made. I heard from Cade on Discord that typically we want to keep the earliest date. In this case, the article was updated, so its date on the website has changed, but I believe it's necessary to use the older date. Stake black msg 00:08, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
    • Yeah that's fair, fixed.
  • You might've already done this, but can you sweep SW.com for potential sources and update the article as needed? Stake black msg 00:08, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Editor
  • So, the article says "The Empire moved in to the Morlani system the day after the incident on Ferrix,[16] imposing permanent authority there[15] and relieving the majority of the Pre-Mor Authority staff from their posts.[17]" However, the Empire took over the full Free Trade Sector, so it should really read "imposing permanent authority there[15] and across the greater Moralana sector (cite to the encyclopedia)." The bit about relieving majority of staff can then be its own sentence. Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:59, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
  • I think you can begin the sentence about Karn moving to Morlana with "Against the wishes of his mother, Eedy Karn,(cite to Harvest) the Coruscanti[1] Syril Karn..." You could maybe even just cite him being Coruscanti to Harvest as well
  • Harvest establishes that "Morlana" on its own is a simplified alternative name for Morlana One Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:03, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
  • There is room for an image in the first history subsection, such as the Pre-Mor Authority logo, File:SWU-SyrilWouldCryIfHeSawThis.png, an image of Syril or other pre-mor personnel, etc
  • On Program establishes that Verlo Skiff and Kravas Drezzer are drunk, which can be reflected Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Star Wars: Unlimited — Secrets of Power Card: Cassian Andor: Lay Low (backup link) establishes that Cassian was trying to lay low during his visit. So, this can be reflected as something like "just beyond a causeway and making his way to a brothel in the Leisure Zone[4] while trying to maintain a low profile.[Unlimited Card]"Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Its established in Syril's little crash out in the ISB holding cell in Narkina 5 that two days pass between the murder and his finding of Cassian: "I was a good Deputy Inspector! I was very good. I solved a double murder and found the killer in two days." I think this can be reflected in some form Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
SWFan
  • I'm seeing on inconsistent linking on related pages to Morlana. I noticed that on Tac-Corpo, there is a redlink to Preox-Morlana sentry guard. The page for Pre-Mor Authority Security Forces just calls them "sentry guards," linking it back to Tac-Corpo. I also saw the same redlink to "Pre-Mor Authority Security Forces" linked on a few of the Preox-Mor corpos' pages, all cited to the SWInsider "On Program" — Star Wars Insider 220. Is this the same as the Tac-Corpo or a different Preox-Mor subunit that needs to be linked to Morlana One? StarWarsFan327Talk 14:06, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
    • On Program just mentions "when a duo of Preox-Morlana sentry guards drunkenly confronted him." The episode itself obviously calls them sentry guards, but Luthen calls them Corpos in Reckoning, which is why it's all the same page I'd say. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 21:40, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Yarael Poof/Legends

  • Nominated by: - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:45, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Prior FAN attempt here: Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Yarael Poof/Legends. I've made efforts to address the outstanding objections from said nomination attempt, but if any further work needs to be done in addressing them then please leave a new objection accordingly.
  • Word count at nomination time: 4860 words (310 introduction, 3346 body, 1204 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Skifffy
  • Stats on his Galatic Files card should be added to skills and abilities like on GA Pons Limbic and FA J'Quille. Skifffy (talk) 23:39, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
    • It's a bit unclear to me exactly how we're quantifying those stats. On Pons Limbic's article, he is described to have "above average" of certain traits and "average" of others, but his Galactic Files card gives no indication of where "above average" or "average" (or "below average") are considered to lie; we don't know that around halfway up the graph is actually average, the average could lie somewhere else entirely; "average" is not the same as "middle," it just means "most common" (assuming a data set has a wide enough breadth of data and isn't solely individuals on the extreme ends of a spectrum). Looking at Yarael's card, I could certainly describe him as "skilled" or "proficient" in the stats/traits shown on his card (given his are all near-maxed out), but if you're looking for the info from the card to be described in a similar manner to Pons or J'Quille, I'm hesitant to do so. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 07:00, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
      • With how long the articles had been at their statuses, I thought some precedent had already been established for these cards. I'll bring this up to the article's nominator about this. Skifffy (talk) 22:25, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments

  • Yarael Poof is mentioned on page 5 of Star Wars Kids (1999) 9: "Yoda was a hand puppet. Mas Amedda, who stood next to Chancellor Valorum in the Senate, was prosthetic makeup. A good example of the animatronic masks we created, besides the Neimoidians, was Yarael Poof." —DKS MaXoO (talk) 20:39, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
    • Thanks for pointing that out, I did in fact miss that. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 20:00, 1 September 2025 (UTC)


Yarzion Vell

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 04:17, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 2230 words (346 introduction, 1700 body, 184 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THR WP:Comics

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote Objections handled via Discord.—spookywillowwtalk 03:38, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Exmar Kloris

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 15:11, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Makes me sad to think that Kloris could well have had second thoughts after Mon's speech, but it was all too late.
  • Word count at nomination time: 2191 words (243 introduction, 1719 body, 229 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. StarWarsFan327Talk 15:45, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

SW Fan
  • There seems to be some inconsistencies with capitalization of "the Senate," both referring to the building and the legislation itself. StarWarsFan327Talk 14:59, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • The first two sentences of the BTS should be reworded. Currently, the second sentence says the date "Aldhani" premiered, but the name of the episode is only mentioned in the previous sentence. StarWarsFan327Talk 14:59, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Etro Edthatt

  • Nominated by: Stake black msg 06:53, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1098 words (80 introduction, 768 body, 250 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Venan civil war

  • Nominated by: Stake black msg 08:09, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1433 words (213 introduction, 1059 body, 161 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:CO, WP:DEMOCRACY

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote OOM 224 20:17, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Objections

OOM
  • In the BTS, only the first issue needs a date. The other issues don't need to be mentioned. OOM 224 16:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Illustrator can also be dropped, per Wookieepedia:Inq/Venan civil war, which you should take a look at. There's a couple points that seem to be outstanding. OOM 224 16:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • The ref for the "Outcome" field in the infobox doesn't explain how it's an outcome of the civil war per se. Might need to remove this if this is just a coincidence of timing and no causality was established. OOM 224 16:24, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    • I tweaked it a bit. Stake black msg 21:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
      • You do need to mention the first issue and give it a date though. I'd also like to see if you can confirm whether all the points on the Inq page have been addressed, particularly around the BBY dating. OOM 224 17:42, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
        • Reworded the BtS. I also adjusted the article based on all of the Inq objections. By BBY dating, do you mean the first Inq point? If so, I added a note to explain the date rationale. Stake black msg 12:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
          • Fabulous OOM 224 20:17, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Elris Florent

  • Nominated by: Panther436 RedNihilEye (talk) 01:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Just barely brought over the word limit by THR art book updates
  • Word count at nomination time: 1089 words (138 introduction, 786 body, 165 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THR WP:COMICS

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 01:38, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 01:44, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Russo-ISC

  • Nominated by: StarWarsFan327 (talk) 16:47, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It has been a lot of fun building Russo's page over the past year!
  • Word count at nomination time: 3015 words (247 introduction, 2675 body, 93 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):WookieeProject The Clone Wars

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Editor
Lew
  • I don't see anything in the databank that indicates the gender Lewisr (talk) 00:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
    • I kept thinking either the Databank and/or his Encyclopedia entry specified his programming. I've corrected it to unspecified gender. StarWarsFan327 (talk) 12:53, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
      • No worries, thanks for changing Lewisr (talk) 22:44, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Cybot Galactica and Forensics droid are infobox exclusive, so should be added into the body somewhere. And Galactic Republic should be worked into the biography as well, probably at the mention of the Coruscant Security Force Lewisr (talk) 00:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
  • I think there's room for an image in the "Coruscant works" section in the biography Lewisr (talk) 00:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
    • All the above are addressed and I added a picture of the Jedi Temple to the Coruscant Work section. StarWarsFan327 (talk) 12:53, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
  • I think the 2nd paragraph of the introduction could be split, it'd look better imo to have 3 roughly similar sized paragraphs Lewisr (talk) 22:44, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  • The 'The truth behind Bowmani' section has space for another image Lewisr (talk) 22:44, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Hosnian Prime could use some context Lewisr (talk) 22:44, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  • I believe you can add the mention of Russo in the file in Scum and Villainy as a quote in legacy, if you look at Yudrish Sedran for example. Also on this and to confirm, no other available quotes that could be potentially to the other quote less sections? Lewisr (talk) 22:44, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
    • I added quotes from Scum and Villainy and Sabotage to the related sections that were missing quotes, asides from "Coruscant Work." Not sure what source to use a quote from for that section, as the content in the Coruscant Work section was only mentioned in source material. StarWarsFan327 (talk) 21:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
      • If there's nothing that can be added then no worries, just wanted to check if there was anything or not Lewisr (talk) 05:38, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
    • Is the quote I added to the legacy section too long compared to the length of the section? Should I use a "..." to shorten the middle of the quote? StarWarsFan327 (talk) 21:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
      • Yes I'd say that'd be a good idea in this case. Would recommend the formatting used in the BTS on Shirene for applying that Lewisr (talk) 05:38, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
        • I shortened the quote a bit, but it still is a bit long for the section, in comparison to the quote used on Shirene. I don't want to cut out context, but everything said in this quote has already been stated in prose earlier on the page. Do you think more could be cut and retain enough of the context? StarWarsFan327 (talk) 21:39, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
          • Sorry the link to Shirene was mostly just for what to do when skipping dialogue. I don't really know what much else to suggest cutting. I think I'm fine with it now, and if anyone else wants to see it shrunk later they can object themselves Lewisr (talk) 03:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Zaviel Tepp

  • Nominated by: Lewisr (talk) 19:09, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Not one I was expecting 1) have to update for Trials 2) bring upto FAN
  • Word count at nomination time: 1331 words (181 introduction, 1089 body, 61 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS WP:THR

(1 Inqs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote Mostly pre-reviewed via Discord.—spookywillowwtalk 17:11, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
  2. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 19:34, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Kaijura

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Really did not expect his creature of the week to pop up again
  • Word count at nomination time: 1078 words (169 introduction, 822 body, 87 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Comics

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Lily Tora-Asi

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 04:47, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 8669 words (680 introduction, 7583 body, 406 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THR WP:Women WP:Comics

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Sithisis

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

1-JAC

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:15, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Large BTS update bumped it just a little over, so hopefully a nice easy upgrade nomination
  • Word count at nomination time: 1045 words (100 introduction, 372 body, 573 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Hoss

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote Primarily reviewed via-call.—spookywillowwtalk 22:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Escape from Coruscant (Mon Mothma)

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Daal

  • Nominated by: Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 19:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: My longest article so far, I think I did fairly decently...
  • Word count at nomination time: 3616 words (355 introduction, 2482 body, 779 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions WP:Women

