Talk: Toprawa and Ralltiir/archive6

Annoyingly persistent user

Could you please do something about Starshiptrooper continuously adding false information to Trade Federation Troop Transport, despite being warned about it? I've used up by three reversions so I can't really do anything more. This person is the same IP that was editing the article as well. Thanks. - Brandon Rhea 15px ^(talk) 20:24, November 7, 2009 (UTC)

• Got it. Thanks. - Brandon Rhea 15px ^(talk) 20:41, November 7, 2009 (UTC)

Feedback

Hey there, I'm not yet as active as I'd like to be on Wookieepedia, but I was just looking for some feedback on something I had been working on for several months and recently finished. I manually went through all 365 days of the year and applied all Star Wars and Wookieepedia-related events to month articles. (Before this, all month articles were blank and served no purpose.) Would you mind letting me know what you think?
_{(January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)}
Thanks! – Noahferfer^Talk 15:37, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

Vast Empire

Hello again,

Couldn't help but notice you didn't answer my earlier question about the Vast Empire, and as to why our wiki page has been deleted. 24.203.224.149 03:16, November 9, 2009 (UTC)(Rogueboy)

• Well, you must not have looked very hard, because I did answer your question. You'll have to go back and look in my most recent talk archive. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:28, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

Your article was imported to the Star Wars Fan Wiki, a growing encyclopedia about fan projects and other aspects of the fan community. It's no longer on Wookieepedia because of the new notability guidelines for fan projects, which your article didn't meet. You can find your article on the Fan Wiki here. - Brandon Rhea 15px ^(talk) 04:24, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

Revert

Why did you revert my edit, I can see nothing that is out of date that was mentioned in those two sources. —Unsigned comment by Uurbeskar (talk • contribs)

Fanboys (2003) Problem

I sincerely apologize for causing any problems. I was completely unaware that the article had been previously deleted by an admin. Had I known this, I never would have recreated the article. However, what should be done about the 36 or so redlinks (I found the article on "Wanted Pages")leading to the page? Also, was there any way of knowing that the article had prerviously deleted as to prevent me from making this error in the future? Thanks. --Darth shohet 00:06, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Deletion

I did not create the template just to list the video game. Like I said before, the reason I created it is because with so many game versions - 6 different platforms, 3 alternate storylines, 2 downloadable levels, multitude of playable models, and now the Sith Edition - almost every item requires some sort of a commentary in the appearances section anyway, and I just came up with a way to list them in a universal way. Now, would that make you reconsider your decision or... ? Mauser^Comlink 11:49, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

Re:

Yeah, sure. Is it preferrable that I add them to WP:VIP, or to an administrator I see on the RC? --Xd1358 ^Talk 18:29, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for noticing me :) --Xd1358 ^Talk 18:31, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

Alk'lellish

Could you type up the Star Wars: Rebellion: Prima's Official Strategy Guide's entry on Alk'lellish for me? --Eyrezer 12:22, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks. My understanding is that the Guide duplicates the game's encyclopedia entries, and therefore the game will not have any info either. Is that correct? --Eyrezer 21:19, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

On Fi Skirata

The Quote on Fi's page doesn't really seem to portray his actual feelings on the republic and i feel like the quote i used was much better i was wondering if you could mabye not change that. Because the Dha Werda quote sorta well sucks

• If you can push yourself to employ the necessary level of grammatical and punctuational skill required, your edits won't be reverted. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:11, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Tho'natu

Hey Tope, thanks for catching that, they should both have been there. Fixed now. :) Jonjedigrandmaster ^{(Jedi Beacon)} 18:39, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

Me being annoying

I don't have trouble with this, I haven't checked since those warnings were posted. And Progate Temple said that someone wanted to eat Luminara, instead of control her. Sorry if I had bad faith.—B-Boba Fett! ^{Make the check out to "Boba Fett"} 20px 01:51, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

R5-M2

Sure, I have issue 37, so I can take a look for you. Give me until tonight (my time) to get you the info. - Cavalier One20px^{(Squadron channel)} 09:24, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

From FF37, AST6 Astromech Droids - "Another droid which played a small but important role in the Rebellion against the Empire, R5-M2 was specially programmed to plot sublight tactical courses. Owned by charismatic Rebel Alliance officer Shawn Valdex, R5-M2 was pivotal to the successful evacuation of Echo Base during the Battle of Hoth." Hope that helps, Tope. - Cavalier One20px^{(Squadron channel)} 20:13, November 24, 2009 (UTC)

No, that was a typo. Stoopid speeling. :P - Cavalier One20px^{(Squadron channel)} 22:22, November 24, 2009 (UTC)

Redlins Tag on Holiday Special

Why did you put the Redlinks tag back on the page when the Appearances section has no red links at all, does it refer to the whole page (The Cast and Crew included)? Natonstan 21:00, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

• Correct. There are still about a dozen or so redlinks on that page. Until that number decreases to around three or less, the Redlinks tag is still appropriate. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:03, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

Articles needing review

Hey, Toprawa and Ralltiir. I noticed you had listed Fleebog for review because it didn't conform to the species article layout guide. I just wanted to let you know that in the future, you could post to my talk page first, and I'll fix whatever issues you have. Or, if you prefer, you could post to the article talk page. I'm much more likely to be able to see your concerns in either of those locations than on the AgriCorps page, and the article can be fixed much more quickly! Thanks, ~ SavageBob 03:48, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

• Very well. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:53, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Alright

Thanks for blocking him. Well, according to data, his real account may be a rollbacker, so, if the admins can't figure out who he really is, the staff may be able to.--Shade 23:47, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

• Whomever the individual is, is creating sockpuppets, in particular one to impersonate Shade Link. If it has not already been done I would suggest a IP Ban. --Kahn Iceay 19:32, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

