Talk: SavageBob/Archive 08

Dathomirian vs Dathomiri

Hey, Savage. I don't suppose you remember our discussion about "Dathomirian vs Dathomiri" we had on this talk page, but I've finally found evidence that "Dathomiri" is indeed a demonym and not a racial term.

1. In Darth Plagueis, Darth Maul is referred to as "a male Zabrak, but not of the Iridonian sort; rather, a Dathomirian". Later in the book, Palpatine says: "I found such a one on Dathomir not a year ago. A male Dathomiri Zabrak infant." While the first occurrence is clearly a mention of species (a Dathomirian), the second one states Maul's origin.
2. In Nightsaber, the word Dathomiri is used to qualify both the "Dathomiri Force witches" and the "Dathomiri underground."
3. Much more conclusive, Fate of the Jedi: Backlash uses expressions such as "Dathomiri spaceport", "Dathomiri clans", "Dathomiri knife", "Dathomiri orbit" and "Dathomiri rain forest."

However, it should be noted that "Dathomirian" has been used inappropriately to qualifiy Humans living on Dathomir:

1. Charal's old Databank entry listed her as a Human and a member of the "Dathomirian Nightsisters"
2. I cannot check just now, but I believe Gethzerion too has been called a Dathomirian in some RPG sourcebooks, despite being established as Human in The Essential Guide to Characters.

This raises a specific problem on the identification of species when it comes to Dathomiri characters. For example, Tribeless Sha's article has her as a member of the Dathomirian species. However, Backlash simply says she is "a Dathomiri woman."

Now that we have more evidence, I'd like to hear your thought about this. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:27, November 20, 2012 (UTC)

• Well, I wonder if we can simply cite The Essential Reader's Companion as evidence that the Singing Mountain Clan, at least, are Human. They're listed as such on the entry for The Courtship of Princess Leia. However, Gethzerion seems to have been retconned as a Dathomirian, since that's listed as her species on the same page. So, yes, I think the burden of proof would be on establishing a character as being of the Dathomirian species rather than simply being a Human from Dathomir (and hence a Dathomiri). ~Savage 15:32, November 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Moreover, The Essential Atlas states that Dathomir hosted only about 5,200 inhabitants, 97% of which were Human. That means the percentage of Dathomirians is definitely negligible, especially since most of them were massacred by Grievous. However, I wonder wheter Gethzerion was actually retconned as a Dathomirian of blood or if it's just another use of the term "Dathomirian" as a demonym—just like Charal. Asking Pablo Hidalgo would probably solve the mystery. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:38, November 20, 2012 (UTC)
    • That shouldn't be necessary; each book entry lists the principal characters with species in parentheses, so it's evident he intends her to be a Dathomirian by species. I'm away from the book at the moment, but I'll double check tonight just to make sure. ~Savage 16:03, November 20, 2012 (UTC)
    • Here's exactly how the book writes their species in the "main characters" list for The Courtship of Princess Leia: "Teneniel Djo, Witch of Dathomir (human female); Gethzerion, Nightsister (Dathomirian female)" (p. 296). However, in the caption for the image on the next page, we get, "Aboard the ruins of the Chu'unthor, Luke Skywalker defends himself from attack by the Dathomirian warrior Teneniel Djo." So, I suppose, Dathomiri and Dathomirian are both demonyms, but Dathomirian is more likely to be a species identity, and Dathomiri is never a species name. ~Savage 12:48, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
      • Thanks for the clarification. But why, oh why? Why on Earth did Pablo Hidlago feel compelled to make Gethzerion a Dathomirian? Darned Clone Wars steamroller... --LelalMekha (talk) 10:32, December 15, 2012 (UTC)

Nho'Apakk

Hello Bob, on Yodapedia Sompeetalay recently changed the Nho'Apakk article showing an image of him loading rocks onto a catapult, though I'm not sure if it's a film shot, or a production still. You can check the information here, and see if that can indeed be proven as Nho'Apakk. By the way, were you aware of that Blue Harvest behind the scenes photo where he was holding the movie slate? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:27, November 22, 2012 (UTC)

• Interesting. Thanks for alerting me! I've dropped a line on Sompeetalay's talk page to ask him about the identification. I'm a bit skeptical, since the Ewok in those pictures has striped fur, but the Nho'Apakk toy has fur that's all the same color. But maybe Som has some info I don't know about. ~Savage 21:00, November 24, 2012 (UTC)

CT

Hey, Bob. I noticed you were getting ready to propose a CT for how we handle unidentified species. Would it be ok if I made a suggestion for a possible addition to the proposal? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:28, November 27, 2012 (UTC)

• Hey, Tope, absolutely! I meant to ask you for input, but I was rushed and only had time to ping Menkooroo. I'd appreciate any feedback. ~Savage 01:57, November 28, 2012 (UTC)

Homeworld Security FA objection

Hey, I'm not sure if you know or not, I just noticed myself actually, but you still have an open objection at the end of your review for the Homeworld Security Command. If you could please take a look and make sure it got addressed, thanks! Cheers, Coruscantfan ^(Talk) 05:33, November 30, 2012 (UTC)

User 12

Thank you--12.71.5.221 17:38, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Concept art

Thanks for pointing those articles out. The issue that I noticed with the Zilkin article specifically (it doesn't seem to apply to the other articles) is that the sources that I removed were concept art of something that became the Zilkin species design, not concept art of Zilkins. I would agree that the sources should be listed in the glurrg article, as they were concept art of that subject, but it's different for the Zilkin—the original design was created years before The Clone Wars created the Zilkin species, so anything that preceded its conception shouldn't be treated as a depiction of the species. A Bts note would be appropriate, I think, but I don't find that the concept art depictions should be listed in the Sources list unless they specifically depict Zilkins. Hope I'm being clear. CC7567 ^(talk) 21:32, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

Unverified article

Hey. An article that you created back in August (Unidentified Rebel Alliance base (Datar)) was tagged {{Verify}} today by Borsk Fey'lya, who claims that the appearance given was invalid. If you can figure out what's going on, you might wanna save it. —MJ— _{Council Chambers} 22:48, December 14, 2012 (UTC)

Snoova

Hey Savagebob. I happened to be looking at the original barn burner page and saw the discussion related to Snoova apearing in Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds and I thought I'd help out even though its already an FA. The bounty hunter unit for the Wookiees is Snoova's sprite, and he is a unit that can be placed in the games level editor. This will need to be put in the appearances list (With an nc template next to it) and maybe a small Bts mention. Commander Code-8 ^{To say hi, press 42} 01:07, December 22, 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks for the heads-up! From what I remember from that discussion, the Wookiee bounty hunter unit is really a "generic" unit and is not supposed to represent Snoova as an individual, though. The ambiguity of the appearance is already discussed in the BTS of the article, but since it's not "really" him, we decided not to include it in the Appearances list. ~Savage 15:53, December 22, 2012 (UTC)
  • Well there's still his appearance in the level editor which is really Snoova, and that is a real appearance of him, but its just non-canon. Commander Code-8 ^{To say hi, press 42} 02:15, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
    • What do you mean? I haven't played the game, so what distinguishes the Snoova version of the sprite from the Snoova look-a-like version? ~Savage 06:26, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
      • The look-a-like version is just the sprite used for the bounty hunter created by the player in normal gameplay when using the Wookiees, but in the level editor, the player can put specific characters in their own levels that they can't use in normal gameplay, and Snoova is one of those characters. Both of these appearances are non-canon, as the scenario editor is non-canon and bounty hunters are not required to be created by the player in any of the canon Wookiee campaigns. Hope that clears it up. Commander Code-8 ^{To say hi, press 42} 07:21, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
        • Ah, that does help; thanks. However, the article currently says that Star Wars Battlefront: Renegade Squadron and Star Wars Battlefront: Elite Squadron are the games that have the Wookiee bounty hunter sprite. So is he in Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds too? ~Savage 15:33, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
          • I haven't played either of those Battlefront games, so I can't help you with those, but yes, he is in Galactic Battlegrounds. Commander Code-8 ^{To say hi, press 42} 22:07, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
            • So do you want to add this info to the article, or would it be easier if I did? Commander Code-8 ^{To say hi, press 42} 09:05, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
              • Hey, Commander! Sorry for the delayed response on this. I've been away for the holidays and haven't had consistent Internet access. Feel free to add the information if you wish. If not, I should be able to get to it in the next day or two. And Happy New Year! :) ~Savage 15:59, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

Good things come to those who wait...

... or don't they? I may be two days late, but it sure won't stop me from wishing you a merry Christmas! I guess I'll have more luck with the New Year's wishes! Thank you for your help on the Wook in 2012. --LelalMekha (talk) 23:49, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

• Merry Christmas to you, too! It's been a pleasure working with you over the past year. Here's to more to come! ~Savage 00:38, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Dulok

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Unidentified Dulok (X) has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Menkooroo (talk) 09:31, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Guineo question

Hello, I'm finally going to finish the Guineo article and would like to ask you a quick question. In your Draag article you mention the they had both male and female sexes. Can the same be said for the Guineo species? I know that the game said that the individuals in the game were male, but is that enough to establish that there were females as well? If so, can you give me the page number I can source it to? Thank you for your time.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 23:13, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

• Hmm. As the dictionary definition of male requires the existence of female, I think it's probably safe to assume they have females even if no source explicitly mentions as such. Of course, you could always say something like, "The Guineo had at least one sex, male" or something like that if you don't think the female assumption is warranted. ~Savage 16:02, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Hi, I wanna wish you a happy new year! :) --XXLVenom998 (talk) 15:37, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks! And Happy New Year to you, as well! ~Savage 15:52, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

Cite template

Hey SavageBob. I changed it because short stories aren't usually italicized, unlike Insider articles. Cheers. Stake black ^msg 00:03, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, Slake. Actually, there are two separate issues here. The first is italics versus quotes. In 99% of style guides, neither magazine articles nor short stories are italicized. However, there have been Senate Hall threads on this for the Wook, and people have not come to consensus about whether we should italicize or use quotes here. That's why the InsiderCite template both italicizes and puts the article titles in quotes. The second issue is about the sub-content of the Clone Wars UK magazine. We use the template not only for the short comic included in each issue, but also for the (non-story) articles. In this regard, it's very much similar to the Insider. For that reason, the templates should match as well as possible. If you think that one should not have italics for the articles/stories, I'd argue that none of them should have italics for the articles/stories. In other words, I don't really mind one way or the other, but the two templates should match. ~Savage 00:12, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
  • I see. Well, I don't feel strongly about this either, either way is fine. Cheers. Stake black ^msg 00:19, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Sakiyan

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Sakiyan has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:41, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Dandelion warriors

Hey Savage. Today, I've decided to give the Dandelion warriors article some love, on a whim. I intend to expand and source it some more before nominating it some time in the future. However, I'm having two little problems that you may help resolve. First things first: when I started working on the article, the name "fftssfft" was written everywhere without capital letter. That seems fair enough, since the name was written like that in Castaways of Endor; however, I'm wondering whether a sentence may begin with a lower-case letter in proper, encyclopedic English. In French, it is an absolute rule that a sentence must begin with a cap, and I thought it was also the case in English. What say you?