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote This is probably my favourite Visions short. Great work on this! OOM 224 16:56, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote CometSmudge (talk) 02:47, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Fan
  • Daal's gender appears to be infobox-exclusive Fan26 (Talk) 19:23, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • So is Sith Mother's faction it would seem Fan26 (Talk) 19:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Ah thanks for noticing those and being so quick with that lol, fixed! Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 19:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
      • I think the pipelink through "joined" in the intro is unneeded; it's fine to only mention the faction in the body. Additionally her gender remains unspecified in the article body. Fan26 (Talk) 19:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
        • it's specified in the P&T, does it need to be in the Bio? Removed the faction pipelink in the intro. Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 19:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
          • No that's fine then, there's precedent. Fan26 (Talk) 20:33, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • In the first sentence of the bio I would prefer it if the Factory Workshop is identified before it is referred to as an Imperial workhouse, rather than this sentence introducing a nameless Imperial workhouse it subsequently identifies as the Factory Workshop. Ordering the info properly and all. Fan26 (Talk) 20:33, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Stakeout
  • A bit nitpicky, but in this sentence "In the short, Eva Whittaker voiced Daal. She never imagined [...]" it might be best to add a qualifier like "according to" or "who, when interviewed, revealed", or something similar. Stake black msg 20:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    • I don't mind nitpicky objections, just whatever sounds best for everyone! changed! Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 21:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Comet
  • In the intro, Screecher's Reach isn't given context until a couple sentences after it's first introduced, so I think it would be good to move its context to its first mention. Same with the Screecher
  • In the body, I think it would be good to name the Screecher when she's first mentioned so that it's more clear who she is when her name comes up later on
  • The Test section is four paragraphs, so it could be split
  • I don't think the Screecher's gender is directly citable to the episode (Her page cites the audio description for it)
  • The last section of the BTS looks like it has room for an image CometSmudge (talk) 00:56, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Done with the above! sorry it took a while. Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 16:19, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
  • I think most or all of the cases of dialogue being directly quoted in prose should be paraphrased instead. The first instance of "I follow your path with strength and courage" might be important enough to directly quote, but in other cases I don't think exact quotes are needed. CometSmudge (talk) 03:26, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
    • I kept James Waugh's "a subverted Luke Skywalker story" and Quinn's "kick'n her up the arse!" since I wouldn't know how to write it in prose without using "butt" or "ass" and have it sound right. I removed the others though I believe. lmk if I missed any you wanted removed! Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 20:00, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
  • There's a few contractions in the BTS that should be fully written out
  • The final paragraph of the Development section could be merged with another paragraph to avoid having a four paragraph section
  • Once you've established Redondo is the art director, you don't need to include that in subsequent mentions of him
  • Empire Strikes Back should have a year
    • I believe the above are now addressed. Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 18:01, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
  • The article is in a maintenance category, Category:WebCite usages without work parameter CometSmudge (talk) 03:46, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
    • Reaching out to discord for discussion Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 18:01, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
  • In the sentence, "they used the same symbology" could you either clarify who "they" is or tweak the sentence so it doesn't need to be used?
  • In the Strength and courage section, I think you could be more explicit that the figure is the Screecher, since it's a bit vague until later in the section. CometSmudge (talk) 03:48, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
    • I personally preferred the vagueness but I won't object, both issues have been resolved. Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 16:12, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
  • The Story Gallery citation should specify the slide number like the concept art gallery citations do
  • ESB will need another ref for its release year, since it isn't in the article CometSmudge (talk) 22:00, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
    • Addressed! Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 16:34, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
OOM
  • My copy-edit. Great work! I added full stops/periods to some of the image captions because they are full sentences, but you're absolutely free to change those up—WP:MOS says "Only image captions and reference notes that constitute full sentences should receive a period (full stop)"
  • I think the article would benefit from specifying that Baython said "eejit" (idiot) when referring to Quinn and making Daal laugh, because it's probably the use of that word that made her laugh.
  • It would be nice if the BTS mentions Ireland somewhere (e.g. in the context of Cartoon Saloon or the director) and clarifies which Emmy Award the short won. OOM 224 19:33, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
    • Addressed all! Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 16:34, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Hugh Sion

  • Nominated by: Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 06:09, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Ok, Dani, now time for those SW:GE noms.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1631 words (457 introduction, 1090 body, 84 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Resistance

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

SWFan
  • At the beginning of the biography section, the citation for 34 ABY is referencing Star Wars: Timelines's date for "Rebuilding the Resistance," as opposed to Timelines's dating for season 1. Even though both seasons take place in 34 ABY, would it make more sense to cite the date to season 1, as that transpires first? StarWarsFan327Talk 17:45, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
    • Apologies for taking so long. Must have missed these. The date ref was a mistake, so have changed to a S1 ref date.
  • In "Rebuilding the Resistance," Hugh confirmed Kaz was expelled from the academy "a couple of times." I understand this may be an instance that couple is a more general number, but I think the wording should be altered, as I would interpret it as being less than saying "multiple times." StarWarsFan327Talk 17:45, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Duel on Kalakar Six

  • Nominated by: Commander Code-8 Hello There! 08:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Just once Maul should get resurrected and live a nice happy life as a scuba instructor
  • Word count at nomination time: 3272 words (391 introduction, 2393 body, 488 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Comics

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

  • Brought this up in the Discord a while ago to no response but there's a bit of a headache that I'm hoping this nomination will resolve: I haven't found a source that explicitly states that the ones behind Maul's resurrection were the Prophets of the Dark Side. In the comic, they refer to themselves as "adherents to the dark side," and if you're just looking at the comic, it's implied that they're remnants/descendants of Baron Yorn's movement. It's been assumed that they were Prophets way back when the article was created in 2006, and this information is repeated across numerous articles, which is why I haven't gone and removed it without getting other editor's inputs. The closest we have to confirmation is that Kalakar Six is located in the Dromund system, but that's still not as satisfactory as I would like. Hoping there's just an obscure source/forum comment that clarifies this, otherwise I'll have a bit of rewriting to do. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 08:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Additional sources: —DKS MaXoO (talk) 04:26, 29 October 2025 (UTC)