Executor revert

Hey Toprawa, I was wondering why my edit to the Executor article was reverted, I was just making the citation a bit more specific. The information from those two paragraphs first appeared in the short story Gambler's Run in Galaxy Guide 5: Return of the Jedi, First Edition. I was just citing that information to the short story and adding short story to the Appearances section. Xicer920px^(Combadge) 00:59, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

Avenger in ROTJ

Hi! Thanks for the info about Avenger when discussing the Star Destroyer at the beginning of ROTJ. Since you had some references, would you care to add info on the Avenger-page, that Vader arrived to Death Star II with the Avenger? --Draii 21:42, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

• Well, he didn't exactly arrive at the Death Star via the Avenger. He arrived via the Executor, and apparently stopped over at the Avenger before boarding the Death Star, for reasons that have never really been explained in canon. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:48, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
  • possible, I know nothing of that. But what I do know is that right now the Star Destroyer in the opening sequence of ROTJ don't have a name, since nothing on Wookiepedia, tells that it's the Avenger, or any other craft. And since it both do a mimic of the classic Devastator-scene i ANH and makes the arrival of Vader, I think it's worth to mention. =) --Draii 21:52, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
    • The Star Destroyers in that opening sequence do have a name, even if there isn't much on Wookieepedia explaining it. If you look at the Death Squadron article, you will see this image with a caption explaining what Star Destroyers are there. If you would like to add this information to other articles, please feel free to do so. :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:54, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
      • Didn't realize that picture was from the movie. Great, I'll do some edits then. Great to finally know what Destroyer it is. Now next thing is to find the names of the two Destroyers chasing Falcon over Tatooine, with the Conquest. And the name of the two destroyers almost colliding with the Avenger in ESB =) Cheers! --Draii 21:59, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

separatist command center

Why is it "crap"? I'm still working on it.--Tellanroaeg 00:17, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

• Well, actual content is required for an article to exist. Meaning when you just create a new article and add nothing but a distorted and over-sized infobox with no actual written words, that's not enough to meet the very basic requirements of an article, which include a written description of the subject, Appearances and/or Sources, and an article category. These are all things to be found here and here. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:21, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes I understand that. But as I said, I'm still working on it. I'm new to uploading pictures and writing articles, so of course it won't be perfect the first time.--Tellanroaeg 00:26, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
    • It doesn't have to be perfect, but your initial edit does need to meet the minimal requirements. If you need a place to work or test edits, you are welcome to create a subpage or work in the Wookieepedia:Jundland Wastes. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:30, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
      • Ok, I understand. But how do I create subpages? Because if I'm working in the "sandbox" it may still be deleted before I'm done.--Tellanroaeg 00:40, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
        • Create a page at "User:Tellanroaeg/Whatever". "Whatever" can be whatever name you choose to call it. For example: User:Toprawa and Ralltiir/Zev Senesca. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:44, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
          • And it seem like you're already fairly competent at wiki editing and formatting. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:49, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
            • Thank you very much, this will help a lot. And there I can take my own time working on the articles, without someone deleting them?--Tellanroaeg 00:55, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
              • Correct. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:02, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Creating Articles

This is a separate follow up on the subject of recreating previously deleted articles. I am choosing to bring this up because, upon finding articles that need to be created, many of them have fit these descriptions. Lets say an article was deleted simply because it was unverified or purely composed of content completely unrelated to the subject of the article (pertaining to Wookieepedia or not). Are there any other reasons an article could be deleted but recreated if the error was fixed? If so, I would greatly appreciate if you could list some as it would greatly help me contribute to and improve Wookieepedia. What would your ruling be on this? Thanks a lot. --Darth shohet 01:31, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

Are you serious? Is this actually such a huge deal? --Darth shohet 20:20, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

I feel I should also mention my first article creating "incident," if you will, was excused by SFH when I expressed my confusion to him. He said not to worry about it. --Darth shohet 20:26, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, you are right, and I should't get so worked up about it. I hope you understand that there are TONS of other things I pay more attention to in my busy real life. --Darth shohet 20:30, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

A new layout perhaps?

Hi. I'm wondering if it is possible to request a new layout. I was thinking there should be one specific to droids. Is this possible or just stuff I only think about? Thanks.--RC 1138^{I hate bugs!} 22:20, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

Reversion

Hi. Why did you revert my edit? -Nistra^Talk 23:41, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

• Because the Kolto article is currently a Good article, meaning all new edits must adhere to the Good article rules, which that one did not. If you would like to try again, while making sure to follow these guidelines, you are more than welcome. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:11, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
  • I am aware that it's a Good article, but what in my edit did not adhere to the rules? Was it the sentence flow? -Nistra^Talk 00:16, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
    • I didn't actually read through your writing, but the end of each paragraph or tidbit of independently-verified information must be properly sourced. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:34, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
      • I did add a reference at the end of the paragraph, since it was all taken from the same source, but I can add several if that is preferable. Thanks for the quick replies. -Nistra^Talk 00:44, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of I.M.P.S.: The Relentless article

Please explain the deletion of the aforementioned article. (I can see the Relentless is mentioned in the TROOPS article, however, I was unable to find references to any of Blacksheep Production's fan movies.) —Unsigned comment by 89.133.170.153 (talk • contribs)

Question on Jedi Council

Hi, Toprawa and Ralltiir! I wanted to ask you a question since you're an administrator. Is that Yarael Poof next to Coleman Trebor and isn't Poof supposed to be dead by ep 2? And where's Adi Gallia? Thanks dude! Simpson Homer 03:00, December 15, 2009 (UTC) User: Simpson Homer File:Jedicouncil2.jpg Never mind —Unsigned comment by Simpson Homer (talk • contribs)

RE:

I am not “creating drama on this wiki” I simply resent being lectured on the civility policy by a user who breaches the civility policy himself. The statement: “No one cares about whatever it is you're whining about” is a breach of the civility policy under: Examples of incivility: Rudeness. However I did not intend to breach the civility policy (I don’t believe I did) and will avoid doing so in the future. Galen Merik20px^{Talk page} 02:25, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

Please be civilised

Hello Toprawa and Ralltiir this is Galstone Jattzan, I noticed that you have been extremely unpolite against many people, including Galen Marik, as you quote is offensive.

