Talk: OOM 224/Archive4

EC 97

Greef Karga said EC Meeting 97 is scheduled for February 19, 20:00 UTC / 15:00 ET. Leave notes if you cannot attend! Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 00:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Wookieepedia SAN Awards 2022

NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 13:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Christopher Lee as Count Dooku

Hey do you think that Disney and Lucasfilm can use CGI and archive footage of Christopher Lee as Count Dooku in future Star Wars installments, along with an artifical intelligence used to recreate Lee's voice. Cuz they did that with Leia, Tarkin, and Luke Skywalker.—Unsigned comment by TrenholmA02363703 (talk • contribs)

Clarification

Well, according to Wikipedia, fusion bombs are a type of nuclear weapon, smarty.AcademicD4224 (he/him) 17:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Garven Dreis' helmet

Wanted to mention that I changed that line about the use of Dreis' helmet because as far as I could see, the source given for that info, Star Wars Costumes: The Original Trilogy didn't seem to specify where that helmet appeared in Jedi. It just said a background character had it. --JMM (talk) 13:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

• Ah I see, thanks. OOM 224 (he/him) 18:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Timeline

Alright, due to Young Jedi Adventures being canon, i've updated much of the timeline so far. As long as there's new episodes coming up, i think this show would expand the High Republic era as we know of. Crazybob2014 (talk) 20:44, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

• That's great, your edits are appreciated! OOM 224 (he/him) 20:51, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Jennifer Hale and Kath Soucie

Hi, I recently came across this fandom page and I see that you're an admin here. I just wanted to point out that there's a lot of mixed up info on the internet regarding the DOBs for both of these voice actresses'. For instance some sites have Jennifer Hale's birth year listed as 1965 and some have 1972. It's more likely the former because back in 2015, the high school she graduated from published a newsletter and listed her as having graduated in 1982.

https://web.archive.org/web/20150720150343/https://www.asfa.k12.al.us/pdf/Applause/April%202015.pdf

As for Kath Soucie, some sites have her birth year listed 1953 and some have 1967. Again it's more likely the former because before getting into voicing acting, Soucie was in a TV movie called The Incredible Journey Of Doctor Meg Laurel where she played a woman that gave birth. This was released in early 1979. So if she was born in 1967, that would mean she was only 11 when it was filmed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-pRzKRz5xI&lc=UgxoZxEcwIpXtDgUkIN4AaABAg.9hwFJNiXkRQ9pQsZv8GoDA&ab_channel=KayMendelson

And also Soucie's high school yearbook is on classmates.com and it has her as a senior in 1971 of Valley Forge High School. She was going by Kathy Soucie at the time. The school is in Parma Heights which is a suburb of Cleveland(where she grew up).

https://www.classmates.com/siteui/people/kathy-soucie/4000183990461

I'm not sure if these can be used as sources for their respective articles. But I just wanted to point this out. Because sites like IMDB, Wikipedia and Google have the falsified DOBs and some people take pretty much everything they read on those as gospel and other sites web scrape without doing any fact checking beforehand.Zeptron1984 (talk) 23:37, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

EDIT: Sorry forgot to sign my post.

• Hiya, yeah birthdates can be tricky, and sometimes there's a lot of conjecture so it's best to not assume on Wookieepedia. That's some useful research though, so you might want to repost them on Talk:Jennifer Hale and Talk:Kath Soucie for posterity. Cheers, OOM 224 (he/him) 08:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

dpugh520

Hi. First I'd like to thank you for restoring my posts on Kath Soucie's talk page. Second in regards to the user dpugh520, I think you should permanently block him. He's already been blocked on several other fandom sites for inserting false information in regards to a VAs DOB and edit warring. And whenever he's presented with strong evidence against his claims, he either ignores it or presents pretty poor sources such as ones from IMDB. He's even gone as far as to post threats on other user's walls.

At one point earlier this year he was actually globally blocked across the fandom network. Which is probably because he annoyed a lot of mods and admins. He's even gotten himself block from Wikipedia for pretty much the same reasons. He tends to have at least two accounts. The other one is called Dewaynepugh388.

