Talk: JangFett/archive10

Pls

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Moradmin Bast has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Please record your achievement here, and feel free to add the {{User featured}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Cade Calrayn 19:17, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

CAnom - Ao Var

I admit to venting my frustration with Cade. You have to understand, however, from my point of view. I nominate an article and am doing my best to satisfy a voter's objections, when he comes and interrupts the discussion I am having with the initial voter to explain details of a Tc discussion that took place. Additionally, he tells me that I am wrong and that MJ did not state what MJ obviously did state. Additionally, Cade went to another article that I presented to a GA review and started making changes to that article. There have been many times when I am writing to someone that Cade pops in uninvited and interjects his comments into my conversation, or has made changes to articles that I have placed Inuse templates in because I am working on them. I realize that I will have to deal with him in the nomination of articles, but I really would like him to quit harassing me. And telling me that an unreliable site says that my grammar is poor is ridiculous. I really did laugh because I thought it was a joke at first. Exiled has retracted his statement that I did not contest every objection. So, I don't know where you get that I am unwilling to accept objections. I will object to someone trying to insist that I use something that does not follow this wiki's policy or that lowers the quality of the wiki by doing something not in line with the policy. I would expect the same of you. I got irritated, however, at the comments from Cade that "I have a problem." That is personal attack. —Gethralkin^Hyperwave 21:02, August 31, 2013 (UTC)

WOTM nomination

Thank you for supporting my nomination of WOTM for September 2013 as result for recognizing my work and hopefully some improvement for our beloved wookieepedia. -- Jedi Marty (talk) 23:25, August 31, 2013 (UTC)

• Hey not that is necessarily mean anything but I couldn't help but notice that according to Special:Statistics Marty's edit was the 4,600,000 thousandth edit. Fe Nite (talk) 00:01, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

The Electric Company Magazine

Why would the page for The Electric Company Magazine become nonsense? -- LegalizeAnythingMuppets (talk) 03:48, September 4, 2013 (UTC)

Elder Tail-heads

Yo Jang...Sorry to bother. But be discreet still. I understand where you sit as far as recent tremors in the Force and canon. Also, in the Togruta talk pages I saw that you took a whack at some ideas. That is why I came here instead of starting a debate again. I'm looking for source confirmation that the Togruta do not wear shoes normally on their planet according to the old canon, along with the rest of that big block of text on the article between the last source marker and the ankal-tooth necklace information which is sourced. Can you please help me here? I suspect the source used to justify the ankal-tooth necklaces inclusion is the same used to verify the Togruta do not usually wear shoes on their homeworld, along with some other statements after that data. If you can interpret the article better, than please assist. If some info is unfounded, then please help me out. Thanks Jang. And good luck with the cause. May the Force be with you.99.188.36.80 05:24, September 5, 2013 (UTC)

New Galactic Empire

So... how about we move Galactic Empire (The Star Wars) to New Galactic Empire but give that page a Template:youmay to Darth Krayt's Galactic Empire? After all, Darth Krayt's Galactic Empire comes directly from Legacy Era Campaign Guide, while "New Galactic Empire" always was a conjectural fan name as far as I can tell. We don't want people to confuse this new non-canonical Empire with neither Krayt's nor Galactic Empire. LOST-Malachi (talk) 21:13, September 6, 2013 (UTC)

• I'm simply unable to check all 56 issues of Legacy + the Campaign Guide now, but the history of the page clearly shows it was a conjectural title when created. The page was bounced around various conjectural title for years until the campaign guide firmly established it as Darth Krayt's Galactic Empire - that's why so many alternate titles in the intro. Of them all only Empire, Sith Empire and New Order I remember seeing in text, other come from a source that it is being called "Galactic Empire" while not being the Galactic Empire - so a prefix was needed. Note also how very few Legacy pages link to it - all of those links predate Campaign Guide. LOST-Malachi (talk) 21:24, September 6, 2013 (UTC)

Droopy McCool

Thanks Jang for deleting Droopy McCool. However, User:JMM has undone what you started by simply recreating the page and once again redirecting it to Snit instead of moving the page from Snit to Droopy McCool. Could you please sort this out. Bo Shuda (talk) 23:31, September 7, 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks, it's all sorted. The problem was that it wouldn't let me move the page over the redirect. I would've if I could've. Bo Shuda (talk) 01:52, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

Inq Meeting 59

Hey Jang. Meeting 59 of the High Council of Inqusitors is scheduled for next week Saturday, September 21. Please make sure to leave notes if you cannot attend. Otherwise, see you there! CC7567 ^(talk) 01:41, September 9, 2013 (UTC)

• The meeting has been rescheduled for the following Saturday, the 28th, due to a conflict with the next EduCorps meeting. Apologies for any confusion. CC7567 ^(talk) 20:14, September 9, 2013 (UTC)

votestruck a comment?

Hey Jang. I'm curious why you applied {{Votestruck}} to Malachi's comment in the Discussion section of the CT. Was it for an intentional purpose or an oversight? It just seemed odd because it wasn't really a vote that was being struck there. Thanks! - Esjs^(Talk) 17:06, September 10, 2013 (UTC)

Wohe Omosp

Ah yes, good catch. No problem I'll just go ahead and do a proper consensus submission. StarsiderSWG (talk) 22:07, September 10, 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks :P I think I fixed it now StarsiderSWG (talk) 22:30, September 10, 2013 (UTC)

EduCorps Meeting 2

You are invited to participate in EduCorps meeting 2, which is scheduled for 7 PM ET on Saturday, September 21st.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 14:13, September 12, 2013 (UTC)

Is this okay?