And yet another thing: while the dandelion warriors from the TV episode To Save Deej seem to have blue stems (per the screenshot included in the dandelion article), the children book adaptation shows them as green. However, in the low-quality videos of the episode I've seen on YouTube, the dandelions' bodies look somewhat greenish. Is it possible that the colors of the DVD edition are somehow messed up? What do you think? --LelalMekha (talk) 22:20, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, Lelal! That's great; I can't wait to read your expansion of the fftssfft article. To answer your questions: 1) Yes, there are very rare cases where a word can always be in lower case in English. The examples I have in mind are things that are normally treated as proper nouns, but which the entity in question has stated an explicit preference against capitalization. There is a writer named bell hooks, for example, who insists her name be written without capitals. This is decidedly not the case with the dandelion warriors! The second case would maybe be for transliteration of a language into English using a system in which capital and lowercase letters have some bearing on pronunciation. I can't think of any examples of this in the real world, but it could be a possibility. In the case of ffssfft, though, there are no capitals, so I doubt that's the situation. Rather, I'd just treat the word as a common noun, much like dog or duck, and capitalize it when it comes at the beginning of a sentence. Or does "Castaways of Endor" leave it uncapitalized even when it begins a sentence? If it does, we should follow its precedent...

• As for the coloration of the warriors, I just checked the VHS version of the episode, and it, too, depicts them as blue-stemmed. What you can do is say they were blue in the article, but indicate the children's book disparity in the BTS, or else (my preferred solution), say that some were blue and some were green and assume that both sources are perfectly canonical depictions of dandelion warriors. Have fun with the article, and let me know if you have any more questions! ~Savage 22:46, January 7, 2013 (UTC)

Narrowing down the dating of "Star Tours: The Adventures Continue"

Hey Savage. Thanks to one of Weedle McHairybug's recent edits, I have new information on the exact dating of Star Tours: The Adventures Continue. As you can hear on 1:45 of this video, the droid G2-9T says "Uh, is anyone here travelling to Yavin 4? Home of the secret Rebel base? Oops! Home of the previously secret rebel base..." Since the Rebels recovered the key to the Great Temple in the Yavin Vassilika in 1 BBY, then it means that the events of Star Tours II must take place between 1 and 0 BBY. I thought you might find that interesting. Cheers. --LelalMekha (talk) 22:28, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

• Ah, interesting find! I think RX-24 may need a minor update. Thanks! ~Savage 13:21, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • However, I see that the dating of 1 BBY for the events pf Underworld: The Yavin Vassilika is currently unsourced, so we may have to take it with a grain of salt. Do you know where that dating comes from? --LelalMekha (talk) 13:25, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
    • I had an edit conflict asking you that same thing! The New Essential Chronology is silent on the date of the founding. It may be speculation. Maybe I can start a KB thread about it. ~Savage 13:26, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
    • OK, done: Forum:KB:Establishing the Rebel base on Yavin 4. ~Savage 13:31, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
      • Good. On my part, I shall read Star Wars: Underworld again and see if I can dig up any clues. I do remember the comic book original introduction saying that "Star Wars: Underworld takes place shortly before Episode IV." However, "shortly before" does not help much... --LelalMekha (talk) 13:32, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
        • I guess I was following this page and didn't know it... For the record, since Star Tours 2 was narrowed down to 2 BBY-0 BBY, I have noted that since Ackbar appears as a Rebel agent, the ride must take place after his rescue, which has been dated at 1 BBY. Granted, there are other anachronisms in the ride -- battles involving lots of separatist ships, TF droid ships over Naboo, and an earlier battle on Hoth -- but Ackbar's inclusion is something to consider. But I'll also say that I thought Underworld was even closer to ANH, in 0 BBY. --JMM (talk) 13:53, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
          • I just found out that The Official Star Wars Fact File 121 YAV1-2, The Yavin Vassilika has Underworld happening in 1 BBY. --LelalMekha (talk) 13:56, January 15, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hiya Savage, thanks for the kind words you left on my talk page regarding the Gree article. I have been trying quite hard with my recent work to source my stuff as much as I can. Out of curiousity though, which parts need more sourcing on the Gree article? Always on the lookout for new info or ways to better some of the pages I have been working on like Gree or Hutts so would appreciate any words on what needs to be done more :) Darth Batrus (talk) 17:28, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

No worries mate :) I hadn't updated in a while so kind of forgot some of the stuff I put so was worried I had left something unsourced heh. Kind of wish I had some screenshots but alas no. The only one I saw is the hologram of Operator IX AI :-/ But thanks again for the praise man, appreciate it. Darth Batrus (talk) 19:06, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Ob Khaddor in "Chronicles"

Hi SavageBob. If I remember correctly, you own a copy of Star Wars Chronicles: The Prequels, right? I'm currently expanding Sheltay Retrac as much as I can, and I'd like to know in what respect and through which words the book "hints" that Ob Khaddor may have been her husband? I'm puzzled as to how a reference book may just "hint" rather than state. Additionally, Khaddor only died with the destruction of Alderaan. Therefore, if he was her father, Winter definitely was not an orphan. --LelalMekha (talk) 00:29, January 18, 2013 (UTC)

• Hmm, interesting. Here's what the book says: "Sheltay Retrac (left) is the head of Organa's support staff and has served as aide to Bail Organa for two years. Recently returned from maternity leave, she left her infant daughter, Winter, in the care of her husband, an artist from the Killik regions." (p. 302). Sheltay Retrac is also possibly the hottest woman in Star Wars. ~Savage 01:11, January 18, 2013 (UTC)
  • Is that all there is? If that's the case, I can't see a "hint" at all. Sounds more like mere speculation to me. Thank you anyway. :) --LelalMekha (talk) 01:13, January 18, 2013 (UTC)
    • That's it! There's no mention of Ob at all. I think someone heard "Killik" and "artist" and ran with it here. But it's speculative. ~Savage 01:15, January 18, 2013 (UTC)
      • Completely speculative, indeed. Additionally, Khaddor may have been a major dissenter, but he was an urban dissenter. As for Retrac's husband, he lived in the Castle Lands, so he must have been a gentle cuckoolander that established his domicile in an ol' Killik hive-mound. --LelalMekha (talk) 01:23, January 18, 2013 (UTC)

Gree Images

Woah, thanks dude! Hmmm, going to sleep right now but tomorrow I am going to see about uploading some pics up. Would it be alright if I run them by you to see which one is good and might suit the article? Cause I have seen your work and would love some advice on making the Gree article better :) Darth Batrus (talk) 22:48, January 19, 2013 (UTC)

Stennes Shifter

Awesome work on Stennes Shifter! I'm glad to see it finally be fully fleshed out and everything.--Demos Traxen (talk) 01:20, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks! Just got to get through the BTS and it'll be ready for FAN. Your work was really helpful in fleshing out the lead section, so nice work to you as well. :) ~Savage 15:31, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

Query about Ithorians

Hey SavageBob. Does the New Essential Guide to Alien Species specify the difference between male and female Ithorians?—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 00:43, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

• Unfortunately, no, it says nothing about how to tell a male Ithorian from a female one. ~Savage 23:52, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you, Bob.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 03:17, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Star Wars Gamer Issue 02

Hello SavageBob, it came to my attention that you owned the supplement Snow Job (as evidenced by your edits there), published within Star Wars Gamer 2. I'd like to know if you could supply me with any info there about the planet Aquilaris, when/if you're available ofc. Thanks in advance. Winterz (talk) 00:58, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, Winterz. I checked the article and skimmed the first few pages, but I didn't see any mention of Aquilaris. Can you tell me in what context it might appear? Like, is it part of some specific character's back story or something? ~Savage 12:40, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
  • I can do that yes. I found some info from it in the Ree article, where it says that "(...) saying that he had visited Aquilaris and Coruscant in pleasure trips". This could be all there is of Aquilaris on the Adventure but just wanted to check it out ;). Winterz (talk) 13:18, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
    • You probably forgot about this but regardless, I just want to give you the heads up that it isn't necessary anymore. I've now acquired the Gamer magazines. ;) Winterz (talk) 14:47, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
      • Gah, sorry! ~Savage 17:33, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Nho'Apakk

Hello Bob, reviving an old topic, but on the Keeper of the Holocron blog owned by Leland Chee on Facebook, he confirmed Nho'Apakk is the Ewok holding the movie slate that I talked about in November, here's the link: http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=499391386749353&id=201820953172172. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:38, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

• Excellent! Now if I could only source the slate image. The Yodapedia isn't very good about sourcing images... :( ~Savage 13:40, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
  • We have this sourced to a random French website. Since it's an OOU image, I guess it's... OK... Menkooroo (talk) 14:34, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

Star Tours II even closer to A New Hope?

Hey SavageBob. I suppose you remember I'v been trying to narrow down the exact chronology of Star Tours II. It is now pretty clear that the events of the ride must happen after the liberation of Gial Ackbar and the acquisition of the key to the Massassi Station, which are both set in 1 BBY. However, there is a depiction of Imperials and Rebels fighting on Hoth during the ride, which seems problematic at first. I discovered there was a lesser-known "Battle of Hoth", which took place early in 0 BBY. This would set the events of Star Tours II in 35:3, which means very shortly before A New Hope. What do you think? --LelalMekha (talk) 00:46, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

• I agree with you that it's probably 0 BBY. However, at this point, we have to be careful about stating that the battle in the game is indeed the lesser-known Battle of Hoth. It may be a third battle for all we know! :) But I think some reasoning such as that you've offered here would be useful on the Star Tours: The Adventures Continue page. ~Savage 15:32, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

FAN page reviewing

Hey, Bob,

I'm writing this to you on behalf of the entire Inquisitorius. At our recent meeting, we discussed the current lack of non-INQs who are actively involved in reviewing on the FAN page, and we decided that the best solution was to simply appeal to people to review more. This first paragraph is being sent verbatim to a whole bunch of people, but the following one is being written specifically for you.

Let's get something straight here: You're one of the most active and talented reviewers that the FAN page has. So no, I'm not trying to say that you're not doing enough or not carrying your weight or anything. I'm just sending this message to everyone I can. :D The INQs are trying to breathe some life into the FAN page, and we'd love to have you keep doing what you're doing as a part of this revolution. And if you want to become an even more active reviewer --- like, super-active, or something --- that'd be awesome too! Cheers, and have a great day. Menkooroo (talk) 07:30, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

• Sounds good! I am trying to be more active than I have in the past. It's tough with grad school duties on top of everything. But I appreciate the kind words and hope I can continue to play my part. :) ~Savage 12:23, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Making a better "Timeline of media" revisited

Hi SavageBob, I recently picked up where Morbus Iff left off a while ago on the Timeline of media revamp discussed here, to which you contributed. I'd appreciate your opinion on the near-finished project: User:Tainb'ocu'chulainn/Sandbox Timeline. The forum for the discussion is Forum:SH:Making a better Timeline of media: revisited. Thanks. Tainb'ocu'chulainn (talk) 20:31, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

The Fleebogs

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Fleebog has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Menkooroo (talk) 03:04, February 12, 2013 (UTC)

Apology

Oh, hi! I only saw this now. It's fine, don't worry :). But I really think classifying as sentient is a bit of a stretch, don't you think? I mean, it's speculation. Stake black ^msg 11:47, February 16, 2013 (UTC)

Halloween

Hey, Bob, just noticed that this non-canon story was added to the Halloween article's appearances. Considering the source's officially-licensed status, it's probably something that deserves to be given a brief mention in the BTS regarding Halloween's appearance in that story. Just giving you a heads up since this is something that will probably be brought to the AC meeting eventually. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:46, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

• Cool, thanks for the heads up. I'll check it out and add whatever's relevant. ~Savage 13:01, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Tocoyan

Hello Bob, as you worked on the Tocoyan article, just wanted to point out that I don't think there's any proof Neb Dulo was actually affiliated with Jabba, as he could have just been visiting the palace. Nothing from his card text indicates he was explicitly affiliated with Jabba. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:08, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

• OK, cool. That shouldn't affect the Tocoyan article; it merely says he "joined the court of Jabba the Hutt," which being in the court is enough to establish. Luke joined the court, too, when he visited, for example. In this case, join is being used in the sense of "visited," or "was part of (even if temporarily)" rather than "became a permanent member of." ~Savage 12:14, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

Dromboid

Hey Savage. I just saw your message and checked Au temps de la Guerre des Étoiles. There's not much to say about Dromboid, but here it is: the French dub does not mention the system Amorphia, let alone the Amorphian beings and their power shortage. Instead, the woman's voice says the following (translated for you benefit): "This mini-transmitter benefits from the most recent technological advances and has been granted the Quality Label. It can be delivered the way you see it here or in a kit. The latter formula offers the double advantage of helping you familiarise with the device and of reducing the costs. An assembly instructions cassette has been provided by the manufacturer, and in either case, you are offered warranty. Our specialist will be happy to show you that the assembly of that kit is a child's play."

