Elzian
Abraxin Brandy
Wiki
Check out my Wiki,feel free to send any comments. Do you know anything on the BlackWing Virus? that's my project at the moment.—Unsigned comment by SithTrooper4 (talk • contribs)
Ewok Hunt
A game set for Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2018). The Second Death Star has been destroyed above the Forest Moon of Endor, your a Stormtrooper and have been left behind on the moon. Help will not arrive until the morning, can you survive long enough for help to arrive?
As the Ewok Warriors close in on your location, all hope seems lost. What path will you chose? Staying on your own decreases the risk of a squad of Ewok's closing in on you, although staying in a group increases your chance's of surviving the night. (night is only 6 minutes, if everyone dies at 4 mins and your left the game can go on for at least 8 minutes)—Unsigned comment by SithTrooper4 (talk • contribs)
"Essays" on own user talk page
Ha sorry i didnt realize that the talk page was for messages! essays ha ha! i'll move the 'essays' to my homepage—Unsigned comment by SithTrooper4 (talk • contribs)
done
ive moved my 'essays' from my talk page all that is left is your messages—Unsigned comment by SithTrooper4 (talk • contribs)
Hello
Hi, i noticed you put a notice above my Heavy Weapons article, what do i need to change?—Unsigned comment by SithLord6 (talk • contribs)
- I don't mean to be annoying or anything, but this article i made is the first on Wookieepedia. the info is reliable because i got it from CANON web pages and books, if you must delete it then delete it.—Unsigned comment by SithLord6 (talk • contribs)
Problem
How do i redirect my page? Phant0mMenace21 (talk) 12:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the help, appreciate it. Phant0mMenace21 (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Deletion please
hello, can you delete my First Order Star Destroyer page please, it was a mistake did not mean to post it! :) Phant0mMenace21 (talk) 14:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Redirected
I guess that my sith eternal army page is gone, if so it took me 4 hours to that! Not to be rude or anything but is it permanently gone? Because my page has been redirected and i no longer have my work. Thanks Phant0mMenace21 (talk) 13:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, for saving my work. :) Ill think about my work next time Phant0mMenace21 (talk) 14:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. - - -OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 14:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello
Hello, got a question; is there a way were I can make a page on an Imperial Stormtrooper without it being REDIRECTED by you or somebody else. Please let me know if there's a way, thankyou. Imperators III (talk) 13:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Mistake
I was browsing the article I must've removed it accidently, sorry won't happen again. :) Imperators III (talk) 08:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
I am not deliberately being annoying! I type the title in I.e., Minetrooper into the add page area and it doesn't say that the page exists yet, so I create it then you keep redirecting it. Imperators III (talk) 13:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Done
Ok edited the Minetrooper page, how is it? is it ok, need to improve anything? Imperators III (talk) 13:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Fanonpedia
Thanks for the sourcing help, just got your message. Also, don't know if you can help with this, but i got a request to remove TK-999's administrative rights on the Fanonpedia (as i call it). Am I supposed to vote, or do I just ignore it? Please help if you can, thanks Imperators III (talk) 08:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Not exactly sure what you're talking about, but I'd just ignore it. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 08:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
👍
Ok, Thanks Imperators III (talk) 12:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Signature
Ok, thank you for reminding me. I'm fairly new to editing, so I'm not really sure how. -CreaBird
Templates
How did you fix the template I added to Scarif, so I know for future reference? Thank you.CreaBird (talk)
- I simply made this edit using the source editor. You can switch to the source editor by changing your settings here. Hope this helps! OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 14:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Weapon-Stub
Hello, sorry to keep bothering you, but I noticed that you removed the weapon stub that I added to a weapon page. I'm unsure as to why, but it was probably my ignorance, thank you!CreaBird (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- No problem. Per the Layout Guide, stub templates should be placed "at the bottom of the article body when the article is too vague or brief, AND when there is clearly more information that can be added." Since in-game gear from Galaxies (such as the weapon) usually don't have much more info to offer, the article has no need for a stub template. I've also provided an explanation in my edit summary, which you can view here. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 15:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Nice missinformation on the page of lightpyke, dude. You literally deleted source that is seem in the games and series.
