Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Galtea

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Galtea
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support votes
      • 1.1.2 Objections
        • 1.1.2.1 spookly
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Galtea

  • Nominated by: Sanathestarr (talk) 16:00, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: was put over the word count by getting updated twice in a row
  • Date Archived: 23:26, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 379 words (83 introduction, 209 body, 87 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Astrography, Wookieepedia:WookieeProject The High Republic, Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Novels

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 09:21, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 23:17, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 04:20, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
  4. ACvote CometSmudge (talk) 00:29, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
  5. Booply (talk) 23:15, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Objections

spookly
  • Similar to Banchii's sun/Travnin/other Frontier SAs, the Frontier region—like the OZ—is considered a history-based fact rather than a description one given it's not a time-static thing and was only a region for a period of time. Should be moved to history and prosified similar to the examples.
    • moved the Frontier part, should I modify the infobox so that OZ is separate like it is in Travnin's infobox or is the current version fine? Sanathestarr (talk) 12:00, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
      • No; I've moved that back on Travnin. We do do it on a different line for instances in the post-expansion period (as Naboo and others aren't in the Outer Rim). But all of the 'original' OZ was, so the status articles reflect that still.—spookywillowwtalk 15:45, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
  • There's room for a History image of Elzar or Nihil emblem or something else.—spookywillowwtalk 00:42, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
    • done Sanathestarr (talk) 12:00, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Per this (if the link doesn't work properly, this in reference to the Imp conversation in the #status-article-nominations channel on the 24th); the template needs to be used in the Western Reaches ref, not just the plainlink. Othernotedly this probably needs to be accordingly applied to any others that are missing it that were updated the same way as this.—spookywillowwtalk 17:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
    • done, must've missed Galtea when I went over my articles to add that earlier today, thanks Sanathestarr (talk) 19:56, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
      • I'm referring to the plainlinked "Star Systems of the Galaxy" present at the start of your ref (which is what Imp had been objecting to in that conversation), which is still there. I'm not sure why the other template has been added; the sentence also doesn't grammatically make sense now. The ref would/should look very similar to the Interior one for Badtibira, albeit for a different corresponding region.—spookywillowwtalk 21:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
        • oh, my bad, I misunderstood what you were referring to. Fixed the plainlink now, tho the middle part I added should remain anyway as there needs to be a middle step that places the grid square in the same area as the region, as Imp pointed out to me when I nominated Enselon system. Sanathestarr (talk) 20:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Seems like a partially shared name note is needed for Galtea Binary system.
    • done Sanathestarr (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
  • The back cover copyright indicator of The DarkStryder Campaign has a 1995 copyright date, which would seem to say that (like most other things, and like the rest of the nominations from that media that don't use full date for a different reasons) the year alone doesn't need an additional reference.—spookywillowwtalk 11:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
    • oh, oki, thought that I needed to use a separate reference since the main ref was to the adventure itself and not the boxed set, changed it back to using the same ref Sanathestarr (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:24, 7 August 2025 (UTC)