Another information, which is more revelant to Drmboid himself: the character was dubbed by Jacques Thébault, who used to be the official French voice of Steve McQueen. I have no formal proof of that, unfortunately, but that's definitely his voice. --LelalMekha (talk) 18:31, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

Niado Duegad's species

Hello Bob, most likely Niado Duegad was based off of a sculpt that never made the final cut of Return of the Jedi, but do you know if any source shows the sculpt for his species? Menkooroo brought up the possibility of being in Star Wars: Chronicles. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 07:04, February 21, 2013 (UTC)

• Yep. He's in both The Art of Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi and Star Wars: Chronicles. I'm away for most of the day, but I'll give you the specifics tonight or tomorrow. There's some decent BTS information. :) ~Savage 12:05, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • Anything new? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:49, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • OK, sorry: I checked again and can't find him in The Art of ROTJ. However, he is in Chronicles. Here's the pertinent info: He was known as "Alien 18." He never made it past the maquette stage since he, like several other Jabba's Palace alien designs, was too difficult to realize as a puppet. Humanoid characters were much easier. The text also notes that it has "features similar to the dianoga trash monster." All this on p. 242. Hope this helps! ~Savage 18:35, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
      • Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:43, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
        • Hello Bob, may I also a request for the info about Soth Petikkin and Bron Burs's maquettes? From talking to Sompeetalay previously, it was my understanding Soth was known as "Alien 25" and was possibly a concept for Jabba's aide. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:10, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

Rodians

Hey, Bob. Hanzo recently let me know that some of my Rodian articles might have incorrect sources. He suggested that you might be able to verify that. You can see more details here. If you do have the sources and could let me know what they say, I'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 01:06, February 23, 2013 (UTC)

• It definitely does help. Thank you very much.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 05:06, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

Light side/dark side in TOR

I'm not sure how else to answer you (I can't figure out the talk page) but on the LS/DS argument for ToR you said you had yet to find a quest that had to DS or two LS conversation options at once. If you go full dark on the Imperial Agent's quest line and turn on the Eradicators, your next choice is to join with Jadus by betraying Watcher Two or betray him. betraying Watcher Two being the DS choice. There are TWO conversation options in which you betray Watcher Two. I did both by escaping and repeating the conversation. You gain an equal amount of DS points for both options. There is only one option (I didn't do it so I can't say for certain, but I'm assuming) to not betray Watcher Two, likely an LS choice. Sorry if this was the wrong place, but I couldn't figure out how to reply to you on the talk page.

--Kingsdaughter613 (talk) 04:12, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, Kingsdaughter, what thread are you responding to? I think I get the gist of your point, but I'd like to avoid Agent spoilers since I've got one, and I'd like to move your conversation to the right thread so others can see it. ~Savage 12:15, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

I saw your comment on the page you reach when you hit the 'community consensus' link. It says the debate there, over whether to make the Imperials DS or LS, is now archived but I'm not sure where the new argument is, if there is one.

--Kingsdaughter613 (talk) 13:36, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

• Without getting into spoilers, do both of the dark side options in that instance grant the same number of dark side alignment gain? That might be a way to distinguish which one is "canon." ~Savage 14:02, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

Maybe? It was somewhere on that thread. --Kingsdaughter613 (talk) 14:17, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

Oops. I was answering about the original thread. Yes, the two choices gave identical amounts of points. --Kingsdaughter613 (talk) 14:18, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

Naboo Elders

Hey SavageBob! I just posted something in the KB forum, and I believe you may have good insight in the matter judging by your focus on alien species. Please feel free to have a look. ;-) Regards. --LelalMekha (talk) 12:19, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

• Interesting. Unfortunately, I have no idea. I can check Chronicles, but that's the only source I can think of that may have anything to say about the matter. ~Savage 13:03, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
  • If you ever have time to check Chronicles, that would appreciated. :) --LelalMekha (talk) 10:11, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
    • Ah, no problem! They are mentioned on p. 117: "The swamps are marked with half-buried stone heads. These relics are veiled in mystery; archeologists do not know if they are giant representations of a vanished race or massive icons devoted to their gods." There's also a picture of one of the heads in production. Looks like at least one of them was sculpted, rather than digital. There's also a shot of a Gungan on top of one of the heads using his macro binocular/farseein things. The caption reads, "A lone militiagung spots the approach of Naboo reinforcements." ~Savage 13:55, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
      • Thank you! While it's not the manna I was hoping for, it's still useful to know to which extent they were mentioned in that book. :) --LelalMekha (talk) 13:59, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Image CT

Hey, I wanted to notify you of changes made to the image CT; it has been overhauled following IRC discussion and now only deals with images in scroll boxes. Feel free to review the changed proposal and alter your vote if your opinion on the new issue is different. Thanks! Cade Calrayn 19:46, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

Pre-GAN question

I plan to expand and nominate Unidentified Aurorient Express band conductor as a GAN, but I'm stuck. His species field was a victim of Dantescifi's species article sprees, and I'm not sure what to do with it. Possible species would be whatever Skeeter is, or even a fat Verpine. I'm banking more on Skeeter's species, due to the facial structure and the little guy's wings (hidden under his green vest). So, what do I do about that part? Trak Nar ^{Ramble on} 06:35, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

• Ah, yes. We do need to revisit that issue on unknown species, don't we? If they were drawn by the same artist, I'd say that's proof enough they're supposed to be the same species. However, in this case, I think it's probably just coincidence. He's definitely not a Verpine. You could always leave species guesswork to the BTS, and mention that his species is undefined, but he looks almost identical to Skeeter. That's probably what I would do! ~Savage 14:00, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
  • That's pretty much what I was thinking, aside from the Skeeter bit; to put that this guy's species was undefined. Though, since we're on the subject... I spent the article trying to avoid mentioning the guy's gender. I think it would be safe to assume that it's male, but since the gender can only be determined by the clothing, then I feel safer leaving it ambiguous. Made for some clunky-ass prose, though. So, should I go ahead and assume male, or leave it ambiguous? In the meantime, the Dantescifi stuff is going bye-bye. Trak Nar ^{Ramble on} 03:53, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
    • Hold on, Skeeter has six limbs, this guy only has four, plus the eyes look different, Skeeter's have pupils, this guys look more compound. --Eyrezer (talk) 09:55, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
      • I worded it as a "passing resemblance," but I could easily nix that entire paragraph. By the way, Skeeter is next on my list for GANs. Trak Nar ^{Ramble on} 09:57, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
        • Personally, I am still in favour of removing the reference to Skeeter. Good to hear he is next up, though! --Eyrezer (talk) 13:12, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
• The reference to Skeeter has been nixed, and a while back, I had deleted those "unidentified" articles attached to this conductor, his bandmates, and the band itself. Now, though, I have another question... Throughout the article, I attempted to remain gender-neutral in my wording. Unfortunately, it comes off as redundant and clunky at times. Considering this fellow's attire and build, would it be safe to assume that he's a male, and word the article accordingly? Or should I keep my gender-neutral wording, no matter how repetitive is is? Trak Nar ^{Ramble on} 11:17, March 6, 2013 (UTC)
  • If he were a humanoid, it might be a different issue, but since he's insectoid, it's hard to tell. Lots of insectoids in Star Wars material have several genders, including neuter drones. I'd leave it ambiguous and use lots of synonyms, even if it leads to less-than-elegant wordings here and there. ~Savage 11:29, March 6, 2013 (UTC)
    • Oh boy, an excuse to use "maestro!" :D Trak Nar ^{Ramble on} 11:34, March 6, 2013 (UTC)
• Alright, one of my GAN objections is to make an article for the conductor's species. Is it notable enough? Do we have any other insectoids this guy could possibly be? Should I just make a no-nonsense article for this little guy? Trak Nar ^{Ramble on} 01:51, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Yeah, since he doesn't seem to match Skeeter due to the arms issue, there's really no telling. Canon tends to play fast and loose with insectoid sentient species (as the Pera shows), but there's little harm in creating a bare-bones article for this guy's species, I suppose. He doesn't look particularly like anything else we know of, as far as I know. ~Savage 12:40, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Queen Kylantha

Hello Bob. Don't you happen to know, by chance, if there's a source that states Kylantha had been Queen of Naboo for long at the time of Star Wars Galaxies? I'm asking this because, as it happens too often, her article says she was queen from 18 BBY, and yet no source is given. I just created this article, which raises a continuity conflict. --LelalMekha (talk) 12:34, March 4, 2013 (UTC)

• Other than Galaxies itself or The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia, I don't know of anything. Maybe search around for Galaxies info? Unfortunately, I never played the game, so sorry I can't be of much help. :/ ~Savage 13:26, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nevermind, then. But I suppose you do own a copy of The New Essential Guide to Alien Species? I'm having trouble with Naboo-related articles, and some answers may lie within that book. You see, it's stated everywhere on the Wook that Naboo's monarchy became elective in 150 BBY, at the end of the Naboo-Gungan War and with the reign of Queen Yram. However, again, the sourcing and referencing in the articles is less than satisfying. I can't even find a single explicit mention of that so-called "Jafan Dynasty"... Could you have a look in your spare moments? LelalMekha (talk) 17:02, March 4, 2013 (UTC)

Jawas

Didn't want to risk turning the talk page into a lengthy discussion, so I'll post here. Hope you don't mind. My reasoning is that his backstory developed by Decipher does not mesh as well as the others already confirmed to be in Jabba's Palace onscreen at the time of RotJ. The number of Jawa's that Decipher created surrounding Jabba's Palace already exceeds the number of Jawa's actually seen onscreen during RotJ. I'm inclined to think that the Jawa on the left may actually be Kalit and the one on the right, Aved Luun as they are a mated pair. Also there is a deleted scene from RotJ that has two Jawas stamping on Luke's hands/pushing him back down with an ion blaster as he hangs from the grate in the floor after having jumped from the Rancor Pit. I think we need to confirm the total number of Jawa's present in Jabba's palace from Leland (or Pablo considering the work he's been doing over at the StarWars.com blog) and who is who exactly before applying the duck test. Also Decipher is notorious for misrepresenting characters with images of other characters. Rokkur Shen (talk) 14:02, March 6, 2013 (UTC)