Will my edits to List of Books be reverted. The section entitled Essays and commentary?Darth Pickle 2 (talk) 21:30, September 13, 2013 (UTC)

AC Meeting 61

You have received a ticket for a front row on the future AC concert starting September 28th. Bring your guitar. If you can't make it to the karaoke session, please leave notes. - Winterz (talk) 00:15, September 14, 2013 (UTC)

WP:VG

Hello there, this is your local tyrannical dictator project team lead. Now that things have settled down a bit I wanted to bring this to your attention. Anyway, check it out when you get a chance and leave a comment, and keep on trekkin'. Corellian Premier^{The Force will be with you always} 16:33, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry

Thank you for your advice. I will make sure to follow it in the future. --LazyStormTrooper (talk) 23:44, September 24, 2013 (UTC)

The Empire strikes back

The vote in the TC thread was unanimous in saying that the title should be a redirect to the film. It just disagrees on whether the page should be deleted first (and that's my fault). I believe that the correct closure here would be something along the lines of "consensus to redirect page to the film, no consensus to delete the history first". If you check with other, longer-tenure admins, I believe that's the way votes like this have been interpreted in the past where the options are not completely mutually exclusive. I therefore ask you, under WP:AA, to change the closure of the TC accordingly. And I apologize for creating this mess in the first place. :P —MJ— ^{Jedi Council Chambers} 23:56, September 24, 2013 (UTC)

Otto FAN

Hello! Thanks to recent research by StarsiderSWG, one of the last persons here who still owns a Galaxies game, there have been significant additions to the "Put on the sidelines" section of Otto's article. Since you've already voted for its FA nomination, I send you this message so you can have a look at the recent additions and, if the need arises, remove your support vote. I don't want people who voted to feel cheated because they supported the nom before the article was complete—without my knowledge. Have a good day! --LelalMekha (talk) 13:15, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Meeting reminder

A reminder that Inq Meeting 59 will be in two days (if you go by ET, that's Saturday the 28th at 8 PM ET). If you can't make it, please remember to leave notes. Thanks. CC7567 ^(talk) 02:33, September 27, 2013 (UTC)

EGW Author's Cut

Hey Jang! I'm just being curious there; why do you think that the EGW Author's Cut blog series doesn't deserve its own article? After all, that series will serve as a complement to the printed version of the Essential Guide to Warfare, and we do have separate articles for the Essential Atlas and its online companion. If we don't have an article for the blog series, won't it be unpractical to indicate where a given information comes from—book or blog? --LelalMekha (talk) 14:37, September 28, 2013 (UTC)

• Actually, there's also Barely Tolerable: Alien Henchmen of the Empire and Viva Space Vegas! The History of the Marvelous Wheel. A lot of retcons have been introduced in those articles, and the blog articles themselves are the only sources to which those retcons can be linked to. As regards the EGW Author's Cut, Jason Fry has commented that "Leland Chee reviewed this for canon/continuity, and is reviewing future installments as well." In other words, the content of that series is and will be canonical. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:26, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
  • Now, it's clear we should have guidelines as to when we should create an article for an official blog post or not. The answer's quite obvious to me, though: an article should be created only when the post reveals new canon elements that are only available there. However, no need to make an article for that kind of post. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:37, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
    • There are borderline cases, though. What do you think of this? (That one has already its article here, by the way. And I must admit I was the one who created it in the first place.) --LelalMekha (talk) 15:44, September 28, 2013 (UTC)

Blog Confusion

Hey Jang, I was just confused on why you deleted my page for the Essential Guide to Warfare Author's Cut blog. It was, as reported on Jason Fry's dorkery, reviewed by Leeland Chee for cross-examination, and contains a load of new canon. Pages like Arhul Kurumenga will now have a redlink or nothing for their source, and 11 more blog posts will soon follow, most likely brimming with new information. What's the story?74.72.159.170 15:48, September 28, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks, JangFett, for replying on my forum question. You saved me a lot of time.

JediMaster22 (talk) 20:34, September 30, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Whoa...

Did you happen to look to see what the whole conversation was about? In case you missed it, I told DP2 that he could find the policies (that he wasn't following) in the links of the Welcome Box (where it's easy to get to them), and he practically answered back that he glanced at it and decided to, instead, just "assume based on past evidence to create certain articles." So, I can interpret that one of two ways: either he will create articles the way others in the past have created theirs, or he will keep creating articles the way he's has up to now and go with whatever he's been getting away with. In fact this latter possibility coincides with his comment of "They correct me when I'm wrong, but for the most part leave me to my own devices." So, unless someone points out that he's wrong, he continues on. This actually answers your message to me, regarding telling someone what they are doing is wrong (which specifically is not PA, by the way, as outlined in the NPA policy), not telling them will never let them know what they need to change. As for DP2 "trying," I don't know if you read his comments to me or not, but if he can't be bothered to go read something to learn how to do it, then that doesn't sound like "trying" to me. So, I am not assuming anything, I just happened to get upset about it. I suspect it may be because he doesn't want to read through it all. Many people don't like to read much anymore these days—even writers, sometimes I don't. However, many editors come here and edit existing articles while they learn what the policy requires, without creating new articles and causing a sloppy mess. DP2 doesn't want to do that because, as he expressed it on my page, "I DO take pride in creating pages first." So, you will never get him to quit creating articles long enough to learn how to edit existing articles because it looks like he sees that as beneath him. If he would simply read the MoS, there would be no issue. I am not the only one who has repeatedly told him that he is ignoring instructions, counsel, and advice, whether posted on template and article pages or in messages from other editors. In fact, you yourself told him to quit creating Star Trek articles, admonishing him that he had been told before not to do it (why did he not listen the first time? maybe he didn't want to). However, I will dial back the vitriol a bit. Additionally, I would like you to review my comments to DP2, because you improperly accused me of violating WP:Civil by calling for a ban. On the contrary, I was letting DP2 know that admins have blocked/banned editors before who were refusing to adhere to article creation policy and who were told too many times not to do things their own way. I have seen it before. So if you carefully read my comments, you will be happy to learn that I was not calling for him to be banned. —Gethralkin^Hyperwave 06:42, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