I literally cannot tell if this guy is either a troll or has some sort of mental disability. Zeptron1984 (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Gonker

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Gonker has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Fan26 16:38, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Lycandis

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Lycandis has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 01:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Mungo Park

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Mungo Park has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 01:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Negrav trampoline

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Negrav trampoline has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 01:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Massacre at Terrina Square

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Massacre at Terrina Square has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Fan26 (Talk) 21:23, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Categories

Is there a way to have a bot alphabetize categories? Me and some other users keep having to fix a user's unalphabetized category placements, and despite a couple messages on their talk page letting them know categories should be alphabetized, they keep doing it. Boats1014 (talk) 12:44, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

• Heya, I don't think there's a bot that alphabetizes categories automatically, though that might be possible if we ask one of the more experienced bot operators. However, it looks like that user has been using the mobile Visual Editor, where it's not possible to arrange the order of categories. I'll suggest to that user to switch to the source editor instead and see how it goes from there. OOM 224 (he/him) 13:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Untitled Star Wars film (Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy)

It was revealed that the title of the film was Star Wars: New Jedi Order, and that filming is scheduled to begin in April 2024 in Buckinghamshire, England, with a May 22, 2026 release date.^[1]

Elijah Palmer (User talk:Elijah Palmer) 16:33, 22 June 2023 (EST)

• I don't see any mention of Star Wars on that webpage though, so for now it's just a rumour. OOM 224 (he/him) 20:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

[[File:Screen Shot 2023-06-22 at 4.41.11 PM.png|thumb]]Elijah Palmer (User talk:Elijah Palmer) 16:42, 22 June 2023 (EST)

• Where's this from, then? But in any case, it says untitled. OOM 224 (he/him) 20:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Malgus

Hi! I apologize for putting unverified info on Malgus’s page, I was going based off of my playthru of the Ilum Republic storyline where he states—or I guess “heavily implies”—that he wants to replace Darth Arho on the Dark Council, but I could also see how he could’ve been lying and using that as his excuse to steal Arho’s resources without ever actually claiming his seat. But, I should also note that in several places on both Malgus’s page and the Dark Council page that he is referred to as a Dark Councilor. Should these also be removed? Thanks. LatinoGamer123 (talk) 12:53, 11 July 2023 (UTC)User:LatinoGamer123 (July 11, 2023)

• Hiya, if Malgus did take over as head of the Sphere of Military Offense on the Dark Council then the information is alright, but you just need to source it properly, per the Wookieepedia:Sourcing policy. There should be an existing reference on Malgus' article that cites a mission from The Old Republic where the information can be attributed; if you can use that reference when adding the information elsewhere then that would be great. If you need any help do let me know. OOM 224 (he/him) 16:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Wind Dancer

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Wind Dancer has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 02:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Abeloth in TCW

It's true. Abeloth is (Indirect mention only) in TCW. The Father pretty much describes the backstory of how she drinked from Font of Power and bathed in Pool of Knowledge with "Too much dark or light would be the undoing of life as you understand it" quote. --Goodmind (talk) 17:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

• Hmm, well not really. That's an extremely vague reference to all the threats in the universe. Also, the Font of Power and the Pool of Knowledge are not direct allusions to the dark and light sides of the Force—yes, the Son drank from the font and the Daughter bathed in the pool, but both nexuses corrupt mortals; bathing in the Pool of Knowledge as Abeloth did doesn't grant you the power of the light side. Regardless, the Fate of the Jedi writers were inspired by the Mortis arc in TCW, but supposed references to later EU material like Abeloth herself in the episodes should always be taken with a grain of salt because we're entering into speculative territory where we're drawing parallels, perhaps unintended ones, between two stories that were made by multiple people. OOM 224 (he/him) 18:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Well, isn't being vague enough for "indirect" mention? It could even be (Retcon). It seems to fit well enough to at least be intentional on part of the novel writers. I know at the time of the episode Abeloth or Celestials weren't tied-in into Mortis at all. --Goodmind (talk) 20:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
    • The issue is that we don't know if it is even a mention at all. "Seems to fit well enough" doesn't do the job; it's plausible, but certainly not something that we can claim without violating our attribution principles. OOM 224 (he/him) 21:02, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Re: Archival links

