Re: TCW Episode Guide
Only that the Weequay pirate Hondo Ohnaka left there after being disgusted by the god Quay and being sold into a life of servitude by his parents. I leave it up to you to decide whether that's notable info or not. CC7567 (talk) 07:57, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
Revertion
Why did you revert my edit on Mandalore the Lesser? I took the facts from Mandalore's biography page on SWTOR.com. AW8 16:32, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I haven't copy-pasted any text, I just didn't come up with an alternative text to use on some part. AW8 16:36, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
- How does it look now? I've changed the text and integrated it with your edit. AW8 16:53, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
Image cats
My bad, I'll be more careful when putting up images to include appropriate categories. I was thinking about the article and not about the image. —fodigg 20px (talk) | 18:09, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
Boonta
At the end of the episode, Jord Dusat talks about entering the Boonta Speeder Race. Adamwankenobi 06:56, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
Unknown Region races category
Hello! I thought that a category specific to the Unknown Region races was needed since there was category for Unknown Region planets, stars, etc., but I've noticed that you have reverted all my changes. Is there a reason why there is not a need for a category for Unknown Region races? Thanks. Kaitco 06:26, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
QOTD Votes
Dude, do you vote against every single quote on the "Other" page? Seriously, why? --Darth Praxus- Stover Lover 17:08, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
question regarding Voss species article
Hello. I've been doing work on the Voss (species) article, and I was intending to nominated it for a GA, but am not sure it would qualify as we have no information on what the Voss look like at this time. I'd be more than willing to maintain this article as more information is released--just as I plan to with the Gormak article--but my concern is that nominating a species article lacking a "Biology and appearance" section would be frowned upon. Thoughts? —fodigg 20px (talk) | 15:44, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
Notability Policy
I got to thinking some time after I started that CT. Something like Darth Vader's lightsaber might not be considered notable under most policies. However, I noticed that Luke, Vader, Maul, and Ventress all have specific pages dedicated to them in The New Essential Guide to Weapons and Technology. I don't know if your rough draft has addressed these or any similar issues, but if not, you might want to do so before presenting it. SinisterSamurai 22:10, May 11, 2010 (UTC)
What the heck, man?!?
Did you just delete my hard works imput on the lightsaber page?!? You know how long it took me to research and find out all that info? A whole week, that's how long! So why did you just delete all that?
cc-7567 lover
- It was low quality. Feel free to add the information back, but I doubt it will stay there long. --Imperialles 23:27, May 12, 2010 (UTC)
No one is ever nice to me on this site! I only try to help ither people's knowledge about the Star Wars universe!
Links for verification
Company homepage and reference from StarWars.com added to SpecPlate article and talk page. Hope it's enough. Trooper377 13:44, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
TOR cleanup
Hey, I noticed you're doing a clean up for The Old Republic-page, which looks good so far. However, although I understand your motivations, d'you think you could incorporate the images from the former classes gallery into the new classes section in a manner that looks good. For, really, they are quite telling about what each class is about. The lightsaber-specialised force-user having drawn lightsabers in contrast to the Force-specialised ones. The agent being a shadowy figure, the trooper being heavily armed etc. Just something to keep in mind while editing. Swedish guy 20:20, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
- I could try. For now, my focus is to eliminate the galleries and replace them with actual text. --Imperialles 20:22, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
- For Ref #16(Smuggler/gunslinger) is there some reason the date is March 13 2010, not Dec 09 2009? SinisterSamurai 19:18, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
- That's when I accessed the page. It's customary to note this when citing web sources (on Wikipedia, at least). We should probably implement a full-scale Cite web template, though, where things like publication date can be noted. --Imperialles 19:27, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