• That all sounds logical except for one thing: we can't necessarily assume that the Jawas on those two Decipher cards were present at Jabba's palace during the events of ROTJ, just that they were present at some point. In other words, there's no hard-and-fast rule that the Decipher cards must all represent folks present in Jabba's palace when Luke visits it. ~Savage 16:14, March 6, 2013 (UTC)
• Ok I decided to look into this and explain it in more depth. Herat and Aved Luun have been confirmed as appearing in RotJ by the StarWars.com databank and Kalit & Wittin by Who's Who in Jabba's Palace in Insider 60. The last Jawa was confirmed to be Snipp Nkik in the Rogues gallery in Insider 134 which also showed Herat. The odd one out is R'kik D'nec who has never even been associated with Jabba in any of the EU lore, aside from being included as a card in the Jabba's Palace set. All I'm really getting at is that R'kik D'nec's page is no longer "comprehensive" with Hanzo removing the image and my comment. Decipher obviously used the image of the Jawa from production photos and this should be noted on the R'kik D'nec page for it to be "comprehensive". As all the Jawas seen onscreen have been accounted for I'm now of the opinion that R'kik D'nec cannot be the same as the Jawa pictured on the left. The Jawa on the left must be either Herat, Kalit or Wittin. Snipp Nkik wears his bandolier over the opposite shoulder so it obviously is not him. Which means that Aved Luun must be the Jawa on the right as the same picture is used in her databank entry. Hope this makes sense. Rokkur Shen (talk) 03:04, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
  • Upon actually looking into the issue, I would agree that a note should indeed be made. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:27, March 7, 2013 (UTC)

Zeuol

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Zeuol has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — CC7567 (talk) 21:07, March 7, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified Tocoyan thug

Hello Bob, I notice in your Tocoyan FA, you refer to the Unidentified Tocoyan thug who Guri defeated as male, yet in that character's article, the gender is said to be unidentified. I assume that then saying the thug was male in the Tocoyan article was an error, but it could have been the opposite, so please fix whichever is in error. Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:16, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

• Good eye. I fixed Tocoyan, since the gender is unclear. The clothes suggest a male, but I suppose we can't be sure. ~Savage 14:20, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Bron Burs in Chronicles

Hello Bob, does Star Wars: Chronicles show enough of the anatomy of the maquette for Bron Burs to prove his species are humanoid? I'd say almost certainly yes, but want to verify first. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:20, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

• Actually, all it shows is the head and shoulders, so beyond that, we can't really say much about their anatomy. That head, however, is quite detailed and a lot can be written about it alone... ~Savage 17:00, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:20, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Stennes Shifter

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Stennes Shifter has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Green Tentacle (Talk) 12:02, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

Lonn Idd's repair station

Hi, I was wondering if you had any plans regarding the magnificient Lonn Idd's repair station or should I go ahead and try improve it to status by myself. If not, I prolly still would need your experise on the related material. (: – Tm_T@Wookieepedia:~$ 12:23, March 19, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, Tm! Nope, I don't have any plans. I'm just going through all our Droids and Ewoks comic articles to update the images now that the Dark Horse Omnibus version is out. Until now, we've had to rely on scans of decades-old comic books, but now we can actually get some decent-quality images from these old stories. In other words, if you want to improve that article, go for it! And let me know if you need images of anything from the issue. ~Savage 12:34, March 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks sir! Back in the day when I was crawling through those Droids comics I didn't find any related information from them, but have you happened to stumble on any other sources for the station or Tig Fromm's starship? (: – Tm_T@Wookieepedia:~$ 12:40, March 19, 2013 (UTC)
    • Nope, I haven't. The only one I can think that may mention it is "Star Wars Droids: The Adventures of R2-D2 and C-3PO" from Polyhedron magazine. Other than that, I doubt it would have shown up anywhere. ~Savage 13:04, March 19, 2013 (UTC)

Preigo's Carnival

Hey SavageBob. A long time ago, in this galaxy, you sent me a BtS picture of Preigo's Traveling Aurore-class freighter with an inscription in Huttese. I just wanted to give you a follow-up analysis. From what I can see, the text definitely reads "Preigo's carnival" in English. However, only two letters come from the same alphabet used in SWTOR and Jedi Academy—the letters A and V, that is. Not that it helps... I find this quite depressing: I mean they actually made up a new alphabet instead of using the existing one. --LelalMekha (talk) 16:52, March 20, 2013 (UTC)

• That is unfortunate. It doesn't surprise me, since this is Clone Wars we're talking about. Maybe it's Shell Huttese or some other alphabet that we don't now about... ~Savage 17:23, March 20, 2013 (UTC)
  • I did, however, create an article on "Jabba's alphabet," which has only appeared in Star Wars Episode I: Racer, to my knowledge. As you can see, it was originally created for merchandising purposes back in 1997, and the entire mapping of that alphabet is known. --LelalMekha (talk) 17:34, March 20, 2013 (UTC)
• Another update on that matter. I just discovered that picture in the trivia gallery of TCW episode Friends and Enemies. It seems that TCW artists did create their own Huttese alphabet, as the letters shown here are consistent with those shwon on the "Preigo's Carnival" vehicle. With those two pics and the translations they provide, we now know eighteen letters (A, C, D, E, G, H, I, L, M, N, O, P, R, S, T, U, V, Y). --LelalMekha (talk) 17:01, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
  • Oh, cool. Nice detective work! ~Savage 17:07, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
    • I must add that, apparently, that alphabet has distinct lower and upper cases, which I personally find quite... impropable. Or too "Human from the modern Western world," if you know what I mean. --LelalMekha (talk) 18:00, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
• And yet... This features the LucasArts/SWTOR alphabet! You've got to be kidding... I wonder if those markings are actually visible in the finished episode. --LelalMekha (talk) 14:41, April 10, 2013 (UTC)
  • Hmm. Well, it wouldn't surprise me that the Hutts would use multiple alphabets. Humans on earth certainly do! :P Maybe one of the alphabets is Evocii, or Nimbanese, or something. We need a sequel to "The Written Word: A Brief Introduction to the Writing Systems of Galactic Basic! ~Savage 16:46, April 10, 2013 (UTC)
    • That definitely would be in order. To date, the only complete and canonical "Huttese" alphabet we know of is Eric Larson's "Jabba's alphabet," but it hasn't been used too often since its invention in 1997. Sadly, I doubt the kind of opportunities that gave birth to The Written Word will rise again. These were happier times for Star Wars scholars' contribution to canon. --LelalMekha (talk) 16:56, April 10, 2013 (UTC)

Image deletions

Just a note that when tagging an image for deletion on the basis of having been replaced by a higher quality version, please provide a link to the better version in the deletion tag. This is needed because the admins must verify that the replacement image is indeed higher quality. Without such a link, deletion is likely to be declined, as I have done with your recent tags. Thanks. —MJ— _{War Room} 03:39, March 21, 2013 (UTC)

• That's fine, but it's a very labor-intensive process to update these images. Basically, I'm going through all the Ewoks and Droids comics and cartoons. If I have to add links to the new versions, it's actually just easier to leave the replaced images unused and let them be deleted through Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Images. But that takes much longer. If that's the route I should take, that's fine, but I hope I am well-established enough that y'all will trust me that the scans from the Omnibus from Dark Horse will be better quality than scans of 30-year-old comic books... For what it's worth, the .jpg is being replaced by .png, so you can always find the inferior image by replacing the extension. ~Savage 04:04, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
• And upon rereading this after a night's sleep, it sounds kinda pissy. I apologize about that; I wasn't trying to be obtuse or difficult. :) And just to clarify: Is it preferable to use the {{Delete}} template, or to use {{Ifd|obsoleted by [[:File:whatever.png]]}}? Or both? I'm happy to adopt whatever works best from y'all's end. ~Savage 11:08, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • No problem. As to the deletion template, either one works (but not both at once). {{Ifd}} is technically misused, as it's supposed to require listing the image on WP:IFD for a one-week discussion period, but no one does that and everyone else these days uses it for standard speedy deletion of images, so no one will complain if you do too. (I've been considering TCing both WP:IFD and {{Ifd}} for that reason for a while now, but that's a different discussion.) Basically, use whichever one you prefer; they both land the image in a deletion category and on my admin dashboard. :) —MJ— _{War Room} 17:50, March 21, 2013 (UTC)

WP:AS related articles

Hey Bob. Quick question. Are the related articles of WP:ALIENS included in the CA, GA and FA count? Stake black ^msg 18:19, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, Sb. Nope; we debated putting them in there at one point, but then decided we wanted the count to accurately reflect the number of species plain and simple, not related stuff like sentientologists, biological classifications, etc. What article did you have in mind? ~Savage 19:55, March 22, 2013 (UTC)
  • I was thinking about porting this idea to WP:AST, really. But thanks for the reply. Stake black ^msg 20:24, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

Serp

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Serp has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Green Tentacle (Talk) 12:52, March 24, 2013 (UTC)

Clearing the air

Hey Bob, I apologize if it seems that I've been very reluctant to the objections, it's been a bad week for me. To tell the truth, the next few weeks will be worse as the anniversary of my father's death draws near, but even so. I wanted to clear the air and let you know that I will strive to do better and that it was nothing against you.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 09:54, April 6, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, no need to apologize. I wasn't upset! Sorry if it came off like I was! :) I'm sorry to hear about your father's passing, and I hope everything is peaceful for you in the next few days. I'll revisit my objections to the CAN soon. ~Savage 13:26, April 6, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Bosph reviews

Hey Bob thanks for the heads up I'd totally forgotten about correcting the other articles I'd written until yesterday when you commented on it and had been meaning to fix it today which I've now done. I've also made the caption for the Moff Harsh image a full sentence. Is there an other objections I've missed? I think I've corrected all the others currently listed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:26, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Spilferithimus-narlamos

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Spilferithimus-narlamos has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — JangFett (Talk) 22:45, April 8, 2013 (UTC)

Lost comic strips

Hey Bob. This might interest you. Cheers. Stake black ^msg 17:10, April 10, 2013 (UTC)

• Awesome! I've been waiting for these. :) ~Savage 17:24, April 10, 2013 (UTC)
  • Please excuse my interfering with the conversation, but I'm interested in those lost strips too! ;-) I suppose we'll have to call them "ambiguously canon?" --LelalMekha (talk) 17:27, April 10, 2013 (UTC)
    • Per the last paragraphs, they should be treated like Casus Belli articles. Uncertain licensing. Stake black ^msg 17:31, April 10, 2013 (UTC)
      • Heya, Bob. Would you mind dropping into the SH thread and offering some thoughts on where in the timeline the comics could be slotted? Thanks. Menkooroo (talk) 23:40, April 10, 2013 (UTC)

Rebel troopers in BTM

Hello Bob, does Star Wars: Behind the Magic feature Cariso Smadis or Chad Hilse in any way beyond the script mentioning all the Rebel troopers? Chad Hilse was named by the CCG in 1995, so it's also possible it mentions his name, while Cariso Smadis was only named in the Visual Guides, so he would only be pictured if anything. Thanks in advance. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:37, April 10, 2013 (UTC)

• Unfortunately, I've misplaced my copy of BTM, and I won't be able to look for it until the semester ends in a few weeks. Sorry. :( ~Savage 23:31, April 10, 2013 (UTC)