• While that may be, and I have said that I would bring it down a notch, it is more appropriate for you to address the tone of my comments for correction (which I do agree were more acerbic than needed to be). However, unfounded accusations are uncalled for. I never called for DP2 to be banned. If I did think that was necessary, you would have been one of the first I would have messaged. I also would not have called for a ban on the users page but only on the page of the admin authorized to do so. Please don't read more into my comments than is actually there. And, while it has been a couple of weeks, I have hardly been able to get online due to personal schedule issues, so I will drop it, but I am answering the messages left for me in my extended absence. —Gethralkin^Hyperwave 16:21, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

Star Wars Rebels Template

So how does this look? Byzantinefire 17:23, October 19, 2013 (UTC)

Star Wars Rebels Books
Star Wars: Rebels Read-Along Storybook and CD | Star Wars: Rebels Picture Book | Untitled Star Wars Rebels sticker book | Untitled Star Wars Rebels junior novel | Untitled Star Wars Rebels chapter book | Untitled Star Wars Rebels Level 1 Early Reader book | Untitled Star Wars Rebels Level 2 Early Reader book
[edit]

Then how about just Rebel Books? Byzantinefire 22:27, October 19, 2013 (UTC)

Then what should i make for Wookieepedia? Byzantinefire 23:49, October 19, 2013 (UTC)

Cassio Tagge

Hi Jang,

Menk's just brought it to my attention that you had been working on Cassio Tagge -- I had started my own version in recent days and had absolutely no idea that you were doing likewise, I promise.

Personally I'm prioitizing Tagge and was planning to get through it within the next week or so—do you mind awfully if I forge ahead? It's only that I see you've been working on it sporadically for over a year now. Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 11:11, October 24, 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for accommodating - If you don't mind me pilfering the appearances and sources that'd be grand. Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 12:27, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • I probably don't truth be told. Any assistance will be gladly appreciated. Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 21:41, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
    • It proved invaluable Jang—I've ported what I've done so far to the article proper. I've still got stuff here that I'm yet to check - I'm going through the radio drama now so no dramas there, just wondering if some of that stuff was in the pack but marked differently (I'm guessing the Guide to the Star Wars Universe stuff is the transcript notepad you have?) Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 01:25, October 29, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Trech Molock

Actually, I don't think it was intended to be political. "Molock was more given to risk-taking than his conservative boss, and in private the two debated matters of military doctrine with a level of heat that would have surprised their fellow officers." IMHO, there's nothing political about that, it simply means that Tagge was attached to more traditional military tactics. --LelalMekha (talk) 13:14, November 2, 2013 (UTC)

• I found the edit in question relating to Conservatism on Cosinga Palpatine and Vidar Kim: "http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Palpatine&diff=3857990&oldid=3857853" The editor responsible is JRT2010. You are free to ask him. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 13:43, November 2, 2013 (UTC)

Interplanetary travel response

I paraphrased for sure. I remember reading into the void, that it took 300 days to get to furies gate, and it took 17 days I think from shikaawa to tython.Darth Pickle 2 (talk) 01:54, November 3, 2013 (UTC)

Pls Branon

Branon is mentioned in the listing for the pilots of Red Squadron, but that's it. No image, either. - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 17:04, November 3, 2013 (UTC)

Motti update

Hello Jang, the new Insider issue has provided Seswenna as Conan Antonio Motti's homeworld. Other text, which I don't think is any new info:

• Motti is Tarkin's nephew by marriage.
• At the time of the Clone Wars, he was too young to enlist.
• Uncle Tarkin was his ticket to power.

That's all. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:14, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

EC Meeting 5

Greetings, EduCorps Meeting 5 is scheduled for Saturday, November 16th at 7 PM ET. If you are unable to attend, please leave notes on the meeting page on how the articles under review should be handled. (If you are not an EC-only member and wish to stop receiving EC meeting notifications, please leave a message on my talk page.)--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 05:58, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Grizzle

Great, thanks. It seems like a pretty unique incident, but yeah, I don't think anyone would have been able to edit him otherwise. Cheers. Menkooroo (talk) 14:35, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the cleanup. I need an image. ^^__^^ 75.34.166.87 00:54, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

CT:Re-opening TOR and video game canon

I thought you may wish to participate in Forum:CT:Re-opening TOR and video game canon seeing as you were involved in the consensus reached at Forum:CT:TOR and video game canon. --Gnarscien (talk) 16:25, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

External link

Hi

I am a new user, and have never made a contribution to Wookieepedia. I was attempting to make a constructive contribution to the Star Wars page that included externals links, and was disallowed. Could this be revoked and I be allowed to contribute?