Now, if I leave the message as that, you would probably just give the same response to me as Galen Marik (or worse). Look, I am not trying to be personal or anything, I simply want to make things better on this wiki. I also know since you are a admin, you wield great power, so I will respect you.

--Galstone Jattzan 18:21, December 19, 2009 (UTC)Galstone JattzanGalstone Jattzan 18:21, December 19, 2009 (UTC)--

Inqmoot

Hello, Toprawa.

I want to apologize to you for not having been able to attend the Inqmoot this past weekend. Unfortunately, something in real life came up a few hours before that prevented me from attending or even leaving notes. Many thanks to you and Grunny for running it. It seems to have been quite a productive meeting. Merry Christmas, Toprawa. Have a splendid day. — Fiolli ^{{Alpheridies University ComNet}} 19:08, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

I'm Already Mad!!!

Hey there T & R, I'm already mad! All the pages I looked at are blocked! This site sucks, you suck and I'm mad!!!!!!!!!!!! --Mr.101 02:08, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

Wampa

Hello, Toprawa. Just wondering - is it really appropriate to have unlicensed, non-canonical source in the featured article? Mauser^Comlink 17:52, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

• That's really not for you to decide on your own. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:53, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
  • Let's assume it isn't, but what are your arguments for keeping it there? Mauser^Comlink 17:54, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
    • No, we're not assuming. It's not for you to decide on your own. I've warned you before about going around and making sweeping unilateral changes to articles on this wiki without consulting anyone, and this falls right into that category. You're inching closer to a time out every time we have to have this discussion. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:58, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
      • Cheez, I'm not even fighting to remove it or anything. I just can't understand why do you choose to keep it there, that's all. Mauser^Comlink 18:03, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
        • I don't "choose" to keep it up there, I follow site policy. The fact is, there are other users on this wiki who would "fight" to keep these articles around. Frankly, I don't care what we do with them, because they're entirely worthless either way you look at it, IMO. But until we do reach a formal consensus to remove them, we're not going to just up and do so by ourselves. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:08, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
          • That's what I wanted to hear, thank you. On a completely unrelated note, The Nightsister's Revenge features a lot more info on Wampas than there is in the article at the moment - both text and some nice images I'm extracting at the moment. I'm hoping to get to updating the article in the following days, so please do not fully-protect it , okay? =) Mauser^Comlink 18:12, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
            • Yeah, I've been hearing rumors about substantial missing content. I would appreciate if you could show me the text and allow me a crack at adding the updates myself, if that's not too much trouble. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:15, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
              • I've added all the cards with images of wampas on them to the sources section. I have all the card images on a flash drive, but it'll be almost a week before I had internet access hooked up at our new house to be able to do much more than what I've already done. - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 18:20, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
                • Neither I nor the article are in a hurry to do anything. :P Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:21, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
                  • The tricky thing is, the content is extremely fractured. Some bits of info are in the random card's lores, some are in the scenario campaign. I'll get the latter into the textual form eventually and will add it onto here, but at the moment I only have it in the game client itself. Mauser^Comlink 18:23, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

Cadavine Sector Fleet Imperial Enclave

Here's a whole selection of tan delights for you. File:VisitExoticLocals.png File:JetPackPortfolio.PNG File:Walker'sEdTraining.png File:VanishingPoint.PNG File:JetPackPortfolio2.png File:JetPackPortfolio3.PNG File:MaxPoinst.png You should probably orphan anything you don't think you can use.SinisterSamurai 07:32, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

Linking practices

Hey, Toprawa. Thanks for your Fuzzum review; I'll make your requested changes shortly. I do indeed make it standard practice to check all links in my articles to make sure none go to redirects or disambiguation pages, but I embarrassingly missed a couple in the article, as you found when you reviewed it. However, I'm more curious about pipe link capitalization. Do you know why it's standard practice here to write pipe links with initial capitals? For example, what's the reason we do [[Starship/Legends|spacecraft]] as opposed to [[starship/Legends|spacecraft]]? I've participated in a few other wikis, and this is the only one that does this, hence my slowness in breaking the old habit. I was just curious if there was a reason behind it. Thanks for your review and for your help, ~ SavageBob 22:45, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks for the explanation! ~ SavageBob 22:50, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

FA Images

What are the specific criteria? thanks in advance. Dangerdan97 01:43, January 7, 2010 (UTC)

