Talk: Tommy-Macaroni/2018

< User talk:Tommy-Macaroni
This is a talk page archive.
Please do not edit this page as it is a historic archive.
If you need to leave a message, please use my current talk page.

Asteroid dreadnought

From what I've been able to see it's a single ship, not a class. I used these two review videos, here and here and pausing it to analyze the pages to get the info from since I don't have the actual book.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:13, January 3, 2018 (UTC)

  • Yeah me too! Okay thanks, you must have much better eyesight than me because I didn't pick that up. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 17:38, January 4, 2018 (UTC)
    • Yeah I lower the speed to .25 and pause and analyze. Sometimes it can take quite a while to go over a page. I'll be getting the book when it comes out in July and if anything is wrong then we can just change the info then unless someone has the deluxe here.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:18, January 4, 2018 (UTC)
      • I may get the deluxe at some point, but until then apprehending it off YouTube works fine, especially since there's so much new info in the book. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 20:45, January 4, 2018 (UTC)
        • Yes there's a ton of new info and a lot of small legends to canon content, it's a gold mine, and it's long, it has around 160 pages I think. All the info I've been able to pull off must total around 40 pages or something. It's a very good book--Vitus InfinitusTalk 00:59, January 5, 2018 (UTC)

Re: Vehement

I had inferred the ship's class from the picture. The book itself just says "Imperial Star Destroyer." - Cwedin(talk) 20:04, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

RE: PAGENAME

I've always done it as typing the ship name rather than having PAGENAME, I guess neither is incorrect or anything just more down to how one wants to do it I guess --Lewisr (talk) 18:59, January 11, 2018 (UTC)

Galaxy of Heroes

Tarkin is in Star Wars galaxy of heroes—Unsigned comment by ClashGamer15 (talk • contribs)

Re: Imperial insignia

Hello there! I see that's you've started a side project regarding the Imperial rank insignia. Have you seen this? I think it might come in handy. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 15:46, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

  • Wow, thanks for telling me about this! That sure is helpful, and I'll definitely have to rework some of that page. A bit of a shame we can't use it for the actual article, after the most recent CT, but definitely interesting. I've actually been working on the project for a quite some time, both on and off of Wookieepedia, so it's nice to be able to compare it to something. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 16:45, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Interdictor vessel

Hey, I forgot to add the inuse template as I had copied that info to my notes and was making the immobilizer section on the article. :) sorry for the mistake--Vitus InfinitusTalk 19:52, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

  • Don't worry! Feel free to take over if you want to do it, the inuse is already there… — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:54, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Veers

LOOK AT THE PICTURE OF GENERAL VEERS DUDE!!!!!!—Unsigned comment by ClashGamer15 (talk • contribs)

  • "The image" isn't a good enough source. You didn't source it to anything, however. Understand that as long as you don't, you will be reverted. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 14:44, January 18, 2018 (UTC)

Spacetroopers

Yes, they can be under Stormtroopers, but Space troopers is a different branch. Could we at least have a put Several space troopers?—Unsigned comment by ClashGamer15 (talk • contribs)

  • There are many other branches to be included if you do. And please source your information, it is very annoying to have to do it for you. And sign your posts, you have been told before. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 15:18, January 18, 2018 (UTC)

CR70 corvette

Hey Tommy! I notice that you mentioned on your profile you have the Star Wars: Complete Locations book, do you think when you get a chance you could take a look and see whether it uses CR70 corvette please? Currently the name is sourced to a Leland Chee tweet and I'm just wondering if it was identified in that book, I know it has been named as such in Star Wars: The Rebel Files, just curious as to which source will need the 1stID tag, thank you --Lewisr (talk) 15:26, January 19, 2018 (UTC)

  • Hey, that’s fine, I’ll look when I get home (shouldn’t be more than 2 hours). — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 15:45, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
    • Thank you! --Lewisr (talk) 15:46, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
      • Hey, sorry about the delay, my bus broke down. To answer your question, no. There is only one mention of the Tantive III, with no reference to the ship's class. Hope that helps :-). Just to ask, are we okay to start removing tweets from pages now, even though the CT isn't closed? Thanks! — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 21:05, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
        • No problem! Ah okay so I guess that means the rebel files is the first source to identify it then, thanks! I'd say its best to wait until the CT is closed before we start doing anything on a massive scale, I was just literally checking if the CR70 was named in a source as I saw it being edited earlier on and noticed it could potentially have gone once the CT closes --Lewisr (talk) 21:10, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
  • Hey Tommy, when it mentioned the Tantive III did it say that it was the same ship Bail used in Episode III?--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:19, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
    • It didn't outright say it, but it was at Polis Massa at the same time as Padme's ship was, and as Bail rendezvoused with them there I would say it's fair enough to assume it was, especially because it was in legends. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 21:21, January 19, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Imperial II-class

Original enquiry here. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 18:44, January 21, 2018 (UTC)

  • Hey, I'll check right now--Vitus InfinitusTalk 17:56, January 21, 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 18:22, January 21, 2018 (UTC)
      • I haven't been able to find a mention of an Imp2, just the Harbinger (Imperial-class), which before your project was listed as an Imp2. I also noticed that the schematics of the Harbinger in the Rebel Files show the bridge tower of the Imp1 while in the comics it has the bridge tower confirmed Imp2's have, so it could have been upgraded like the Devastator. Hope this helps!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 18:39, January 21, 2018 (UTC)
        • Ooh, that's interesting! I'll leave the new Harbinger info for now, but I will remove the appearance of the II. Thanks for the info! — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 18:41, January 21, 2018 (UTC)

Recusant

Hey Tommy, saw that you had Tarkin. Since Recusant-class light destroyer/Canon's name is based off a Leland tweet, I'm trying to identify a source for the name. There's Commerce Guild destroyer and so on, but I saw that it was identified as Recusant-class in tarkin. I was wondering if there was any more info on a name if you remember or if you could find out if you can, thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 15:20, January 24, 2018 (UTC)

  • Just saw the talk page for the article, it seems this was discussed in 2015, so I'm going to move the page back to that previous name.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 15:35, January 24, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Delta-class

Original query here. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 18:46, January 25, 2018 (UTC)