Unidentified Gran guard

  • Nominated by: Stake black msg 13:29, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1176 words (122 introduction, 853 body, 201 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:VISIONS, WP:NOVELS

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote CometSmudge (talk) 03:11, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comet
  • The last sentence of the first intro paragraph seems redundant, so I think it should be reworded or cut
  • The final bio section looks like it has room for an image, probably of the Ronin
  • I think the rest of the Traveler's quote could be used in the bio
  • I think you could mention the Traveler's response to the Gran, as well as when they warm the Ronin about him
  • I don't think we can duck test his hat as being a sedge hat, especially since it's different from the other designs labeled as sedge hats
  • The article says the Ronin gave the chief his own lightsaber's crystal, but he actually gives him Kouru's
  • Is the skirmish at Osou spaceport actually days later? I checked and it only seems to be a single day after CometSmudge (talk) 02:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • The Ronin needs context and linking in the intro
  • The infobox says he has dark hair, but the body doesn't give any hair color CometSmudge (talk) 02:37, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
    • Done. Stake black msg 11:02, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
      • The infobox says dark, but the body says black. It should be made consistent, and I don't think a specific color can really be listed since all the images are in black and white.
  • The Ronin being a former Sith isn't citable to "The Duel"
  • I think the timeline in A handsome bounty is still a bit off. The Ronin meets the Traveler the day after the skirmish, and they head to Osou together. Once they reach Osou, they split up, and that's when the Traveler encounters the Gran in the cantina. Then a few hours after they split up, the Traveler finds the Ronin again and warns him about the Gran. CometSmudge (talk) 19:43, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Riot Control Walker

  • Nominated by: OOM 224 18:31, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Han Solo complaining and generally being useless in the first half of this comic works so well for some reason lol
  • Word count at nomination time: 1074 words (71 introduction, 732 body, 271 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB, WP:LEGO, WP:COMICS, WP:VG

(1 Inqs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 04:11, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. StarWarsFan327Talk 15:03, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

spookly
  • Sources seems to have two {{1stm}} used; were they meant to be simult or something else?
  • Sort of the general mind that a 4-paragraph BTS (or any section really) isn't the most ideal where it can be easily avoided, what with precedent and aesthetic and that. The last two paras of that are super short; perhaps better merged?
  • We usually give full dates for magazines of most types; was curious about that 59th issue mentioned and whether the reference on the media page can't be used for that full date. To my knowledge we've been taking ones like that as valid for other SAs.—spookywillowwtalk 18:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
    • The 1stm was a result of the LEGO videos being recategorised to a Source, so I've removed that and rejuggled the BTS accordingly. The missing date was just me being forgetful 😅 OOM 224 20:29, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Sienar TF73

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 21:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: GA that lasted long…
  • Word count at nomination time: 1099 words (150 introduction, 733 body, 216 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB, WP:AST

(2 Inqs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 03:44, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 02:26, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
  3. StarWarsFan327Talk 17:22, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

spookly
  • That October 13th date isn't citable to the appendix itself. It should probably use the Substack ref like Jero system.
  • Seems like it isn't categorized in Slice planets (and yes I realize that it's in the sector category here too, but according to the new category structure it still gets main overarching region + secondary region + sector cat since they're not full overlaps.
  • A redirect present in intro and body.—spookywillowwtalk 18:34, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Lew
  • Should the appendix be listed in sources? And also counted as a 1stID? Seems like it should just be the Galaxy Map in this instance Lewisr (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
SWfan
Editor
  • I recognize that this might be a controversial suggestion, but I think that Luthen's line from "Welcome to the Rebellion" can be reflected in some form. Something along the lines of, "After Andor's success on Sienar, Rael pondered if something greater had been acting through Andor on Sienar and during his other missions." Editoronthewiki (talk) 21:39, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Pokkit

(3 Inqs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Inqvote OOM 224 23:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 17:42, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 18:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  4. StarWarsFan327Talk 17:00, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

SWFan
  • In the BTS, the citation to the release date does not say specific dates after December 10, asides from confirming they released one a week, and as a result, does not specify that "You Have a Lot to Learn About Pirates" released on December 24th. Perhaps to make it clearer, the citation template could be changed to match the release date Twitter citation that is on "You Have a Lot to Learn About Pirates," and specifies the exact date every episode released. StarWarsFan327Talk 13:32, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Yanibar