• Is there a minimum pixel count? I need to know the lower acceptable limit for when I re-scan the image. Dangerdan97 01:47, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Don't re-scan anything. The full image that image comes from is as good of quality as you will get as it came directly from the Wizards website. - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 01:58, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
    • Sooo... how does the image get included in the article, then? Not at all? That seems counterproductive to the wiki. Dangerdan97 02:03, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
      • The image is pretty crappy, and it's kind of a stretch fitting it into the article as is. I'd just as soon not include it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:04, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
        • It's the only image of a TIE shuttle that isn't a teeny blurry speck or an obviously photoshopped bomber. Heck, it's the only fully original art of a TIE shuttle at all. I'll drop the matter if standards really are more important than comprehensiveness. Would putting a thumb of the whole orignal image (with indicative subtitling) be acceptable? Dangerdan97 02:10, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
          • Obviously photoshopped? The main image is from the official Databank entry. Of course it looks very similar to a bomber. It was a specially modified TIE bomber. - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 02:17, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
            • Point taken, but regarding my question..? Dangerdan97 02:18, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
• It's not a matter of comprehensiveness. It's whether or not the text of the article can support X number of images. Currently, the textual portion of the article is holding as many images as it can reasonably support, and we usually do not include images below the BTS section, because it just looks bad in most cases. And we don't need to include every single image available of a subject as long as the images in the article illustrate everything that needs to be shown, and there's very little in this RECG image that isn't already demonstrated in the other images. But I've thrown your image is in there for the hell of it. Enjoy. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:25, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • I'm grateful for the special consideration! Dangerdan97 02:37, January 7, 2010 (UTC)

Removal of article??

Any particular reason for removing my article "Knightings on Dac" and why you thought it "bloody confusing?

-Just wondering so that I might improve. —Unsigned comment by MrMuse 92 (talk • contribs)

Some BTS info for your Wampas.

250px Or perhaps it's a new addition to the history and characteristics. Or maybe you hate me. SinisterSamurai 04:54, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Review

Apologies. I assure you that it was not my intention at the time of the nomination to wait for it to pass, then revert things to the way I wanted them. I hadn't taken particular note of that part of the copy-edit, and it was not until December, when I was re-reading it, that I noticed the difference. Another of my noms, Larrim, had the exact same line in it and had recieved 4 support votes by that time without incident, so I assumed that there was nothing wrong with my version and changed it back to what I personally believed was better.

In hindsight though, your version was better. Anyway, enough dodging the issue at hand. I've reverted the edit I made. Thanks for telling me :). SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is the truth)} 06:52, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

• Got it. Thanks, 21:45, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Executor

No, actually. It only appears in the background during the Battle of Hoth. QuiGonJinn 20px^(Talk) 17:13, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

• I'd say closer to the end of the battle, since the Rebel evacuation is well underway by that point. QuiGonJinn 20px^(Talk) 17:23, January 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Hello again. I've replayed the game and found out that the Executor also appears in the background during the Battle of Endor. While he is aboard the Death Star, X2 is also told that the Executor is about to crash into the station. There appears to be no contradictions or new information, but I thought you may want to know this. QuiGonJinn 20px^(Talk) 16:09, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

Rahm Kota pre-nom

Hey Tope; as discussed can you look over my User:Cavalier One/Kota|Kota rewrite with an eye towards the linking when you get the time? I want to get this one right :P Grunny ran through it with an AWB check, so it shouldn't be overlinked. Thanks in advance, - Cavalier One20px^{(Squadron channel)} 16:10, January 20, 2010 (UTC)

Hey Tope; I made the changes on Kota's article, so it you could give them a once over when you have five minutes, I'd be grateful. Looks like I'm still underlinking though, which is pain :P - Cavalier One20px^{(Squadron channel)} 12:01, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

Appearances of Executor

Hey Toprawa, I noticed you locked the Executor article edits. I just want to let you know there is missing (Mentioned only) Appearance from Darksaber (novel). Thanks.--Jedi Marty 00:58, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

Yoda in Action!

I noticed earlier today you deleted Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Yoda in Action!. I don't know how badly the creator of that article had written it, but I thought I'd let you know it is a legitimate book and not fanon. - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 02:20, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

• Yes, I'm aware. What I deleted was vandalism, at best. If you can recreate the page properly, please feel free. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:48, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

Kowakian monkey-lizard

I'm confused. What else do you think deserves to be mentioned? That the monkey-lizard teased Ahsoka and that she glowered at him? It plays a very bit part in the episode, unless I missed it somewhere. ~ SavageBob 05:02, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

• Sorry if that came off as irritated or angry. I agree that the article needed to be updated, but I'm wondering what else you think should be included from the appearance. Are you just interested in a bit more context for the monkey-lizard's appearance with the two Weequay? ~ SavageBob 23:34, January 25, 2010 (UTC)
  • You're welcome to expand it as you see fit. I figure any kind of appearance deserves more than a one-sentence blurb about what's going on. Without looking at it, you can probably explain under what circumstances Ahsoka ran into the creature; what year it happened; where specifically it happened on Coruscant; etc. Use your imagination. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:46, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Inuse

• Sorry about that, I had just noticed my mistake when I saw your revert. OLIOSTER ^(talk) 20px 18:55, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

re: reversion, Vil Dance

Any particular reason you reverted my edit on the Vil Dance page? It seemed legitimate to me, considering the amount of useless trivia and information most "Behind the scenes" sections have.--SOCL^comm 03:53, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: TC

To be honest, I'm not incredibly well versed in NJO information, but from what I can tell having read the previous article and offhand knowledge, most of it seems to be there. I'll add anything in the future I find to be missing. Thanks. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 22:58, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

Staying civil

In the interests of future constructiveness, what would be the best way to approach off-topic discussion in the forum threads, i.e. an acceptable mode of discourse for dissuading such behavior, and encouraging new thread creation? BTW, thanks for the latitude, I won't abuse your generosity. Dangerdan97 20:02, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

deletion of zuckuss prius

why did you delete my zuckuss' prius page? i know it was badly written but I was improving it when you deleted it. PLease reply. Hunter 4-LOM 19:12, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

• WP:NFP
• WP:MOS
• WP:LG
• Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:15, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

fine, you can make your own snake eater page

deletion of snake eater page

why did you delete my snake eater page! I didn't see anyone else making the page.