The Rebel Files

Cradossk

Hey, Tommy! I noticed that Star Wars: The Rebel Files is listed on your user page. Do you have a copy? - Cwedin(talk) 17:54, January 29, 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes, I do. Feel free to ask if you need any info from it! — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 17:59, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Awesome! Could you tell me what the book says about Cradossk and the Bounty Hunters' Guild? Vitus Infinitus has already pointed me to a few things, but I was wondering if you've found anything else. - Cwedin(talk) 18:06, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
      • I couldn't find anything beside those two pages, but I will reiterate what they say, as Vitus' video isn't the best quality (I've come to the conclusion he has specialised government image-inhancers). It basically says Cassian Jeron Andor told Davits Draven in a message that the Rebel's agent in the Bounty Hunters' Guild reported that there is negative sentiment in the guilt towards the Alliance, due to the Empire's increased use of their services. Cassian than said: "In other words, Cradossk is making a killing." He then said that Imperial moffs are using the guild to sort their own problems out, and the Imperial Office of Criminal Investigations has a whole arm dedicated to dealing with the guild. In his conclusion, he then said that the guild would still take the alliance's money, but for larger jobs they would be outfit by the Empire. That transmission was recorded in The Rebel Files, and Amilyn Holdo annotated the message in that book, saying that the guild wasn't what it used to be, and so it was a good time for the resistance to form a partnership with them. Caluan Ematt replied to this saying the First Order didn't make dealing with the guild for ideological reasons.
        Hope this helps, and please ask if you need any more elaboration! — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 18:30, January 29, 2018 (UTC)

Siege Breaker

Lol I wish I had enhancers! Just extensively reviewing! I was wondering if you could find anything about the Siege Breaker, thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 19:10, January 29, 2018 (UTC)

  • Siege breakers are mentioned on page 72. It's a bit vague and strange, but I think it's a classification of portable weapon ships that, as the article currently says, could shatter mountains and anything but the strongest energy shields, and that's about all it says. There is an image, which I will try to upload. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:40, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
  • Hey sorry to bother but what does the Siege Breaker part say about kyber crystals?--Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:37, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Outright—nothing. It is said that the point of a siege breaker is to have enough of them to equal the power of the Death Star. It's kinda implied they use kybers but I wouldn't add it to the article. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 20:42, January 29, 2018 (UTC)

SSD

Hey, whenever you can no rush, but does Rebel Files make a distinction between Executor-class and an SSD? I was able to read pages 110 and 111 and to me it seems that they are the same. I haven't been able to read if there's anything beyond those two pages about the subject, let me know when you can, thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 18:10, January 30, 2018 (UTC)

  • I can't find anything else. The book complete locations makes a distinction between SSDs and Executor-classes, so no. Also, where is the Kuat SSD mentioned? I can't find anything. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 18:13, January 30, 2018 (UTC)

Senate arrests

Hey, so I'm going to try to get a good article nom for Arrests in the Galactic Senate, which is in the Rebel Files. I was wondering if you could let me know what it says on the top of page 12 about it, as I can't read it much, and also if it was possible if you could upload the picture on page 11 with the arrested senators being loaded unto a shuttle. I'd definitely appreciate it! I'm not in a rush either, so whenever you can, thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:38, January 31, 2018 (UTC)

  • If it's okay with you, I'll have a look tomorrow. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 21:05, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
    • Yeah of course, whenever you can! Thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 03:07, February 1, 2018 (UTC)
      • Page 12 says:
        "Shea Sadashassa of Herdessa
        Ivor Drake of Kestos Minor
        Fang Zar of Sern Prime
        Streamdrinker of Tynna
        Tanner Cadaman of Feenix
        All those arrested had also been signatories to the Petition of the 2,000, a formal protest against Palpatine's new system of regional governorship that was signed by two thousand legislators and presented during the last full Senate session.
        Is your senator a traitor?"
        Mothma than left a note saying: "Bail and I were detained but released after we professed our loyalty. Why do I fight the Empire? One reason is my guilt."
        Hope this helps. I'll get on the image now. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:34, February 1, 2018 (UTC)
  • Hey Tommy, could it be possible for you to upload a higher quality image for Senatorial arrests? I currently have an objection about it being a bit blurry and cropped. I would very much appreciate it if you could help me out with this, thank you and let me know if you can.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 18:55, May 4, 2018 (UTC)
    • Hey Vitus, sorry but I originally took that on my phone and that's the best I can do, as I don't have any scanning equipment or anything. At a push, JMAS or Lelal sometimes manage to find reference book's artist's websites and extract digital images from those, although that isn't guarantied, and if they haven't already uploaded it I doubt there is one. Sorry I can't be of much use, and I hope you can find what you're looking for. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 19:25, May 4, 2018 (UTC)
      • Don't worry about it, I appreciate the advice! Thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 19:41, May 4, 2018 (UTC)

Images and info

Hey Tommy, do you think you can get images for Torpedo Sphere, Mass Shadow Generator, and Asteroid Dreadnought and see if there's anything that needs to be added? I want to get those three to Comprehensive status, thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 00:04, February 9, 2018 (UTC)

  • Yeah sure, I'll have a look in a bit.—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 17:42, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
    • Okay, I'll upload them now but I will say that the CA rule 11 says: "…include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits." Not sure if pictures taken on my phone are of the highest quality, although allowances may be allowed due to the obscure nature of the book. Just thought I'd led you know.—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 20:20, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
      • Okay thanks, we'll find out during the process, though I think it'll be okay since there aren't any other images. Thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:45, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
        • Thanks for uploading the pictures. Is there any more info about the Mass Shadow Generator? Thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:03, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
          • I was just updating it when you asked! That seems to be all.—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 21:06, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
  • Great, thanks for the help!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:12, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
  • Oh, forgot to ask sooner, is there any quotable sentence from the Mass Shadow Generator section?--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:14, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
    • Added the entire section. Good luck with your nominations, I look forward to reviewing them!—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 22:00, February 9, 2018 (UTC)

The Rebel Files, again

Lewisr tells me there's an Ultra-Light Assault Vehicle pictured in The Rebel Files. Think you could upload the image? - Cwedin(talk) 19:28, March 22, 2018 (UTC)

Melshi

Hello, my friend. I have noticed that you own Star Wars: The Rebel Files and Star Wars: On the Front Lines, two sources which I'm missing for my Ruescott Melshi project. Could you please tell what do these books say about the guy? Thank you. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 19:13, January 31, 2018 (UTC)