- For Ref #16(Smuggler/gunslinger) is there some reason the date is March 13 2010, not Dec 09 2009? SinisterSamurai 19:18, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
Notabillity for Fan Video
I have provided proof of notability for the Three in the Afternoon page. Check it out to see the proof. --Darth Praxus- Stover Lover 03:56, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
8 years old
Hello there Imperialles. Users are not allowed if they are 13 years old. This user says he/she is 8 years old.--Station7 16:34, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
IRC
I apologize for our discussion earlier on IRC. I do realize that we both want what's best for the site, but simply have differing ideas as to going about that. Please accept my apology in the spirit it is given. A post left to me by SavageBob really made me think about things. I will try in the future to make sure I am reading and remembering all of the site's policies correctly, but I will also ask of you to consider some of the ethics in your recent actions. No one was trying to harass you. It's time for us all to move away from this divisive discourse and find ways to get things improved in a constructive manner. Graestan(Talk) 16:52, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Of course. I realize I may come off as obstinate, but I am merely acting out of my perception of what is best for the site in the long run, and I have never consciously intended to suppress anyone's ability to speak their mind. The tone of our recent conversations colored my responses to you, and for that I am sorry. Shake hands and all that. I hope we can continue to work together in improving the site. --Imperialles 16:58, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
Thirsty Bantha
 |
Procedure CT
Hey, Imp. Just letting you know that we've tweaked the wording of the CT on procedure so that a reply is not required. The new wording features this clause removed from option one: "All users who have cast votes prior to the desired change to be included are directly contacted and have expressed either their approval or rejection of said change by commenting under their vote, or the alteration to the vote is rendered invalid." Thanks. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 19:53, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
TSLRCM and TSLRP
Hello. Lord of Hunger again.
I see that the final vote has been tallied and TSLRCM's page has been deleted (or moved to the Fan Wiki). I am not here to dispute that, in fact I am fine with it considering that you made the official rules clear and TSLRCM was not in compliance.
However, I did notice that TSLRP's page was not deleted. I believe you said that you for deleting that page as well since it did not comply with the rules either. However, this has not occurred I understand the votes were tied, but that does not change the fact that the result remains unfair. The TSLRP has not a single attempt to provide official recognition, not even fan recognition, whereas the TSLRCM page had many sources. Furthermore, TSLRCM is a published mod and has active support and improvement, whereas TSLRP's site (the only source of information for that page) is out of commission. I do not wish to tell you how to run this site since you are an administrator, but there are many people claiming bias.
Thank you for your time, Lord of Hunger 19:59, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
- That discussion was evaluated and closed by Toprawa and Ralltiir, another administrator. Since all such consensus evaluations are up to the individual administrator, I suggest you contact him. --Imperialles 20:02, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
Superchubby (user)
Hi Your block doesn't work on me because i have this account to--Darth Nexu aka superchubby 21:23, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
Re: Block
I see you changed my ban/block from 1 year to only a couple of days. May I ask why? —Unsigned comment by ShamelessDreamer (talk • contribs)
- You promised to behave. --Imperialles 14:49, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Pretty sure it was changed before anything of the sort was ever indicated from me. You admins just arbitrarily change the rules whenever you wish. We'll see how long it is until my next run-in. —Unsigned comment by ShamelessDreamer (talk • contribs)
- I'm pretty sure you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. --Imperialles 15:28, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, implying that my thoughts are completely unfounded... that old tactic. Honestly, I/we wouldn't have an issue with Wookieepedia if you all didn't strike up underhanded comments about our lack of reasoning and/or concept of fairness when we voice our complaints concerning the projects. I can see that we're not the only ones it happens to. I guess I'll join the ranks of the disgruntled and just leave. This place really does suck. ShamelessDreamer 16:03, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. --Imperialles 15:28, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Pretty sure it was changed before anything of the sort was ever indicated from me. You admins just arbitrarily change the rules whenever you wish. We'll see how long it is until my next run-in. —Unsigned comment by ShamelessDreamer (talk • contribs)