Mactionjackson (talk) 07:31, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks. I tried another edit on the same section, and gave a link that features Lucas explicitly stating what I am describing, but it gets blocked. It's an important edit since Lucas sees it as the theme of the saga.—Unsigned comment by Mactionjackson (talk • contribs)

Ghost Concept Art

It seemed confirmed to me at least i won't get any complaints on Disney Wiki or Star Wars Rebel Wiki. Byzantinefire 05:02, November 30, 2013 (UTC)

If it were only that easy Jang its very hard to find the images i want with said credibilities why does Wookieepedia have to have such strict rules. Byzantinefire 05:09, November 30, 2013 (UTC)

AC Meeting 63

Meeting 63 is scheduled for December 9 at 9 PM UTC (4 PM Eastern). Make sure to leave notes if you can't attend. 1358 ^(Talk) 16:40, December 2, 2013 (UTC)

• Actually, December 7. A Saturday like usual. Apologies. 1358 ^(Talk) 16:49, December 2, 2013 (UTC)

Menk

Why'd you block Menkoroo, I've heard much worse things in my life. He just gets carried away with things. --75.34.192.144 12:33, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

About the image I uploaded

Hi JangFett, if you recall, you deleted an image - Mc03, that I uploaded. The email I received told me, your reason for deleting the image was because of falsified sourcing. But I really don't understand what was 'falsified', please explain it to me so I don't make the same error again in the future.-- MadMarek ^{(Force Box) - "We speak, we learn, thats what we're for"} 16:41, December 19, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Thanks

Thank you, I'll be sure to do this now!-- MadMarek ^{(Force Box) - "We speak, we learn, thats what we're for"} 16:50, December 19, 2013 (UTC)

P.S. - One more question

Hi, its me again, can you please explain to me, in plain english, how can I archive my old talk pages?-- MadMarek ^{(Force Box) - "We speak, we learn, thats what we're for"} 16:53, December 19, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Ifd

Thanks for the tip! I'll remember that in future. Bo Shuda (talk) 01:15, December 20, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Image

Hey JangFett ! Yes, I still need this file File:Storm Commando Gunner-TotC.jpg because I posted on a page, but in the future I'll use {{FTBR}}, it will be more convenient ;) Maguinic (talk) 17:20, December 22, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, but that still doesn't awnser my question

I know I have to dump all the stuff in the archive, but what I meant, actually was how do I dump it all in there? Please explain simply.-- MadMarek ^{(Force Box) - "We speak, we learn, thats what we're for"} 12:13, December 23, 2013 (UTC)

Re

I wrote on the talk page but it was deleted where else was I meant to go and as for what I put on the Disscussion page I have asked for help on where put write things and had none so It wasn't my fault now where do you suggest I go to ask what I wrote on the Knowledge Bank with out it being deleted but the Edit Police on here?--IG Series (talk) 14:55, December 24, 2013 (UTC)IG Series

AC Meeting 64

Meeting 64 is scheduled for January 18 at 9 PM UTC (4 PM Eastern). Make sure to leave notes if you can't attend. Winterz (talk) 17:34, December 27, 2013 (UTC)

Disney Template

Thank you Jang. Byzantinefire 21:22, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

But what about characters? Byzantinefire 21:35, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry i did not think things through more. Byzantinefire 22:18, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

So did you get my message on Disney Wiki? Byzantinefire 18:24, January 2, 2014 (UTC)

I need you to make a Marvel.com template for Disney Wiki. Byzantinefire 19:41, January 2, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks again. Byzantinefire 19:49, January 2, 2014 (UTC)

Takara's officer|Takara's officer

See that: http://www.ossus.pl/biblioteka/Oficer_Takary --Darth Plagueis "Mądry" - Hego Damask 16:51, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

Two questions

I originally asked these questions on the talk page for that image, but no one came and answered them. I hope you can please.-- MadMarek ^{(Force Box) - "We speak, we learn, thats what we're for"} 17:55, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

1. I see this image needs croping, can I crop here on Wookieepedia, or do I need to crop it on my computer, and then re-upload it?-- MadMarek ^{(Force Box) - "We speak, we learn, thats what we're for"} 14:07, December 28, 2013 (UTC)

Where can I use this image, I originally uploaded it for the Battle of Endor article, but it got removed from there, I then tried to salvage my time and trouble uploading it and put it on the MC80 Home One type Star Cruiser article, but now I see its been removed from there too,...huh...what now?-- MadMarek ^{(Force Box) - "We speak, we learn, thats what we're for"} 14:07, December 28, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Two Questions

Thank you, I checked out the page, I think I found a spot for it. And thank you again, but my other question wasn't weather the image needed croping, it was can I crop the image on Wookieepedia, 'cause the only system on my computer that I can use to crop, leaves the image a '.bitmap' And that format, as you propably know, ain't supported by Wookieepedia. So...?-- MadMarek ^{(Force Box) - "We speak, we learn, thats what we're for"} 18:24, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

Official Poster Monthly 14

Hello Jang, I saw you just added Star Wars Official Poster Monthly 14 to TK-119 and TK-875's sourcelists. Does that include the same pic of two stormtroopers featured on the action figure? If so, then TK-875 isn't on there, but instead Unidentified stormtrooper (Central Core Shaft). Unless it features all 3 of them. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:17, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Re: 187.* IP

I apologize for not replying when originally asked as I had failed to check my Talk Page at the time. I wish to make it clear that no I am not this IP: Special:Contributions/187.171.170.197.

I had made attempts to contact you after being banned but for some reason couldn't manage it so I ultimately decided to just wait for my ban to expire and then inform you.