Yeah nice very very nice—Unsigned comment by Germansoldat (talk • contribs)
EC 76
Oh Mighty Spirits of Bedlam, you are invited to join the 76th EduCorps meeting, scheduled for 7:00 PM UTC / 2:00 PM ET on March 6th. Please leave notes if unable to attend. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the heads up.
I’ll be sure to leave that page alone.—Unsigned comment by Aiden1700's (talk • contribs)
Protostar in Empire
Hey, I noticed you undid my edits on The galaxy concerning the Protostar image. Now, I don't know what the The Star Wars Book says, but the when I read the story Right-Hand Man it did establish that the end image of Empire showed a protostar, not the galaxy. I'll try to add a quote asap. So, either it's a retcon or a mistake on the author's part, but it still seems valid enough to me. Timjer (talk) 08:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- EDIT: Okay, during Right-Hand Man (which takes place exactly at the end scene of Empire), this quote says "The large viewport of the Redemption's surgical suite yawned wide and dark [...] The spinning fire of a nearby protostar was unusually brilliant". Timjer (talk) 08:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have no problems making a compromise, but how do you suggest we do that exactly? Either it's a protostar or the galaxy (two completely different things), but I don't see how it can be both. Timjer (talk) 08:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- I see your point. This might warrant a wider community discussion. If you have Discord, you should hop on to the Wookieepedia Discord server. Discussions like this would get more people participating in it. If not, I think we should start a Senate Hall thread to get further opinions. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 08:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well, it's been a while since I last used Discord; I don't think I still have my login info anymore (seem to have misplaced it). I wouldn't mind throwing in my opinion in the Senate Hall though, but only if you think it's necessary to do so. I'm not that familiar with how Wookieepedia handles such discussions, and I'm not sure how I (just a casual editor) can really make much of a difference there. Timjer (talk) 08:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- It's good to have varying opinions, and it's best to have more than just us two deciding whether that shot in ESB is a protostar or the galaxy. There's also the option of bringing this up just after the upcoming Mofference on IRC, but I'll create a Senate Hall thread where we can all chip in. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 08:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well, it's been a while since I last used Discord; I don't think I still have my login info anymore (seem to have misplaced it). I wouldn't mind throwing in my opinion in the Senate Hall though, but only if you think it's necessary to do so. I'm not that familiar with how Wookieepedia handles such discussions, and I'm not sure how I (just a casual editor) can really make much of a difference there. Timjer (talk) 08:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Tund/Legends
Hey there. Regarding your reversion here, I would like to direct your attention to the "Behind the scenes" section of the Layout Guide. Mentions of authorial intent as derived from unofficial, unpublished sources are permitted for inclusion in the out-of-universe "Behind the scenes" sections of articles provided no mention is made in the actual encyclopedic content of the article itself. In the context of my edit, I was careful not to make any mention of Mr. Wallace's personal opinions on the status of Tund's formal membership in the Empire outside of the "Behind the scenes" section—the content of my in-article edit was derived from the text of The Essential Atlas itself & the other sources I employed in my initial rewrite of the page, not the personal opinions of the Atlas's author. May I revert your reversion? SeboltoTalk 19:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- As an addendum, I'm not sure what you mean by "unsourced" in your edit summary. As the author of the rewritten version of the article in question, the various parts of my edit were made to sections I had already previously sourced & referenced. I have been instructed to abstain from extensive line-by-line sourcing, so if I make an edit to a section already exhibiting a reference to the work being cited, I desist in adding a duplicate reference. While this may take the appearance of adding unsourced material, all the content I added in this revision was gleaned from the relevant sources; I am happy to provide specific page numbers if requested. Your reversion removed a fair few such improvements derived from the cited material, not to mention negated the various other formatting improvements I made, like the MoS-related fixes to duplicate links, the adjustments to wording for increased clarity, etc. SeboltoTalk 21:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, a misunderstanding. Judging by your edit summary, I thought you were saying that you've added information from Fry's private comments, which was why I reverted that edit. If your edit to the article body was based on official publications and the bts section is sourced, by all means please revert my reversion if you haven't already done so. And thanks for clarifying the situation here. Apologies for the confusion. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 21:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Sweetest of waters
What??