Project colon
I was trying to contribute to Forum:SH:Project Colon and of course managed to make a pest of myself. I created a number (and not a small number) of redirects to certain issues, thinking that I could have them redirected for now and then just move them over. Except now I'm getting errors when trying to move pages over an existing page. So...I think it may need a rollback. Sorry. :( If you need a list of all the redirects I created I can compile that for you. —fodigg 20px (talk) | 14:54, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
Or should I just tag all of those redirect pages for speedy deletion? There are 14 of them. —fodigg 20px (talk) | 14:57, May 25, 2010 (UTC)- Now it's letting me move them over the redirects. I am..wha..I can't even... —fodigg 20px (talk) | 14:59, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh wait, was I trying to move a redirect page to a redirect page? Wow. Awesome. —fodigg 20px (talk) | 15:01, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay then… --Imperialles 15:05, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- New question, and I'm asking first this time. After making all the article moves (but no cat moves yet), is there a way to request a bot to edit the text of the actual articles to change every link from "Star Wars Legacy" to "Star Wars: Legacy"? Or should I be doing that manually? —fodigg 20px (talk) | 17:41, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Changing the links can be handled perfectly well by a bot. Try asking here. --Imperialles 17:44, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, request made. Is there a "best practices" way to go about moving categories? There's no "move" button and I know each article would have to be re-linked, which should probably be a bot. I'm just not sure how to go about doing it. —fodigg 20px (talk) | 17:55, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, categories can't be moved. You have to manually create new ones, then re-tag all the articles in them, and finally tag the old categories for deletion. --Imperialles 17:58, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- So, just to double check, I should go ahead and make the new categories, then request a bot make the changes, then request that the old cats should be deleted? —fodigg 20px (talk) | 18:02, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, if you're not intending to fix the category links in the individual articles yourself, you can probably hold off on creating the category. Just give the bot operator clear instructions. --Imperialles 18:04, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- So, just to double check, I should go ahead and make the new categories, then request a bot make the changes, then request that the old cats should be deleted? —fodigg 20px (talk) | 18:02, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, categories can't be moved. You have to manually create new ones, then re-tag all the articles in them, and finally tag the old categories for deletion. --Imperialles 17:58, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, request made. Is there a "best practices" way to go about moving categories? There's no "move" button and I know each article would have to be re-linked, which should probably be a bot. I'm just not sure how to go about doing it. —fodigg 20px (talk) | 17:55, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Changing the links can be handled perfectly well by a bot. Try asking here. --Imperialles 17:44, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
Removal of my Wookiepedia page
Imperialles, just wanted to drop you a line and ask why you've deleted my page? I'm a webmaster of over a decade, with an article published in The Insider (Issue 90) and another in the next issue, and reports on the official site as well as being interviewed on The Forcecast. Just wondered why my page had been removed, doesn't make any sense. --JanLomona 12:22, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Your article was deleted per the site policy Wookieepedia:Notability of fan projects, specifically the bit that says "If a person is recognized purely for creating and/or maintaining a Star Wars website or other fan project, he or she is not considered notable enough to warrant an article." Your article had zero mention of any official involvement, hence its deletion. --Imperialles 12:31, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
Why did you want to delete my article?