Bron Burs' species

Hello Bob, while I'm maxed out on GANs right now, I've worked on satisfying all your objections to my failed (due to being too long) Bron Burs's species CAN. From looking at the article, do I really need to also include a "Society and Culture" section? I think that both "Biology and Appearance" and "History" are enough. Also, with describing Burs' clothing, would you say being robed is enough? Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:07, April 11, 2013 (UTC)

• I'm fine with not including all sections, but in the past, people have required that the entire alien species layout guide be adhered to. The only optional section is "...in the galaxy." In other words, I won't object, but someone probably will. :) I think saying that some wore robes would be fine for a S&C section. ~Savage 19:41, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
  • Added the section with the clothing. And I saw other articles that didn't include the S&C, but nonetheless have included based on what you said. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:41, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

Viidaav

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Viidaav (species) has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Cade Calrayn 01:31, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

Squab system

Hey Savage, all previous sources refer to it as the Squab system. Previous comments by Jason Fry imply that systems listed in the appendix of the atlas and online companion are simply for the ease of finding planets/systems and do not always reflect the "canon" in-universe system name as previously established. I'm simply following the example set by all the other system articles on the wook that still go by their original system names and not necessarily the system names as listed in the atlas appendix. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:32, April 20, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey Savage..sorry for the delay. This isn't the full extent of what I know I have tucked away somewhere and funnily enough I think it may have been yourself who pointed me towards these to begin with. See: Forum:SH:The_Essential_Atlas_and_system_names & Forum:CT_Archive/Atlas_and_systems. Essentially from these & the links to comments/queries directed towards Jason Fry on the boards at theforce.net contained therein, I made the informed judgment that we were still treating system names printed exclusively in the atlas appendix as conjectural, unless they are identified specifically by name in another source. So I propose that in the case of the Squab system, "Skor system" should only be mentioned in the Behind the scenes section, rather than the main article itself, until "Skor system" is explicitly mentioned in an official published source. Systems that only appear in the appendix (lacking any other published name) for the sake of placing a particular planet should continue to have a conjecture tag placed on them until published in another source as previously voted in-favor-of in the aforementioned CT. What are your thoughts? Rokkur Shen (talk) 10:50, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • Ah, thanks for the pointer. I was completely unaware of that CT! ~Savage 11:00, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Datar

Hey, Bob, can you take a look at the Datar system's sun nom? I checked, but there's nothing in the sources. Cade Calrayn 15:40, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

• Done! ~Savage 16:02, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

New Essential Guide to Alien Species

Hello Savage. I wondered if you could check a two things for me in The New Essential Guide to Alien Species.

1. It's stated everywhere on the Wook that Naboo's monarchy became elective in 150 BBY, at the end of the Naboo-Gungan War and with the reign of Queen Yram. However, the sourcing and referencing is less than satisfying. I can't even find a single explicit mention of that so-called "Jafan Dynasty"...
2. Is there any mention of the mysterious Elders in the entry pertaining to the Gungans?

If you could check any of these—or even preferably both :p—in your spare moments, that would be really helpful. Regards. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:31, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, Lelal, no sweat. I just checked the book, and I don't see mentions of any of that. No Elders, no monarchy, nothing. Whoever sourced those things to the book must have misread it, unless I overlooked something. Sorry! ~Savage 02:48, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Ultimate Aliens Anthology

Hey Bob, would you mind checking the Ultimate Alien Anthology for information on Nullada, and Circumtore, if there is any? It would probably be in the Shell Hutts section, if there is one. I'm asking you because you are the resident expert on alien species, and no doubt, at least I hope, have the book. Thanks in advance for your time! 501st dogma^(talk) 17:43, April 25, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, 501, no problem. "Nullada" is given as an example name for Hutts on p. 74. Other than that, there's no mention of Circumtore, or of Shell Hutts. Hope this helps! ~Savage 02:59, April 26, 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks! 501st dogma^(talk) 20:56, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

WOTM

Hey Bob, just wanted to say thanks for supporting my nomination for WOTM last month. I really appreciate it. Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:02, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

• No problem. You deserve it! ~Savage 16:14, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

Re: New Fact Files

Hi Bob, there doesn't appear to be any new information on any of them, so you don't need to update anything. --Jinzler (talk) 14:45, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Card

Hey Bob. You're the alien expert, help me out here. What species do you think this is? If it's not identifiable, it warrants its own article, wouldn't you say? Stake black ^msg 16:08, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

• That's Amanaman, the Amani headhunter from Jabba's palace. :) ~Savage 16:33, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Tulvaree

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Tulvaree has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:04, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Gilramos Libkath

Hey Savage. Whenever you can easily access Star Wars Chronicles: The Prequels, could you check for Gilramos Libkath? I'd like to know what that book says precisely about him. Thanks in advance. --LelalMekha (talk) 23:17, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

• No problem. I don't see him mentioned at all, actually! ~Savage 00:44, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
  • Ah. Now that's quite curious. Perhaps there is something about Gunray's aide (which was not Haako at the time)? At any rate, the Contract-Scribe article has Chronicles: The Prequels as its only source, and Libkath was said to be a Contract-Scribe. --LelalMekha (talk) 00:49, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
    • OK, in that case, I found him. He's on p. 195: "A loyal aide and contract-scribe ensures that Nute's lust for vengeance translates into an equitable agreement for the Trade Federation." ~Savage 10:58, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
      • Then I guess that Haako is a Contract-Scribe, and not Libkath. Thanks. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:14, May 16, 2013 (UTC)

Diamond

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Unidentified Dulok (diamond) has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:00, June 4, 2013 (UTC)

Bounty hunter strategy guide

• Hey Bob I'm told you might have access to Star Wars: Bounty Hunter: Prima's Official Strategy Guide, if so I was wondering if you could please do me a massive favour and check if chuba stew is mentioned. If it is it will be in the entry for the secondary bounty Romi Moola who appears in the Gardulla's palace level. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:50, June 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Hey, I'm away from my books for the moment, but I should have access in about a week briefly. I'll try to take a look then! ~Savage 14:46, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks man! Much appreciated. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:38, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

Troig!

TROOOOOOOOOIIIIIIIIGGGGG Menkooroo (talk) 03:42, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

• Updated! Thanks for pointing out that great thread. :) ~Savage 15:03, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Episode I Racer Prima Guide

Hey, Savage! Judging by your answers pertaining to Nugtosh, it looks like you own a copy of Star Wars: Episode I Racer: Prima's Official Strategy Guide. I wanted to know if anything can be salvaged about the Order of Dai Bendu in that book. I'm desperately trying to expand the article. Cheers. --LelalMekha (talk) 12:04, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

• There's this (again from the Prima guide) on p. 21: "An ancient Bendu tribal monastery high on Andobi Mountain serves as the starting point for the first three courses on this planet [Ando Prime]. Bendu Village has remained much the same for centuries. Far to the south, however, modern settlements have grown up in recent decades. The search for water sources for these cities led engineers to Andobi Mountain, where they constructed a giant pump station and pipeline to carry water south from its glaciers and lakes. Completing this massive civil project took many years and thousands of workers. For their entertainment, Podraces were, and still are, held annually along the access roads around the mountain." There's also this (same page): "Ten-Abu Donba is high priest of the ancient tribe of Bendu monks who live peacefully in the mountains, away from the bustling city. Three of the Podrace courses on this planet tear right through their village. In keeping with their nonconfrontational beliefs, howeve,r Ten-Abu Donba welcomes the visitors with open arms, hosting all the Podraces on the planet. Content with this harmony of monks and race fans, the tribe sells its crafts, tapestries, and, of course, its famous Anobi Mountian water at these events." ~Savage 12:10, June 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks a lot. There certainly are "new" pieces of information to salvage in what you just wrote. I'll see what I can do with it. --LelalMekha (talk) 12:15, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

Cragmoloid

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Cragmoloid has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — JangFett (Talk) 13:46, June 20, 2013 (UTC)

Species template

I am thinking about giving the species template a facelift, including introducing some subheadings as are found in most other infobox templates. Let me know what you think of this as a first cut. I have tried to group the fields in a logical fashion, using some seemingly relevant subheadings, although I am sure that you could think of more appropriate names. One downside is that sentience is no longer the very first field. --Eyrezer (talk) 03:47, June 27, 2013 (UTC)

• I like it! One could make the argument that sentience is as much a biological feature as a behavioral one, so I think it might be worthwhile to move the sentience field to the top section. Other than that, I see no reason not to upgrade. ~Savage 15:11, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
  • When it comes to infobox, do you consider that "Near-Human" to go in classification or distinctions? --Eyrezer (talk) 08:51, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
    • I usually put that under "classification." ~Savage 21:09, July 1, 2013 (UTC)

Nosaurian Image

Hi SavageBob! I added a picture to the Nosaurian entry, but it got removed by User:JMAS. He thought there was no room for an additional picture and said it was over-crowding. It's a small picture, I don't think it's over-crowding. But he asked me to get your opinion since you nominated it for FA. My modification is located here: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Nosaurian?oldid=4541460 The picture is under "Society and Culture". What do you think?--Richterbelmont10 (talk) 04:12, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

• Hi, Richter! Thanks for the message. I think I agree with JMAS, though. Aside from the overcrowding issue, the big sticking point for me is that the image you added doesn't add anything to the article except some additional graphics. The image doesn't have anything to do with Nosaurian society or culture, so it would only really be appropriate for the "Biology and appearance" section. But there we already have a full-body image of a Nosaurian, so that's preferable to one that only shows the Nosaurian's head. I hope this makes sense. I don't mean to discourage you from contributing to Wookieepedia, but with images, we have to take these things into consideration. :) ~Savage 21:51, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • Ok, I appreciate your reply. Thanks.--Richterbelmont10 (talk) 01:42, July 6, 2013 (UTC)

Skup

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Skup has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Green Tentacle (Talk) 12:07, August 3, 2013 (UTC)

Zeuol question

Hello Bob, I happened to look at the Zeuol article, and saw that you list the species as actually appearing in Star Wars: Episode III Revenge of the Sith. However, I always thought that Eeusu Estornii was a cut character who never made it to the final film. Just wanted to give you a heads up, and see what are your thoughts. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:32, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

First EduCorps meeting

Hello, I am inviting you to the very first EduCorps IRC meeting, which will be held at 7 PM ET on Saturday August 31st. I am inviting all Inquisitors, AgriCorps members, and EduCorps members to a meeting in order to discuss the large amount of old comprehensive articles that are in need of maintenance. I would also like to discuss the possibility of increasing the responsibilities of EduCorps-only users due to the lack of reviewers on the Comprehensive article nominations page and CA review page. Please come join the discussion on this page if you wish to participate in the meeting. I encourage anyone who wants to contribute to add any articles with issues to the appropriate section on the page. Thank you for your time.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 04:00, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Move help

Well, I can do, but I don't see why you want to move it. If the character was refered to by that name even at least once, then that name is surely canonical despite no further uses? I would equate it to the DS-1 Orbital Battle Station name - it's barely refered by later material (excepting the upcoming Haynes Manual) but we still consider it to be the "true" name. - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 09:02, August 19, 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough, the reasoning seems sound enough. Page moved as requested :) - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 19:02, August 20, 2013 (UTC)

Squib & Dulok

• Star Wars: The Old Republic: Rise of the Hutt Cartel — Scavenging Crew Skill mission: "Urgent Recruitment"

A Squib salvage team needs another pair of hands before they can set out on their latest scrap run. Volunteer your companion for the job.