RE:Sorry

I didn't know that. It wont happen again. Loneshark1138 20px ^{(Comlink Active} 18:59, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Editing Ahsoka

Excuse me but I was trying to make an edit to Ahsoka Tano to say that she's a practitioner of Ataru. I read in the Form IV: Ataru article, in the practitioners section, that Ahsoka practiced Ataru in the The Clone Wars: Wild Space book. The trouble is I know I'm supposed to source it but I don't know how to source it. In the sources area of Ahsoka Tano's article, I can't find The Clone Wars: Wild Space but it is in the Ataru sources section. I know that she uses Ataru and if you don't believe me read through the Ataru practitioners section. You might have to read it carefully but I assure you she is mentioned in it. Do you think you could help me with the sourcing?

OK what the hells going on?! I've made changes to Ahsoka's Personality and Traits and Powers and Abilities, and I've sourced them, and the computer automatically thinks I'm abusing it or whatever the hell happens when you put something wrong on this site. Why can't I just edit it for goodness sake?!--UnlimitedPower 21:47, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Coruscant

Hey, Tope. For the Battle of Coruscant article, Yoda's db entry confirms that he's a High Jedi General. As for the rest of the Jedi listed under that infobox, Obi-Wan and Mace should be the other two, as they're confirmed to be High Jedi Generals as well. Hope that helps. :) I see that some anon was reverting you, and it appears that their was some confusion with who's a High Jedi General and who isn't. JangFett ^(Talk) 19:25, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Question about Darksaber (lightsaber)

I see that you removed the TC tag. Is the debate about whether or not to keep the article over? Marko14126 00:22, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

• That particular discussion thread has expired. I imagine the debate will persist for some time. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:26, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

RE:GAN

I understand this, however, I've been reviewing John Jackson Miller's comments on blog and his production notes for certain issues. From these, it says that "Squinquargesimus" was not Malak's real name, which is why I reverted all references of Squinquargesimus back to Alek. And when it passed the GAN, the article listed his name as Alek, in CC's review for Malak in the FAN, he said he'd leave the decision on using Alek or Squinquargesimus to me.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:48, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

• Alright, I'll be sure to use the edit summary in the future. Sorry for the confusion and all.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:54, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Things

Yes, I will do that, but I'm doing my best for this Wiki.--Station7 22:31, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

That's a good idea. I will doing that tommorow. As the time not different was I would read it.--Station7 22:40, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I've read everything what you gave me.--Station7 18:21, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

And I did not use that about that source. That was someone else.--Station7 18:27, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

why did you just delete my thing?

Ok so i just joined this wiki thing because im a huge fan of the star wars saga and the first thing that i decide to write, i look up and says that you deleted it! So what im trying to ask is why! why? why oh why oh whyyyyyyy??????!???!???!? Darth hossboy 03:06, February 21, 2010 (UTC) darth hossboy

• Does that really need explanation? Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:07, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Vandelism, hey. Well you just deleating stuff like that, and not for the first time. Rember Darth hossyboy. You are the one vandeliming this site, you mark my words. —Unsigned comment by 86.130.23.26 (talk • contribs)

Tarsus Valorum

Thank you very much. Wow, actually. I did not realize that there was so much written on him.

GreenJedi 03:07, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Darth Maladi page..

Why did you undo my changes to the Darth Maladi page? Did I need permission first before I could make any changes?--DarthKenny 04:45, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Padawan Pack

Hallo here is Station7 again. I have a question. on the page of Padawan Pack we see that the name and death-sign symbole are on each other. A user did it back in it's old version. But the Station7+ (example) are so on each other. While it has to be Station7 + (example). Am I right?--Station7 19:05, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

• I have no idea what you're trying to say. Please speak English. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:13, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • I'm doing my best. Do you want to look at the old version he did at that page? And my version? Then you see the difference.--Station7 19:36, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
    • I think I understand what you mean now. Whether or not there needs to be a space between the name and the death symbol. The Padawan Pack page is correct as is. No space is necessary. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:38, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
      • This is my version:[1] and this the old version:[2]. Which one is better? i'm Dutch so that's the problem.--Station7 19:38, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
        • The older version is correct. No space. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:40, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

References

Hey, Tope. What is the big deal with the references to the characters in the CSWE?--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:40, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Fireball (Clone trooper article)

Hello, Could you please restore the Fireball article? I was in the process of fixing it when you deleted it. Thank you. Corellian Premier 00:51, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

• I would suggest creating a subpage or utilize the Jundland Wastes sandbox to practice creating this article first instead. Wookieepedia mainspace articles are not the place to test your edits. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:10, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Jordi Skirita

Why did you delete the Jordi Skirita page?Please either bring it back or create one for him. I made him out of a clone arc fig. PLEASE bring him back. —Unsigned comment by 173.108.73.85 (talk • contribs)

"Greek" alphabet

There's a new Hyperspace article about various writing systems, and apparently alpha, lambda, and delta are all part of the Tionese language. I tried to move Secondary alternate alphabet to Tionese language, but it said only admins could merge or something. Would you mind doing so? Thanks! (If you're a Hyperspace member, the article is located at http://starwars.com/hyperspace/source/writtenword/index.html?page=3). —Milo Fett^[Comlink] 20:14, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

• Never mind, it's merged. —Milo Fett^[Comlink] 22:33, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

voting policy

where can i see the number of mainspace edits ive made...specifically if i have twice as many as i do non-mainspace ones..thank you ASDF123920px ^Discussion 05:18, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks ASDF123920px ^Discussion 05:24, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Backlash

Sure. Without going into much detail, Luke compared a lightsaber slash/wound he made to a Rancor in terms of injury it would cause to a Tauntaun or Wampa. ToRsO bOy 19:20, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Ravilan