That bold text does not seem like nonsense to me. I intended it as a very clear notice that the page was intended as good faith and a metaphor to the Star Wars universe. I wanted to make sure that no administrator would block me for creating the page because they thought it was a personal attack. You may improve it, but please don't delete it or assume bad faith.99.27.224.120 22:42, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Your article had zero relevance to the subject matter of Wookieepedia, hence its deletion. --Imperialles 22:44, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
Kala'uun
You put Vette's holonet entry as a source for Kala'uun, yet I see no mention of Kala'uun anywhere in her entry. What am I missing? - JMAS 
Hey, it's me! 15:29, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
- The background Aurebesh. :) --Imperialles 15:32, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Ahhh, I see. Man, I'm losing it. I'm usually good at picking out minute details like that. - JMAS
Hey, it's me! 15:40, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Ahhh, I see. Man, I'm losing it. I'm usually good at picking out minute details like that. - JMAS
Nigel VI
|
I must have done that wrong...sorry
Did I do the whole moving the Delephr system page wrong? I just read up on it and thought I was moving the article the correct way, by creating the newly named page and stating why. I am sorry if I did that wrong, please let me know, thanks! TK-299 (Click Here) 
12:09, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- No, you did nothing wrong. I simply deleted the redirect from the article's old name. --Imperialles 12:10, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Sweet, glad I did that correctly. Thanks again! TK-299 (Click Here)
12:13, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Sweet, glad I did that correctly. Thanks again! TK-299 (Click Here)
Reversions
I went ahead and reverted your edits to the tabs over the FA, FAN, etc. pages. A number of users were complaining about not being able to read the tabs, so I decided to leave it off until the CAN/Grey Cadre proposal passes CT. Don't mean to step on your toes, but I don't want new things to be added which cause problems that I end up hearing about, at least not without the community putting it to vote first. Graestan(Talk) 05:26, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
- You could have undone instead of reverting. Now I have to go back and re-do a lot of things. --Imperialles 05:27, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I only rolled back stuff form the last couple of days. Everything else I saved the previous edit if it was by you. Graestan(Talk) 21:52, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
Re:
I don't see to have. If you let me know here that'd be great. Cheers -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 10:51, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 11:04, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
Ord Lithone
|
Query
Would this article be acceptable to nom for the CAs?--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 21:45, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- It's only 193 words at present, so if it can't be expanded further, sure. --Imperialles 21:47, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, and no, it can't be expanded further.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 21:48, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
Mussubir star?
Was there any mention in the book of the star for that system? I know it was typed up as Mussibir in the article, but again I don't have the book and have no idea. Thanks for checkin! :D TK-299 (Click Here) 10:21, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
- The book doesn't mention the Mussubir system at all, and it certainly doesn't mention a star called Mussubir (or Mussibir, for that matter). All that is mentioned is the planet itself. --Imperialles 10:34, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, well that puts a kink in my editing :( I'll hold off on that one till I can find some more info. TK-299 (Click Here) 10:52, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Here's the only instance of the word "Mussubir" in the novel:
- Oh, well that puts a kink in my editing :( I'll hold off on that one till I can find some more info. TK-299 (Click Here)
| Source: Children of the Jedi | |
| The admiral folded his squamous hands, a ghostly image in the subspace holo, like a statue wrought of mist in the receiver cubicle. "This is curious enough, but it coincides almost exactly with the "vacations" taken by the uncommitted ex-governors of Veron and Mussubir Three, and with representatives of the Seinar Corporation and a high-up member of the Mekuun family. Drost Elegin—the head of House Elegin—evidently took his family but left them on Eriadu." | |
| This work is copyrighted. The individual who uploaded this work asserts that this qualifies as fair use of the material under United States copyright law. | |
Hope that helps. --Imperialles 10:59, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