I didn't remove any content, what are you talking about? —Unsigned comment by Darth Jeff21 (talk • contribs)
stop deleting sofe im trying to find a pictur shes in mandalor
stop deleting sofe im trying to find a pictur shes in mandalor —Unsigned comment by Starwarsfan4547456 (talk • contribs)
So sorry
Hello I'm Jeff's father, and I've just come across what he's been doing, I'm terribly sorry about it. Is there any way I can help to fix what my son has done? I can't even trust him on this Wookieepedia. Please get back to me, my most sincerest apologies to you. Darth Jeff21 (talk) 13:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- There's nothing you need nor can do here. Just exercise some control and help your son find something creative to do. Then he'll be happy and there would be no need to waste time like this. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 13:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
He says he's very sorry and that it shant happen again, Darth Jeff21 (talk) 13:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
No problem
He would like to know if there is an area on this website were he can experiment and NOT get into any disputes with others Darth Jeff21 (talk) 14:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- He can use Wookieepedia:Jundland Wastes, though note that that sandbox is periodically wiped clean. A more permanent place for experiments would be user subpages such as this one. He can make his own subpage by creating something like User:Darth Jeff21/Workbench. He might also want to check out Wookieepedia's newcomers' portal, which provides links to editing tips and guides, as well as site policies. Do note, however, that everything on this site is subject to the site policies. This means his user subpage should not have overly-lengthy fanon and must be related to Star Wars. In particular, he should observe the user page policy. Hope this helps. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 14:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Thankyou very much, this is very helpful and I really appreciate it. Hopefully it should keep him quiet, thanks again. Have a nice day bye. Darth Jeff21 (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Mighella
A friend updated Mighella's species to Dathomirian, but you changed it back claiming that she is called a human in Jedi v Sith, which is correct. For several years after the release of TPM, the women on Dathomir were called humans, but this changed, at least for the Nightsisters. This is not dissimilar to how Maul was at first an Iridonian Zabrak, but a few years later he was changed to be from Dathomir. I don't know when the first mention was made that the Nightsisters were specifically the species of Dathomirian (also Dathomiri, as well as Dathormiran Zabrak, supposedly even for the females, which I am not presently addressing), but the shift was made, and this happened for sure by January 7, 2011, as seen in TCW's season 3, episode 12 "Nightsisters. Note that the air date is five years after Jedi v. Sith, which you sited on Mighella's Talk Page. Please check the Legends pages that I linked above for Dathomirian and Nightsisters. Also please see the Legends pages for Gethzerion, Talzin, and Asajj Ventress. My point is that even if Mighella is not specifically mentioned to be Dathomirian, she was a minor character who made one story appearance, which was in 2000, long before Nightsisters were said to be Dathomirian. If you note, the genetic history of those who are now said to be from Dathomir changed several times in Legneds and even again in Canon. But there are two facts that are indisputable: 1. Mighella is a Nightsister, and 2. Nightsisters are Dathomirian. Out of universe, we have the fact that, even though they were first said to be human, Nightsister history was changed to say they were Dathomirian. It is illogical to say that Mighella is human and also say that she is a Nightsister. ...Or perhaps I overlooked a Wook rule in regards to listing a character's species? If so, then please let me know. We were going to explain the situation on her Talk Page before you made the revert. Red Heathen (talk) 22:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for discussing this instead of going ahead with reverting my revert. According to Nightsisters/Legends#Society, some Nightsisters were Humans, whilst some were Dathomirians. This means it is perfectly logical to say that Mighella was a Human. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 23:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
EC 77
- "Sir, you came finally. I always at expect your come."