Once again, I apologize for not responding on time and hope to avoid such a situation in the future. The Wikia Editor (talk) 2:10, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Takara's officer

Biblioteka Ossus have that article. Wookieepedia is bigger, more known, but doesn't have it. Plese, recreate it. The Source is here. Darth Plagueis "Mądry" - Hego Damask 11:50, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Yo Verros here

Yo Verros here, can't figure this out on my phone so please revert this but why did you delete my page, how was it "bloody confusing? It took me forever to type that out on my phone. Respond via email or PM or something if you could please. Darth Verros (talk) 09:50, January 17, 2014 (UTC)

Hi, still on my phone so lack a lot of this sites greater functionality. Yes I was referring to TOR and, as the article title suggested I was referring to the community consensus decision to assume all Republic characters take the LSP conversation options and all Empire characters take the DSP ones when writing their character pages, i.e. Hero of Tython, Voidhound, Darth Nox, etc. I am attempting to reignite debate on that topic as I do not think the archetypal Smuggler, Trooper, Bounty Hunter or Imperial Agent would always go LSP or DSP respectively. Thanks. Darth Verros (talk) 09:50, January 17, 2014 (UTC)

Gampassa

Hello Jang, would you have Star Wars: The Clone Wars: The Complete Season Two? I also asked CC the same question. I am looking for whatever info the extra features have on Gampassa, which I have written and plan on nominating for CA status. Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:55, January 18, 2014 (UTC)

Done, finally!

Hey there JangFett, remember that image: File:Home One Endor.jpg, I finally croped it, and reuploaded it, but I see the old one is still there. Do you have to delete it or what?-- MadMarek ^{(Force Box) - "We speak, we learn, thats what we're for"} 13:15, January 30, 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks a mill!-- MadMarek ^{(Force Box) - "We speak, we learn, thats what we're for"} 13:56, January 30, 2014 (UTC)

OOU LG addendum

The proposal to the OOU LG has been modified with an exception about future series. Please be sure to check the CT to be sure that you still support the proposal. Thanks. Cade Calrayn 18:10, February 12, 2014 (UTC)

Help for Javapedia

Hello, I'm the admin of the Javapedia, the italian star wars wiki. I've already written to other Wookieepedia administrators for technical problems in the past, but I would make another try asking you to help me adjusting this template that is the translation of your Template:App. I would add the button "Hide" but although I have copied and pasted the Template:App's code it doesn't appear. Could you find the cause of my problem? Thanks very much, and I take this opportunity to congratulate with you and the other Wookieepedians for the huge work you do everyday. Congratulations from me and all the Javapedia ADMIRAL MIKE501 Yes, Sir! 18:35, March 5, 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks very much for helping me, I'm grateful ADMIRAL MIKE501 Yes, Sir! 18:51, March 5, 2014 (UTC)

Photo upload deletion

Just wanted to know what I failed to do correctly in uploading the file you deleted. (Rebel Logo.png) Did I select the wrong fair use case or did I miss something else entirely from the MOS. Just want to get it right in the future.

Mhommer (talk) 02:34, March 6, 2014 (UTC)

hi jandfett

hi jandfett waz up

I also see that your an admin.—Unsigned comment by Alex star wars fan (talk • contribs)

Echo's alive

Just wanted to let you, brave sir, know about CT-21-0408's new info. Failoni has just announced that Echo's alive. You're free to scream whenever you return from your vacations to Naboo. Winterz (talk) 19:28, March 10, 2014 (UTC)

Concept art

Maybe I've phrased it wrong, but I was explaining that the concept art depicts his appearance after a survival. Not that the survival itself was canon. Sorry for any misunderstanding. Alexrd (talk) 00:22, March 11, 2014 (UTC)

Doffing the top hat

Thanks for the award and kind words, Jang. Its much appreciated, my friend :) - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 18:07, March 11, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Bric

Here you go. I believe this isn't the shot you were looking for. If not, let me know. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 06:16, March 13, 2014 (UTC)

Page redirect

Hey.

Was wondering if you could make a redirect page to Wim Smoot with the page name as 'Smootie'. I've tried doing this but have been unable to because an admin has to. I think this is needed as the character is only mentioned in the game as Smootie. Thanks. Bounty Hunter happens to also be my favorite game as is the character Smootie in case you hadn't noticed :)

Smootie (talk) 23:52, March 13, 2014 (UTC)

Escape from Tipoca City

Seeing how you deleted the page, Escape from Tipoca City, how exactly would one refer to the events of "Fugitive", considering they were fairly crucial to the story? Bane7670 (talk) 16:22, March 14, 2014 (UTC)

Inhibition and AOTC

Hey Jang. Although the inhibitor chip was obviously invented for TCW, Lama Su did say "We modified their genetic structure to make them less independent than the original host" in AOTC. And in the Lost Missions episode, the chip IS described as the means they use to make them less independent and aggressive as Jango.Lelal Mekha ^{(Audience Room)} 16:42, March 14, 2014 (UTC)

• Well yes, that's how I intended it. But even as a retcon, it's still an indirect mention, is it not? It deserves both tags. --Lelal Mekha ^{(Audience Room)} 17:01, March 14, 2014 (UTC)

Hailfire

Eh, I'm unsure what to do now? Link to the disambiguation page? Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 17:10, March 17, 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the quick reply. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 17:18, March 17, 2014 (UTC)

Yoda's Orange Lightsaber deletion

How was that page nonsense? --Geekius Maximus (talk) 00:43, March 20, 2014 (UTC)

Malevolence

I feel like calling the primary armament "dual" ion cannons is a bit misleading. Perhaps, "interconnected" or something similar could be used. Most users would assume that two dual cannons means a total of four cannons, two on each side. Just like the Millenium Falcon's Quad laser cannons means a group of four barrels in a single mounting, rather than four seperate laser cannons such as on the X-wing. I get that they may be part of the same system, but because their fire arcs are opposed instead of identical, I feel like that should be cleared up, if need be "one dual ion cannon capable of firing to one side or the other," perhaps. Just trying to clarify it for more casual readers who haven't seen any episodes where it's clearly a single cannon shot to one side or the other, not a pair. --23.115.50.0 17:34, March 20, 2014 (UTC)

Geonosis

Hello, Jang. Yes I'm able to read and understand the message on top of this page. But as this does not only touch the GAN objections, I believe this is the correct (and only) place where I can ask you for this.