  • I'll check now. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:16, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
    • Okay, so I can't find anything on him in the specific Rogue One section of the rebel files, so you may want to ask Vitus Infinitus what page it's on, as he added his appearance. As for the Front Lines, quote:
      "Sergeant Ruescott Melshi
      Leader of the Alliance's Pathfinder commandos in the mission on Scarif, Melshi was a practical and combative commander accustomed to improvisation when faced with long odds." — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:36, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
      • Thank you for the quick response. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 19:47, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
        • No problem! — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 20:10, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
          • Okay, so according to Vitus, Melshi's the one who wrote the section about the different types of stormtroopers. I have checked out a Youtube video showing The Rebel Files, but the quality is pretty low and it's hard to figure out what it says, especially the additional written notes. Can you summarize for me what's written there? It should be on pages 34-35. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 20:27, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
            • For the article, you probably only need to mention that he made a guide in the Rebel Field Manual that was on stormtrooper variants, and it was later put into The Rebel Files. Caluan Ematt left an annotation on it in a copy the latter book saying: "Melshi. Gone too soon, but it's good to see the old nek name once more. I served with him on Gaulus." — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 21:05, January 31, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Imp II sound files

Original query and reply here.—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 08:49, February 5, 2018 (UTC)

  • Hi Tommy, sorry I didn't get it up before the nomination, I happened to be away from my computer all weekend. I'll try and get the audio done tonight unless anything comes up. I've got to admit, Imperial-II is a fairly bold project, but I suppose with the visual identification method there won't be that many confirmed appearances going forward. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:26, February 5, 2018 (UTC)

Open Circle Fleet

Hi Tommy, hope you're doing well! I was wondering if you could help us out with this please? As I know you have the Complete Locations book, thank you --Lewisr (talk) 04:24, February 8, 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hey, I did not commit vandalism, I got rid of that quote because it has nothing to do with their history. Let me know on my User page. Thanks, ~User:ClashGamer15—Unsigned comment by ClashGamer15 (talk • contribs)

  • The quote is relevant because it is about Stormtroopers, in an article on Stormtroopers. It shows that the presence of Stormtroopers denotes danger. The quote doesn't have to be about something in the history section. Removing relevant content from pages is vandalism. Please don't continue to do so. Also, please remember to sign your posts with four tides (~~~~).—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 18:23, February 9, 2018 (UTC)

Of MSE-6 and Men

Original request here.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 22:51, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

  • Hey, just replied to it --Lewisr (talk) 22:47, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

Force Dash

Listen up, Emperor Palptine could use Force Dash. It was spotted in Episode Three. When he was about to be arrested by the jedi.—Unsigned comment by ClashGamer15 (talk • contribs)

  • Then source that info. I'm tired of your laziness at not adding sources and simply expecting others to do it for you. Until you can actually be bothered to learn how to source, you will be reverted.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 15:57, February 14, 2018 (UTC)

Victory-class in Vader comic

Hey, so I saw in the talk page for the Victory class and saw that someone thought they appeared in Darth Vader 6. After I looked for myself, what I though were ISDs look more like Victory classes.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 15:07, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

Whinging

If you have a big problem with me, then don't start. Have you heard of a jerk? It totally fits you. British boy. ~ User:ClashGamer15—Unsigned comment by ClashGamer15 (talk • contribs)

Victory-class image

I was under the impression that the ship had been identified as such. The page for the Aspiration refers to the ship as having engaged with a victory-class. Yo.-User:Fan26 (Talk) 16:58, February 27, 2018 (UTC)

  • Wookieepedia articles aren't sources. The card doesn't state the ship's class, and as the Victory has no image in canon, it would be assumption. I will rectify the Aspiration page now.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 18:29, February 27, 2018 (UTC)

Officers

Hey, are Grand Moffs and Moffs officers? We're also including ISB and Inspectorate correct?Thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 16:15, February 28, 2018 (UTC)

Wookieepedian of the Month

Hey Tommy, congrats on your election as Wookieepedian of the Month for March 2018! 1358 (Talk) 00:02, March 1, 2018 (UTC)

qaz

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
qaz-class Star Destroyer has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:52, March 1, 2018 (UTC)

Imperial Military

Hello. Why are you removing "Imperial Military" affilation from imperial ships? --С уважением, Starit (обс) 09:55, March 4, 2018 (UTC)

Got it, thanks. --С уважением, Starit (обс) 09:57, March 4, 2018 (UTC)

Dreadnought cruiser

Hey, so I noticed a few days ago that you had a workbench for the Dreadnaught-class heavy cruiser. It's featured in the trivia gallery here--Vitus InfinitusTalk 18:02, March 6, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Dawn of Rebellion

Hey, so the book is based primarily off of events and characters from Star Wars Rebels, Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, and some novels like Tarkin (novel) and building on it. I remember reading on the Wook somewhere that the canonicity of books are on a case by case basis, and I think this book was listed as canon because it's based off of rebels and rogue one. From what I've read, there isn't any Legends info, as the new appearances that first appeared in Legends seem to supplement what has been established in canon. Books like Nexus of Power contain a lot of canon info, but also mix a good amount of legends so that is a different case as we have to sort through what is canon and what isn't. On the progress of the CT, the discussion on discord has slowed. I guess we're all still trying to figure out what could be done. Hope this helps!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 18:47, March 9, 2018 (UTC)

  • Hey, I noticed you were working on Seventh Fleet, Dawn of Rebellion has a page on it so I'll post here what I found.
1) Officers that served under Grand Admiral Thrawn, including his Flag Captain, Albus Marinith, usually describe him as cool and analytical with a deep passion for art and comprehensive understanding of naval tactics. They view that when he leads his ships into combat, or when he's discussing a piece of art or obscure galactic culture, he shows the powerful intellect that drives him.
2) Although Grand Admiral Thrawn is largely unknown to the Alliance, his dangerous reputation is beginning to spread largely in part due to his activities with the Seventh Fleet on Lothal
3) The Chimaera was laid down shortly after the end of the Clone Wars and so has a large and impressive service record and battle citations as long as "a Wookiee's arm". It was captained by Flag Captain Albus Marinith who was an old but reliable navy officer and was chosen by Thrawn himself.
4) After Thrawn moved his flag to the Chimaera at the start of the Lothal campaign, he made many changes to the vessel to suit his preferences, prominently renovations to his private suite of staterooms, an art gallery where he meditated on enemies and new strategies, and moved his art collection to his private cabin.
Hope this helps!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 19:50, March 10, 2018 (UTC)
That's brilliant, thank you. I was planning on doing the Chimaera after the 7th fleet so that works out really well. Now I really have to get this book.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT)
  • I look forward to seeing them!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 19:58, March 10, 2018 (UTC)
    • Hey, so the excerpt says "Sato commands his fleet of corvettes and cruiser from the Quasar Fire-class light carrier Liberator, which carries Phoenix Squadron, a group of A-wings and elite pilots." I took to twitter because Sato's CR90 is Liberator so I'm thinking this may be a mistake. Also, just reviewed and Perilous is only pictured, it's the same image as the cover for Lords of the Sith--Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:54, March 23, 2018 (UTC)