- It does a bit, I now have an understanding of what was mentioned in the book. I just don't want to add any unverified info to these small stubs I'm working on, which sucks cause I've already connected the system and planet to eachother, Should I delete the info about the planet belonging to the system? TK-299 (Click Here) 11:23, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Nah, it's a fairly safe assumption to make. I think the Atlas authors mentioned on a forum somewhere something along the lines that the Appendix and Online Companion named a lot of systems for their most well-known planet, making the connection between Mussubir Three and the Mussubir system pretty safe to draw. --Imperialles 11:29, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, sounds good. Thanks for the help, and just think......allllll this extra typing for a little stub article, lol, sorry. TK-299 (Click Here) 11:32, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Don't worry about it. When it comes to improving the encyclopedia, I am more than happy to help. --Imperialles 11:36, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, sounds good. Thanks for the help, and just think......allllll this extra typing for a little stub article, lol, sorry. TK-299 (Click Here)
- Nah, it's a fairly safe assumption to make. I think the Atlas authors mentioned on a forum somewhere something along the lines that the Appendix and Online Companion named a lot of systems for their most well-known planet, making the connection between Mussubir Three and the Mussubir system pretty safe to draw. --Imperialles 11:29, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
User talk:Prince Xizor
[source?] -- Αsh Ketchum 21:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
Shae Vizla
Shae Vizla is a part of the lore surrounding the game. Hence why she belongs on the Star Wars: The Old Republic page. There are other characters listed that only appear in trailers and videos so this character should be no different.Pangscar 22:11, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
- We have an article for the trailer itself, she belongs there for now. The Appearances lists are for subjects that appear in that specific product, not everything loosely related to it. --Imperialles 22:20, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
Pzob
|
RE: Path of Destruction
Hey Imp,
Sorry I took so long in responding. I reviewed the source and, as you have concluded, the date should correctly read something like 1,001 BBY. Let me know if you need anything else.—Tommy 9281 18:43, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
77,000th
Woot! Thanks a bunch, I have just been adding in all the new systems from the updated Atlas Online companion. Wow, that's a lot of articles! Thanks again! TK-299 (Click Here) 13:12, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
Re:Restriction
- It's not so much a restriction as a warning that attempting to game the system and nominating that article for deletion without a legitimate reason to do so falls under WP:POINT. The same thing applies to any article that was kept via TC—you don't renominate it for deletion without either a lot of time passing, or new and compelling arguments for deletion. I was just actually placing the policy reminder/warning there so people aren't tempted to re-nominate it after 3 discussions. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 17:50, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Ya, you're right. I had initially forgotten about the lengthy period of time clause and have since added it in a subsequent edit. ;) Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 17:58, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Ya, you're right. I had initially forgotten about the lengthy period of time clause and have since added it in a subsequent edit. ;) Atarumaster88
Obas
|
Amendment
Hey Imp,
Just wanted to let you know that I made a minor amendment to the wording of the CT you voted on. Per Hydro's suggestion, I added in "and source material" to account for things like endnotes and stuff. Menkooroo 23:54, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
Old revisions
I've noticed you've been fairly active and on the ball with deleting old image revisions as they're uploaded. I wondered if you'd be interested in doing so for the Category:Images from The Old Republic: Hope trailer|Hope trailer images, many of which have old revisions. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 15:20, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Consider it done. --Imperialles 15:24, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Great. Much appreciated. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 15:26, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Great. Much appreciated. - JMAS
Celestial Page
Thanks for moving my speculation article on Celestials. I tried to make it linked to my user page by originally making the name "User:Darth Hydren-Celestials, but the system said that was a separate user account. Thanks again! Darth Hydren 11:03, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
U.R. 100 Terrors Article
Hey. I have a question about creating an article, which I posted on Senate Hall. I haven't received a response, so I decided to ask someone specific.
I was reading about the Unknown Regions, and I saw several mentions of the "100 Terrors of the Unknown Regions". I also saw that there is no Wookieepedia page on this topic. I just wanted to know if I should create a article on this, including a brief history of the term, and a list of some of the known Terrors or inferred Terrors. If not a separate article, maybe I could make a new section on the Unknown Regions page.