Hey, I noticed you took off the Inuse marker on the Ravilan article. I'm just writing to let you know that I am still working on that article on my PC, I expected it to be done sooner but there were some unforeseen difficulties that have slowed my progress on the article. I'll put the Inuse marker back up when I'm closer to finishing it if thats OK. Thanks. —Obi-wan Jacobi 17px 22:02, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

• Yup, fine with me. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:03, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Awesome, thanks again. —Obi-wan Jacobi 17px 22:42, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Edits to Merrejk and Gherant

The Return of the Jedi script does mention both Merrejk and Gherant, calling them both commanders, how come my edits were reverted? Hanzo Hasashi 20:41, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

The Long Shot Campaign: Appearances

From now onward, I'll consider The Long Shot Campaign to be an Appearance rather than a Source as you said, but I'm still unsure about whether it is covered by the community decision you've mentioned. TLSC is a 36-page text including a 16-page adventure ("Tests of the Godking"), a 9-page section of "adventure outlines" (similar to those provided in the source Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game, First Edition pages 115 to 121) and, first and foremost, an 11-page description of a RPG environment, similar to that in Galaxy Guide 10: Bounty Hunters (which, btw, is a source but includes an adventure in the last pages). To avoid further controversy, TLSC is an appearance until further notice, O.K.? --Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:24, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Lightsaber Lost

Hey, Tope. Can you clarify what you think needs updating on Kowakian monkey-lizard? I thought I already updated the article for Lightsaber Lost and then updated it again because you didn't think my first try was enough. What else needs to be added? ~ SavageBob 20:53, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

And here's the diff, just FYI. ~ SavageBob 20:55, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

• This guy, specifically. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:59, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Ah-hah, thanks for the pointer. I'll see what I can do. ~ SavageBob 00:01, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Operative

I been wondering why wookiepedia did not have an article on the operative occupation. I decided to make one. It wasn't respecting wookipedia's standard. So I cut the part I thought wasn't conforming the standard, but now I got a vandalism message on my talk page and the article still got the "sorry about the mess" quote. I'm stuck! Spryquasar 21:37, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks for your help Spryquasar 22:13, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Categories

Hey TP. The reason I did so is that not all entries in Category:Rogue Squadron personnel are pilots. We have droids, mechanics and etc included. Another thing, I checked a few other profiles like Luke and Han, they have pilot and squadron personnel profile categories. I've stopped for the moment until I get the green light. ToRsO bOy 01:01, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

• I see, it just seemed incomplete for the other entries especially for the ones without pictures. My mistake then for using those as benchmarks. Thanks for the heads up, I'll clean my own mess. ToRsO bOy 01:16, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

TC on B-series

Hey Tope! I know you won't like this, but I have found evidence for the recently closed TC on the B-Series. It is explicitly mentioned in The Clone Wars Campaign Guide on page 196 in the OOM-series battle droid entry, here is the corresponding quote:

"Although technically superior to (and less expensive than) their replacements, the B-Series battle droids and super battle droids, OOM-Series battle droids are viewed..."

Greets, Tyber ^{J. Kenobi's Droid} 18:22, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

• Well, good luck to someone reverting and undeleting everything. Because I'm not doing it. It would help if you actually looked for evidence for this stuff while the TC is still ongoing. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:44, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • I wasn't actually looking and had closed the TC for myself. But I just did some research for Jedipedia's new wiki portals and stumbled over this, and I wanted to bring it to your attention. Tyber ^{J. Kenobi's Droid} 18:49, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
    • Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:54, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, Tope, will you at least restore the B-series article and all it's revisions? I'll then move it B-series battle droid per the above stated source. JangFett has already started adding information back in and I'll be joining him in that massive endeavor. Thanks. - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 20:24, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

• Done. Thanks to both for handling this. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:26, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Thanks Tope. I've also asked Grunny, as they deleted it, but I'm not sure they're around right now. Would you also restore Category:Images of B-series battle droids please? Thanks in advance. - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 20:34, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
    • Grunny made all the changes for the categories with his bot to save time. You might want to ask him to recategorize everything with the bot again. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:37, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

Hamill

Yeah that was a mistake, I thought I was reverting the vandalism. That's what I get for not paying attention :) Sorry about that. Omicron 21:35, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

Recent edit rejection

hi,there needs to be a page on planet killer (as featured in star wars clone wars adventures (volume 2)) but when I click on it, it just redirects back to the superweapons page! help me please! Jacensolo148 —Unsigned comment by Jacensolo148 (talk • contribs)

• I can help you, but I'm not convinced "Planet killer" shouldn't remain a redirect to "Superweapon." You'll have to do a better job of explaining what you're talking about. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:43, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • there needs to be a page on the planet killer as it is a seperate superweapon. how can i create one? sorry for any confusion. --Jacensolo148 19:46, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
    • Well, odds are we already have an article for whatever it is you're talking about. What is it, exactly, that you're referring to? Perhaps I can point you in the right direction. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:48, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

its ok, got it working, sorry about that. it turns out that Planet killer, is down as Planet Killer!--Jacensolo148 20:03, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

Mutiny on the Rand Ecliptic

You said here that you have some information about the original short story about the mutiny on the Rand Ecliptic. Could you help me combining that information to the article?--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 21:23, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

I could kiss you for that! Thanks a LOT!!! I love RPG-books and SW short stories!--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 21:34, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

After reading the short story I still see slight problems in combining it to the info from Darklighter but not so much. They are just running their own separate schemes and that's that. Thanks again from the link. I think I will find other useful things from there as well when I have enough time to search it through.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 21:52, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Is that last part in the "Aftermath" what you meant when saying it is not impossible to combine the stories? Did I hit anywhere close to get it correct?--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 20:12, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do about that. With Celchu trial I learned to first do the article well in English and only then translate it to Finnish. So we shall see what I get out of this one. Maybe even my first GA nom, who knows...--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 20:26, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Star Wars: The Further Adventures