Ubiqtorate

Hey Tommy, just noticed a mistake I made in the appearances of Dawn of Rebellion, the Ubiqtorate isn't classified under COMPNOR, it's its own thing, sorry for the mix up!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 19:57, March 9, 2018 (UTC)

  • Okay never mind. Just to ease my conscience, are you sure everything else is correct?—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:58, March 9, 2018 (UTC)
    • But wait, Tarkin says it is under COMPNOR.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:59, March 9, 2018 (UTC)
      • Hey, so just tripled checked. In Dawn of Rebellion COMPNOR and Imperial Intelligence are two different sections, Ubiqtorate is mentioned in the Imperial Intelligence section but not in the COMPNOR section which includes Select Committee. I thought I messed up and saw you were editing so I kinda rushed and forgot to check other references such as Tarkin. So the Ubiqtorate is part of COMPNOR, just not part of the Select Committee it seems. Sorry for the mistake, I triple checked to make sure if this is the correct info and it is (Sorry for the late response I tried editing but apparently the Wook was down)--Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:33, March 9, 2018 (UTC)

Sourcing

If you haven't seen Star Wars: A New Hope, Death Star troopers (Canon) had a DH-17 hand pistol, the picture for it matches it. Second, they worked with Imperial Gunners (Or whatever they are called) I found this out at the Imperial Navy trooper (Canon). Let me know what you think. Thanks, {{User:|ClashGamer15}}—Unsigned comment by ClashGamer15 (talk • contribs)

When you look at it Mr.Expert (You have more experience) , The Imperial Interdictor (Canon) was experimental. Let me know what you think. Thanks, {{User:|ClashGamer15}}—Unsigned comment by ClashGamer15 (talk • contribs)

  • I have seen A New Hope, but that isn't the point. If you are going to add information to pages, you MUST add a source, or else what you add could be purely speculative. You have been told this many times, but I will provide you with the link on how to source again. Please take a look over it. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Thanks—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 21:20, March 13, 2018 (UTC)

If you haven't seen Star Wars: Rebels, Gar Saxon knows how to duel, because light-saber training is hard to master, second we've seen him pull out a Mand. Pistol and rifle... Let me know.—Unsigned comment by ClashGamer15 (talk • contribs)

  • Again, that's not the point. If you add info to this site, it MUST be sourced. As you have already been banned for this, I seriously suggest you reconsider your approach. You have already been given the necessary information on how to properly construct a reference.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 20:21, March 23, 2018 (UTC)

Onaconda Farr funeral date

Hey Tommy, I nominated Honor Guard for comprehensive status and I need to be sure of the date for the Funeral of Onaconda Farr. It's sourced to Star Wars: Galactic Atlas, and I noticed you had it. If you can, could you let me know if it confirms the date? Thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 04:11, March 31, 2018 (UTC)

  • No, it doesn't. The sources of the article doesn't include GA, and I can't find any mention in the book, so I think the date ref is only to source the type of date system. Furthermore, the book says that the Battle of Ryloth and the Second Battle of Geonosis occur in 21 BBY, and the first thing it mentions to have happened in 20 BBY is the Battle of Dathomir. So the funeral occurs in either 21 or 20 BBY, as Senate Murders is set between Legacy of Terror and Massacre, if you wanted to construct a reference for that. I'll review the article shortly, Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 09:35, March 31, 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks, I saw your review before this, I'll get started on that ref note soon--Vitus InfinitusTalk 15:18, March 31, 2018 (UTC)

Victory-class Star Destroyer

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Victory-class Star Destroyer has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 23:13, March 31, 2018 (UTC)

The Rebellion Begins

I don't own a copy, but my local library does carry it as an eBook, and it happened to be available. I checked it out and took a look. What the book says is that Ezra Bridger is fourteen years old. We know that Bridger was born on Empire Day, so I'm assuming that's where that information is coming from. ProfessorTofty (talk) 03:04, April 6, 2018 (UTC)

The Last Jedi The Visual Dictionary

Ahch-To (bless me)

Wondering if you could double-check something for me now. Our page for Ahch-To says that it has two moons and references that to The Visual Dictionary for The Last Jedi. However, the junior novelization states that it has only one moons, so I want to put a note about that in there but I'd like someone to check that reference for The Visual Dictionary first. Oh, and sorry about not following your instructions regarding replying at the top the last time - only jus tnow noticed them. I'll keep them in mind now though. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:03, April 9, 2018 (UTC)

  • Yeah thanks for that. I can't find any info on the planet's moons in the book, although it does say Ahch-To orbits two suns. This was likely an error on the editor's part (it was an anon), and they got confused between suns and moons. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 10:23, April 9, 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks. I'll go ahead and edit to 1 and source it to the junior novel. P.S.: Loving the new subheading here - funny. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:33, April 9, 2018 (UTC)

Jayfon

Hey, an unregistered user claimed that Jayfon was identified in the book, could you check whenever you can? Thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 17:33, April 9, 2018 (UTC)

  • Umm, okay, it's a big book but I'll have a look, although I highly doubt it. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:14, April 9, 2018 (UTC)
    • Actually I can't be bothered to look through 80-odd pages if I don't have to, so could you say the user where in the book it is? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:33, April 9, 2018 (UTC)

Abecederian line in "Rebel Files"

Hi Tommy! I see that it was you who added The Rebel Files to the sources list of the Abecederian line article. Is the exact phrase explictely used in the book? Cheers. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 13:41, April 10, 2018 (UTC)

  • Hey Lelal, no it isn't, although I was under the impression the line was listed under sources if a ship from the line was mentioned, like we've been doing for TIE line. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:07, April 10, 2018 (UTC)

Tector-class Star Destroyer

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Tector-class Star Destroyer has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — 1358 (Talk) 16:34, April 11, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Images

Of cource you can reupload them. We are already doing same things since our wookiee's birth, so dont mind to fo it. :D --С уважением, Starit (обс) 07:00, April 13, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Jordo

Not fast enough.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 09:26, April 13, 2018 (UTC)

I would if you help me with a project on another wikia.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 09:30, April 13, 2018 (UTC)

Then I suggest you make that along with the other books pages for not just Vader but other comics whose books have no page.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 09:38, April 13, 2018 (UTC)

Users make redlinks everyday and they still take months, even years, before making a page.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 09:51, April 13, 2018 (UTC)

If there's going to be a spoiler it's going to be on the mark.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 10:03, April 13, 2018 (UTC)