- ―Space General to Ratio Tile
Everybody is good! The EduCorps gathers for Meeting 77 and to view terrible Chinese translations of Revenge of the Sith at 6:00 PM UTC / 2:00 PM ET on Saturday, April 10 2021. Fan26 (Talk) 04:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
RE:Introduction
As far as I can see, neither the MOS nor the Layout Guide state that the introduction should summarize everything in the article body. Only that there should be an "introductory sentence or paragraph". --Potsk (talk) 12:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should have pointed to the Layout Guide, which says "articles shall only have an introduction section, commonly called an "intro," if the article body reaches 165 words in length." Regardless, if you take a look at any article listed on Wookieepedia:Featured articles, especially long character articles such as CT-7567/Legends, you'll see that introduction sections are usually a few paragraphs long. If you compare different status articles, you'll also see that intro length depends on article length. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 12:29, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Unidentified freighter (Tatooine)
Sourcing/Referencing Pages
Please remember to reference your additions to pages!!!!! It makes things easier for other members to edit your pages.-AmazinglyCool (talk) 14:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Canonicity of the Star Wars novelizations
According to Pablo Hidalgo of the Lucasfilm Story Group (the official keeper of new canon for the Star Wars universe), the novelizations are part of the new canon except for the parts of the novelizations that have been retconned by a movie. Please refer to the screenshots of the Twitter thread in this article:
https://starwars.fandom.com/f/p/3100000000000115910
SAMcCaffrey (talk) 16:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)SAMcCaffrey
(talk) 16:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)SAMcCaffrey
Sourcing
So you told me to source things. So I did and then you deleted them.
-Starwarsfan2525—Unsigned comment by Starwarsfan2525 (talk • contribs)
Sources on Peter Geddis
Hi. Apparently this has been an issue recently, but I have gone out of my way to obtain a primary source regarding the passing of Mr. Geddis: https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Talk:Peter_Geddis. If you have any further questions, or if you believe it will be necessary for me to pay the $15USD to obtain the certificate copy itself, please feel free to get in touch. Thank you for your time. StrangeStatue (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Pastoral Collective
You went offline, so :P
The Ilum book
TENEBRAE
Hello, last month you asked me to leave a line that states that valkorion is no longer a sith. I will leave the link below and I would like to say that echoes of oblivion does not claim that Tenebrae is a sith, because the guy we face in echoes of oblivion is not the real tenebrae, just a remnant of him so even if he claimed to be a sith this should not be considered.
https://youtu.be/X_PFrlJ1oTQ —Unsigned comment by Ragnarstark7 (talk • contribs)
RE 2: Tenebrae
Even though the Tenebrae of echoes of oblivion is an inprint of your spirit, it is still not enough to categorize him as a sith. The only line that states that he is a sith is the phrase that he says "I am the master of all sith" This is not enough to say that he is a sith, he has this speech because the Inprint of his spirit was done at the time that he ruled the sith. This statement is false because he is no longer the master of the sith and the only sith who follow him are the servants, who the scourge despised them because they are not real sith but beings who enslave themselves to a sick person. Another fact that negates the argument that echoes of oblivion categorizes Tenebrae as a sith is the fact that we see 3 forms of tenebrae. The old one, who was a Sith emperor who only cared about his rituals; his form in galactic war where we saw him as an emperor who wanted to cause war to perform his ritual; and his form as a valkorion who wanted to be seen as a God for the people of Zakuul. The Tenebrae imprint divided his consciousness into three forms and the last time we saw him complete he was not a sith, categorizing him as a sith would be the same as categorizing revan as dark jedi because of shadows of Revan.
- ~~Ragnarstark7—Unsigned comment by Ragnarstark7 (talk • contribs)
Simus
Geektionary continuity
Ackbar being a Fleet Admiral does contradict him being a Grand Admiral. He even explicitly states in the book Aftermath that he is not a Grand Admiral and is a Fleet Admiral. ExquisitePuma (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ackbar holding one rank does not contradict him holding another rank. However, what you're saying about Ackbar stating that he's not a Grand Admiral does contradict Geektionary. If what you're saying is true, you should clarify this on the Geektionary article. Also, there still exists the problem of clearly non-contradictory information on that article, such as the two ranks of Thanisson. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 14:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- I've edited the part about Ackbar's rank and removed the part about Thannison. What about the bit on the military experience of the Spectres? Geektionary states that only Zeb had military experience, but both Kanan and Chopper served in the Republic Military, which is contradictory. ExquisitePuma (talk) 14:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. For the Sprectres, I suppose that's contradictory. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 14:34, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ok thanks. The only other thing was Geektionary saying 'Following his involvement in the Battle of Scarif he was chosen to take command of Red Squadron during the Battle of Yavin.' This does contradict Rogue One where he is already Red Leader. I would also like to apologize, the continuity for Geektionary is the first time that I've made edits on Wookieepedia and I realise that I have made mistakes, so thank you for your patience. ExquisitePuma (talk) 14:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- And thank you for working with me. I'll point out that that's not a contradiction though. The source says he was chosen to command Red Squadron specifically in the Battle of Yavin. I don't think being Red Leader means you automatically command your squadron in every single battle. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 15:20, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ah ok, I didn't realise that was how Squadron Commanders worked. I'll remove that part from the article now. ExquisitePuma (talk) 15:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
How do I do that?
