Comprehensive
article
nominations

This page is for Comprehensive article nominations. A Comprehensive article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Good or Featured status due to its limited content. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe are ready to be reviewed to achieve Comprehensive status.

The article-nomination process is not a way to showcase your favorite articles, but rather articles that are of high quality. Articles placed on this page will be extensively reviewed by experienced editors, including the presiding EduCorps review panel. The nomination process will require the article nominator to respond to objections and improve the article until the requisite number of users supports the nomination.

In undertaking a nomination on this page, the nominator is taking responsibility for their nominated article. This means they need to thoroughly read the following instructions, implement them into their nominated article, and respond to given objections. Nominators are encouraged to ask more experienced editors for guidance and assistance, but self-sufficiency is a requirement of the article-nomination process. It is not inherently the job of reviewers to rewrite elements of an article, but rather to guide nominators to be able to fix issues themselves.

Your nomination is your responsibility. Nominations that severely neglect the following rules or otherwise fall idle after one week will be subject to immediate removal.

READ THIS FIRST!

A Comprehensive article must…

…be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
…be unbiased, with a neutral point of view.
…have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
…be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
…follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
…be stable during and following the review process. This means the article does not change significantly from day to day with new content and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism or other administrative edits, such as page protection.
…not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
…have no redlinks.
…provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article is preferred but not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section or subsection.
…include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
…include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
…provide an introduction that gives a good summary of the topic if the article reaches 165 words, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section (not including captions, quotes, headers, etc). Conversely, an article must not have an introduction if it is less than 165 words (with the exception of articles on out-of-universe products), not counting the "Behind the scenes" section. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
…not exceed 250 words in length if it provides an introduction. This word total counts the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, but not captions, quotes, headers, etc. However, any article that does not provide an introduction per Rule #12 is eligible to be nominated for Comprehensive status regardless of word count. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
…not be deliberately shortened if it approaches the 165- or 250-word limits.
…be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

Select an article you feel is worthy of Comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Comprehensive article status previously, you will need to specify the number of the nomination as a parameter (e.g. {{CAnom|second}}). To automatically generate an index upon nomination, use {{CAnom|index=1}}.
Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary.
Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
Purge the article to update the template.
Other users will object to the nomination with issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
The nominator should then adjust the article until the objections are satisfied. The objector is responsible for striking their objection when it has been addressed, not the nominator. Additionally, reviewers will often copy-edit the article themselves as desired to fix any issues.
Following their review, other users will vote to support the nomination. Users may not vote on their own nomination.
Each user shall be limited to eight active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations will be subject to immediate removal.
Users must successfully complete one Comprehensive article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the CAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful CA nominations before they can have three, and so on.

How to review:

To review an article, users should read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
The article should be reviewed with the criteria listed above, and any issues should be placed under the Object section of the article's nomination page. Objections should be clearly explained, and detail how the article can be improved.
Objections should then be addressed by the nominator. Once the objector is satisfied, they should strike their objection. The nominator should not strike reviewers' objections for them.
Once a reviewer is satisfied with the article, they can vote to support it. Please note that in order to support a nomination, you must have 50 mainspace edits.

Result:

If a nomination has been active for over two days and has no active objections, it may pass with a total of either three EduCorps votes or two EduCorps and three user votes.
Once the nomination is successful, the article will be considered a "Comprehensive article." As such, an EduCorps member will archive the nomination using JocastaBot in Wookieepedia's Discord server and place the article on the Comprehensive articles page. Only members of the EduCorps are allowed to perform these archiving tasks.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to immediate removal by EduCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 1 week.

Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Narkina 2

Nominated by: RocketLaunchJr1 ^{Ever been to Ghorman?} 07:48, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:time for everybody's favorite subject :P
Word count at nomination time: 317 words (0 introduction, 140 body, 177 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Astrography

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 2 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Dani

~~The episode being the finale of the season/series cannot be sourced to the episode. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 12:22, 4 November 2025 (UTC)~~
- Fixed! RocketLaunchJr1 ^{Ever been to Ghorman?} 12:37, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
  - Are you certain the citations in the first BTS sentence can't be cleaned up/reduced? NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 12:19, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    - reduced by 1 citation RocketLaunchJr1 ^{Ever been to Ghorman?} 03:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
      - You can drop the first instance of 4 in the BTS. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 16:38, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
        Fixed RocketLaunchJr1 ^{Ever been to Ghorman?} 10:04, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
        Made a minor adjustment. Special:Diff/15307645. 19:03, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
~~BTS should discuss Insider issues as "Xth issue of SWI". See Eleventh Brother#Behind the scenes for an example. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 16:42, 20 November 2025 (UTC)~~
- Confused personal preference with policy :P See Wookieepedia:Manual of Style#Comic and magazine issues for further information. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 16:53, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Can you do a look through the article and ensure everything is linked? NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 01:02, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Looked through and added a link to Narkina 5. I didn't see any others but it is possible i missed one or two on accident. RocketLaunchJr1 ^{Ever been to Ghorman?} 17:47, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
~~Should mention the author of SW.com articles, if there is one. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 01:02, 4 December 2025 (UTC)~~
- addressed. Sorry this took so long, i've had a really busy past few weeks. RocketLaunchJr1 ^{Ever been to Ghorman?} 17:44, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
The cited article doesn't confirm Gilroy as executive producer. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 01:11, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Stakeout