Thanks for the kind words and handy links! I saw what you did there and took note for future reference. Hope you don't mind me leaving this message here as I wasn't sure if I was to respond to comments on my own talk page or yours. Have a great day! LadyNeret (talk) 01:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

• No worries! Either way works for me, you too! OOM 224 (he/him) 10:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Consensus track

Hey, just wondering how long to leave a consensus track before closing it and how to go about doing that? Kyle03 (talk) 20:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

• Heya, the administration is responsible for closing Consensus track threads, per Wookieepedia:Consensus. A vote usually lasts two weeks, but you can see further details on that policy page. OOM 224 (he/him) 20:43, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Hey again, since it's been fourteen days and the new image has reached 10 votes while the old one has received 7, according to the infobox image section on the Wookieepedia:Consensus is it time for the consensus to be closed and the new image to be uploaded to the article? Kyle03 (talk) 21:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Hiya, the vote has 17 votes, which means one option must achieve a 5:2 ratio compared with the other option; so far, neither has reached that. You'll need 16 support votes in order for the vote to pass with 7 users opposed. If the page remains unedited by a vote-eligible Wookieepedian for five days and has yet to achieve consensus, then it can be closed as "no consensus." OOM 224 (he/him) 21:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
      • Ah okay, just thought for infobox images it had to reach over 10 and a majority since it says "shall be decided by simple majority vote or plurality vote. As defined above, these votes are still subject to the ten-voter minimum requirement". Just confusion on what is described. Kyle03 (talk) 22:06, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
        • OH good catch, you're absolutely right, sorry! I'll get right on with that. OOM 224 (he/him) 22:08, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
          • Thank you! You've been the most helpful admin I've come across on here so appreciate that. Many thanks. Kyle03 (talk) 22:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
            • No worries! OOM 224 (he/him) 22:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Marfalump

Would you like it if Marfalump returned? -- 72.212.64.192 01:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Gray Jedi

Hello, OOM 224. Are you an expert on Gray Jedi and Living Force? Since you were the one who split two definitions of the Gray Jedi in BTS, do you think it's warranted for the article to be split into two separate articles? And do you think Qui-Gon's appearances should really count on the page if he's only thought to be gray by some of the Jedi, but never confirmed, even if he fits the second definition? Thanks. --Goodmind (talk) 16:59, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

If you missed this or don't have an opinion on it, let me know --Goodmind (talk) 22:51, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

• Hey there, sorry I missed your message. I personally think it's alright as a single article, as long as it's clear on the different types of Gray Jedi. As for Qui-Gon himself, I admit I'm not too familiar with the sources, but if he fits the definition and if some Jedi think that he's a Gray Jedi, then I think he should absolutely be documented on the article. Whether to explicitly refer to him as a Gray Jedi though, I'm not too sure. OOM 224 (he/him) 23:07, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Imperators II said since he's not confirmed Gray Jedi, but only ever thought to be that by some Jedi, then technically the Appearances section would be inaccurate, otherwise we'd have to list appearance of every Jedi who has ever disobeyed the Council. Does that make sense? --Goodmind (talk) 21:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  • The only two sources about Qui-Gon are Star Wars (1998) 36 and The Jedi Path: A Manual for Students of the Force and both don't seem very definitive. Thanks in advance. --Goodmind (talk) 21:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

The Blade dating

Hey! Haha you're too kind:P But I think we can definitively place all of The Blade in 382 BBY, though it may require a bit of a note. In issue 2, Barash talks postively about the Jedi's role of ending the Eiram and E'ronoh War as depicted in The High Republic: Convergence (the third issue of The Blade even references the wedding between the two heirs in that book so it is certainly after Convergence). This leads me to believe that the events of The High Republic: The Battle of Jedha have not taken place yet because the Jedi sentiment after that would not be positive. Alternatively Timelines dates Porter earning his nickname of the "Blade of Bardotta" to 382 BBY, we know per this characters of THR series video on Porter that it was the siege on Bardotta that earned him the nickname, which Porter is sent to deal with at the end of issue 4 of The Blade Lewisr (talk) 19:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