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 22:59, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1426 words (186 introduction, 999 body, 241 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:VG, WP:KOTOR, WP:TOR

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Fan
  • I'm going to push back slightly on assuming the TOR PC who did the Crew Skill mission here must be the Outlander. Shadow of Revan had content that was not directly part of the main story and therefore isn't assumed to have been canonically done by the Outlander. We already assume that each of the eight classes was on Rishi for one reason or another at that time based on the limited class-specific content released in the expansion, for example, and there's nothing saying that since the Outlander as a unified player character first fully began to take shape during the Revan expansion, therefore every canonical questline not part of the main story must also feature the Outlander to the exclusion of everyone else. We already have confirmation that the Outlander as a character distinct from the class stories existed earlier, with post-Eternal Throne content confirming that your Outlander was the one who defeated Malgus during the Illum questlines, but we don't assume that every (Republic) sidequest released since Illum therefore must feature the Outlander (whom, for article writing purposes, we treat as a Republic player). Since Shadow of Revan still has all eight separate player characters running around at the same time and the story unification into the Outlander is only confirmed to affect the expansion's main story, there's no reason to assume non-story content, including the Crew Skill missions released at that time, must be completed by the Outlander. If this were Crew Skill missions released in the Fallen Empire or any later patch, then I would say we could assume those were completed by the Outlander, since by KOTFE there's only the unified Outlander storyline. But before KOTFE I don't think there's enough evidence to be able to assume that anything not part of the main story must have been completed by the Outlander. Fan26 (Talk) 05:18, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
    • I mean, I'm pretty sure it was you who originally asked me to change it to the Outlander, so of course I'm fine with changing it back. :P Imperators II(Talk) 08:02, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
      • Lol I honestly have no memory of that, but if I did ask you to do so then I was definitely in the wrong. There is limited precedent for taking this route anyway re: Revan Crew Skill content, but firmly hammering it in both on the FAN Page and the project discord channel is a good step forwards. Fan26 (Talk) 03:23, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Shadow trooper

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 17:46, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Anil's, which went over due to various bits and bobs from various folk, and it'd been near wordcount for awhile. Towing up in his absence as there's minimal point in stripping it when it's mostly in good shape.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1031 words (92 introduction, 366 body, 573 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMBWP:BFWP:VG

(1 Inqs/2 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 Inq vote required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Sauronswill (talk) 23:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. StarWarsFan327Talk 13:08, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote OOM 224 20:40, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Eighth Brother's TIE fighter

  • Nominated by: NBDani TeamFireballLogo-Collider(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 06:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Ignore the WPs below. This is totally a WP:Inq project. Hey wait, ain't I supposed to be working on a GAN rn? <.<
  • Word count at nomination time: 1214 words (189 introduction, 765 body, 260 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Ambition and WP:Rebels

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. StarWarsFan327Talk 17:48, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

SWFan
  • I noticed the Facebook card also has miswritten Maul's species as "Zabrack." I think this should be mentioned somewhere, although I'm thinking it may be too unrelated to the Eighth Brother's TIE. I could see it being mentioned amongst the TIE's continuity errors, or perhaps this could also just be mentioned on Maul's page instead. StarWarsFan327Talk 14:32, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
  • In the equipment section of C1-10P's infobox, it calls his arms "Retractable grasping arms," as opposed to grasper arms. Are these supposed to be the same thing, as the page on "grasper arms" doesn't mention Chopper or the C1 model, and Chopper's page does not link to the grasper arms?StarWarsFan327Talk 17:24, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
    • The Audio description of the episode used the term "grasper arms" so that's what I went with. Most likely they're different words for the same thing, but that'd require research into both subjects and a possible merge, which imo is out of scope of this nom. NBDani TeamFireballLogo-Collider(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 17:29, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Bennet Sten

  • Nominated by: Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 02:29, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1079 words (169 introduction, 826 body, 84 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Dodz

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 21:37, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1363 words (282 introduction, 1029 body, 52 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:Comics

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Spinnaker

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Nadiem/Legends

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 17:29, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1336 words (205 introduction, 1039 body, 92 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:Comics

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Skifffy (talk) 21:22, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Skiff

Comments