• A conversation between an Imperial player and Treek—note: this may or may not be true. Treek's life story is different depending on whether you're Republic or Imperial; Hall Hood has suggested that she's not telling the truth all the time. Cade Calrayn 17:26, August 23, 2013 (UTC)

I warred with a Dulok tribe in the Sagreb Swamps. They regretted challenging me. I claimed Dulok ears for my necklace!

Duloks accused me of trespassing. They sent warriors to skin me. Big mistake. Duloks are tall, but thin. Their legs break easily.

They are scaly, bony lizards. They have big ears and small brains. My homeworld does not miss their kind when they die.

I lost my necklace on Nar Shaddaa. A vrblther ate it. I took the vrblther's ears as a replacement. They are not as good.

• • Thanks, Cade! I'll see about sorting through this toute de suite. ~Savage 11:52, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

Layout guide

I heard you might be looking for this :P Shortcut is WP:LG/OOU. Cade Calrayn 17:57, August 27, 2013 (UTC)

• • Thanks, Cade! Ewoks may happen soon, then. :) ~Savage 11:52, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

Attark in BTM

Hello Bob, just want to ask you about Attark in Star Wars: Behind the Magic. Can you give whatever info it has on him? Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:17, August 27, 2013 (UTC)

• • Hey, Hanzo. Let me see if I can find my copy of BTM. Last I checked, it was missing. I'll get back to you soon. ~Savage 11:52, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

Yoxgit in Behind the Magic

Hello, could you check and see what information there is on Yoxgit in Star Wars: Behind the Magic? Thank you for your time.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 17:50, August 30, 2013 (UTC)

WOTM nomination

Thank you for supporting my nomination of WOTM for September 2013 as result for recognizing my work and hopefully some improvement for our beloved wookieepedia. -- Jedi Marty (talk) 23:26, August 31, 2013 (UTC)

Kintan crusher

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Kintan crusher has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:28, September 4, 2013 (UTC)

Ref errors

Hey Savage, I have noticed what you reported in MJ's talk page just now and went on by to check it myself (apologies for that :P). Anyway I have noticed that you have some mistakes on your references'. I ask you to allow me to edit your sandbox so you can see what I have fixed. Winterz (talk) 17:03, September 10, 2013 (UTC)

• Although I have fixed the error that was blocking the Reflist's function you still have a few ref errors but I'm sure you'll want to handle these simple ones yourself. Winterz (talk) 17:09, September 10, 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the cookiee however, notice that the error isn't there (that was just me being "BOLD" <.<). The mistake that caused the error was by giving space between a "/" and ">" as in "/ >. It is strangely simple but also enough to cause chaos. ;) Winterz (talk) 18:26, September 10, 2013 (UTC)
    • Ah, got it! That's good to know in case I ever see this again. ~Savage 19:49, September 10, 2013 (UTC)

EduCorps Meeting 2

You are invited to participate in EduCorps meeting 2, which is scheduled for 7 PM ET on Saturday, September 21st.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 14:14, September 12, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Species culture

When I was working on making the Society and Culture category less overpopulated, I came across the Culture by People category. Many of the categories were formatted differently: no description, having cultures species be a subcat, or the other way around. So, to keep everything the same, I looked at some of the oldest, and more prominent culture categories to see which way it was done for them; the species was a subcat of the culture. So, since this is how it was done first, and is more logical, I went through and standardized all the Culture by People categories. I'll use Squib as an example: the Squibs category is solely for members of the Squib species, while the Squib culture category is for everything related to Squib culture. The Squibs category should be a subcat of Squib culture, because each individual Squib is a part of that culture. Squib culture should not be a subcat of Squibs, because the Squibs category is specifically for the individual members of the Squib species, not the species as a whole. Trip391 (talk) 19:59, September 14, 2013 (UTC)

Francis

Hey, Bob. I know this is going back a ways, but I was hoping you could check and see if anyone ever satisfied your concern about an update here. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:51, September 23, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, Tope. Wow, I completely forgot about that comment! I just checked the archived blog post I mentioned there, and it seems like no one ever responded by updating the article. There are several key details that are left out of our article's BTS section. I would argue, then, that the article as it stands it not comprehensive. It would be an easy update, though, since it's only BTS info that is missing. I hope this helps! ~Savage 13:38, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
  • It does. Great, thanks for letting me know. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:45, September 23, 2013 (UTC)

EduCorps things

Hello, EduCorps member. This is a general message to you, as an EC member, regarding EC membership responsibilities. In accordance with recent site mandate, it is now the responsibility of all EC-exclusive members (EC members who are not otherwise also members of the Inq or AC) to maintain the Comprehensive article system by reviewing CANs and attending EC meetings. Since the beginning of this initiative, several members of the EduCorps have made no effort to meet their new responsibilities, so the EC came to a formal agreement to send out general notices to all EC members reminding them of their expected responsibilities. For those EC members who do not meet their responsibilities, an effort will be made to remove their membership. The next EC meeting has been scheduled for next weekend, on Saturday, October 12, at 7 PM ET. Hope to see everyone there. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:49, October 4, 2013 (UTC)

Art of RotJ

Hello Bob, IIRC you have a copy of The Art of Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi. I'm 99.999% sure the script mentions the Imperial dignitaries, and would thus be a source for the unidentified red-and-black-robed Imperial Advisor, whom I'm trying to get a comprehensive source list for. Can you check it out? Also if you have found Star Wars: Behind the Magic, can you also check that too? I certainly think they're all mentioned in the script there too, and am also wondering if we can see that guy pictured too. Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:31, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, Hanzo, I'm away from home at the moment, but I'm happy to look when I get back! I'll let you know on your talk page. ~Savage 19:48, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
  • Hey Bob, they're accompanying Palpatine to the Death Star. Also the uncropped photo is in Star Wars: The Official Starships & Vehicles Collection 22. Hope this helps. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:59, October 11, 2013 (UTC)
    • Ah, OK, when he disembarks from his shuttle. I'll check for you soon, then. ~Savage 16:14, October 11, 2013 (UTC)

Wisties

Hey SavageBob! Thanks for your addition to the Wistie article. ;-) Now that I think of it, it's possible that you have access to resources I don't have regarding the Endor material. For example, could you tell me how the Wisties appear in "Malani the Warrior?" Also, is it possible to obtain a clear animation cel of a Wistie from the cartoon? --LelalMekha (talk) 19:25, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

• Sure thing! I'll take a look at "Malani the Warrior" soon. As for the cell, do you just want any cell, or did you have a particular image in mind? ~Savage 19:48, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
  • The best option would be a cell featuring a full body shot of a Wistie, preferably an uncursed one. But of course, I'll make the best of what we have. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:53, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks for everything, Savage! ;-) --LelalMekha (talk) 12:09, October 9, 2013 (UTC)

Bovorians

Hey Savage. I wanted your opinion on something there. As part of the Coordinates Challenge, I was intending to work on the Bovorian article for square O-13. However, I noticed a continuity mistake: their homeworld of Bovo Yagen was only christened so after being discovered by an Imperial explorer. However, in the old HoloNet News website, they were already called Bovorians at the time of the Separatist Crisis. Do you think it would be suitable for a status article to bear the "canon conflict" template? --LelalMekha (talk) 11:57, October 11, 2013 (UTC)

• Hmm. I think you're right! There's obviously some sort of conflict there. I'd say use the template and explain what you said here in the BTS. ~Savage 12:55, October 11, 2013 (UTC)

Quotetrans

Replying to the comment left in your undo edit for Ebe Endocott, would all quotes spoken in another language use the quotetrans? For example, Ebe's P&T quote is spoken in what we can assume to be Huttese (From Episode I Racer), but we are given basic/english subtitles without quotes. So, what do we do there? Normal quotes? Or the Translation quotes? --Clonehunter^{(Report your W.M.D.)} 18:24, October 12, 2013 (UTC)

• Yeah, we use Quotetrans if the quote has been translated from another language into Basic for our benefit. So, in the comic, we can tell the language spoken is not Basic because of the << and >> symbols. Thus, we use Quotetrans. We would use it for Jabba's dialogue from Return of the Jedi as well, unless we were displaying it in Huttese. So, in most cases, we use it if something has been translated for the reader or viewer's benefit, and not necessarily only if we are the ones translating something. In fact, it's almost never used in the latter type of situation. ~Savage 19:02, October 12, 2013 (UTC)

EduCorps Meeting 4

Greetings fellow EduCorps! Our fourth meeting will be held Saturday October 26 at 7 PM ET. I hope to see your there! OLIOSTER ^(talk) 14:18, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

Sateen Vestswe in "Chronicles: The Prequels"

Hi Bob! Whenever you've got the occasion, could you please check Star Wars Chronicles: The Prequels for me? I'd like to know what it exactly says about Sateen Vestswe so I can know what should be sourced to that book. Thanks in advance ;-) --LelalMekha (talk) 20:43, October 14, 2013 (UTC)

• Hello Bob. I don't mean to bother you, but I think you haven't seen that message. ^^' If that's possible, I'd like to nominate Sateen for GA on short notice, so it would be really helpful if you could check Chronicles: The Prequels for me. :-$ --LelalMekha (talk) 10:39, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • Oh, sorry! I'll see if I can check tomorrow or Thursday. Remind me if you haven't heard back by Friday! ~Savage 22:26, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Comic Book Resource images

Ah! You've raised a valid point there. I must shamefully confess that I didn't even consider the question before uploading them. :-$ How could we determine whether they're canon or not with certitude, though? Honestly, I think that as long as the characters don't do any particular action and look the way they do in the actual comic book, that should be ok, don't you think? --LelalMekha (talk) 22:13, October 14, 2013 (UTC)

• Yes, there can be no harm in asking Giallongo, who seems to be very open. However, he might not even know it himself. Leland Chee might be able to give a definitive answer, but he's a busy man. (On a completely unrelated note, do you know if they intend to sell a digital version of that comic? Because I just can't wait to update Charal, Talisman of the Raven and Wistie... Without the comic, of course, I'm stuck.) --LelalMekha (talk) 23:22, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
• Oh, and another thing: it's very likely that Giallongo used "Ewok–Dulok War" because he saw it here. --LelalMekha (talk) 23:24, October 14, 2013 (UTC)

Shadows of Endor

Hi Savage, just a few questions. I was wondering if we should restore the references to the interview with Zack over on Newsrama.com in the appearance list...I can just see someone eventually questioning Renz, in particular, as fanon. Also, Lumat is mentioned as appearing in the interview but I can't identify him. Any ideas? Can you also point out Deej, Shodu & Winda on page 73? And finally, on page 10, any idea who the two Ewoks who brought Agluk before Chirpa are? Bo Shuda (talk) 02:59, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