• Aha, that's fab, thanks Lew! Knew I must've missed something there. OOM 224 (he/him) 20:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Formerly in infobox

Why can't there be a formerly in the infobox though if indicates that the affiliation is in the past and they left/were expelled from whatever group they were in before? Andrewh7 (talk) 20:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC) Andrewh7

Snoke's Slippers

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Snoke's Slippers has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Lewisr (talk) 23:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Unidentified joyrider

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Unidentified joyrider has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 16:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Skyboard

You created the Skyboard article without any references. I'm sure that was just a simple mistake, but could you please add the necessary reference? ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 13:09, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

• Hiya. It's usually alright for single-source articles where the one sliver of information that exists is obviously verifiable to that one source, hence my omission of a reference note. OOM 224 (he/him) 13:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Riot Control Walker

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Riot Control Walker has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 17:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Late reply!

Sorry, I somehow forgot to thank you for your helpful hints on my talk page. Thanks! The images have now been fixed. Hope they are useful. Celestial oubliette (talk) 22:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

• No worries! Appreciate the uploads! OOM 224 (he/him) 22:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Supernatural Encounters

Hi OOM 224, thanks for leaving a comment to your reversion, appreciate it. While it really doesn't bother me either way, I added that statement, which I thought was the most diplomatic way I could put it, to the Supernatural Encounters page, to make it absolutely crystal clear that Bongiorno's atlas supplement should not be consulted for the purposes of Wookieepedia. I've discovered that quite a few pages here on Wookieepedia have been using incorrect/fanon information/suppositions, that appear to have originally stemmed from Bonjiorno's misintepretations contained within his various drafts over the past several years and upon analysing the information contained within the atlas supplement have found it to be vastly at odds with established lore also. I've done my best over the past few days to correct the fanon inconsistencies and shall continue to do so but am concerned given the complexities surrounding this work and it's widespread coverage that by not highlighting it's shortcomings, we may continue to facilitate fanon-creep into articles for some time to come. Thankyou. Celestial oubliette (talk) 12:26, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

• Hiya, I appreciate your reasoning and your work. Yeah, as I explained I just throught that the article in its current form pretty clearly defines Supernatural Encounters as fanon, and that elaborating on the details of its work being contradictory to fanon like with their map is unnecessary. As you may know, there has been some ill feelings between fans of Supernatural Encounters and Wookieepedia so I think it's best for the article not to go down too hard, if you will, on reiterating its fanon status. OOM 224 (he/him) 13:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
  • All good! Cheers! Celestial oubliette (talk) 22:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Discovery of Korriban

Why revert information from Book of Sith on Discovery of Korriban? --Goodmind (talk) 01:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

• I think the intention of Sorzus Syn saying that "the subjugation of the Sith people marked our arrival" or something like that (I don't have the book in front of me) was just to emphasise that the Exiles arrived on Korriban and the first major thing they did was to assert control over the Sith people, not something that conflicts with the facts as the wording in the article implied. OOM 224 (he/him) 10:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
  • I'm under impression the article is about their first landing, which is why there's no picture of Sith kneeling before the Exiles, she explicitly says that in her opinion "not our landing but rather our triumph over the Sith Purebloods marked our arrival" which is a conflicting view --Goodmind (talk) 21:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
    • Okay, but that's about what marked their arrival, rather than the arrival itself. So maybe the article should specify that she thought the more important event concerning the Exiles' arrival on Korriban was their "triumph" over the Sith Purebloods rather than their landing itself. OOM 224 (he/him) 21:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Edit wars

Hey there, I’d just like to apologise for the recent edit wars on the pages of Din Djarin’s parents. I interpreted the removal of the information as a form of vandalism, and hoped to revert it, but you’re right, both parties in an edit war are in the wrong, and I should have handled it much more maturely. Hopefully all is good. I’ll make a post soon on a talk page to discuss what should be said on each page respectively, and act from there. - Bespashin (talk) 11:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