I put some examples of Terrors on the SH page, here's the link: http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Forum:SH:Article_on_100_Terrors%3F&t=20100617184753 Thanks for any help you can give. —Unsigned comment by Darth Hydren (talk • contribs)
FAN
Hey Imp, I just wanted to apologize for how I responded to your objections on the FAN. It was childish and obstinant of me, so sorry. I could have easily just done as you asked, but I decided to make a "thing" out of it instead, which was stupid. Thanks for the review, and I hope you aren't discouraged from reviewing my work in the future, as your reviews always yield improved quality. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 17:20, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
- You have nothing to apologize for. After thinking about it, I realized that you were right, and I was being downright rude. I wasn't considering the connotation, only the definition, both of which are equally important in terms of POV. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 23:02, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
Yuvie Yuve
Thanks for the info! And any appearance, background or not, is noteworthy enough to add to the appearances section, no? I'll do it... right now! Menkooroo 16:23, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, you meant to the article itself. Is it noteworthy enough to discuss in the article? ... Possibly. I'll sleep on it. ^^ Menkooroo 16:27, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
Sith communications officer
Hey. Just wanted to let you know that you supported the Unidentified Sith communications officer GAN without striking all of your objections. JangFett (Talk) 22:13, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Check again. That is not an objection. --Imperialles 22:32, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Regardless, could you please strike it. JangFett (Talk) 04:33, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
- No, it is not an objection. It's a long comment, similar to what the majority of other users end their reviews with. I absolutely refuse to strike it. --Imperialles 11:24, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Regardless, could you please strike it. JangFett (Talk) 04:33, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
CT change
- Further amendments have been made to the "Grey Cadre" section of voting in the comprehensive articles vote, specifically the outlining of no self-votes being allowed, and the removal of the "vote bypass" clause in the trial page's rules section. Please review the amendments and make sure that you are still satisfied to support the initiative. Thefourdotelipsis 05:29, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
Featured on...
Done. Should work fine, let me know if it doesn't work anywhere. Cheers, Grunny (talk) 08:22, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
Begeren
|
forum deletion
the admins on this site have repeatedly deleted my forum topic. i want to know why, because i really want this question answered. as far as i can tell, i have no violated any rules and it is perfectly ON TOPIC. a link to it is here: Forum:KB:Most_dangerous_planet 24.63.181.250 02:07, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Your question is completely asinine. There is no metric by which to judge which is the "most dangerous" planet, so there is no way to answer the question in a proper and verifiable manner (as per rule 8 of the Knowledge Bank) or without resorting to original research (rule 12). Hence your thread's deletion. --Imperialles 02:34, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
- perhaps i should have worded it differently. My reason for it is that im trying to find a piece on information and im having trouble finding the planet, and thats all i could give for details. i was asking if people could name a few planets that have a bad reputation in order to find what im looking for. I think it would have been better to ask me to elaborate, instead of just deleting the post altogether. If its really so hard for me to get help here, let me know and ill go elsewhere.
Re: RFA
Thank you for both your kind words and your support. I look forward to working with you in whatever way possible. :) CC7567 (talk) 02:28, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Undercity sewers
Hi! Noticed that you were active on Undercity sewers Inq page and wanted to let you know that I'm trying to do some work for it in my subpage. Feel free to use it also. (: --Tm_T (Talk) 16:30, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
- FYI I have done with the sewers for now, I copied my changes to the article. --Tm_T (Talk) 17:02, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
RE:Dark Council
Hey, Imp,
Yeah, because Teneb Kel was brought before the Dark Council and Vowrawn was named by Marr as though he was present, I felt that that was sufficient evidence to add him to the page. I can respect your point of view however, especially given the copius amounts of allusion with which TOR is permeated. I have no qualms about you removing him if you see fit.—Tommy 9281 00:29, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
Processing vane
Hey Imp,
Processing vane has an entry in the CSWE and I wanted to create it, only discover you had deleted a previous version. I just wanted to know what prevents its creation, and what we can do to change it. Thanks,—Tommy 9281 01:19, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