Lots of the objections on Stouff were there, let's be honest, due to poor writing on my part. However, as I plan to do other Geonosis-related articles in the future and more importantly, already wrote some in the past, I would like to "discuss" a few points. I agree with you that Windu at first assembled the strike team to rescue only Kenobi, if the mission objectives changed after realizing that Skywalker and Amidala were also captured is therefore irrelevant as long it is worded the way I have done it in the articles. I also agree that the CIS should be mentioned when I say that Kenobi was captured. However, while you say the Kenobi was captured by the Geonosians, IMHO he is captured by the Separatists, as the Geonosians were part of that Alliance and kind of "hosting" a meeting. Ah yes, and Obi-Wan is a Jedi Knight.

These should be all relevant points. If you agree with me, I will go on and take a look at my other articles about strike team members and (if needed) edit them appropriately. It would be great if you could take a look at them after that and tell my if any issues remain.

Thank you for your time. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 11:51, March 24, 2014 (UTC)

Yes, he could not know as he gave specific orders to Anakin not to go to Geonosis. When the arrived and saw that there were three hostages instead of one, then they were surely trying to rescue the other two also. However, the articles tell that Windu assembled the team to do this and this and at this point the objective was to rescue Kenobi. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 12:16, March 24, 2014 (UTC)

imperisal palace

how was the imperial palace thread off topic? --12.218.151.2 17:33, March 25, 2014 (UTC)

Parameter not showing in device infobox

Hi Jang! I'm experiencing trouble with the device infobox template. As can be seen in this article, nothing appears in the material parameter although I did fill it. Do you have an idea why it happens? --Lelal Mekha ^{(Audience Room)} 14:35, March 28, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Spring break?

Not quite spring break - more like a temporary leave of absence from the real world. I've been neglecting this place for far too long, so I thought I'd drop by and go on a delete and block spree make some edits here and there. :p It's good to be back though. Glad to see some familiar faces (or read some familiar names, I suppose). Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 00:35, March 29, 2014 (UTC)

sign

Aye i do have a question, what do you mean my signature is wrong ? Srry cuz i am speaking french. Can you explain me please ?-- Emperor Jarjarkine (talk) 20:05, March 29, 2014 (UTC)

sure Emperor Jarjarkine

Re: Dis.

I hereby accept and claim the full responsibility for the lack of quality and mass of errors in these nominations. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 14:38, March 30, 2014 (UTC)

After another look, I want to give you a feedback about a few of the points:

1) The brackets. Leftovers from old days, when nobody cared that much about it. As I reload/add a new infobox to any article I write, I can say that this won't happen anymore in the future. Of course, this point should have been changed during my own edits and is therefore completely my fault. I'm sorry if you are upset, but honestly, I don't see that as such a major issue. Yes, it is not correct, but same goes for linking or so. IMHO it is something that should be pointed out like you did in the Aiwha-Squad GAN, but not a "blatant mistake". 2) The infobox issue slipped past me. Now that it is clarified it won't happen again. 3) For the "its", you told me not to use this, but I actually saw several of this in use, prominently in the articles before I edited them. I thought this was fine, but obviously it is not. Is there any occasion in which it can be used or is "it" always wrong? There are two articles that still have an "it" in them. If there are certain situations where I can use it, please say so. 4) I'd like to say that all these users should not be blamed completely for failing to recognize it. They do a lot of good work and errors happen. The person responsible for the mistakes is the nominator and that's me. Yes, they are ECs, but if I may dare to remind that you also took a look at the article in the past? Please don't take this as an insult, but I believe that in the case of the Padawan it was a combination of laziness, bad luck and different point of views and not so serious like it may have looked. And I'm sure that none of the persons involved will ever make these mistakes again. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 17:27, March 30, 2014 (UTC)

Makes perfectly sense now, thanks for the explanation. I reworded the articles accordingly. I'll not use "it" anymore, but I'm anyway not planning to write any non-gender specified article in the future. :P Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 20:42, March 30, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Disappointed

Jang, I'd like to point out that Manoof is not an EC member, and as such is not expected to catch every single mistake. He is learning to review, and because of this, will obviously miss certain objections more experienced users would make, such as the placing of the double brackets for the infobox. In addition, I let "its" pass without an objection because, as you said, its gender is unknown. "Its" does not specifically mean that it is asexual. Sure, reffering instead to the article's subject as the Padewan's Master would clear things up a bit, but it is not nessecarly needed, as "the Padawan and the Padewan's master" uses Padewan a bit too much. 501st dogma^(talk) 14:38, March 30, 2014 (UTC)

RE: Disappointed

Sorry to have disappointed you Jang. Looking back you're completely correct and I didn't give nearly enough attention to reviewing that article, which is a poor show since I'm an EC. In future I won't let it happen again, so thank you for bringing it to my attention. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:02, March 30, 2014 (UTC)

Signature

Is my signature okay? -- Emperor Jarjarkine (talk) 02:07, April 1, 2014 (UTC)

The Discourses on Jang

Hold up just a second, you purblind chucklehead. I do believe you wrote that entire debate on the thinly lined excuse of a fabrication. If you truly wished to oppose me, perhaps you should have studied deeper into the social impact that I possess. Everything I do, down to every minute detail, is dedicated to the advancement of human civilization. If you doubt me, just ask my fellow Wookieepedians. Their very existences have been bettered by my mere presence on this wiki that was all-but-doomed before I arrived.