• Thank you, I appreciate it. OOM 224 (he/him) 23:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Discord

Can you add me back on the discord server?Elijah Palmer(talk) 00:24, 23 November 2023 (EST)

• Of course, feel free to rejoin the server. OOM 224 (he/him) 10:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Leia in Ahsoka

Hello there, I recently made a detailed edit to the page of Leia, detailing Leia’s role in the Ahsoka series, including how C-3PO represented her in the case. Earlier it was reverted by an unverified user. I believe that despite her lack of physical appearance, it would still be relevant to Leia, and it seems to line up with how other articles portray similar scenarios. Was going to mention this on the talk page, but I thought it would probably come down more yo what the wiki allows rather than what would be voted for by the community, so I thought I should run it by a mod first for approval (apologies if it should have been on the talk page instead). My edit is listed below, I was wondering if it would be considered okay. Thank you in advance! Special:MobileDiff/13099262

- Bespashin (talk) 30 November 2023, 12:07 (UTC)

• Hiya, yeah the case is relevant to Leia, of course. I do think that it could cut down on some details that are not necessary to establish context for Leia's involvement though; currently, the text is too play-by-play instead of succinctly explaining her intervention. OOM 224 (he/him) 13:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the response. I will admit I do go overboard with details sometimes haha. I’ll bring back the edit, and try to cut out unnecessary details, and add refrences to her involvement. Thank You! - Bespashin (talk) 30 November 2023, 14:03 (UTC)
    • You're welcome! If you need any help with making the wording concise don't hesitate to reach out; I'll be more than happy to help :) OOM 224 (he/him) 16:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
      • If that’s possible, I’d appreciate that :) - Bespashin (talk) 30 November 2023, 16:24 (UTC)

Leia biography rewrite

This is what I have so far:

• Syndulla was soon sent to a courtroom, where she was being prosecuted by Senator HamatoXiono for disobeying direct orders. Wishing to defend her friend, and stop Thrawn, Organa sent her trusted droid C-3PO to represent her in the trial. Upon his arrival, 3PO was greeted by Mothma and was granted permission to speak on Organa's behalf, much to the satisfaction of Syndulla. The protocol droid claimed that Organa had only recently become aware of the situation, and hoped to present a data transcript as proof that she had authorised the mission, in order to resolve the matter. Despite Xiono's objections, Mothma allowed for it to be read. 3PO then stated that the transcript proved that Organa had personally authorised Syndulla's reconnaissance mission to Seatos, claiming that the Princess was unaware of Xiono's vote against it.

• 3PO continued, stating that Leia was willing to overlook the 'mistake', with the request that further concerns be addressed directly to her. After his humiliation, Xiono claimed to be satisfied, prompting Mothma to dismiss the case. In the aftermath of the case, Mothma personally spoke with Syndulla, stating that she knew that Organa did not authorise the mission, though was willing to side with them as she believed in their efforts to prevent the threat of Thrawn's return.

I cut out unnecessary details that weren’t applicable to Leia, and added extra refrences to her to keep it relevant to the page. Something about it feels like it could be improved though, and if there are any improvements that could be made, I’d appreciate the feedback. Thank you! - Bespashin (talk) 30 November 2023, 16:28 (UTC)

• It looks great! My only suggestion here is to leave out how C-3PO arrived and was greeted, since that's more or less redundant to the previous line that he was sent to represent Leia in the trial. OOM 224 (he/him) 21:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Amazing! Thank you very much! - Bespashin (talk) 30 November 2023, 22:04 (UTC)
    • Anytime! OOM 224 (he/him) 22:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Level of detail

Hey there, apologies for disturbing you again. Based on a lot of my previous edits, I have noticed that I probably do go too far into details when updating pages (to the point where it may come across as being like an audio description from a series, rather than a summary appropriate for a wiki). I was wondering if there were any particular pages or sections from pages you’d consider to be appropriate in terms of levels of detail, so I could look at it to understand how I should approach further edits in the future. Thanks in advance! - Bespashin (talk) 1 December 2023, 11:53 (UTC)