you sent me a message asking me to sort out the categories but how do I sort them out? I don't know how to sort the categories I don't know how to do that?
Also thanks for offering that advice even though I don't know how to sort the categories. Scales and Armor 4:55 (UTC)—Unsigned comment by Scales and Armor (talk • contribs)
Thank you I will get to work on alphabetizing the categories. Scales and Armor 9:54 (UTC)—Unsigned comment by Scales and Armor (talk • contribs)
Thanks for telling me I didn't know if there was a canine category I will put Defel in that category. Scales and Armor 4:56 (UTC)—Unsigned comment by Scales and Armor (talk • contribs)
Confused ranting
But sources and even Wookiepedia it's self say that Pacithhip is a Pachydermoid and all Pachyderms are mammals. There's no category for Pachydermoids or Pachyderms so that's why I added the mammalian category to Pacithhip because the source says it's a Pachyderm unfortunately there's no category for Pachyderms. Scales and Armor 4:13 (UTC)—Unsigned comment by Scales and Armor (talk • contribs)
If sources say that canines, rodents are felines mammalian then Pachydermoid are mammals as well. You have sources saying that canine and rodent sentient species are mammals just like real world canines and rodents. So if canine and rodent sentient species are mammals then Pachydermoid sentient species are mammals.
Do you not study or learn anything about animal species? Do you even know what a Pachyderm is? You are ok with canine sentient species being mammals just like real canines so why question Pachyderm sentient species?
If Pacithhip is not a mammal then it shouldn't say Pachydermoid in it's Infobox. If this wiki is going say fictional canines and rodents are mammals then that counts for Pachyderms as well.
You said that you were sorry about messaging me so many times but yet you still keep sending a lot of message. Scales and Armor 536 (UTC)—Unsigned comment by Scales and Armor (talk • contribs)
MSE-4
I found something
I watched some of the Ewoks cartoon series and the episode Horville's Hut of Horrors it shows what Garth the snake eater and Ploob look like. Yes you see curtains with a picture of their face on them however during the nightmare scene it shows what Garth and Ploob look like only in Wicket's nightmare. I took screen shot photos of Garth and Ploob so people know what they really look like without the curtains. But I don't know how to send, share or post the photos so you can see them.
I just thought I should let you know that and think people should know what those two characters look like. Scales and Armor (talk) 11:58, (UTC)—Unsigned comment by Scales and Armor (talk • contribs)
Galen Erso
Hello, you asked me why I changedGalen Erso's birthday to 56 BBY and here's why: If you read the Galen Erso article it says that he was born in 56 BBY but when you go to his information bracket, it says 51 BBY. There are two different birthyears for this guy and 56 BBY is the correct one, Krennic was the one born on 51 BBY.
~~MixerIllusive36 ~~—Unsigned comment by MixerIllusive36 (talk • contribs)
thank you!
Thanks for the quick fix on my Mitth page edit, I've been frantically scrambling trying to figure out how to fix it lol! Very new to editing, sorry about that! MollyMerula (talk) 17:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- No problem, and welcome to Wookieepedia! We all start off by making errors. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out for help! Cheers, OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 18:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Panda
You changed the correct link.
Hello,
- I was wondering why you changed the link I added on the Malevolence Campaign page. The link before brought me to the wrong page and I made sure that the link I added was a canon page. It's not the first time someone changed a link I added. Just wanted to know why you changed it back to the wrong one.