TLJ

Every single part of my edit had sources. I posted URL links to literally all of its parts. On what grounds did you remove the entire thing? Benandi (talk) 17:19, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

  • The URL isn't enough to source it (I provided a link on how to source on your talk page) and as Brandon Rhea said when he reverted you, "That's incomplete information without sources also talking about how the score was manipulated by a small handful of people". Please bring it up with him if you feel it should be added. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:25, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

I have a better idea; since you guys are the experts here, and I seem to have trouble navigating these rules, why don't you add the information? The page itself even says it requires a cleanup, so why don't one of you put the information there, phrasing it and sourcing it however you wish, instead of leaving it to people like me, and then deleting my work and threatening to block me if I don't do it exactly right again? The information is clearly relevant, and I'm sure you'd phrase it in a far gentler manner anyway, since there isn't any other negative information on the page about the movie, like it's Friday box office drop. Benandi (talk) 17:32, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

Oh, hey, one more thing: I read your source guidelines page, and while I didn't see which rule I apparently violated, I did find this quote there: "In principle, any edit lacking attribution may be removed, and the final burden of evidence lies with the editor wishing to add or retain the material. However, this policy should not be used to cause disruption by removing material for which reliable sources could easily or reasonably be found." I believe that you removed material for which reliable sources could easily be found (not counting the ones I already posted) and are therefore violating your own guidelines. Benandi (talk) 17:45, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

  • Ecks seems to have sorted it out anyway with proper citations. I wasn't aware of that passage in the Sourcing page, so my apologies, although ecks is right in saying just the link on this page was out of place in the article. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:09, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

Well, thank you both for sorting this out. I recognize the problem with the raw links, and believe me, I tried to convert them into reference notes for over an hour before giving up. I don't think I'll be attempting any more edits here, so I guess it's done then. Ciao. Benandi (talk) 18:17, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

  • Please don't feel you have to leave because of this. You can look at what other users do when editing and pay attention to any advice, and feel free to ask questions if you are stuck with a ref or anything else. I'd be happy to answer them if you can't figure something out. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:23, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

Arbitrator

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Arbitrator has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — 1358 (Talk) 21:03, May 7, 2018 (UTC)

Imperial remnant

If not disambiguation pages then how are we supposed to know what an Imperial remnant is?--Rgilbert27 (talk) 10:57, May 16, 2018 (UTC)

Unverified info

Its not unverfied. All of that info came from the Vader Comic on Mon Cala. Your confused. The unverfied info is from the new Vader Comic also.—Unsigned comment by ClashGamer15 (talk • contribs)

  • You misunderstand, I'm not saying what you added was made up, but rather I reverted your edit because it had no source. All information added to wookieepedia must have a source, no exceptions. You have already been banned on multiple occasions for failing to provide a source so I implore you to rethink your approach. All information you need on sourcing can be found at Wookieepedia:Sourcing. Thank you. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:59, May 18, 2018 (UTC)

Fan fiction

Apparently I was adding Fan Fiction. Can you explain how the hell that was Fan Fiction!?—Unsigned comment by LynxIsASith (talk • contribs)

  • I can't remember what that was for. What was it? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 06:04, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

DLT-19

I may have forgot to add my reference for DLT-19 Heavy Blaster Rifle (Canon), I just forgot the game, In the reboot of Star Wars Battlefront II, Heavy Stormtroopers are seen in the game cover and throughout game using DLT-19 Heavy Blaster Rifles, I will add Star Wars Battlefront II for my reference, Is that good for a source?—Unsigned comment by ClashGamer15 (talk • contribs)

  • Yes, thanks. Also, please sign your posts with four tides (~) like this: ~~~~. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:50, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

Star Destroyers

Hello, I have a question. I know that you like Star Destroyers... So what type of Star Destroyer variant is your favorite? Please let me know. Thanks ClashGamer15 (talk) 17:20, May 24, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15

  • Hey, I don't know strangely I've never really thought about it. If I had to answer it would probably be the Imperial II for design wise, and the Interdictor-class for functionality. You? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:25, May 24, 2018 (UTC)
    • I would chose... the Super Star Destroyer. My second would be Imperial 1 Class Star Destroyer. Whats your favorite Imperial Naval commander? If you have one... Thanks, ClashGamer15 (talk) 17:28, May 24, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15
      • Thrawn. Every time. Who's yours? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:31, May 24, 2018 (UTC)
        • Thrawn too. Came a fan once I read the Canon book Thrawn. ClashGamer15 (talk) 17:33, May 24, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15
          • Yeah that book's great. Can't wait until Alliances! Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:34, May 24, 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism

I didn't vandalize that page, I removed a mistype.—Unsigned comment by 64.136.215.65‎ (talk • contribs)

Imperial Heavy Gunner

I have a question. In a game called Star Wars: Force Arena (Canon), there is a trooper in there for the Galactic Empire called "Imperial Heavy Gunner", could this a another nick name for the Heavy Weapons Stormtrooper (Canon)? Let me know what you think. ClashGamer15 (talk) 14:42, May 29, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15

  • Hey. I don't have the game so I'm not really sure. Do the gunners have a similar look or function to the Heavy Weapons Stormtroopers? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 14:54, May 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Yes, Imperial Heavy Gunners is a nick name for Heavy Weapon Stormtrooper(s). Sorry it took me awhile to respond, lap top died... Forgot to charge it. Been busy doing Final Exams. Should we put the nick name for the Heavy Weapons Stormtrooper? ClashGamer15 (talk) 17:33, May 31, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15
      • Yeah I'll add it now. Don't worry, sadly I've got exams on too. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:36, May 31, 2018 (UTC)
        • Thanks for the help. ClashGamer15 (talk) 17:44, May 31, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15
          • No worries, thanks for bringing this up. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:46, May 31, 2018 (UTC)

Cthon

Are cthon sentient or not sentient? I'm wondering so that I know whether or not to correct the most recent edit. --Rakhsh (talk) 13:32, May 30, 2018 (UTC)

  • Hey, yeah I saw that edit and didn't know whether to revert it or not. For the other one, the article stated that they were non-sentient, so it could be reverted. However, for this one, the article gives no information, and I don't have any of the sources to check, so I decided to just leave it. I guess they could be given their description in the article. Sorry I can't be of much help. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:36, May 30, 2018 (UTC)

Seventh Fleet

Hello, I've notice that the Seventh Fleet (Canon), at the bottom were the complement is, the Imperial Construction Modules (ICM-092792 construction modules) is not linked. ClashGamer15 (talk) 15:05, June 1, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15