- The original article consisted of one line: "its a pipe that wen a rebel uses it heavy laser cannon it will destroy all the imperial forces and gain the rebel a big fat victory!" It was promptly CSD tagged by a user, then deleted by me. If it's actually a valid subject then feel free to recreate it. Do you want me to restore the old revisions as well? --Imperialles 03:38, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
WB
Just wanted to stop by and say welcome back. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 18:45, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks! --Imperialles 19:42, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
Battlefront III continued
I think the page needs to be reinstated but it needs to be edited down to what is actually known information instead of all the rumours and suchlike going on there. The discovery via a Gamespy server viewing application showing servers for BFIII is quite a good example that the game does, or at the very least, has existed (and the servers didn't exist before summer this year). This has also been tested out. As well as this, the fact also remains the "leaked footage" bears a massive striking resemblance to Elite Squadron, which also contains the Star Wars: Battlefront III watermark in its game files. However, it's your call. I say we need it reinstated but pared right down from what it was, and I never thought I'd actually say this, but the Wikipedia article is a good place to start that from. Ggctuk 11:17, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, there's evidence supporting it's existence, and even though it's technically a "Canceled game" at the moment, it should have an article detailing all that has lead up to it's cancellation. We all know LucasArts has BFIII somewhere, whether in storage or secretly moved to another developer remains. But the proof it exists/existed is there, it's all a matter of time before we find the truth in order to update it. Asian Inferno 08:08, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- The problem is, we can't operate out of an assumption that the evidence exists—we need to see something concrete. --Imperialles 17:42, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
Sorry
I would like to apologize for angering you with my fanon on the Jawa page, I had believed that I was on the wookiepedia fanon website and that you were a troll trying to put down my idea. When I was blocked though I did not understand why until actually reading the header on the page and realized how stupid I was, so I have since been trying a way to get through so that I can apologize I had no wish to anger you or anyone else, and am increadably sorry for my actions. —Unsigned comment by 178.255.155.118 (talk • contribs)
- Okay. Don't worry about it. --Imperialles 17:42, November 5, 2011 (UTC)
IRC
Hey Imp, I hope you plan to come back anytime soon. There's "something" we have to discuss. ;) Tyber J. Kenobi's Droid 18:11, November 6, 2011 (UTC)
RE: TOR beta
Hey Imp :). I tried emailing the at wookieepedia.com email but got an error that it doesn't exists, so I used the gmail address you used to use on the admin mailing list. Hopefully it gets through :). Cheers, grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 15:31, November 12, 2011 (UTC)
Permatest
Hey Imp,
I was chosen for a TOR weekend test, but apparently admins are eligible for permatesting. If so, can you forward my Anvil9281@gmail to the appropriate parties please? Thanks,—Tommy 9281 Saturday, November 26, 2011, 21:10 UTC
- Yes, I was able to get a number of Wookieepedians into the perma-testing pool. I am sorry to say that the time window in which this was possible has closed, and Bioware has asked all fan sites to not send in any more requests for beta access. --Imperialles 13:32, November 27, 2011 (UTC)
Your edit summaries
In the two months since you've decided to return to Wookieepedia and grace us with your presence, I've noticed a rather disturbing trend of rude and extremely insulting edit summaries aimed apparently at both individual users and the community alike. Being the veteran of Wookieepedia that you are, I shouldn't have to remind you that your behavior is contrary to the policies and guidelines of Wookieepedia:Civility and Wookieepedia:No personal attacks, and I'm issuing you this message so that it stops now. Thank you for your cooperation. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:13, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
- No personal attacks have been made, and cursing is explicitly allowed as per the second Mofference. Go away and stop wasting my time with ill-conceived baton-waving, or I can assure you I will report you for harassment. Thank you for your cooperation. --Imperialles 21:24, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for 3 months for your unacceptable and improper behavior aimed at other members of this community, as outlined by Wookieepedia:Civility and Wookieepedia:No personal attacks. It is my responsibility as an administrator of this wiki to enforce the rules of the community and block violators accordingly at my discretion, and I have determined you to be outside the bounds of what we consider tolerable behavior here. You have belittled and profaned ("Learn to source"; "this is lazy and shameful"; "are you fucking kidding me") other users with your rude and insulting edit summaries for the last time. If you can't bring your behavior in check while editing this wiki, we will check it for you. If you want to report me for administrative abuse and appeal my block, go right ahead. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:38, January 3, 2012 (UTC)