Thank you, Scaroldsby.—Unsigned comment by Scaroldsby (talk • contribs)
- You're right in saying that Battle of the Kaliida Nebula is a Canon article, but since a link to that article already exists in the infobox of Malevolence campaign, adding another one of that link in the infobox, as you did here, means adding a duplicate link, which goes against Wookieepedia's linking policy. I hope this explains my reversion. If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask me and/or join the Discord server for help! OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 10:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Edit without source
Sorry if I bother you. I just read your message. I didn't know that I couldn't edit without sources. I will remember. I will not edit again without a source.
-Sincerely, TheStorm19—Unsigned comment by TheStorm19 (talk • contribs)
Jumpin east of Javarica
EC 80
You are invited to join the 80th EduCorps meeting, scheduled for 6:30 PM UTC / 2:30 PM ET on July 10. Please leave notes if unable to attend. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Gree Device
Force-Sensitive Outcasts
Hey OOM! Not sure if you've seen this, but I'd appreciate your opinion on it since it was your removal of Ty from the page which made me consider the question about the others, who I believe we've added because they fit the definition. Thanks! Lewisr (talk) 17:27, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Thrawn Chaos Rising Plot Summary
I need 50 edits before I can join the rest of the Wookieepedia discord, so I can't quite communicate with other editors yet. I have no idea if what I have so far is good or not. My only real concern is that I'm being too detailed (but this is Wookieepedia so I'm not sure that's a problem lol). Is there a way I can send you or other editors some of what I already have done for critiques? Legogamesguy99 (talk) 11:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
AC Meeting 142
Join us for The AC-Files Episode 142, scheduled for 7:00 PM UTC / 3:00 PM ET on July 31, 2021. Please leave notes if unable to attend. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
There's something I can't figure out?
I'm having trouble with something and maybe you could help I don't know how to upload pictures on here? I haven't been able to get any answers or replies yet from other people on how to upload pictures?
Scales and Armor talk 4:53 July 3 2021
What is special uploads? Also I'm trying to upload screenshot photos to show some information that I found in some Star Wars books. The screenshots are proof of what I found and read I hope that this doesn't sound silly but I want to show the screenshots so other people will say or be ok with me adding the information.
The screenshots of the information that I found and saved have something to do with Oola and I want to make that people will be ok with me adding the information after reading it in the screenshots. The information I want to add is about Oola's personality, characteristics and traits. Because I to screenshots of pages that say this about Oola optimistic, foolish, naive, vain, bitter, jealous, pride, headstrong, self delusion, selfishly and a few other things. Those words have been used to describe her in some books and some of the words have been used more then once.
And how it mentions how Bib Fortuna tricked, Oola with a bunch of lies. In one of the books it says that Oola believed his words and what Bib Fortuna told her about Jabba was mouth watering. Yes it does say everything Oola heard about Jabba was mouth watering but them everything was shattered when she saw him. Books say that Oola thought life in Jabba's Palace would be like a fantasy dream come true and like a fairy tale.
That's why I want to know how to send pictures so I can show the information I found and see if people are ok with the information being added. With this information people could probably finally write Oola's personality and traits on her page.