The article is a real word article about a series of actual products. It is not an in universe article and thus does not need to be "verified". Stop putting the verify banner on it. The Broox 00:07, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

My edits have been in no way disrespectful. I never once thought that because I was a moderator elsewhere I would get special permission here, that is your own fabrication. You were continuously putting the Verify banner on an article that didn't warrant it. I simply asked you to stop. The Broox 00:29, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

• Incorrect. If it didn't take you a half-dozen edits to finally spit out what you wanted to say on the article, then no, the Verify template would not have been needed. But since I'm guessing no one, including myself, had any idea what the article was even meant to represent until you provided proper links, the Verify template was necessary until "verification" was provided. And you did not ask me to stop adding the template. You instructed me to do so after I politely asked you to either stop removing the template from the article or provide proper verification. That is what I found disrespectful, and what I'm asking you to check at the proverbial door. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:37, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re: FF

"Meanwhile, Brie was not dead. Her body had been recovered and taken to Darth Vader on his Super Star Destroyer Executor. There, Vader had Imperial scientists work round the clock to restore Shira to an operational state. This involved the use of prosthetic limbs and a life-support suit." Xicer920px^(Combadge) 19:11, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

sig

Why can I not have two colors? ~Darth Stabro 20:19, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

Mutiny again

I was reading Heliesk's article to help me with that Mutiny on the Rand Ecliptic article, when I noticed that who ever has written it has created rather different combination of the two stories than I did when writing about the mutiny. I don't know if there is any canonical evidence to back either reading, so we might both be suspected of "original reseach" and that is not allowed here. What should be done about that? I know some part of that was my bad since I didn't read Heliesk's article before doing that mutiny article that is mostly based on the version in Derek Klivian's article about the events.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 19:14, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Not much, I think. But the article about Rand Ecliptic itself is supporting the theory in Heliesk's saying that "neither of them knew that the Captain was a Rebel spy" or something like that. The main difference, I think, is in a way the timeline is reconstructed. I placed the events in Darklighter and short story on top one another while the reading used in Heliesk and Rand Ecliptic puts the events in Darklighter happen before those of the short story. But reading that other version I must admid that it makes as much sense as my version, I believe.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 19:26, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Help

Hey Toprawa,

I accidentally moved Force Sense to Force ense. Can you somehow undo the mistake I made please? Thanks.—Tommy ⁹²⁸¹ 19:29, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

• I was trying to decapitalize Sense, and somehow forgot the "s".—Tommy ⁹²⁸¹ 19:35, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • Thanks alot.—Tommy ⁹²⁸¹ 19:35, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

IRC

Toprawa, why'd you ban me from the IRC? I haven't done anything. (Sorry if you responed to me when I PM'd you, my computer is on the fritz.) NaruHina ^Talk 14px 21:54, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Toprawa please don't give me a warning

Toprawa please don't give me a warning i was just posting the correct information, please i didn't measn any harm , please don't give me a warning, i'll sign my posts next time and give more reason okay? —Unsigned comment by Masterclanner (talk • contribs)

• Ironic. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:19, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • look i just wanted to get the pirates redirected here changed, otherwise, i didn't mean to do anything, please, don't be angry at, i want to be a full helping member of this wiki!(Masterclanner 20:20, March 28, 2010 (UTC))
    • Then go and do it. And a user warning doesn't mean I'm angry. It just means you're failing at Wookieepedia is some way. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:22, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the info. 'Alpha85 20px ^{(Kamino Databank)} 20:45, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Inexpugnable FAN

Hey Tope! Thanks for reviewing my FAN for Inexpugnable-class tactical command ship. I reviewed your comments, corrected 5/6 of them, and provided some arguments against one (you asked that the remaining ships be identified after the loss of Courageous, but not all ships are named, and not all ships are confirmed to have been actively in service at the time.) So yea, thank you! Any more comments, let me know, and I shall do my best to fix the article up! Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith ^{-Just shy, not antisocial: You can talk to me!-} 15:05, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

• You're INQ voter number five! w00t! So what happens now? Thank you! Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith ^{-Just shy, not antisocial: You can talk to me!-} 19:00, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, there, my name's Back Again, and I just joined Wookieepedia. I found your link on my freind Wren T'Marred's page, so I thought maybe you could help me out. I know her in real life and I know she tends to think of herself as always right, and everyone else as always wrong. She told me a story of what got her blocked, but I know it probably isn't the whole truth, so, if you have the time, I was wondering if you could tell me what really happened --Back Again 16:48, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Five Blossom Bread

Toprawa and Ralltiir - please delete my addition for Five Blossom Bread. After rewatching the episode following your comment, I realize that I was mistaken in what I had originally thought the episode contained. --AdmiralTrench 00:47, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Nahdar Vebb Name

Hey, I have tried twice now to add to the Nahdar Vebb page. I add that his name may come from the spanish verb nadar, meaning to swim. But, you took down my edit. Why?

