This page is an archive of the Trash compactor discussion about the future of Wookieepedia's coverage of the topic(s) listed below, including whether or not to delete or redirect the relevant page(s). This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the relevant talk pages or in the Senate Hall forum rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Redirect.—spookywillowwtalk 00:27, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Narkina 2 (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)
So, there's been a lot of hubbub about this, but all of the "mentions" of Narkina 2 are very deliberately hypotheticals. They're not mentioned in an official capacity; the Andor Explained mention is a very clear typo and the wording even makes it clear that the prison Meero is in is only reminiscent of the Narkina 5 prison. This should be covered in the BTS of Narkina 5 until such a time that it's mentioned in an official IU source.
Redirect to Narkina 5
- As nominator. Cade
Calrayn 00:54, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- This is a hypothetical for BTS sections, not an actual IU existing topic (at present) Fan26 (Talk) 00:57, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- If even one of these wasn't hypothetical, anything at all, I'd be for it. But the sw.com is clearly a typo, and the others are so very hypothetical treating it as firmly IU is inaccurate.—spookywillowwtalk 00:58, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Lewisr (talk) 00:58, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- CometSmudge (talk) 00:59, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Super weird it happened 3 times, but I think it's clearly a typo from Narkina 5 in the StarWars.com article. It's weird Tony mentioned it twice, but both instances were hypotheticals. NBDani
(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 00:59, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Even these Andor Stars Were Creeped Out by the Series' Strangest Power Couple on StarWars.com (backup link) uses very similar wording but says reminiscent of Narkina 5, so the Andor Explained article is definitely a typo. Rsand 30 (talk) 01:01, 23 May 2025 (UTC)- Editoronthewiki (talk) 01:03, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Master Fredcerique
(talk) (he/him) 01:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Bonzane10
05:28, 23 May 2025 (UTC) - Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 06:19, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- OOM 224 06:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- This was my original suggestion, although the Andor Explained mention is a bit of a gray area a typo is the only thing that makes sense. Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:46, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 07:14, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Imperators II(Talk) 08:08, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah I think with the information we have right now, it makes more sense to include in the BTS in the Narkina 5 page ThePedantry (talk) 01:25, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Do the same with Narkina 7 probably as wellDaRealDarkLord (talk) 01:13, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- あざした (talk) 05:18, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yasen Nestorov (talk) 07:26, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete
Keep
Alright, here’s my thoughts on this (I am the person who made the article):
- I mostly created this article to stop people saying that Dedra Meero was imprisoned on Narkina 2 (a result of the episode guide confusion), because this has not been confirmed
-I see what you’re saying about even though Tony Gilroy’s comments about Narkina 2, but I also think we shouldn’t just assume that. Like we often do with these wiki articles, we don’t assume. For example, even as male as a character looks, we use “they/them” unless their pronouns are explicitly stated; Even as much as it is likely this is a typo, unless StarWars.com edits the typo, I do not suggest deleting it. This is paired with the fact ‘Star Wars Explained’, a YouTuber who has somewhat regular contact with Lucasfilm, keeps saying it, and the article would likely have ben corrected by now if it really was a typo. I too am assuming here though, so I guess take away from this what you will. It probably wouldn't be as directly clear that dedra meero wasn't imprisoned here on the narkina 5 article since that article is longer
Again, like I said before, I do get every point you made, and am fine with it getting deleted, but I do not recommend doing so for the reasons above
-RocketlaunchJr (Vote struck, reason: Per policy: WP:SIG, informed via Discord -- —spookywillowwtalk 03:13, 23 May 2025 (UTC))
- Drour1234 (talk) 02:07, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- RocketLaunchJr1 (talk) 07:18, 23 May 2025 (UTC)