Scales and Armor talk 5:15 July 3 2021
Burning Plains
Smoking Forest
EC 81
EduCorps Meeting 81 is scheduled for August 14, 2021 at 7:00 PM UTC / 3:00 PM ET. Please leave notes if you are unable to attend. Zed42 (talk) 07:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Singing Stone
Algrious Gideon
Ok 198.199.87.124 17:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
megalight per hour
I noticed that you recently undid my edits to the page, stating that "Each source should be clearly stated for every bit of information". However, how can I source mathematical conversions? The source I listed was a conversion made by the user Deboz from the original data in Raymus, which I have double-checked. It ends up as 1 MGLT is 0.0755 ly/hr. I further converted to get that one megalight is a bit less than one light month, and double-checked it all. If necessary, I can source the individual info to the specific conversion that got me to it, but I would think that would be inefficient. What would you like me to do? Jarhead002 (Talk) 17:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- What do you mean by Raymus? What is it? If it's a fan site and the data there isn't sourced fully from Canon sources, then it shouldn't be used on Wookieepedia due to WP:ATT and WP:Sourcing OOM 224 18:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Raymus is a short story in From a Certain Point of View about Raymus Antilles. Did you click on my link above? Jarhead002 (Talk) 19:06, 30 July 2021
- Ah, okay, I thought you meant something else. Then going back to your ref note (According to Raymus, the Tantive IV can cover 0.25 parsecs (about 0.81 light-years) in 8 minutes at full sub-light speed (81 MGLT). This means it covers about 6.11 Light-years per hour, so 81 MGLT ≈ 6.11 light-years per hour. We can thus conclude that 1 MGLT ≈ 0.0755 light-years per hour.), does the source say that 0.25 parsecs was about 0.81 light-years, or that full sub-light speed is 81 MGLT? The note here does not make that clear OOM 224 20:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- We know from various sources, including Raymus, that the speed of a CR90 corvette, which is what type of ship the Tantive IV is, is up to 81 MGLT. Raymus also says that at full sub-light speed, or 81 MGLT, the Tantive IV can cover 0.25 parsecs in 8 minutes. 0.25 Parsec~0.81 Ly.
So 81 MGLT~0.81 ly/8 min, or 81 MGLT~0.101 ly/min. This means that 81 MGLT~6.11 ly/hr. This gives us 1 MGLT~0.075 ly/hr. This is about 660 times faster than light, which travels at 1 ly/yr, or ~0.0001 ly/hr. If one megalight per hour (MGLT) is about 0.075 ly/hr, then one megalight is about 0.075 ly. This is 27 light-days, or a bit less than one light-month.
Since these are all direct mathematical conversions from the original canonical info of 81 MGLT~0.25 parsecs/8 minutes, I believe it is perfectly fine to put how fast 1 MGLT is based on 81 MGLT, how much faster than light 1 MGLT is, and how long one megalight is. I'm pretty sure I can just cite the conversions from the original source, and not have to source every single peice of info. Jarhead002 (Talk) 21:21, 30 July 2021
Black Vault & Berken's Flow
Singing stone
Dromondar Beta
EC 82
EduCorps Meeting 82 is scheduled for September 18, 2021 at 7:00 PM UTC / 3:00 PM ET. Please leave notes if you are unable to attend. Ayrehead02 (talk) 02:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Vow
Hey, are you still working on The Vow of Silver Dawn? Stake black msg 08:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hey there. I've got no plans for that page other than updating the summary and Appearances list, which I'll do so as I read my way through the chapters. Things are getting a bit busy for me though, so I won't be reading much of Vow. OOM 224 15:45, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
As there is no category with a single page
There are Wikis that allow that, and there are some of those, in this Wiki they are not allowed.—Unsigned comment by AgentPastor (talk • contribs)
- I don't see a point of creating a Category:Planets by affiliation sub-category for an organisation which only controlled one planet. Besides, Category:Sith planets is sufficient for the purpose of Exegol. OOM 224 17:13, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Wookiee cookie
![]() |
Stake black msg 02:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Discussion?
Hi. In your recent edit to Palpatine/Legends, you indicated you were, among other things, readding one of SaintSirNicholas's edits due to discussion with him. Can you direct me to this discussion? Because it doesn't seem to be listed in either your edit history or in his edit history. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 02:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- I was referring to a discussion I had with him on Wookieepedia's Discord server, where we agreed that a part of his additions isn't speculatory. OOM 224 06:20, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Kybo Ren image
Hey. The Kybo Ren image on your user page has been replaced by File:KyboRenBlaster-TPoT.png if you want to update it. Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:06, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
AC 146
AgriCorps Meeting 146 will be held at 7:00 PM UTC / 3:00 PM ET on December 11, 2021. Please leave notes if you are unable to attend. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:33, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Mandalorian Clan Werda
I was just wondering why Mandalorian Clan Werda has not been added to the Mandalorians Clans. The link is here:
/wiki/Clan_Werda—Unsigned comment by Darkness Deezul (talk • contribs)
Podracing & Sports
Regarding your recent rollback - I was unable to find 'Podracing' under the sports category which is a gross omission. If you have issues with redundant categories, consider addressing the categories.