~~You can probably split that first paragraph into two.~~ Stake black ^msg 12:26, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Imperators II seems to have beaten me to that RocketLaunchJr1 ^{Ever been to Ghorman?} 12:33, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

spookly

Regarding this edit, pronouns aren't pipelinked to gender anymore, following a CT decision two years ago to avoid doing so as it is not accurate in some cases and so we shouldn't assume someone's gender based on their pronouns alone.
- That makes sense. I've removed it from Narkina 2 as well as some of my WiP pages and will keep that in mind for the future. RocketLaunchJr1 ^{Ever been to Ghorman?} 03:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
~~There's room for a BTS image, perhaps of Gilroy or of the Insider cover.~~
- added image of the Insider cover RocketLaunchJr1 ^{Ever been to Ghorman?} 04:14, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
I'm not sure the Entertainment Weekly article meets the guidelines for being listed in External links as its own bullet. Its already being used as a citation, and everything that is simply used as a citation doesn't automatically quantify it being in EL as a distinct listing only on the basis of it being mentioned or present within, so something like that would generally be removed.—spookywilloww^talk 18:59, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- removed RocketLaunchJr1 ^{Ever been to Ghorman?} 04:03, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Per standard of other SAs, fairly sure the intro should lead in as "Narkina 2 appeared, albeit unidentified,, in the series finale..." etc. to add the noted words since it wasn't actually named in the episode itself.—spookywilloww^talk 03:53, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- Fixed RocketLaunchJr1 ^{Ever been to Ghorman?} 03:56, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Theca

Nominated by: Hego Damask II (talk) 00:03, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Word count at nomination time: 75 words (0 introduction, 57 body, 18 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 2 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

StarWarsFan327^Talk 17:33, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
—Vuvalan ^talk 00:23, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
ThePedantry (talk) 19:34, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

SWFan

~~Theca's hair color, Jedi Order and the Jedi assault team are all currently exclusive to the infobox.~~ StarWarsFan327^Talk 22:09, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Fixed Hego Damask II (talk) 20:58, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Pedantry

~~Could use a little context around the First Battle of Geonosis and the Petranaki Arena.~~
- Fixed Hego Damask II (talk) 20:43, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
~~All three sentences start with "Theca", recommend adding some variance to the sentence structure. ThePedantry (talk) 07:31, 9 December 2025 (UTC)~~
- Fixed Hego Damask II (talk) 20:43, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments

In the BTS, the release date should be cited to a specific source, such as the one listed in the infobox for Inquisitor: Rise of the Red Blade, rather than citing the book itself. StarWarsFan327^Talk 17:42, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- The current citation is one I've seen applied across multiple comprehensive articles. Hego Damask II (talk) 23:19, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  - The release year is citable to the book, and in this instance is fine to be just the year per the layout guide Lewisr (talk) 02:39, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

High Voltage

Nominated by: ThePedantry (talk) 02:50, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Word count at nomination time: 146 words (0 introduction, 70 body, 76 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Video Games Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Entertainment and Culture

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

Lewisr (talk) 23:37, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
—spookywilloww^talk 23:50, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Annisa

Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 02:52, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Word count at nomination time: 113 words (0 introduction, 79 body, 34 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): WP:Novels

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 1 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

Skifffy (talk) 16:31, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Lewisr (talk) 22:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
—spookywilloww^talk 23:52, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
ThePedantry (talk) 19:35, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Rain skink

Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 23:55, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Word count at nomination time: 92 words (0 introduction, 75 body, 17 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): WP:THR WP:Novels

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 1 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

Lewisr (talk) 23:39, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
ThePedantry (talk) 19:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
—spookywilloww^talk 20:21, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
StarWarsFan327^Talk 00:10, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Blue sprout

Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 03:45, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Word count at nomination time: 123 words (0 introduction, 74 body, 49 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): WP:THR WP:Novels

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

Lewisr (talk) 20:50, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
ThePedantry (talk) 19:51, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
—spookywilloww^talk 20:21, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Unidentified Twi'lek (Zenarita)

Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 21:37, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Word count at nomination time: 165 words (0 introduction, 128 body, 37 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

Lewisr (talk) 21:01, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Grat Resa's treatise

Nominated by: Lewisr (talk) 05:44, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Word count at nomination time: 195 words (0 introduction, 159 body, 36 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS WP:THR

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

CometSmudge (talk) 19:01, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
—spookywilloww^talk 20:07, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Unidentified mercury-based species

Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 04:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Word count at nomination time: 125 words (0 introduction, 59 body, 66 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): WP:Novels WP:Aliens

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

Lewisr (talk) 04:25, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
—spookywilloww^talk 00:25, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew

~~Unless I'm missing a second (or more) image in "Twin Suns," then the illustrator (Tim Eldred) should be noted~~ Lewisr (talk) 03:56, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Noted them CometSmudge (talk) 04:03, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Ovax gas

Nominated by: Lewisr (talk) 01:35, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Word count at nomination time: 166 words (0 introduction, 132 body, 34 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS WP:THR

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

CometSmudge (talk) 20:23, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
—spookywilloww^talk 00:21, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
StarWarsFan327^Talk 00:17, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Unidentified Sakiyan (Zenarita)

Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 01:47, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Word count at nomination time: 179 words (0 introduction, 142 body, 37 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

Mor9347 ^(Talk) 16:14, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Lewisr (talk) 00:44, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Orla Jareni's youngling group

Nominated by: Lewisr (talk) 05:39, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Word count at nomination time: 177 words (0 introduction, 144 body, 33 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS WP:THR

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

CometSmudge (talk) 20:28, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
—spookywilloww^talk 00:24, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments