Talk: Imperialles/Archive4

< User talk:Imperialles
This talk page has been archived and is no longer active. If you wish to leave a message, please use the current talk page.
Archived talk: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5


verification of multiprocessor

If you think I dont have any sources for the article perhaps you should look at the hot chocolate article. That is were it is mentioned, so I created an article for it. My EU is very very rusty so I cannot provide a source, but ask who put the stuff about multiprocessors on the hot chocolate page. I dont think its fanon, I definatly didnt suck it out of my thumb. T.Neo 12:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Alright, I found the source. Thank you. --Imperialles 12:23, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. T.Neo 19:13, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Your opinion please

Can you take a look at File:Nabooyacht.jpg. Redemption accuses me of just taking the small version he uploaded originally and just enlarging it. This is not the case though. I scanned the image from Star Wars Chronicles: The Prequels page 186. I don't care if he reverted it because there is something wrong with the larger version I scanned, but I don't see it. Am I missing some horrible flaw in the image I scanned or is Redemption just being stubborn? - JMAS 13:02, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Well, both images are pretty much equal quality-wise. Redemption's is slightly sharper, while yours is better framed (the ship isn't cut off). There's no big difference in quality. My suggestion is to either discuss the matter with him on his talk page (he's not an unreasonable man), or simply forget about the issue for now. It's not worth getting into a reversion war over such a minor dispute. --Imperialles 13:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

KOTOR project

Hey, I'd like to assist in the KOTOR wookieeproject, but I don't have all the comics. Do you know the website where I can find the scans? Thanks.--CT-5619 helmet comlink 22:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

  • If such a site did exist, you'd be better off asking for it in our IRC channel. --Imperialles 22:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

Hey Imp, seems like you also blocked my account by blocking that IP (10.10.20.183). Maybe you could fix that? --Borsk Fey'lya Talk 00:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Heh, indeed. Should be fixed now. --Imperialles 00:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the info

hey Imperialles,

Just a belated thanks for helping me out with the categorization—I get it now: no redundancy basically. Cheers, and keep up the good work. Merry Christmas (if it applies :P) Harrar 00:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Darnit

Didn't think the first one had posted. Will leave you alone now! Harrar 00:08, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

YodaClaus-SWAJ8
Graestan would like to wish you a Merry Christmas!

I'd like to thank you all for the friendship, guidance, and support you've given me in the past year. Were it not for people like you, Wookieepedia would not be the success it has become. Keep up the good work! -- Graestan(Talk) 18:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Category:Images of Humans affiliated with the Old Jedi Order

I beg your pardon, but was your reason for having this category remove? As I was led to believe, we are trying to organize the images as best as we can, correct? An as I see it, breaking down Category:Images of individuals affiliated with the Old Jedi Order into sub- categories such as Humans affiliated makes it that much easier and cleaner. So, hopefully we can straighten this out and I can go about sorting through these images with having to worry about the categories disappearing! Merry Christmas! Purpilia 04:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Because what you're doing is creating completely redundant categories. You're combining two categories that were fine as they were. Please stop. God Jul. --Imperialles 13:18, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
    • I am afraid I dont see your point. My intention is to break it down so as to make it easier to located a desired image. The New Order/Old Order cats were created by someone other then me and I thought they worked well. That is why I broke it down further into Human Jedi Old/New Order. I had first created the Human Jedi cat but decided that it did not coincide with the aforementioned Old/New Order cats. That is why I seperated it. So I dont really see a problem. Maybe it is to many categories, but the way I see it is they are already categorized! Why revert over a hundred images to a categoryless gallery. I hope we are on the same pattern now, because I know, at the end of the day are true goal is categorized images, and less Galleries of Jedi!

Purpilia 19:05, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

So thank you for unblocking me and even more thanks for taking the time to at least transfer the images under Human Jedi Order into the main cat. It doesnt completly undo everything I had done. Well, I hope you all complete the transfer from Gallery of Jedi to Category of Jedi images expediantly! I am afraid I wont be partaking in the switch any longer as I am going to help the Lord of the Rings Wikia. Enjoy! Purpilia 03:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Navlinks

Seeing how the default skin is set to quartz, I think it would be appropriate to have a more than standard navlinks section. I propose the following:

  • 1
  • 2
    • Project:Wookieenews|Wookieenews
    • recentchanges-url|recentchanges
    • Special:Random|randompage
    • helppage|Help

Greyman told me to bug you about this so here it is. ;) --Charitwo 01:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

>:( --{{subst:User:Charitwo/SigX}} 04:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I changed it—how's this? --Imperialles 19:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Dol Grenn

When you finally get around to it, could you please strike your objection to his FAN, as it's been fixed for two days now.--Goodwood 20px (Alliance Intelligence) 23:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

WookieeProject Knights of the Old Republic

I have been given permission by the original founder to take over this WookieeProject. As a result, I would like to ask if you are still interested in working on it. Please contact me if you would like to continue or not, stating which role you wish to play if so.--Goodwood 20px (Alliance Intelligence) 18:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Checking in

Hey, man -- Can you give me a shout when you get a chance? I haven't heard from you lately. -- Danny (talk) 20:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Ngaaluh

Your objection to the picture, whatever it was, has been resolved as the pic has been removed. --Eyrezer 22:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Citadel Station

Just wanted to let you know that the image objections you have to its FAN are resolved. Sorry about the mess.--Goodwood 20px (Alliance Intelligence) 16:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk page merges

Hello, Imperialles. Is there any way that we can move this talk page, Talk:The Revanchist, to the Talk:Revan/Legends archives? If you look at Darth Malak's talk page archives, you'll notice that Alek Squinquargesimus' talk page is included. Please leave me a message on my talk page. Good night.--Jedi Kasra 04:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Ngaaluh

Hi Imperialles,

I know Eyrezer has already asked but could you possibly strike your objection for the Ngaaluh FA nom? Whatever the objection about the picture was, it was resolved on the night you put it forward and is kinda holding back the article. Harrar 18:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Inquisitorius

Bah! :-P Cull Tremayne 14:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Inq meeting

There will be an Inq meeting on the 23rd/24th at 0:00 UTC. Graestan(Talk) 16:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

"Totally KOTOR"

I'm not sure that article you just deleted was nonsense: the external link worked, and led me to a KOTOR spoof webcomic which appears to have been running for a while. Whether or not it would pass our notability requirements and thus be worth writing a better-formatted article about, on the other hand, is not so certain. Cheers, —Silly Dan (talk) 00:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

  • I noticed that it wasn't nonsense, but I doubt the notability of the webcomic regardless. If someone can prove it's notable, feel free to recreate the article. --Imperialles 00:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Image categorization

Would you mind unlocking File:SithHolocron-CVD.jpg so that I can categorize it? Thanks. - JMAS 14:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Done. --Imperialles 14:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Appreciate it. Thanks. - JMAS 15:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AlGray

You sure are fast. ;) Thanks! --Tinwe 15:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

  • No problem. --Imperialles 15:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Identity mixup

On #Wookiepedia, I believe that you believed me to be Commander Lightning. I would just like to say that I am not Commander Lightning, and have never spoken to him or this 'Culator'. I was carrying out a promise for a friend. I am sorry that you thought that I was Lightning, but I have my own account here, and on SWFanon. I am Darth tom, not Commander Lightning. I am sorry that you got this impression. Darth tom Chit 'n' Chat 21:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Alright, I'm sorry. --Imperialles 21:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:User talk:Havac

A number of Inqs (more than five) sat down and voted to strike Ataru's objections, since he'd let them sit for over a week. No one made any decisions alone. Culator might have the logs. Graestan(Talk) 01:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Havac and I have come to an agreement about this issue; no further action is needed, though thank you for your concern in the situation. Atarumaster88 20px (Talk page) 05:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Please provide notice about IRC decisions such as this in the future in the Comments section of the nomination. --Imperialles 06:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
      • Similarly, please attempt to discuss such decisions with those who carry them out before overturning. (This is as much political advice as it is a request.) Graestan(Talk) 06:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
        • The issue was discussed in depth in the Inquisitorius channel without any mention of a vote. But I'll keep that in mind, thank you. --Imperialles 06:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Multiple Force web articles

There are two articles for Force web; one is reached through searching "Force web" and the other through "Dark side web." I know that it is "scheduled" to be merged, but could you please take some action and delete one of them?

I'm not sure about whether or not Dark Side web actually restricts from the Force or not, but it sounds very fanon-ish to me. Thanks, -- 66.21.201.207 02:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC) (yay for ip addresses)

Image

Hello, Imperialles. I stumbled on this image here and noticed that it was not under the "Category: Images of Darth Malak" category. Just thought I'd let you know. File:Darklordmalak.jpg --Jedi Kasra 22:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Thanks. It's been fixed. --Imperialles 01:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

IRC

Was it you who blocked me? Darth Oompa Loompa 20:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Stazi pic

Thanks for fixing that. I accidentally uploaded a new photo on the same name. I am still new to doing the whole photo upload bit, so I appreciate your help. :-) AdmiralNick22 22:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Gunn Yage pic

File:Gunnhateshermomlol.jpg Hey, Imperialles. Could you please crop this image for me so it can fit on Gunn Yage's article's infobox? I happen to think it's a better image than the current one, but that's just me. Thanks.--Jedi Kasra 03:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Tycho Celchu

With your recent absence and the fact that Redemption has rescanned the necessary images for Tycho Celchu, the Inquisitorius held an impromptu meeting and consensus was to strike your objections and queue the nom, given that you have been notified via e-mail. If you have further issues with the article, please bring them up at the next Inq meeting. Cheers. Atarumaster88 20px (Talk page) 03:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Mailing list

Hey, Imp. I've set up a private administrator mailing list to help coordinate the current administrators of the site, and I am attempting to contact each administrator to get them to subscribe. You can subscribe here. My point with setting up this mailing list to get all of the administrators of Wookieepedia operating on the same page, and in a more unified fashion. Regardless of any personal differences that may exist between some members, I still feel that it is important that we are all operating on the same level, with regards to knowledge of the site, and new/upcoming stuff that is going to happen—so, basically, this is an attempt to coordinate us all in an effort to help keep us on the same page with regards to new policies, new ideas, announcements, discussions, etc. In my opinion, we're all on the same team and this will only help us to be a more organized and cohesive working unit—even more so than we currently are. I've already spoken with a few admins via IRC, and they have liked my point of this whole thing, and have thus signed up—I would really appreciate it you could do likewise :) Any questions about this, you know where you can reach me. Cheers, Greyman Jan.png (Talk) 15:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Inq meeting

Hey, just letting you know that Meeting Sixteen has now been scheduled. Your attendance and input would be appreciated. Cheers, Greyman Jan.png (Talk) 04:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

FAN image objections

Hey, Imp. I believe I've satisfied your image objections to the two TOTJ noms. Cheers, Greyman Jan.png (Talk) 19:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Naboo freighter to Confederate Transport Ship

You added a {{confirm}} template onto the article "Naboo Freighter." I was very sure that I saw the vehicle on Galactic Battlegrounds, but I remember it as a ship for the CIS, not the Naboo. So, going through the ship transports of Galactic Battlegrounds on its article, I came upon the Confederate Transport Ship. It looks exactly like the Naboo freighter. I don't think that the Naboo freighter is canon, but the image on its article is identical to that of the Confederate transport ship. So do you think we should delete the "Naboo Freighter" article but move the image over to the Confederate transport ship? Marco Lam 20px(Contact) 05:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Sure, that sounds reasonable. --Imperialles 11:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
    • Okay then. Cheers,--Marco Lam 20px(Contact) 22:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
      • Um...lol, how do you delete articles? Marco Lam 20px(Contact) 22:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
        • Naboo Freighter should be gone now. Only administrators such as myself have the power to delete pages, by the way. --Imperialles 23:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
          • Oh, ok. Marco Lam 20px(Contact) 23:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
            • Um, but I kind of wanted to use that image on the Naboo Freighter as the main image on the Confederate tranport ship since it was a better image of the same thing. Marco Lam 20px(Contact) 23:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
              • The image itself was not deleted and can be found here. Please try and source it before using it in an article, though. --Imperialles 05:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Weir photo pbjections

Hey Imperialles. I was hoping when you get a chance that you could review the changes I made to the Weir pictures and consider striking your objections. The article has 5 Inq votes now, so I think the only thing keeping it from an FA are those objections. Let me know if you have any other thoughts or suggestions!

Thanks again, --Colinmcev 20:58, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Duel on Ruusan (disambiguation)

Have you read Wookieepedia:Deletion policy? It specifies that articles should be put through the Wookieepedia:Trash compactor process before being deleted, with only a few exceptions that didn't apply in this case. --Andrew Nagy 23:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

  • I am familiar with the deletion policy. The reason I deleted the disambig page is because it was completely useless. Duels that belong to a larger event (such as a battle) are treated as part of that event. The duels Katarn fought on Ruusan are discussed in the mission article. I suggest you link to that instead. --Imperialles 00:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
    • (1) Where does the policy provide an exception for completely useless articles? (2) I *did* link to the mission article, until you deleted the disambiguation page containing the link. --Andrew Nagy 00:13, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
      • The policy does not reflect deleting articles that directly contradict established consensus. Why couldn't you link to the mission article in the Duel on Ruusan article instead of making a whole new page? --Imperialles 00:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
        • I saw two possible ways to disambiguate the two pages, so I picked one. Why didn't you do that instead of deleting the disambiguation box entirely? Also, where is the consensus exception to the deletion policy written, and what particular consensus are you referring to? --Andrew Nagy 00:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Stazi as FA

Imperialles, would you mind taking a look at my nomination of Gar Stazi for FA? If you have any advice, please let me know. So far, I have addressed all the objections raised. I appreciate your help. AdmiralNick22 00:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Inqmoot

Inq Meeting Seventeen has been scheduled. Your attendance is appreciated. Toprawa and Ralltiir 07:47, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Dustin Roberts?

Hi--I just searched for Dustin Roberts only to find that his page no longer exists. Considering he is the ex-Fan Club President, is a Force-Cast team member (plus a contributor to several other fan sites), and appears in 3 different issues of Insider, I think he probably deserves an article. What do you think? Thanks! GeneralTarfful 01:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Image

There's a image in Category:Images of Alek Squinquargesimus that doesn't belong there. It's File:Zaynedisguiseremove.jpg. Just thought I'd let you know.--Jedi Kasra 04:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Could you elaborate on that? --Imperialles 13:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Well, the image shows Zayne, who is pretending to be Demagol, removing his mask, but doesn't have Alek in the pic at all. Sorry I didn;t get back to you sooner.--Jedi Kasra 01:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Nevermind. Alek is in the image, though you can barely see him. He's there, though.--Jedi Kasra 04:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Forum header troubles

Thanks for all your help.--Mitth'raw'nuruodo(Imperial HoloNet)20px 12:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

  • No problem at all. --Imperialles 12:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Userpage

How do you protect your page like you did on yours, when it says view source? CloneSaber 13:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

  • I am administrator, so after having my user page vandalized several times I used the admin-only protect tool to shield it from vandals. --Imperialles 13:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Also, how come I can't edit certain pages, some that are big, and some that only have 10 words? It won't even let me vote today. CloneSaber 13:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
      • Some pages have been protected against newly registered and anonymous users. You'll be able to edit them in a few days. --Imperialles 13:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the info. CloneSaber 13:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Objections

Your image objections on WP:FAN for Kapp Dendo and Paltr Carvin have been taken care of, as well as possibly others. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 14:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

  • For Dooku, too. --Eyrezer 04:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Imp, we put our resident image gurus on the image objections on Dooku, as much as possible. They're either addressed or not readily obtainable. Since you've been gone and Dooku's been on there for three months, we went ahead and struck the objections. If you come back later and find that they're not up to snuff, we'll do what we can to fix them. Thanks. ;-) Atarumaster88 20px (Talk page) 02:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
      • Welcome back, Imp! Couple of other outstanding objections of yours on the FAN page as well, if you want to take a look at 'em. Thanks. Atarumaster88 20px (Talk page) 14:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi.

Just thought I'd say hi. JadenKorr13 04:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Inq18

Inq Meeting Nineteen

Inq Meeting Nineteen has been scheduled for the 25th/26th of July. Your attendance is requested; if you are unable to attend, it would be appreciated if you could leave your thoughts on the agenda items with another Inquisitor or on the meeting page. :-) -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 01:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

NEGTC

Hello. I'm the new director of WookieeProject: The New Essential Guide to Characters, and I'm trying to improve our output. Our new main focus is Lando Calrissian. He's been a focus of ours in the past, but we've never quite finished work on his article. Let's work together, add information from the remaining sources and get it on the FAN page ASAP. See Forum:Lando Calrissian for a list of sources that still need more information added from them. MTFBWY, and let's get Lando finished and ready for FA! Chack Jadson (Talk) 22:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Groznik and other FAs

Hey Imperialles. I fixed up the images on Groznik and wondered if you wouldn't mind striking the objection.

I also have noms for Andoorni Hui and Gara Petothel out there, if you wouldn't mind giving those a read whenever you get the chance. That's up to you, though.

Thanks! --Colinmcev 23:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

  • I'll have a look as soon as the FAN page stops malfunctioning. Cheers. --Imperialles 11:02, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Cole&Tawni

Hey Imp. Could you block User:Cole&Tawni please, he has been editing other peoples pages. I did ask another admin to do it awhile ago but he said he would wait and see. I can't remeber which admin that was or I'd ask him. Any way since then Cole&Tawni has edited another user's page, after I warned him. Thanks - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 10:53, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

  • I have warned him. If he continues, he will be blocked. --Imperialles 11:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Rangerkid51

Hey Imp, could you block USer:Rangerkid51 please, he's been tampering with templates after warning - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 18:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Torrent Company

Just to let you know, Torrent Company isn't fanon - it's from Star Wars: The Clone Wars (novel). If you could restore the article, I'll source it. Grand Moff Tranner 20px (Comlink) 20:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Moving my CT String

Is there any way I could un delet the CT string or find a history for that page so I could move it to the Senate Hall because I cant remember a word of what I wrote. My memory is really bad. NaruHina Talk 20px 01:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Edit conflict

Hey Imp, Just before you deleted Darth Plaugous I was marking it for speedy deletion and I hit the save button after your deletion, so you might want to delete it again. Cheers. MadclawShyriiwook! 14:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Nevermind, Culator got it, sotty for the mixup. MadclawShyriiwook! 14:37, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Battle of Coruscant

Could you have a look at Wookieepedia:Inq/Battle of Coruscant (Clone Wars) before August 17, please. Thank you. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:46, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

edit to ackbar article

Hi, the reason I edited the Ackbar article is because the info in EaW is contradicted by pretty much every other cannon source, as well as several other articles on this site and the starwars.com databank -

"The Mon Calamari converted their beautiful exploration ships and space liners with weapon mounts and armor plating, turning them into the Mon Calamari star cruisers."

from special edition trilogy sourcebook

"each vessel is hand crafted as an original work of art"

dark empire sourcebook

"mc90 was the first calamari cruiser expressly designed for combat"

there are numerous other sources that expressly contradict empire at war in this respect. there were no plans or standardised crs designs untill the mc90 of dark empire era.

Regards, JV —Unsigned comment by 86.147.105.217 (talk • contribs)

  • The article doesn't contradict any of that. The schematics could have been for these "exploration ships and space liners." --Imperialles 02:28, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

My point was that the cruisers were modifications of existing ships - there were no blueprints - not at least until the Mc90, because as many sources say, each CRS was unique.

Regards, JV

FAN objections

  • Your images objection to Jes Gistang on the FAN have been fixed. Cheers. DC 18:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Safe Harbor

  • Hey Imp,

I just wanted to wish you well while you are abroad. Make it back safely, my friend. You will be in my prayers.—Tommy9281 20px (Peace is a lie) 23:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

  • May the road rise up to meet you. May the sun shine warm upon your face. May the wind be at your back and the rain fall soft. Be safe, God speed and God bless. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 23:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
    • Cheers, gentlemen. Take care. --Imperialles 23:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
      • We wish you the best. Dr.Kermit 20:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
        • This is really late, but good luck Imp. Hope that it all goes well and we will see you in August. Chack Jadson (Talk) 21:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Inqmoot

There will be an Inq meeting at midnight UTC, Saturday 6th/Sunday 7th September. Your attendance/input is welcomed. Cheers, -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Inq meeting 21

October's Inq meeting has been scheduled. Please do your best to show up. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Flits

Hi Imp. I wrote up an article on the flits of Galaxies fame, making use of the screenshot you uploaded. Would you be able to get a second image that would be appropriate to place further on in the article? Perhaps some kind of action shot, or one of a group of flits on Lok? --Eyrezer 19:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

  • I'll try and grab one when I'm home on leave (Feb. 5th). --Imperialles 23:54, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Thanks. --Eyrezer 21:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Inqmoot 23

The twenty-third Inq meeting has been scheduled for Saturday, February 21st at 7pm Eastern time. Your presence or input on the meeting page would be appreciated. Graestan(Talk) 16:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Visas Marr FAN

Hey Imperialles. I believe that I have addressed your objection to Visas Marr. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at the article when you have a chance and let me know if there is anything else you feel needs more work. Thanks. Cylka-talk- 08:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

S-100 objection

Hey, I was wondering if you'd take a look at your objection to S-100 Stinger. Some attempts were made to get a better image, but WotC uses mono-molecular paper or something and what's there really is better than almost anyone is capable of. Red is unavailable for scanning until further notice. Graestan(Talk) 00:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

  • Ditto Graestan (minus the mono-molecular paper part), regarding Darth Reave. All options have been exercised.—Tommy 17px (Nine two eight one) 00:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Per above for Darth Azard. I have attempted to re-scan them many times with no noticeable improvement. Grunny (Talk) 03:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
      • Fixed. For the record, that new CT is a disaster. --Imperialles 08:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Query

I don't intend to go around shrinking images at this time (even though we probably should be shrinking them). It's one thing for someone to be bending Fair Use by, on his own recognizance, uploading an image that's of better quality than is needed for an article; it's another thing entirely for formal processes of our site to be demanding them. While your claim that "there is nothing about fair use that expressly forbids the use of high resolution images" is technically true, in the CT itself I quote a relevant portion from Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corporation. It presents a test for one of the four areas of fair use evaluation that our use of higher-resolution-than-necessary graphics would not pass. And to "strive for high quality in textual and graphical form" IS becoming an image library, if image quality becomes an end unto itself rather than a means of supporting our articles. jSarek 10:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

The new Triage system

After the Inquisitorius' most recent meeting, it was decided to enact a triage system for dealing with the large number of nominations on the FAN page. The Triage page has been set up in the Inquisitorius forum to make it easier for Inqs to see what nominations are best focused on for clearing out the nomination page. This is a tool for helping Inqs combine their efforts on articles, and shouldn't be taken as mandatory; as usual, any Inq is free to review any article they want. - Lord Hydronium 03:20, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

RFB

Imp, I couldn't have done it without you. I am honored to finally take my place at your side. I've always looked up to you since I first came to this site, and I promise to make you proud. Thank you for your vote, and thank you for your blessing of my new tools. I remain at your service. Graestan(Talk) 18:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Inq Meeting XXV

An Inquisitorius meeting has been scheduled for 23:00 UTC on the 24th of May. Your presence is requested. Apologies for the late notice. Thefourdotelipsis 00:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

INQCON

The new INQCON system is now in effect. For details on this new tool, please review the linked page. It is requested that you check any current featured article nominations that you have fully read and are currently objecting to, and change the respective INQCON number on the nomination if you are intending to ultimately support the article once your objections have been resolved. Also, please remember to change the Triage page when altering INQCON numbers. Any queries about the process can be made on the afore-linked INQCON page. Thanks, Thefourdotelipsis 00:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Page delete request

Would you mind deleting the Silooth page? It currently has two listing. The second listing is for Fi (Star Destroyer) which merely mentions Silooth in the BTS section from cut content from a book, therefore unofficial. I'd like the disambig page deleted so that Silooth (Sith Warbeast) can be moved there. Thanks. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 23:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

  • I'd have logged in to IRC to ask an admin there, but ChatZilla isn't connecting for me for some reason. Thanks for doing that for me. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 23:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

The Saga Begins

Sorry about that, I should read next time. :) OLIOSTER (talk) 30px 07:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

  • No worries, these things happen. I fell for it myself, even. --Imperialles 07:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

The Old Republic

The Appearances list does not equal to index. While appearances section is for the full list of continuity, the index is for new elements only. I'm reverting your changes to the video game article, I'll let you sort out the index for yourself. MauserComlink 12:55, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

  • I am aware of this. The reason I moved the list is that is too big to remain in the article already now; imagine how large it will be come release. The only sustainable way to keep a list of "Appearances" is to move it to another article. If you think the list should be referred to something other than an index (the existence and definition of which has never been established through any sort of formal consensus process), feel free to make a suggestion. --Imperialles 13:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
    • It's anything but big now - most books have appearances lists bigger than that one. I already tried to take down ridiculously long appearances section of one article before, but was told to use scrollboxes instead. Indeed, scrollboxes can handle lists of insane length - just use them whenever you need to. So, as there is no need for a separate article, I'll revert your changes again. MauserComlink 13:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
      • The existence of "Appearances" sections in OOU articles has no basis in policy or consensus. The fact of the matter is they are clunky, prone to speculation and confusing to readers. But seeing as you insist on keeping the list in the article, I shall simply have to CT the matter. --Imperialles 13:23, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Triage

A new Triage meeting has been scheduled for next Sunday, June 14, at 23:00 UTC. We hope you will be able to attend, as there are a fair amount of nominations that need sorting. Chack Jadson (Talk) 13:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Inq meeting

Hello. An Inq meeting is scheduled for Saturday, June 20, at 2300 UTC. Please try to attend, because we will be talking about the current state of the FAN page, what with all the summer noms. Apologies for the late notice. Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Request

Whenever you get a chance this week, I need to talk to you privately in IRC. Grand Moff Tranner 20px (Comlink) 22:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Cropping

I need you help. Can you please show me how to remove the speech bubbles from the images that I uploaded? Andykatib 10:35, 4th July 2009 (UTC)

  • It's not the speech bubbles that are the issue. Parts of the black frame surrounding the image in the comic itself are visible in the image. Generally, we try to avoid that. I am not sure I can do anything to improve these specific images as I don't own a copy of the comic. I have tagged the image with maintenance templates; hopefully one of our scanning experts will address the matter soon. --Imperialles 10:39, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Welcome home

First I'd like to say, welcome home, Imp. Secondly, would you mind sharing where you found the Timeline videos for TOR at 1920 x 820? The official site only has them at 1280 x 720. Thanks. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 21:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Thanks, it's good to be back. As for the videos, I used the HD versions at GameTrailers.com. The heightened resolution might be artificial in that I viewed the videos in full-screen mode, and took screenshots. At any rate, the reason I overwrote some of your uploads was merely due to my eye and intense hatred for .jpg artifacts—the versions I uploaded used virtually no compression. --Imperialles 21:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Image quality?

Hey Imperialles, I was just wondering why a few of my KotOR images were marked with the {{imagequality}} tag. Is it because the images aren't like most of the other robe images from the game? Or is it because the actual quality of the images is low? If the former, I couldn't get the same kind of images because those robes weren't upgradeable and using the upgrade screen is the only way I could get those images, so I was forced to put the robes on NPCs and take a screenshot. If the latter, I could try to upload better quality images if you could tell me what was wrong with them. Thanks. Xicer920px(Combadge) 15:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Several of them were a bit dark. Try using the Levels function in Photoshop to brighten them. Furthermore, try to use as little compression as possible when saving the images as .jpgs; that way you significantly reduce the prevalence of unsightly .jpg artifacts. --Imperialles 15:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Triage

A new Triage meeting has been scheduled for Sunday, July 19, at 0:00 UTC. Please try to attend. Thank you. Chack Jadson (Talk) 15:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

RFRA questions

[1] Those are the questions that you removed from the RFRA page. I'd like to see you put them back, or at least the one (for bureaucrats) that reads "What should happen to admins/bureaucrat candidates who disappear for awhile without warning, leaving many questions, projects, and that sort of thing hanging?" I can understand you removing the communist question (were people really concerned about that with you?) but I'd like to see the others put back, silly as most of them may be. Having said that, it's not that a big a deal, but I'd like to see if you're open to the possible of putting at least some of them back. Chack Jadson (Talk) 13:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Thanks Imp. Glad you figured out I meant RFA, and not RFRA. :) Chack Jadson (Talk) 14:02, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

I got over excited about making these articles is there any way to fix my problem I have made. --Darth Vochkalie 15:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

I would like to join your group I feel horrible for what I did and I want to make sure this will never ever happen agian. Also Are you going to remove me from Wookieepedia because I am not a mean vandalist just a partially new wookieepedian who wants to help this site grow and prosper. --Darth Vochkalie 15:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Would it be ok if I joined your group because like I said I want to make sure that other people in the future dont make the same mistakes I did. Please I feel horrible and I want to join you because you are now like a role model to me. --Darth Vochkalie 15:41, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Inq meeting

Greetings. An Inq meeting has been scheduled for Saturday, August 1 at 23:00 UTC. Please see here for details. Hope to see you there. Chack Jadson (Talk) 11:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

KOTOR TC

Hey Imp, I've closed the KOTOR spacecraft TC. Thought I'd leave the merging of information to you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:00, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

  • How generous. --Imperialles 22:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Inq meeting 28

Hello. Inq meeting 28 has been scheduled. It will be held Sunday, September 6th at 0:00 UTC. Cheers. Chack Jadson (Talk) 15:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Discussion - "Payback: The Tale of Dengar"

Do you think the discussion page for "Payback: The Tale of Dengar" should be deleted? Its a request to obtain an illegal copy of the story. What does that have to do with the article?-- Frank V Bonura 12:17, September 30, 2009 (UTC)

inuse

I'm sorry about not being able to get to the articles I've tagged, but because in the past two weeks my grandmother died and I nearly died myself after a pretty bad case of swine flu I haven't been around to getting to it. I'm probably going to quit editing here anyway. DjMack 18:29, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

  • I don't really see the relevance. I was making a technical comment, I have no interest in your personal life. --Imperialles 20:31, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
    • I'm just saying that I have better things to be worrying about then me realizing I left some tags on a Wookieepedia article. DjMack 21:56, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

Battlefront III

Hello, Imp. I see that you have redirected the page Star Wars: Battlefront III to Battlefront and protected it indefinitely. I too have read the news about the game being ultimately scrapped in favor of PSP in mobile games, however, since the game was not just a rumor, but actually was in development, it deserves an article, much like Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic 3 and other canceled products. I ask you to unprotect the page, and I will edit it accordingly to it current canceled status. MauserComlink 17:38, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

  • I agree with Mauser. It does deserve a page, seeing how there was a trailer, a logo and pretty much everything else for it.--DK743 00:22, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
  • I agree also. A canceled product that was officially confirmed to be in development at some time should have an article, which is what we have {{Canceled}} and Category:Cut stories for. —Unsigned comment by Master Jonathan (talk • contribs)
  • I'd also have to agree. - JMAS 20px Hey, it's me! 00:45, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
  • Show me proof that the game was actually in development, and I will unprotect the page. --Imperialles 01:49, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
    • Aren't the links from the history of that page enough proof? Also, when you redirected it, you said that "It's just been revoked" - surely you know the link then. MauserComlink 06:27, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
    • Looking over not only the linked articles, but the concept artwork on the page itself, sure look like proof of development to me. There's even links to leaked gameplay footage in those articles, though the video itself now seems to be defunct. jSarek 07:46, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
    • I'm not going to accept Amazon listings, etc. as proof of development. The gameplay footage I have not seen; as you said the video is defunct. Furthermore, the video supposedly shows storyline elements from Star Wars Battlefront: Elite Squadron, which makes it likely that the footage is in fact from that title. Get me an official statement, or at least a reliable source. --Imperialles 10:06, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
      • I'm pretty sure that this is the footage in question: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p842PtJWYW8 . It appears that much of the storyline from Elite Squadron is in this trailer. Though whether or not it is actually a Battlefront III....well, who knows? Although if this video is not directly Elite Squadrons footage, and coupled with the concept art, I thing that perhaps the page should be set up again. Dr. Kermit(Complain.) 02:32, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
        • If we dont return the article itself, then lets at least tell that it has been canceled. Dummies like me, I just spent an hour or so while searching the article.--Kreivi Wolter 17:01, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
          • We don't even know for sure that it's ever been in development. How can we then know it's been canceled? --Imperialles 11:47, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
        • Isn't it safe to say that it has been cancelled because Pandemic Studios has been closed? User:Yodaman5678 11:43, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
          • We haven't seen any legitimate source stating that it ever was in development, so no, we can't really say it has been cancelled. --Imperialles 16:35, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

Query

Do you have the CSWE, by any chance?--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 22:32, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Confused over article deletion

I recently wrote an article about Voice of the Republic, a Star Wars podcast that is hosted by someone that has created official Star Wars content. It was deleted for some reason and I am not sure why. —Unsigned comment by 76.181.219.14 (talk • contribs)

  • As far as I could tell, the podcast fails the Notability of fan projects policy. The fact that its host has created official Star Wars content has no bearing on its notability. If you can demonstrate notability per the criteria noted in the policy, I would be more than happy to restore the article. --Imperialles 03:55, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • While I don't have access to official numbers only being a fan, it is my understanding that they received hundreds of downloads a month. Also, the fact that it is a project from someone who is part of the Star Wars family has much bearing in my opinion. If someone takes the time to look up an artist that has worked on Star Wars projects, I'm sure they would be very interested in knowing they also product a podcast about Star Wars.Crwatkins 21:45, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
    • And why does that information need to be in a separate article? --Imperialles 22:12, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
      • I would assume the same reason Forcecast has a separate article from theforce.net. Also, while Voice of the Republic does include Joel Carroll, it is not his project alone. It is also something separate from his other work. That would be like saying "Why do each of Karen Traviss' books need a separate article? Just put them all in her main article." --Crwatkins 22:29, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
        • Each of Karen Traviss's books are official publications, so your argument is moot. When it comes to fan projects, notability must be proven on a case-by-case basis (per our policy), something the creators of the ForceCast article apparently have managed. Present proof and you can have your article. Until then, I must insist that policy be upheld. --Imperialles 22:35, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
          • I thought that I made the point of notability with the fact that it is a widely downloaded podcast with an international fanbase that is co-hosted by someone that has created official Star Wars content. I only mentioned Forcecast because you asked why there should be a separate article from Joel's article. The point being that while they are related, they are two separate things. And again the same reason I mentioned an author. While they are one person, they have multiple projects each with their own article. --Crwatkins 22:44, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
            • I understand your argumentation. The issue is that Wookieepedia policy differs between official content (such as the aforementioned books) and fan-created content. If you can prove that the podcast satisfies any of the recognition criteria of the fan projects policy, then feel free to recreate the article. It is going to take a solid, verifiable source, however. --Imperialles 22:50, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
              • So if I contact one of the show's creators and could produce a source to verify that they have an average monthly download rate in the multiple hundreds, you allow me to recreate the article... even though it is a product of someone that already is notable enough to have their own article. Would this would make them as notable to Star Wars fans as Unidentified Rodian with jacket? --Crwatkins 22:57, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
                • The existence of article A is not a valid argument for the existence of article B. As for the Rodian, he appears in an official product, and is thus far more notable than the podcast. Scrounge up the evidence, and we'll hold a vote. --Imperialles 23:06, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
                  • It wasn't an argument, it was a question. So I again ask, could produce a source to verify that they have an average monthly download rate in the multiple hundreds, would that typically be sufficient enough evidence to allow me to recreate the article? I really don't feel like doing even more work only to have it all wiped away again or not matter. --Crwatkins 23:13, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
                    • I am uncertain if "hundreds of downloads" qualifies as "widespread recognition in Star Wars fandom". Feel free to produce the evidence, but it is by no means a guarantee that the article will remain. --Imperialles 23:19, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
                      • I contacted one of the hosts the show and he gave me some screen captures of the show's weekly downloads recently. Turns out my conservative estimate was more conservative than I thought. It seems they usually have over 1000 unique downloads during any given 4 week period. If you like I can send you these screen caps. Just let me know where you would like them sent to. -- Crwatkins 22:52, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
                      • Sorry, I am still waiting for a response as to how you would like me to get you this information. --Crwatkins 01:56, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
                        • Feel free to upload them to any hosting site. --Imperialles 13:23, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • I have recreated the Voice of the Republic article as was discussed in the email, but it still is getting marked for notability. Could you please remove this or take some sort of steps to resolve this issue?--Crwatkins 03:36, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

List of future comics

Why did you delete it? It wasn't a category, it was a list of upcoming comics by release date, similar to the List of Future Novels. I couldn't find a list by release date, so I made one. Where's the one I apparently missed? —Unsigned comment by Vandaronas (talk • contribs)

  • I deleted it because it's superfluous. We already have Category:Future comics. --Imperialles 16:39, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
    • Yes, but you also have both a Category:Future books, which is just an alphabetical list, and a List_of_future_books, which is ordered by release date. I was just adding the ladder for comics. vandaronas 16:51, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
      • Decent point. I'll restore your list for now. --Imperialles 16:53, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
        • Thanks! I'll keep it up to date as well, if that helps. And sorry about all the edits... I messed up the links above a couple times. vandaronas 16:57, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

The Old Republic Issue 1

Just noticed that you deleted the page that I created for issue 1. It redirected me to a page for the whole of Act 1, Threat of Peace. However, that webcomic is being released in monthly form starting this summer. Act 1 Threat of Peace is being released over three monthlies. I was going to add it to the List of future comics, to keep it up to date as I said I would. I figured, since it's a separate release, it deserved it's own page. Maybe not? Thanks. vandaronas 13:34, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

  • My bad. I suspect we're going to have to revisit the organization of all those articles at some point, but I have restored your article for now. --Imperialles 13:36, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
    • Yeah, you're probably right about that. For now, thanks! vandaronas 14:01, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Rawk and Jorak Uln

Hi, Imperialles, I see you took the Inuse tags off both articles. OK, but I still plan to nominate both articles, just to let you know.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 13:55, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

"BOBAFETT1 DEMANDS DELETION"

Maybe I need to be a little less pushy, but I wasn't demanding it per se. And isn't there a way to block people from creating it if it's already been created and deleted 3 times?—BobaFett1 Bounties collected 20px 20:22, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

WHY?

Why are my articles about the Jebble box war being deleted? These events did occur and were referenced in Star Wars Dark Times 11: Vector, Part 5. Nico Fett 18:17, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

  • No longer deleted. --Imperialles 18:18, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Objection to Arana

Before you strike your objection, I'd ike to tel you that I added it in the BTS, and it gives a tag saying it was drawn by Joe Corroney and was in the article Republic HoloNet News Special Inaugural Edition 16:5:24. I wanted to know if this was OK.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:17, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

  • That's fine. Just keep in mind that images have to support text. --Imperialles 19:26, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Piett

Thanks very much for that Imp. Cheers. Thefourdotelipsis 00:41, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Archiving

My apologies; I got caught up in doing something else and completely forgot. I'll make sure not to make the same mistake in the future. Thanks for reminding me, I'll get on that right now. Jonjedigrandmaster 20px (We seed the stars) 22:43, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Mistaken Image Tagging

My apologies. My assumption was that because Imperial Knights was not itself contained within a "Gray Jedi" category, that it would require an extra tag. I wanted to be thorough, then started to think I had gotten myself into trouble when I realized how dang many Imperial Knights images there were. Is there a better way to have Imp Knight images appear in a "Images of Gray Jedi" category? Should I revert the tags I put on the Jensaarai and Jolee Bindo images as well, or are you already handling that with your rollback? Sorry again. —fodigg 20px (talk) | 19:09, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

  • Wow, so I could have created that page simply by making Jensaarai, Imperial Knights, and Jolee Bindo categories into sub-cats. That's really embarrassing. Apologies for creating so much work, especially for you. —fodigg 20px (talk) | 19:14, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
    • Well, regardless, thanks for setting me straight and helping me undo my mess. —fodigg 20px (talk) | 19:17, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

From The Greel Wood Haven

"Major [Adazian] Liebke served in the Dnalvec Militia during the Houk-Weequay conflicts on Sriluur. During that time he became a dark wolf handler. Dark wolves are fierce nocturnal creatures indigenous to Sriluur. After the Houk-Weequay conflicts ended, the Empire entered Dnalvec and established a permanent presence in the form of a garrison along the Copper Coast and in the industrial capital Meirm. Resenting the Imperial occupation of the very territories his companions had died protecting against the Houk forces, Adazian packed his belongings, secured his best pack of dark wolves, left an offering at the Obsidian Shrine and defected to the Alliance." - Lord Hydronium 23:50, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

NEGTAS

I don't have the NEGTAS, so could you tell me what's missing from Bulq's article, or give me a scan of the Weequay entry? Thanks. Havac 02:10, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

  • Never mind. Xicer got me a scan. Havac 04:05, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Hypocrisy

If "possible mention" cannot be used and is considered "speculation" by yourself, then you must also remove the following from the Jedi Exile page in the Appearances section: Galactic Republic Defense Ministry Daily Brief KD0092. If not, then Wookieepedia has a hypocrisy issue. JohnnySeoul 15:33, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

  • It's more of an accuracy issue, really. I'll take care of the Exile thing. --Imperialles 15:37, April 28, 2010 (UTC)