  • Hey. Yeah, the reason for that is because the page is already linked in the article, in the "Return to Lothal" section. Per policy, an article should only be linked to once in the article body (excluding into, infobox and references), in the first mention of the subject. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:45, June 1, 2018 (UTC)

Souring

The information of the "Heavy ordnance" for the Demolition Trooper, Rocket Stormtrooper, and Grenadier comes from the Imperial Army (Canon) on this site. Underneath "Specialized". I am not putting unverfied info. ClashGamer15 (talk) 16:35, June 1, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15

  • Infomation from other Wookieepedia articles is not a source, per our sourcing policy. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:02, June 1, 2018 (UTC)
    • Ok, I understand. Thanks. I won't do that again. ClashGamer15 (talk) 17:16, June 1, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15
      • Thank you. Please feel free to ask me if you have any other questions. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:44, June 1, 2018 (UTC)

Participate

I've just added Gozanti-class cruiser to the Participate section that why that cruiser is involved with Mission to free Wookiee prisoners. What do you mean "Didn't"? --Ben800013 (talk) 18:18, June 4, 2018 (UTC)

  • Because it wasn’t directly participating. That is an FA, so please contact the nominator to make changes. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:21, June 4, 2018 (UTC)

Battle of Jakku

Hey, I was watching the Star Wars Battlefront II Campaign (Canon), were Iden Versio goes to the Battle of Jakku, I noticed that Imperial Heavy Weapons Stormtroopers were used during the Battle. Could it be possible if me and you add that in? Thanks, ClashGamer15 (talk) 13:44, June 5, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15

  • Sure, I'll do it now. Cheers. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:46, June 5, 2018 (UTC)
    • Another thing, the Jakku Imperial Renmant used Heavy Weapons Stormtroopers since I see them multiple times within the campaign. I've tried to put this in the past, but people called it unverfied info, but its really not. ClashGamer15 (talk) 13:48, June 5, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15
      • Sure, I'll add that too. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:50, June 5, 2018 (UTC)
        • Thanks for the help. ClashGamer15 (talk) 13:52, June 5, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15
          • You're welcome, but please let me remind you again to source your edits. Please. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:53, June 5, 2018 (UTC)
            • First off, Whats your favorite TIE Line Starfighter? Second, I looked at the Jakku Imperial Renmant, and Demolition Troopers are missing, which is a shame because they were used alot with the Renmant. Can you add them in for the Jakku Imperial Renamnt? Thanks, ClashGamer15 (talk) 13:56, June 5, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15

Already there. I'll say that my favourite TIE Interceptor, but please don't ignore my frequent requests for you to source your edits by trying to change the subject. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 14:33, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

Answer

I shall take a look ad it. RC-0407 (talk)

Krennic

Shouldn't the section about Adventures in Wild Space: The Rescue on Krennic's page come before the Erso's leave Coruscant? The Erso's leave in 17 BBY but the Adventures in Wild Space books take place around 18 BBY according to the book pages and the canon media timeline pages --Lewisr (talk) 18:55, June 14, 2018 (UTC)

  • Hey Lewis. Basically, no. In The Rescue, Tarkin is in command of Sentinel Base, a position which we see him promoted to in the final pages of Catalyst, after the Ersos' escape, meaning The Rescue must be after Catalyst. The 18 BBY date is only a guess for one book, and we don't know how much time passes between the entries. BTH I always meant to change that date but never got round to it. Feel free to hop onto IRC if there's anything else. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 19:03, June 14, 2018 (UTC)
    • Hey, fair enough then makes sense. Sure thing I will do if anything does come up --Lewisr (talk) 19:06, June 14, 2018 (UTC)

Titan

Hello there, Tommy! :-) As regards the Y-85 Titan dropship nomination, do you have any more objections to come up with? I see that you struck the ones I already addressed, but didn't vote, so... --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 16:13, June 18, 2018 (UTC)

  • Hey Lelal, don't worry I haven't forgotten, I've just been a bit busy at the moment and I haven't found time to continue my review. I'll try and get around to it soon. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 16:33, June 18, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Images

Well... I didn't know that sorry. :-/--ΠλVƋX {disc} 11:22, July 6, 2018 (UTC)

Rollback

Congratulations, Tommy! You have now been officially deputized with Rollback user rights on Wookieepedia. Please read through Wookieepedia:Rollback and ask any questions you may have. Good luck! Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:41, July 15, 2018 (UTC)

  • POWERRRRRR! LIMITED POWERRRRRRR! Congrats, Tommy. 1358 (Talk) 05:44, July 15, 2018 (UTC)
    • Fantastic, thanks guys! Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 08:50, July 15, 2018 (UTC)

Century tank

The century tank is technically a TIE, isn't it? Why were my changes changed?

Yours sincerely, —Unsigned comment by Superguy11p (talk • contribs)

  • It was in Legends, please see TIE Series. Please also note that all edits must also be sourced. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:07, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Subjugator

Hello there! Just looked it over, and have found nothing to change. Thanks for telling me about the changes you made! --Belugan Jedi/Riverdale Chauffeur (Wanna Discuss Something?) 03:43, July 19, 2018 (UTC)

Fanon

Why did you give me a fanon warning. Also I'm pretty sure I was sourcing complete vehicles and not locations--O21014Talk 18:20, July 30, 2018 (BST)

Complete Location 2016 Executor

Hi Tommy, I saw that you have the 2016 edition of Complete Locations so I was wondering if you could help us and since also you're the Imp guy around here this is your area of expertise. Does the Complete Locations book mention that Blizzard Force was part or stationed aboard the Executor? This user and some anon users keep removing it and since Complete Locations is one of the Ref books I still need to get, I need your help to confirm this information. Hope you can help, Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:38, August 6, 2018 (UTC)

  • Walkers being on the Executor is implied in that it carries Y-85 Titan dropships which in turn carry walkers. Blizzard force is never said to be exclusive to the Executor. I think the article is better without these bits tbh. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 09:30, August 6, 2018 (UTC)
    • Definitely the article is better without it since its a bit of speculation. Thanks for the help--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 19:17, August 6, 2018 (UTC)

EC Meeting 49

You are hereby ordered to report for your cadet trials, also being dubbed EduCorps Meeting 49, in Simulation Hall 32174 at 4PM ET on August 25, 2018. Failure to comply without leaving notes will result in termination of training and transfer to maintenance and janitorial. See you there. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 03:56, August 8, 2018 (UTC)