• Your edit has been reverted because it is unverified speculation. We try to avoid Behind-the-scenes speculation unless it is canonically connected to the article subject. For example, if the creator of that TCW episode had said specifically that Nahdar Vebb's name was inspired by the Spanish word. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:13, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Re:

Sorry about that—I wasn't sure about it at first, but then I remembered that they don't get the tags. I'm going back through and removing it from the ones that have them. Thanks for the heads up, I won't forget now. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 02:51, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

• K I'll go through and add the 1stm, but out of curiosity, which source would get the tag if they were released simultaneously? Because the news articles and timelines are published together. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 02:55, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

deathwatch assassin

hey toprawa and ralltiir i posted about the deathwatch assassin and isn't it boba fett? if not just let me know thx —Unsigned comment by 142.177.45.22 (talk • contribs)

Unidentfied stormtrooper

Toprawa I know I should not leave notes about GAN objections, but it's been two weeks and your objection on Unidentfied stormtrooper|this guy is fixed. Even if you don't want to vote for him or leave objetions; please strike the objection if you think it is fxied. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 11:08, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

• Sorry, Toprawa I didn't want to bug you. No offense. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 17:36, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Lemelisk

Hello Tope, I was just wondering, in regards to Bevel Lemelisk, which entry in the Encyclopedia has information missing from the article. I've checked Lemelisk's entry, which had a few minor semantic points to be added (which have since been added), and the Hefi entry doesn't seem to have yielded any extra info, so if you could point me in the direction of the relevant entries, it would be much appreciated. Cheers, Thefourdotelipsis 03:49, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

• OK, thanks for that. I think it must have something to do with Darksaber clashing with Galaxy Guide 5, in so far as Lemelisk not knowing that the Death Star had been destroyed when he was brought before Palpatine. Looks like Sansweet tried to fix that little gaffe, but then CSWE took a giant dump on it. I've added a note in the bio and rejigged the BTS though, hopefully to your approval. Thefourdotelipsis 04:47, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Will do, thanks again. Thefourdotelipsis 04:59, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Vandal

Here you go :). A perverted kid who vandalized Norba Nuum. Here is a good example--Shade 15:19, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

GAnom: Lauli Wahlo

I nominated the article Lauli Wahlo on the 3rd of April. You removed the GAnom on the 19th of April. According to one of the GAnom rules: All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks. Prior my absence this was still 3 weeks instead of 2, so it must have been changed during this period. I also have one question: does a nomination get terminated after not all the comments have been taken care of, or after a 2 week period after the last change has been made on the GAnom page of the article. If the first is true, I myself made a mistake with not fully understanding that rule. I would like to renominate the article. Is that possible, or is their some sort of 'waiting' period? —Jawaman ^(Talk) 14:53, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

• Thank you for answering my questions. In the future I will nominate an article only if I'm sure that I can edit on the Wook without being absent for a long period of time. Also, Lauli Wahlo will be renominated in a few days, I think. (Maybe a little cleanup is needed.) —Jawaman ^(Talk) 13:51, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks…

…for your link to Traavis' article, wasn't aware of that.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 04:29, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

"who hailed"

Sounds good. :thumbsup: —fodigg 20px ^(talk) | 19:29, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

• Cool. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:30, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Wynn and the other KotOR noms

Thanks for the kind words, I will ensure that I watch these articles regularly, I don;t want them getting stripped of FA or GA status.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 03:55, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Updating Malak

I just wanted to let you know that the recently-released The Secret Journal of Doctor Demagol does have relevant info on Darth Malak. I copied and saved it to mny drive, once I read through, I will add relevant info to the article.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 12:50, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Refs

I actually asked CC about this, and I might as well ask you, too. What is wrong with making a reference appear like this: ''[[The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia]]'' {{C|See ''character''}}? I thought this was a matter of personal preference more than anything, and it doesn't detract/add anything to the article. Sometimes, it's needed, since some of the entries include "Admiral", "Master", etc.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:21, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

• Alright, but do you have a problem with me putting the ref as is? If it is a big issue, I'll stop doing this, but if not, well, it's you call.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:30, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
  • OK, thanks. Don't worry, I never put that in the sources, with the occassional exception that you stated. An example would include Yuthura Ban, who is mentioned as "Yuthura" in Wynn's entry. Thanks again.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:42, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
    • And one more thing I'd like to add, I've decided not to use this ref style for the GA's anymore, unless it's absolutely necessary.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:48, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
      • Alright, thanks for you help, Tope.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:52, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Award

[[:File:MasterApprentice.jpg|thumb|right|200px|I, Jonjedigrandmaster, award Toprawa and Ralltiir with the Master and Apprentice award]] I, Jujiggum, hereby award you, Toprawa and/or Ralltiir, with the Master and Apprentice Award. You've been an immense help to me recently, assisting me to become a better article writer and reviewer, giving me all kinds of advice, putting up with and even answering my endless questions and concerns, retaining contact with me despite my IRC issues, and otherwise assisting me in becoming a better all-around user; and for all that you deserve a giant thank you, coupled with my undying gratitude. Sure, awards are pretty trivial, but in some cases they're due, and this is one of those cases. So here you go. Thanks so much for all the help, Tope. :) Jonjedigrandmaster 20px ^{(We seed the stars)} 19:49, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks a million, Tope! I do take pride in my accomplishments, but like I said, I wouldn't be the user I am today without your guidance. Jonjedigrandmaster 20px ^{(We seed the stars)} 14:15, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re:

Hahaha, no problem. :) Jonjedigrandmaster 20px ^{(We seed the stars)} 20:17, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

...

Why did't you do that with the PS2 page? —Unsigned comment by Collector1 (talk • contribs)

The Master link

Sorry about linking that to Arana. I've seen others users do it, so I assumed it was OK.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:05, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

• Not a problem. If it were pipelinked to a specific article, like Jedi Master or Sith Master, that's one thing. But it's probably unnecessary in this instance. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:07, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Ravilan

Hey Toprawa,

Sure thing. I'll try to be on tonight between 11pm-12am est., if you're available. Thanks,—Tommy ⁹²⁸¹ 20:53, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Order 66 podcast

I'm sorry but I don't understand why this was tagged for notability. The lead designer for Saga Edition, Rodney Thompson, has been on it thirteen times so far. Is that not official recognition from Lucasfilm Ltd? Also Sam Witwer, aka Galen Marek, has been on it 8 times.