Likely a better argument could be made to remove Podracing from Sporting Events, as the Boonta Eve Classic is a sporting event but Podracing itself is not.
If there is a rule concerning redundant categories could you please point me to it?—Unsigned comment by Driftlow (talk • contribs)
- I removed the article from Category:Sports because the page is already listed in Category:Sporting events, which is a sub-category of Category:Sports, thus making the new category you've added redundant. However, per your point that podracing itself is not a sporting event, I've now removed that category from the article and left Category:Sports in. Let me know if you've got any further issues or questions. OOM 224 17:42, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Grogu's page
Why did you add back the 'We're doomed!!" template? The page seemed complete.
Ghffuwg2 (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- That's because that article has a lot of issues, as listed on that template. Ideally, articles on Wookieepedia should be as high a standard as possible, with correct grammar, following all site policies such as the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide, and being well illustrated with a suitable amount of images, to list a few criteria. You can take a look at status articles, such as Wookieepedia's Featured articles, for examples of the best articles the wiki has got to offer. Some of the recently-passed status articles are EV-9D9, Sanyassa IV, and Seftin Vanik. If you have any more questions, feel free to visit Wookieepedia's Discord server! —Unsigned comment by OOM 224 (talk • contribs)
Links re
The reason I did that is I read the part that said duplicate links and decided to remove links I thought were duplicatesDaRealDarkLord (talk) 20:41, 21 November 2021 (UTC)darealdarklord
- I will keep that in mind for future editing DaRealDarkLord (talk) 21:25, 21 November 2021 (UTC)DaRealDarkLord
RE: Unsourced additions
Unverified information? Did you even read the reference? I used very simple math to convert one Mustafarian year as given in Mustafarian days into standard days. One Mustafarian day is 36 standard hours, as given by Galactic Explorer's Guide, so 412 Mustafarian days, or one Mustafarian year is 412*36=14832 standard hours. Since one standard day is 24 standard hours, as given by Star Wars: Absolutely Everything You Need To Know, Updated And Expanded, 14832 standard hours is 14832/24= 618 standard days. Thus, one Mustafarian year is 618 standard days, or approximately 1.69 standard years. Is basic mathmatics unsourced/unverified information now? I have always made sure that I only added well-sourced, verified information to articles. I would appreciate it if you would take the time to actually look at the reference, in the future. Jarhead002 (talk) 20:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, in fact I did read that reference, and that reference did not cite any sources. Therefore, the added information is unsourced and violates Wookieepedia:Sourcing. OOM 224 20:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- No. The original information of one Mustafarian year being 412 Mustafarian days comes and one Mustafarian day being 36 standard hours comes from Galactic Explorers Guide. Thus, we can convert one Mustafarian year to Mustafarian days easily, then convert to standard hours easily, and then convert to standard days or standard years easily! Jarhead002 (talk) 20:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- How about |lengthyear=412 local rotations<ref name="Galactic Explorer's Guide" />, or 618 [[Standard day]]s <ref name="year note">One Mustafarian year is 412 local days and one local day is 36 [[standard hour]]s as given by [[Galactic Explorer's Guide]]. One [[standard day]] is 24 standard hours, as given by [[Star Wars: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know, Updated and Expanded]]. Thus, one Mustafarian year is 412 local days*36 standard hours each=14832 standard hours=618 standard days.</ref>?
It gives links to the sources for the original information that the conversion is based off of.Jarhead002 (talk) 21:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Great. A few things need to be cleaned up, such as removing extra spaces, changing present tense to past tense, and putting italics around the sources. Also, keep in mind that Star Wars: The Galactic Explorer's Guide is the source while Galactic Explorer's Guide is the in-universe item. Other than those, it's more or less ready to go. However, I would reword that last sentence to "Thus, one Mustafarian year consisted of 14832 standard hours, or 618 standard days" for clarity as well as a more formal tone. OOM 224 21:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Inqmoot 134
Inqmoot 134 will be held at 7:00 PM UTC / 3:00 PM ET on January 22, 2022. Please leave notes if you are unable to attend. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