Officer Corps

Hi Tommy, just wanted to say thanks for adding the Officer Corps info to all of the Imperial status articles. You are truly a loyal servant of the Emperor. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:09, August 9, 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks, no worries. *salutes in Imperial*. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 10:12, August 9, 2018 (UTC)

Unidentified dreadnought

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Unidentified dreadnought has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:43, August 9, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Filenames

Well at least thanks for leaving right| in the "right" place.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 19:28, August 19, 2018 (UTC)

Secutor

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Secutor-class Star Destroyer has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — 1358 (Talk) 20:37, August 19, 2018 (UTC)

Honor Guard

Hey Tommy, so in regards to the appearances of the Honor Guard, the duck test I feel doesn't really apply. The cloaks are different, and the episode guide for Senate Murders makes the difference clear, comparing both cloaked guardsmen. We don't use the duck test for Imp 2s for example, even though it's 99.9% certain that they are Imp 2s and not necessarily modified Imp 1s. It's one reason why I brought it to comprehensive status, to make it clear that they are two different guards. I'm going to revert for now, but if you or others still feel like the Honor Guard then I feel like it would be better for a EduCorps review rather than to simply altering the article. Thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:23, August 31, 2018 (UTC)

  • That's fine, although if I was mistaken about the small difference in cape colour, perhaps it would be prudent to explain that in the article, to avoid further confusion. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:31, August 31, 2018 (UTC)
    • Sure! I'll add it in the BTS section--Vitus InfinitusTalk 15:04, August 31, 2018 (UTC)
      • Great, that's what I was thinking. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:08, August 31, 2018 (UTC)

Imp II

Hey Tommy, nah I've just been really busy sorry. Hm I guess even if it is a fair assumption to make it might be best to not assume, but I don't really know --Lewisr (talk) 21:52, September 3, 2018 (UTC)

  • Yeah, I tend to agree. Thanks for replying, and welcome back! Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 07:40, September 4, 2018 (UTC)
    • Thought so, thank you! --Lewisr (talk) 11:17, September 4, 2018 (UTC)

Questions about infobox

Hey Tommy, so I have some questions in regards to the infobox. I thought they were supposed to have the latest information on the subject/article, which is why we have (briefly), (tentatively), and etc in the infoboxes, and before when we had (formerly). Wouldn't unit infoboxes also have to remove rank and not just ship infoboxes? Also, the infobox of the 501st Legion would become weird, as Appo was formerly a sergeant but was promoted to commander and a leader of the legion, and we would have to remove (briefly) from Pong Krell's name as well as ranks, which is why I thought infoboxes were supposed to have the latest information and as such reflect that with ranks, (formerly), and etc. Let me know you think, thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 16:31, September 9, 2018 (UTC)

  • It's pointless saying they have the latest info, as it happened "a long time ago" so they're all dead anyway. Infoboxes are supposed to be a simplification of the info in the article, that can be looked at at a glance. The more we add to them unnecessarily, the more we make them pointless. I was told by Imperators to remove the ranks of commanders from one of my Star Destroyer noms, because ranks change and those notes and such make infoboxes look messy. This would be clear with your Appo example. Much easier to just have him in the commanders section. The article body should explain his rank and position change. Also, why would we have to remove briefly from Krell's name? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:21, September 9, 2018 (UTC)
    • Ahhh, I see the reasoning behind it now. I was thinking of it differently, thanks for clearing it up.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 18:25, September 9, 2018 (UTC)

Imp Military

Question... Imperial Military (Canon) is missing Imperial Department of Advanced Weapons Research in the info box... Could we add that in along with Imperial Intelligence, Naval Intelligence, and Imperial Security Bureau? They all operate within the Imperial Military. Let me know what you think... ClashGamer15 (talk) 14:50, September 11, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15

  • What source says they are? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:17, September 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • It says that Imperial Security Bureau worked close with the Imperial Military. I'm not so sure on Naval Intelligence or Imperial Department of Advanced Weapons Research. Let me know what you think... ClashGamer15 (talk) 18:01, September 11, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15
      • Working close with doesn't mean is a sub-agency of. All info on this wiki needs a source. If you find a clear source, feel free to add that info, but if you can't, then don't. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:13, September 11, 2018 (UTC)

Rax image

Hey Tom, I was searching pictures of Gallius Rax,and I was able to find one, I don't know if I can download it right now, Wi Fi is acting up right now. I want to let you know. ClashGamer15 (talk) 15:10, September 14, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15

  • Hey, so I don't think we have any official images of Rax at the moment, so what you saw could just be fan-art. If you could find it for me when your Wi-Wi's better I'd appreciate it though. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:13, September 14, 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, Its art comes from the same art used by Grand Moff Rannd. I'll try finding more imagines. ClashGamer15 (talk) 15:15, September 14, 2018 (UTC)USer:ClashGamer15

Striker

I'm confused... the TIE Striker info page says they are part of the Imperial Army Air Corps... I'm lost. Can you explain? Thanks, ClashGamer15 (talk) 18:26, September 14, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15

  • I reverted your edit because it was unsourced. You should know this by now. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:38, September 14, 2018 (UTC)

Razor-class frigate

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Razor-class frigate has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 18:16, September 15, 2018 (UTC)

Galladinium 50th Edition

The pre-release event for the 50th Edition of Galladinium's Galactic Datalog of Fantastic Technology will be held on October 6th at 4 PM ET. Please leave notes if you cannot attend.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 23:37, September 16, 2018 (UTC)

Hunter-Killer CA-to-GA

Given that I'm coming dangerously close to 250 words, and that the final issue likely will have something worth adding to the page, I thought I'd ask you, as an EduCorps member and someone aware of my Hunter-Killer CAnom, if there's a precedent for moving CAnoms to GA when they get to long and how I'd do that. Fan26 (Talk) 03:26, September 19, 2018 (UTC)

  • You can ask me to remove the nom for you at any time, and from there you can nominate it for GA if it's over 250 words. However, I'd encourage you to wait for the final issue's release so you don't have to re-nominate it for CA. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 06:50, September 19, 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks. I'm planning on waiting until the next issue if more is added-hopefully I might even get an Image next issue, b/c that would really help push it to GA status. Though as it is now, it's a pretty good CA-just have to deal with QGJ's objection. Thanks Tommy. Fan26 (Talk) 13:09, September 19, 2018 (UTC)

Ravager

  • Sigh* No its not unverifed info, its in the book, Life Debt. I shouldn't even have to source that, its right there in the book. Rax has an office with all that. ClashGamer15 (talk) 16:20, September 24, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15
  • Actually, yes you do. It isn't just you reading this wiki, and most readers aren't aware of where that info comes from. At this point, you should know this. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 16:52, September 24, 2018 (UTC)