• Hi, Bo. I removed the references because they fit a pattern of articles on sources here: we source all appearances when the source is still unreleased (based on interviews and press releases), then we remove those footnotes once the source comes out and stands for itself. So, yeah, most of the refs I removed are probably not needed anymore since the source is out. But I see what you mean on Renz; his reference should probably be restored. One way we can duck test many of the Ewoks in the comic is via this image on Giallongo's Tumblr blog -- it shows his character designs for many of the characters. Using that as a basis, we can see that Shodu is the Ewok on the far right on p. 73. And Winda is the wokling. Lumat is another matter -- I actually can't find him, if he's supposed to look like the striped Ewok in that image. We may need to remove him from the "Appearances" and note in BTS that Giallongo said he'd appear, but he really doesn't. And Deej is the Ewok on p. 73 looking longingly at Wicket. I'm basing this on the hood design (particularly, the little bone fragment on the left, which matches the one in our portrait of Deej on our Deej Warrick page), on the eye color, and on the fur color. As for p. 10's Ewoks, one of them might be Romba, but I'm not really sure... ~Savage 03:18, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the quick and detailed response! That image link you provided is fantastic. Thanks. I'm fairly certain it's not Romba. I think he can be seen, his back turned, purple hooded without a feather on page 26 next to Fufuneek who's wearing an orange hood. If that's the case they may have confused Romba's design with that of Machook. To my knowledge no Ewoks have had stones/gems attached to their hoods in other sources so we'll probably have to wait for confirmation as to who those two on page 10 actually are; along with whether Charal's conjured skeletons are the remains of Duloks or Sanyassans. Bo Shuda (talk) 03:48, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
    • This being said, I know I'm running the risk of being spoiled, but... Savage, what do you personally think of Charal's involvement in this tale? Does it fit, continuity-wise? Knowing that she resides with the Sanyassans and that they all have been there for 100 years, doesn't the latters' absence from the comic seem awkward? --LelalMekha (talk) 23:47, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
      • Maybe, maybe not -- there seems to have been a seismic shift in continuity such that the Ewok TV movies now seem to take place after ROTJ, not before. Unless I'm misunderstanding how continuity was before the comic, of course. ~Savage 23:49, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
        • If the Ewok movies happen after ROTJ, there's a continuity error. In ROTJ junior novelization, Wicket remembers the Towanis and Charal when meeting Leia... --LelalMekha (talk) 23:56, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
          • Well, there's an 8-month gap between the depiction of Charal in the movie and the book's final coda (which is coterminous with Jedi), so there's still a chance the continuity hasn't shifted too much. It would be something like this: Ewoks cartoon and comics, Shadows of Endor (all but last 2 pages), Ewok TV movies, ROTJ/last 2 pages of Shadows of Endor. Does that sound feasible? ~Savage 11:57, October 16, 2013 (UTC)

Adaptations

Hi Bob, I'm currently fiddling around with the idea of a navigation template for each SW film and am working from your exhaustive lists. I hope you don't mind if I've ported some of it over to the my template subpage's talk page just for the purposes of crossing things off. Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 23:05, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

• Not at all! That's what it's there for. If there were some way to move it to WP space, I'd do it. My ideal is that others would add to it. ~Savage 23:17, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

Endor timeline

Hello again! Just to let you know that I asked Zack Giallongo about the timeline of Shadows of Endor in relation to the rest of the Ewok material. Here is what he answered: "The two Ewok movies take place before ROTJ during the 8-month period between "Shadows of Endor" and "Return of the Jedi". So, the timeline can be seen as Shadows of Endor > Caravan of Courage > Battle for Endor > Return of the Jedi. Shadows of Endor also helps explain why we don't see the Duloks in the later stories. Hope that helps!" --LelalMekha (talk) 19:17, October 31, 2013 (UTC)

• Cool! I figured it had to be something like that. Though, I'm a bit sad for the Duloks. I always just assumed they were a much smaller band than the Bright Tree Ewoks and that they stayed hidden during the Empire's reign on Endor. :( ~Savage 12:01, November 1, 2013 (UTC)

Morag and the castaway Tulgah

Hey SavageBob! Since you're an expert in that matter, I'd like to ask you something about Morag. From what I see in her article, she was born on Endor around 200 BBY. However, the Tulgah article says she was a descendant of Tulgah colonists who arrived on the Forest Moon in 130 BBY. Any idea how to solve that contradiction? --LelalMekha (talk) 13:42, November 4, 2013 (UTC)

• Interesting problem! Here's what I've been able to dig up: The "200 years old" comment in the Morag article seems to be based on this comment from Logray in Sunstar Versus Shadowstone (NOT The Cries of the Trees as the current article claims): "For 200 snows you've plagued us. How could I forget you!" This, of course, means Endor years, not standard years, so some mathematical conversion needs to happen here (and the Morag article is thus wrong). Our article on Morag also cites the Star Wars Encyclopedia for her being shriveled and stooped and being more than 200 years old. This seems to be an error; the encyclopedia mentions a "shriveled, stooped body" but it says nothing about that being an effect of age, and it says nothing of her age itself. For all we know, it seems to be a broader species trait of Tulgahs, judging by the other one we have a picture of. Then, "Castaways of Endor" says a ship with Tulgah colonists crash-landed on Endor c. 130 BBY, and that the Rebels were surprised to find their descendants on the moon during the Galactic Civil War. The implication is obviously that Morag is either part of this group or descended from them, but the article doesn't mention her explicitly. So, in sum, I think we first need to find out how many standard years are equivalent to 200 Endor years. If the numbers still don't add up, we can assume Morag was not part of that ship of Tulgah colonists and came to Endor some other way. This would not violate canon, since she's not mentioned as part of those colonists in "Castaways." ~Savage 13:03, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • And to followup: Assuming my math is correct, 200 Endor years is 220.27 standard years. So, we have to assume either Logray is mistaken (unlikely) or that Morag was not associated with the Tulgah colony ship mentioned in "Castaways." ~Savage 13:21, November 5, 2013 (UTC)

Kal'Falnl's ship image?

Greetings, Wookieepedian.

Not that long ago, you made an exhaustive research about the Quor'sav alien species so you are probably knowledgeable about this subject. Kal'Falnl C'ndros's ship, Shelltooth, is a modified Gymnsor-3 freighter as specified in Secrets of the Sisar Run - albeit it's supposed to be a custom-built ship per Kal's Decipher card, Kal's Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia entry and Kal's Databank entry, thus not a "stock freighter with modifications" but a "ship built from scratch according to Kal's specifications" - but let's not delve on that and assume that Running the Sisar considers the Shelltooth to be a Gymnsor-3.

Now: I can see the silhouette of a Gymnsor-3 in Pirates and Privateers pg 58. I see the images in Running the Sisar and I'm looking for something similar, trying to identify the Shelltooth. The best thing I can find is the image in pg 33 of Secrets of the Sisar Run, by Marshal Andrews III. I think the ship in the top left corner of that image may be the Shelltooth. I'd like to ask if you, in your informed opinion, agree with my approach about the image.

Thank you for listening, --95.122.164.98 19:07, November 6, 2013 (UTC)

P.S.: About the sentence "The world (Uaua) fell within the domain of Darth Revan's Sith Empire from 1004 to 1000 BBY", I'm also confused. By 1004 BBY, Revan was long dead; this was the time of Kaan, Bane and other sith. Why did you say Revan in that line?

P.S.S: Damn, I logged out inadvertently. It's me, Farl.

• Hey, Skippy! Nice to hear from you! I didn't take many notes on the Shelltooth when I did my research, but I checked over what you proposed, and I think I agree with your conclusions. I think the "custom-built" aspect is that she widened the corridors in the ship, which is probably enough to qualify as "custom-built." And I think that's a mistake on my part about Revan -- my Old Republic chronology is not that great. I think the proper conflict is the the New Sith Wars, but I'm not sure what faction to use. Any suggestions? ~Savage 13:12, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

• • OK, let's take it one step at a time. Uno alla volta per carità, like we say. First of all, glad to talk you again. Secondly, thanks for the help on Shelltooth, I'll consider that matter to be closed. Now on the juicy subject: Who controls Uaua from 1004 to 1000 BBY. You base your information on page 133 of The Essential Atlas, which I studied in detail. The Sith ruling sect changed throughout the New Sith War, but the so-called New Sith Empire more or less stopped being c. 1,010 BBY because Kaan conquered it all and restructured it as the Brotherhood of Darkness, particularly per The Essential Guide to Warfare, page 44, right column; and the BoD will be the dominant Sith power until the Battle of Ruusan in 1000 BBY. Was it the only Sith power? Absolutely no: At least Darth Bane was an active Sith outside the BoD; theoretically, per my recent studies about the New Sith War (You know, tabletop RPG), many other Sith factions may exist. However, the map in Atlas page 133 refers unambiguously, per the accompanying text (pg 134), to Kaan's Sith armies, thus to the Brotherhood of Darkness. I would strongly suggest replacing "Revan's Sith Empire" with "[Kaan's or the] Brotherhood of Darkness". Of course, the safest option would be simply saying "the Sith", in general, which would also be true but maybe shier. In any case, I feel that the article on Quor'sav should be your domain. Hope I helped you, see you by e-mail. --Skippy Farlstendoiro (talk) 16:32, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

EC Meeting 5

Greetings, EduCorps Meeting 5 is scheduled for Saturday, November 16th at 7 PM ET. If you are unable to attend, please leave notes on the meeting page on how the articles under review should be handled. (If you are not an EC-only member and wish to stop receiving EC meeting notifications, please leave a message on my talk page.)--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 05:58, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Dulok skeletons

Hey Savage, any plans on adding info about Charal raising the Dulok skeletons from the dead to the Dulok article? Bo Shuda (talk) 04:55, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, Bo. Yes, I still plan to expand the "History" section of Dulok. I've got the notes taken; I just need to do the update. It'll probably be in the next few days! ~Savage 22:26, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

Huttsbane

I don't quite understand your need to have reverted ALL of my edits on the Huttsbane (even though you did later revert back some of them). My edits made the article more accurate and more concise (not to mention a lot of it was actually copy editing).

Also the GameDS template looks considerably worse in the article than the header template I replaced it with considering that the text within the GameDS template is so short. I hope you will not object to me restoring my changes in full. --Gnarscien (talk) 22:07, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

I've made a minor correction to the 'Behind the scenes' section, which I think is what you were referring to when you meant it doesn't all add up in the game. Other than that, I see no good reason to revert the other edits. --Gnarscien (talk) 22:13, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

Look again at the history; I realized my error and then only partially reverted. The problem with the version of the page you've currently go up there is that you haven't used the proper templates to indicate that killing Huttsbane is the dark side option. We assume that's the canonical outcome, but we have to indicate it relies on the player's choice. ~Savage 23:17, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

That's what the EmpireHeader template is for. That's what Grand Champion of the Great Hunt (Cold War) uses, and that's for an article on an entire class. I guess I don't understand the distinction of when GameDS should be used as opposed to EmpireHeader. In my opinion, GameDS only seems acceptable if there's a huge body of text between GameDS and GameOver templates (see Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic if you want to see what I mean). If you think that GameDS should be used over EmpireHeader, then feel free to change that, but I ask that the other edits remain as they are mostly improvements on accuracy and conciseness. --Gnarscien (talk) 23:33, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, the other changes are fine; my mistake on changing those, so sorry. It appears that the page for Template:EmpireHeader shows it's only supposed to be used for the eight character classes, so I guess that solves that dilemma. :) ~Savage 14:28, November 16, 2013 (UTC)

Yep! No problem. --Gnarscien (talk) 15:16, November 16, 2013 (UTC)

EduCorps membership notice

Hello, this is a notice regarding the recent changes to the EduCorps reviewing system. EduCorps members are now responsible for either attending or leaving notes for the regularly scheduled EC meetings. If you are unable to leave notes or attend the next meeting—which is tentatively scheduled for Saturday, December 7th at 7 PM ET—you will be removed from the EduCorps membership list. If you are able to participate fully at a later date, your EduCorps rights may be reinstated at that time.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 03:47, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