And look at yourself! You stated that you are a law-and-order kind of guy, yet I have you quoted as saying that you are "...an agent of chaos." Really? Because law-and-order and chaos do not mix. You are a sorry excuse for a bipedal humanoid that tries to pretend that it exists in the same universe as me. You may sit on your throne and gloat that I do not meet your "high expectations," but everyone knows that it is you that will never ascend past the rank of WOTM!

Do you really think you can defeat me in a social-political battle? I AM THE SENATE! I studied under the great Niccolo Machiavelli himself. I know how to dominate in politics and social behaviors. Your political arguments are but a laughing stock pretending to sound quasi-credible. You want to make a call to the people? Fine. But the people know who their real leader is. And it's not Sir Jangeth Fettston II. It is Calendar Man himself, the Earl of Steel! You want to start a fight? You know where the RFRA is. GO USE IT! The people know where their allegiance lies. It lies with the man who has fought for the protection and preservation of this wiki since the moment he joined. That's right! I fought the great darkness that perverted Wookieepedia for so many long years, and I drove it back. Now, you wish to face me? I hope you have truly give this a lot of thought, because this is a step you will never, ever be able to take back. Choose wisely, dear sir.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 00:28, April 2, 2014 (UTC)

• I refuse to read your sadistic tl;dr rant. If you wish to prove that I am a despicable person, then you will have to provide credible witness and/or sources. Good luck with that.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)}

Pro rant

May I ask why you guys will not tell us why you are needing these subscriptions when it seemed on March 30th everything was fine? I am asking out of a professional courtesy you are asking for my money. I am more than willing to pay $5 a month, however, I want to know why I was never informed of your dire situation before March 31st. Further, you have not explained where this money is going. Is your staff volunteers or is it going to be a paid staff. I have problems with the later not the former but I am asking where the money is going, and what are the hopes with the money that is earned beyond that what is needed for site maintenance. I feel that if you are asking for my money for something that is community and fan based as we all know this is, then I should have the ability to have those questions answered. Please understand that I am asking under the premise that this is NOT a joke, I am asking questions that I feel should be answered as a potential subscriber not as someone trying to root out a "joke." Consequently, I would ask that you consider that when making your response.—Unsigned comment by 173.190.177.248 (talk • contribs)

Chat does not exist anymore ? Emperor Jarjarkine (talk)

Wookieepedia Pro

Hey there Jang, sorry to bother you about this, but I've asked left, right and center, and just been ignored! I think speaking to you directly will save me a lot of brain cells. I do not know who to believe about this whole Wookieepedia Pro thing. A hundred people say its a joke, a hundred people say its not a joke. I start a Concensus Track pole to try get some truth and maybe put an end to all the confusion, and the Admins delete it saying the whole thing is a joke. But then I read another page to see a hundred people say its not a joke!!! I think this thing has been blown completely out of proportion! And worst of all, I don't even know who to believe!!! Just please tell me the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. I can accept the truth, if it was just made clear what is the truth.--MadMarek|TheyCallMeJames^{(Force Box) - "Doeth thee mother know you wearest her drapes?"} 12:30, April 3, 2014 (UTC)

• Dude... Wookieepedia:April Fools' Day 2014. Also, hi jang. Winterz (talk) 13:53, April 3, 2014 (UTC)

Indefinite Inactivation

I have returned to active status, I'm sorry to have restored my user page a few days too early. I have a clean record here, may I have the indefinite status removed? Manuccij (talk) 04:22, April 4, 2014 (UTC)

Chat

Hey, i was wondering, because now i am at my father so, i cannot really talk. So can you come here once please ? http://fr.onepiece.wikia.com/wiki/Sp%C3%A9cial:Chat --Emperor Jarjarkine Senate Hall 00:08, April 8, 2014 (UTC)

Tanbris

Hello Jang, as I have privately conferred with Lelal, and he has given me the permission to GAN Tanbris as he has lost interest, would you be able to do a check through the adaptations, sources, etc. to ensure Tanbris's list is in fact complete? I guess the same applies to Boelo, who I plan to nom as well. Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 00:12, April 8, 2014 (UTC)

mtm ?--Emperor Jarjarkine Senate Hall 00:30, April 8, 2014 (UTC)

Userpage

Hey there Jang, I was just checking out your profile, really cool man, I like it, I was wondering if I could perhaps use it as my profile, (with all my details, of course). I'm also still awaiting your response to my previous question, about Wookieepedia Pro, I'll be patient since your on vacation. Hope to hear from you when you get back!--^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 12:50, April 8, 2014 (UTC)