Ozzel

My bad Tommy. I was thinking Legends. In Legends, Kendal Ozzel served as a Fleet Admiral. Brain Freeeze!!! Thanks for correcting my silly mistake. Thanks, ClashGamer15 (talk) 19:26, September 25, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15

Canon HK CA

Hey-o. Just saw the removal vote on the Hunter-killer droid CANom page. I'm back, from an issue to complicated to warrant explaining, and preparing to adress the current objections. Is there somewhere I should say this to get the vote struck, because the nomination guidelines are not clear on how to do that. Thanks, Fan26 (Talk) 14:30, October 1, 2018 (UTC)

  • Just reply to my objection, and say that you’ll deal with it immediately. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:00, October 1, 2018 (UTC)
    • Already dealt with Hunter-killer and am dealing with all other remaining objections. Thanks. Fan26 (Talk) 15:01, October 1, 2018 (UTC)

CC-7700

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
CC-7700 frigate has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:51, October 17, 2018 (UTC)

Thrawn audio file

Imp suggested I talk to you about getting an audio file from Thrawn (audiobook) for the afore-linked CA nom. Would you be able to help me get a file for the quote (""Oh, and you got another message about two hours ago from a Juahir Madras." "Juahir Madras?" "Yes, Governor, from the Oovo Four detention center.")? Fan26 (Talk) 01:39, October 21, 2018 (UTC)

  • I'll try and get around to it at some point. Audio files for quotes aren't required for status articles (yet), so this won't hold up your nomination. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 16:06, October 21, 2018 (UTC)
    • Okay, thanks. Fan26 (Talk) 13:58, October 22, 2018 (UTC)

Removal of citations?

Hey Tommy. Can I ask why you just removed a bunch of citations from across several articles and replaced them with factcheck tags? At a glance they appear to concern the dates from a number of Rebels-related things, and I wasn't aware of a change of process/policy that invalidated (what appear to be) perfectly valid citations. If I saw an anon doing this I would've undone all the changes without a second thought, but you fall into the 'trusted folks' category so I thought I'd ask first =) — DigiFluid(Whine here) 15:23, October 24, 2018 (UTC)

  • Per AC/Inq procedure, articles shouldn't need be using a SH link to do their reasoning for them. Also, the dates themselves don't even work in the context of the SH forum, as just because an episode falls between two episodes with known dates, that doesn't mean that episode's date is certain. Those refs also fail to mention Galactic Atlas, the only canon source to use the BBY/ABY system. The fact tag alerts readers that the info is unverified without having to fully remove it. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 16:56, October 24, 2018 (UTC)

Timothy Zahn's Interview

Hi Tommy-Macaroni,

I just wanted to notify you that I will be seeing if I could make an interview to Mr. Timothy Zahn. I have yet to ask him via his Facebook account if he will accept, but I'm sure he will want to share his time with us. Back to the matter, I just wanted to ask you if you would like to ask him some question so I can ask it to him during the interview.

Thanks!—Unsigned comment by X9 The Android (talk • contribs)

  • Great, thanks for the heads up X9. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:22, October 28, 2018 (UTC)

New Page: Anti-Turbolaser Tower?

Hey Tom, I was looking at StarWars.com when I noticed that within the "Vehicles" section the have something called an "Anti-Air Turbolaser Tower". I've tried my best to see if we had something similar to it but all what I found was the Turbolaser. Could we make an article for this? Let me know what you think, Thanks, 216.56.8.70 20:33, October 30, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15 Here is the link as well: https://www.starwars.com/databank/anti-air-turbolaser-tower

  • I'd say probably not, seeing as they look identical to the XX-9 heavy turbolaser battery. Good spot though. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 21:09, October 30, 2018 (UTC)
    • Hey Tom, I looked at the Anti=Turbolaser Tower on StarWars.Com, and I think theres a difference between the two, for one, these are meant for ground, second, major height difference. Let me know what ya think, Thanks, 216.56.8.71 14:01, November 1, 2018 (UTC)User:ClashGamer15
      • Idk, I think a simple duck test applies here to be honest. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 19:06, November 4, 2018 (UTC)

Gallius Rax Affiliations

Hello, One of my most recent edits on Gallius Rax of him being in the Imperial Navy was removed by you. I know addding that in seems a little too much, But after the Battle of Endor and even before that, Rax was in the Imperial Navy. He commanded most of the Imperial StarFleet after Endor. So... Why would you removed that and make it seem it was additional, I mean... Look at Sheev Palpatine... Hes got more than ever. Please contact me as soon as possible. May the Force be with you. Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 19:06, November 6, 2018 (UTC)User:SupremeCommanderRaxus

  • Hey. I removed it because, per policy, "the "Affiliations" field of infoboxes shall list sub-bullets to a maximum depth of one (example: *Galactic Empire **Stormtrooper Corps). This is done for aesthetic reasons with regard to article presentation in the Wikia skin." In regards to the Rax article, Imperial Navy is between Galactic Empire and Naval Intelligence, so it is not shown. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 19:14, November 6, 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining. Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 19:30, November 6, 2018 (UTC)User:SupremeCommanderRaxus

Gallius Rax Master

Second question, Gallius Rax was loyal and was a protege to Emperor Palpatine, could we possible put Palps as Rax's Master? Let me know what you think. Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 19:32, November 6, 2018 (UTC)User:SupremeCommaderRaxus

  • From my experience that's for force user master/apprentices but if you can find a precedent for anything beyond that in other articles I say definitely add it. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:34, November 7, 2018 (UTC)

EC Meeting 51

Grab your stethoscope and scrubs, because EduCorps Meeting 51 is right around the corner. See you on November 24. Cheers, 1358 (Talk) 18:58, November 14, 2018 (UTC)

AC Meeting 111

AgriCorps Meeting 111 has been scheduled for December 15. See you there. 1358 (Talk) 18:51, November 30, 2018 (UTC)

Wrath

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Wrath has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:52, December 14, 2018 (UTC)

Congrats on getting a promotion for Wrath!

Hey, Great job! I never knew about this space station (which I didn't know about) after reading it and you being the heavy contributor, I just wanted to say you did an excellent job. Keep it up! Your Wookiepedia's greatest weapon. May the Force be with you, Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 15:52, December 14, 2018 (UTC)SupremeCommanderRaxus

EC 52

EC 52 BBY, 12/01/19, 4 PM ET. CY. Imperators II(Talk) 16:51, December 24, 2018 (UTC)