• Hiya. It's pretty much case-by-case, so it really depends on what the article subject is and the extent of details provided in sources. However, status articles WP:FA WP:GA are peer-reviewed by veteran Wookieepedia writers so they should make pretty good examples of the level of detail. Note that character articles and location or event articles (especially those that include other subjects with their own articles, like the Atrisian Commonwealth, the Atrisi system, and Atrisia) may probably have differing levels of detail. If you're looking for more familiar status articles that document film or TV content, the Client, Lant Davan, Valin Hess, Wrobie Tyce, Invincible, Nikto hideout, and Garven Dreis/Legends might also be helpful. Cheers, OOM 224 (he/him) 15:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

TIE/sh VIP shuttle

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" TIE/sh VIP shuttle has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Feel free to add the {{User FA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — anilserifoglu 16:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Dowaaka

Hi 00M 224, I was wondering what led you to name The Vow of Silver Dawn species (达瓦阿卡人) "Dowaaka" instead of "Dawaaka"? I believe the pingyin of the Chinese is spelled like the later. Should the page be renamed? Crowbuster (talk) 18:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

• Good catch. Seems like I confused the first word with Cantonese, haha. Yeah, "Dawaaka" is more accurate to the Mandarin pronunciation. OOM 224 (he/him) 18:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Walex

Hey OOM, I wanted to let you know that I'm now nominating Walex Cantwell Blissex I for FA status as it has surpassed the GA word count limit. Would appreciate it if you could review it again! Thanks. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 15:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

• Hey Vitus, sure thing! OOM 224 (he/him) 16:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Character of the Year 2023

I'm new and I don't know if this is where I should ask, my question is about how I should vote for Character of the Year 2023. Thank you—Unsigned comment by Chloe Bridger Wren (talk • contribs)

• Hiya! To vote, click on the signature icon () in the edit toolbar if you're using the Visual Editor. Otherwise, you could switch to the Source Editor and copy-and-paste #~~~~ to a new line, which will produce your signature. OOM 224 (he/him) 16:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Minted

Thank you so much OOM, I appreciate it! Helping others brings is all I know. Heh, maybe I want to take on the whole Empire myself:P Lewisr (talk) 20:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Blog

Do you mean "Other Blog posts may be listed in the "External links" section as appropriate."? I'm pretty sure some of these blog posts from specific authors are treated as canonical sources, I just don't remember which authors --Goodmind (talk) 22:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

• Our policies/precedents are a bit muddled on this issue, so it's been an ongoing debate. It's broadly agreed currently that certain articles are treated as canonical sources, but it's more to do with what information they provide rather than the authors who wrote them. For example, the Star Wars Inside Intel series and SWCA 2022: 7 Things We Learned from the Lucasfilm Publishing Behind the Page Panel on StarWars.com (backup link) are listed, since as a general rule of thumb, they provide unique information at the time or consolidate information of critical relevance (so that rules out top ten rankings and the like). However, I believe it's not been really agreed what blog posts should be listed under the "Sources" or "External links" sections. OOM 224 (he/him) 09:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

About my signature

I've actually never signed a petition like this before, so I actually have no idea how to do it.—Unsigned comment by LockdownWasTaken (talk • contribs)

• To vote, click on the signature icon () in the edit toolbar if you're using the Visual Editor. Otherwise, you could switch to the Source Editor and copy-and-paste #~~~~ to a new line, which will produce your signature. OOM 224 (he/him) 21:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

The Eye of the Empire

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" The Eye of the Empire has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 18:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

I appreciate your review and help, hopefully another one will come soon when I have more time and a better handling on the rules.GenralHux (talk) 22:43, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

• Indeed, we all have bumpy starts, and what you've done so far is really good progress. Happy to help! OOM 224 (he/him) 22:47, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Minas Velti's lightsaber

Why isn't this lightsaber notable? Elijah Palmer (talk) 10:12, 30 December 2023 (EST)