• Ha! I see you're back, wasen't expecting a response so soon. As for April Fool's, I was probably the biggest fool getting all worried about it and even starting a Consensus Track pole to try and stop it, HA HA HA!!! I should be given an award for that, April Fool Of 2014, Ha Ha!! Hey maybe you guys should implement something like that, eh?--^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 14:03, April 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • All done! Thanks Jang. I did give you credit, (even though I changed a few things), a link back to your talk page, I take people seriously with copyright and sourcing, (and April Fool's Day jokes, Ha! Ha! Ha! Hey, speaking of which, do you think Wookieepedia could dream up a April Fool's Day Award?)--^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 13:27, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
    • Oh, I see, could I get one for my stuependious response to "Wookieepedia Pro", and well, not that I think its fun to be a fool, but for being the biggest fool of all? And while we're on the topic of awards, how does one actually give someone else a award?--^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 16:37, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
      • Okay Okay!! Thanks a mil!! Nice talkin'!!--^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 16:43, April 9, 2014 (UTC)

Userpage MK.2

Hi JangFett, I see i'm a bit late to the party, I also want to ask you if I can use the coding that makes your profile look so nice. I would also like to take it interwiki with me if that's alright you. I'll put a link on the bottom of it, back to your talk page here on wookieepedia that way people will know who invented it.DarthNematode.--DNDark Council Chambers 16:28, April 9, 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks for the tip-off about the sig, I fixed and tweaked it at the same time. As for userpage coding, I'll be implementing it in the next day or so, prepare for fame, I know some profile fashionista's who are going to go mad over this. I say, let them come and try to break down the gates, (we'll hold them off with tooth and nail)DNDark Council Chambers 17:17, April 9, 2014 (UTC)

New Wookieepedia Project

Hi there Jang, sorry to bug you again, but I'd like to just make sure if it is okay for me to implement a new Wookieepedia Project. Basically, this Project is the rapid updating, expansion, and Wookieefication of all articles of or pertaining to the Rebel Alliance, their allies and origins. I see other users have started other Projects, (i.e. Dogma's Far Orbit Project. There are others too). Is okay if I put the Project page link on my profile tabs, and create put templates on all the articles I'll be working on, I just want to make sure that I won't get into trouble or anything.^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 11:26, April 10, 2014 (UTC)

• Perhaps a slower and more thorough updating in order to meet high-level standards. Would that be alright?^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 12:10, April 10, 2014 (UTC)
  • Okay, I'll talk to him. Thanks!^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 12:19, April 10, 2014 (UTC)

Jhi

Jhi master. What do yu think og Hawkeye (clone trooper)? I all took care of it ! Can you tell tour appreciation?Emperor Jarjarkine Senate Hall

Jang, what is the account name of the founders of yhe wook? Do u have links ?Emperor Jarjarkine Senate Hall

Is he still editing ?Emperor Jarjarkine Senate Hall

CAN

I sincerely apologize that my attempts to help all these articles maintain their status did more harm than good. I therefore will refrain from trying to fix the issues on the probation articles without permission. However, the image of the Arrestor (Talbot wasn't added by me. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 21:32, April 13, 2014 (UTC)

You Seem Knowledgeable

I would love to be able to help Wookiepedia out, but i have no idea how; I am afraid that i am not very able when it come to technology. Are there any guides somewhere that i can utilize?Milo49 (talk) 01:24, April 15, 2014 (UTC)

Qotd

Sorry for my random sign :D i taught it was for this day and as it was a cool one.... Is it a serious mistake ?Emperor Jarjarkine Senate Hall Damn srry for this late reply but floyd stole mt money !!! Emperor Jarjarkine Senate Hall

Wookieepedia Project

Hi Jang, Cav finally got to me on that Project I proposed, he says its a, quote, "sound idea", as long as nothing is rushed and it all gets done properly. He also said project pages and templates are only needed if I'm getting others involved, which I am going to. So just to be sure, dose this give me the go-ahead?^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 10:29, April 18, 2014 (UTC)

Hey Jang, are you still here, I'm still waiting for your reply on the above.^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 12:36, April 24, 2014 (UTC)

Question

Hey jang, why grunny have to be admin if he is staff ao he alreDy have thoses right ? I sont understand :SEmperor Jarjarkine Senate Hall

Re: Project. Thanks!

Alright then, I hear what you are saying, as I said, I do hope people get involved. I will be beginning right away. Thank you for all your assistance!^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 12:14, April 25, 2014 (UTC)

• Oh Jang, one more question. I was looking at Dogma's and Cav's profiles, I see the project pages they have are subpages of their userpages, I'd like to know if those are the project pages themselves or are the project pages under a different namespace?^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 13:01, April 25, 2014 (UTC)

• • Okay then, thanks. So if people want to get involved will they come to my talk page and tell, and can I invite people to come in? This should be my last question concerning this.^MadMarek_{YouCanCallMeJames} 12:20, April 26, 2014 (UTC)

Community Messages

Just a small heads-up-- there's a minor misspelling in the new Community Messages - "annoucement" should be "announcement." ProfessorTofty (talk) 15:54, April 26, 2014 (UTC)

Clone troopers confusion

Ok, I am confused. For the GA nomination - Good article nominations/Unidentified clone trooper 2 - you mentioned that there is no need to mention his being a human male, as that is covered by saying he is a clone trooper. This is supported by the GA 2242. However, for the CA nomination (which might end up being a GA) - Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified clone trooper - both Commander Code-8 and Cade Calrayn are asking for mention of that clone being human, contradicting the aforementioned article.

As this involves two inqs and an edu member, I am not sure what to do, though i am inclined to follow what you said, as the aforementioned article agrees with this. I have left messages on the other users pages as well. Thanks for helping with trying to clear this up, i tried IRC but got no response, and posting a topic on the senate hall wouldn't necessarily get a response from you. Manoof (talk) 06:56, April 28, 2014 (UTC)