CT:Re-opening TOR and video game canon

I thought you may wish to participate in Forum:CT:Re-opening TOR and video game canon seeing as you were involved in the consensus reached at Forum:CT:TOR and video game canon. --Gnarscien (talk) 16:23, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

EC Meeting 6

EC Meeting 6

Greetings, EduCorps Meeting 6 is scheduled for Saturday, December 7th at 7 PM ET. If you are unable to attend, please leave notes on the meeting page on how the articles under review should be handled. Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:38, November 22, 2013 (UTC)

Species

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Unidentified Majoor species has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Cade Calrayn 20:15, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

Stennes Shifter update

Hello Bob, just wanted to let you know that Trinto Duaba has been confirmed as the Holiday Special Stennes in the new Blog entry by Sompeetalay and Wild Whiphid. Therefore, an update to your FA Stennes Shifter is needed. Cheers! Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:53, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

• Cool article! Thanks for letting me know. I should be able to get back in the swing of things after next week, when my semester ends. ~Savage 11:48, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • Just to let you know you forgot to add The Star Wars Holiday Special to the appearances, which I have just done. Now that we know Trinto Duaba is in the Holiday Special, are there any missing stuff which depicts the character not added to the sources/appearances? I have seen only the Holiday Special and nothing else back when it was unknown if Trinto was that Stennes, who had his own article, but hope you can look into it. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:30, December 6, 2013 (UTC)
    • Good point. I'll make sure to check. ~Savage 22:07, December 6, 2013 (UTC)

Ribba Nom Nom

Hey SavageBob, I have no idea if this is bad form or not, but I was wondering if I could get your support on a CA I just did. It just needs one more vote (I think), as it already has 3 EduCorps member votes. Again, if it's rude to ask, I apologize, but here's the link just in case: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Comprehensive_article_nominations#Ribba Thanks in advance. Demos Traxen (talk) 18:42, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

• No worries, man. I appreciate the offer and I'll definitely take you up on it in the future. Demos Traxen (talk) 19:03, December 20, 2013 (UTC)

Objections complied with

Hello SavageBob, your objections in Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Knire Dark have been complied with for a while (one at least) now. Could you please strike them down or take a look at them and see if they've been properly complied with. Thanks. Winterz (talk) 19:19, December 19, 2013 (UTC)

Lugubraa and Mnggal-Mnggal

As much as I like having that stuff in there, it was removed because there isn't "hard evidence" to support the connection. : ( See my talk page for details. SinisterSamurai (talk) 16:49, December 21, 2013 (UTC)

• Not sure about the info myself. It's obvious that it's what they intended, but as SinSam said on his talk page it's an "unidentified duck-like being" situation. I saw that you reverted the changed on Lugubraa, and that's okay as we're in a sort of flux with this info. Hopefully we'll see a response on the Star Wars blog (though contacting Daniel Wallace himself is a better option, as I've done that in the past) some time soon. Demos Traxen (talk) 07:56, December 22, 2013 (UTC)

Meeting 7

Hey, just a heads up, Educorps Meeting 7 is taking place tomorrow at 7pm ET. If you cannot make it, please leave notes. Thanks, Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:12, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

• No worries then, next meeting will probably be in early February. Supreme Emperor (talk) 01:06, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Pacithhip info

Hello Bob, the Pacithhip article is missing information relevant to Ketwol from the latter's Power of the Jedi figure. Just wanted to give you a heads-up. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:29, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

• Hey, Hanzo. Can you be more specific? I drew information from that figure when writing the article, so what do you see that's missing? ~Savage 18:52, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
  • The Adventures info, screenshot here. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:33, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
    • Ah, OK. In this case, I think I thought that info was very Ketwol-specific and didn't really say anything about the Pacithhip species as a whole. I've been taken to task for giving too much info on notable members of species before, after all. :) I think I still don't see that it's essential info. What do you think? ~Savage 20:08, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
      • Fair enough. I wasn't quite sure as I have little experience with species articles, but I would believe that's fine to leave out. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:17, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Another Dulok

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Unidentified Dulok (O) has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — CC7567 (talk) 07:01, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Regarding your question in the barn burner page

Hi SavageBob! Just saw your question regarding the creation of a "sperm" article, and it made me think of something. I've been willing to fix the reproduction article for a long time by now, but I'm lacking serious sources regarding the actual reproduction process. You said you got several sources that may pertain to that subject? (By the way, I think that the article should be called "sex" and not "reproduction," since it also includes "non-reproductive mating." Then again, I'm European, and differences in mentality may be involved here.) --LelalMekha (talk) 19:38, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

• Hey, Lelal! The sources I mentioned are now listed on the sperm page, which Master Jonathan kindly allowed me to create. Revamping the reproduction page sounds like a great idea! I think it should be fine at that title, since you could cover both sexual and asexual methods of reproduction in the same article. I think of the sources I found, The Wildlife of Star Wars: A Field Guide might be very important; it seems to talk a lot about the reproduction of a lot of the species it features. ~Savage 23:57, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Rugger

Hey Bob - the rugger only get a brief mention in relation to the Yuzzem hunting them, then storing them and cooking them over open fires. - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 21:29, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Insider Guide - Podracers!

I was just wondering if you ever got back to your copy of The Phantom Menace Insider's Guide. Not to rush, prod, push, yell, bark, marinate, verb, or yadda, but, just wondering. Also, while the topic we were gonna look at was Slide Paramita, I was wondering if a peek could also look for Navior, who is apparently listed on the insider's guide Wookieepedia (Holy shit, it forces me to spell that correctly) page. And you don't happen to have the art book by chance, do you? I swear to god Slide Paramita was the original incarnation of Mars Guo. The old (2001-era) databank has a preview shot of Guo's concept art, but the link is dead. THe preview however shows the character;s midsection, and it has Paramita's skinny body and outfit wings (except they're orange). Who could've guessed, huh? Anyways, mostly wondering if you got a chance at looking at the insider's guide or not. --Clonehunter^{(Report your W.M.D.)} 03:50, January 12, 2014 (UTC)

GAN

Hey Savage. While not entirely an objection complied with, Clonehunter put up a question about your objection almost 2 weeks back. Could you check it and provide him some assistance or closure, it would be most helpful ;). It's this nom. Winterz (talk) 18:49, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

• I was waiting on him to report back on his findings, but I've pinged him. :) ~Savage 19:18, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

EduCorps Meeting 8

EduCorps Meeting 8 will be held on February 8th at 7 PM ET. Don't be afraid of the smile.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 00:56, January 18, 2014 (UTC)

Alien thermoregulation

Hey SavageBob! I was thinking of this: since Star Wars Science Adventures: Journey Across Planet X clearly defines the differences between endothermy and ectothermy, and since many guides describe the species they feature as warm- or cold-blooded, I was thinking that a "thermoregulation" item could be added to the species infobox. However, I don't think many people would be interested in implementing such a change, which is why I'm asking your opinion first. (In the mean time, I already created categories.) Cheers! --LelalMekha (talk) 11:51, January 24, 2014 (UTC)

• Hey! Interesting find. I think whether a species is endo- or exothermic should be mentioned in the article if known, by all means. But I'm not sure it belongs in the infobox. I just can't think of many species for which this information is known. If it were a significant percentage, it would be worth looking into, though. ~Savage 19:07, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
  • As you can see, each of the new categories I made already has 12 articles in it. Granted, it's not a lot, but I found them just by glancing through the articles we have as they're currently written. There could be many other mentions. You also have to admit there already are infobox parameters which, on the whole, are very seldom used. I'm thinking of the "mass" one, for example; this is the kind of information that many older guides never gave. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:11, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
    • Yeah, I searching for "cold-blooded" and "warm-blooded" within our site on Google yields many, many hits: [1], [2]. "Endothermic" yields a couple more: Iyra and Lamproid. A couple more thoughts, though: First, many species articles already note endo- and ectothermia in the "Distinctions" field. Second, because we note things like "mammal" in the "Class" field, the "Thermoregulation" field might be redundant for certain classes of creature. In other words, is this maybe something that is better left to "Distinctions" for species where thermoregulation can't be assumed from one of the other fields? ~Savage 19:19, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
      • You're probably right. As long as the categories can stay, I should be happy with that anyway. ;-) To be precise, I was thinking of a specific infobox field just because sometimes, the thermoregulatin type of a species can't be deduced on its own. The GFFA has warm blooded reptiles, and let's not even speak of the reptavians. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:22, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
        • I agree. Maybe it could be placed within the "Class" field. So, for instance, if a species is a warm-blooded reptile, the "Class" field would say both "Reptile" and "Endotherm", perhaps as a bulleted list. ~Savage 19:25, January 24, 2014 (UTC)

Giallongo's character cards and "Ewok–Dulok wars"

Hi SavageBob! If you remember, we had a conversation about whether Zack Giallongo's profile cards for the Ewok characters were to be considered "official" or not. Here is the answer! --LelalMekha (talk) 15:01, February 8, 2014 (UTC)

• Ah, very nice! Glad you checked! ~Savage 03:09, February 10, 2014 (UTC)

OOU LG addendum

The proposal to the OOU LG has been modified with an exception about future series. Please be sure to check the CT to be sure that you still support the proposal. Thanks. Cade Calrayn 18:10, February 12, 2014 (UTC)

New step to archiving a CAN

Hello, since you are a member of the EduCorps, I just wanted to let you know that there is another step that should be completed when archiving a CAN due to the change in the nomination system. Here is the new addition.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 02:36, February 18, 2014 (UTC)

Force-eater

Hello, Bob. Seeing as you wrote the Stennes Shifter article, which is currently highlighted on the Main Page, I wanted to inform you that the species' alternative name, "Force-eaters," is mentioned in the intro but nowhere in the article body. That should be done so with a proper reference, and then "Force-eater" or "eaters" should be created as a redirect to the Stennes Shifter article. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:40, March 13, 2014 (UTC)

• Cool, done. ~Savage 23:45, March 13, 2014 (UTC)

EduCorps meeting X

Just to let everyone know, the next EduCorps meeting is at 7 PM ET on April 12th.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 03:30, March 28, 2014 (UTC)

Another advisor in BtM

Hello Bob, I overlooked this as Kren Blista-Vanee was not my FA at the time I asked and you verified this guy was pictured in Star Wars: Behind the Magic, but as I have now become Kren's unofficial caretaker of sorts after a recent update, I noticed he was missing all the script sources in his source list. Before I actually add BtM to the list, I want to check if that also includes any images of him (I'm almost certain it does, but want to verify), to determine whether that would need an (Indirect mention only) tag. Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 05:52, April 10, 2014 (UTC)

• Nevermind, got it taken care of already. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:56, April 13, 2014 (UTC)

EC meeting time change

In order to allow time for the Inquisitorius meeting, I have worked out a compromise that moves the EduCorps meeting up to 6 PM ET. If you are unable to attend, please leave notes. Sorry for the confusion.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 23:36, April 11, 2014 (UTC)

EduCorps notice

This is a notice to inform you that you may be removed from the EduCorps review board if you are unable to leave notes or attend the next meeting.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 03:11, April 13, 2014 (UTC)

EduCorps Meeting 11

Please note that EduCorps Meeting 11 will be held on Sunday, May 18th at 8 PM ET. Please leave notes if you are unable to attend.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 06:35, May 6, 2014 (UTC)