Talk: Revan/Archive9

This page is an archive of the discussion of an article. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's current talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

Revan's canon face

Right the action figure has been realesed and the hood is removable, and shows revan to be bald and white, so does this establish a canon face I wonder well here are two images to look at.--\\Captain KAJ// 10:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC) thumb|left|250px|The Darth Revan action figure with the hood removed thumb|right|300px|A screen shot of Darth Revan showing the face that I think is indended to be canon

• That doesn't mean anything, though. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 20px 14:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Are we sure? I am not completely sure about the canon status of the action figures. I remember Finis Valorum's figure holding a scepter with the Supreme Chancellor emblem. The scepter had not been seen in the movie, but the seal was. Curtis Saxton mentioned it in his Tech Comments [1], so I guess he considers the scepter to be canon. Hmmm... --Skippy Farlstendoiro 14:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Regardless, as of now, Revan has no canonical face. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 20px 14:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
      • Being that this is Sith Lord Revan, all it establishes is that Revan had light skin being that there is a year difference and for all we know his hair could have grown back. --Redemption^20pxTalk 14:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
  • I seem to recall an off comment made in the Kotor Comics about like "unless we start shaving our heads and talking about the darkside" or something to that effect may be in fact the canon representation of Sith Revan. Note that all the other male Sith Lords of this era were also bald: Malak, Bandon, Nihilus (maybe), and Sion. We can be sure to some degree that Revan, as a Sith Lord, was bald, but the face, we just dont know. Darth Byss 17:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
    • • • • Where did the second image come from? It wasnt in the game was it? 67.72.98.118 20:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
            • Its from the dark side ending of the game, also how long was there between his capture by the council and serving on the endarspire, because I dont think its long enough for a full head of hair to regrow, at the very least it establishes him to be canocialy white and canocialy bald during his time as sith lord, seeing as there is only one white bald face in the game it fairly certain to be canon.--\\Captain KAJ// 20:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
              • Just wanted to apologize - I edited the page to "Unknown" before I had the time to check that it wasn't simple fanon. I've altered it back now.--\\Jerroc Sinn// 17:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
                • No, that face is not "fairly certain to be canon". As of now, he had no canon face. In addition, we cannot say his hair color was "Bald", as everyone has hair at one point in their life. The only thing regarding Revan that was made known by the figure is that he was white. For all we know, Hasbro didn't put hair on the figure because he has yet to receive a canon face. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 20px 21:45, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
                  • • • Then why does Malak and Bandon have their hair color as bald, Hasbro intention's are unknown but the action figure is official and establishes an aspect of revans character that was previously unknown.--\\Captain KAJ// 22:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
                        • The only thing it establishes is that at some point in Revan's time as a Dark Lord, he was bald. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 20px 23:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

I would like to say that since it's a model, they likly just didn't detail any of his flesh in order to spend less time making it. Destroyer Droid 20:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Maybe, but if that were true they wouldnt have made the hood removable at all. The facts are that the action figure establishes Revan to be canonical white and canonical bald, there was not enough time between his capture by the council and him serving aboard the endar spire for a full head of hair to regrow (Vader's didnt regrow at all remember).--\\Captain KAJ// 08:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

• My humble opinion about this: The figure will establish the canon face for Revan, when the figure is released (Prototypes are not canon, same way as Ramón Bach's drafts for Tomcat are not canon but the final release in the published comic is). Currently we know that Revan canonically had no hair at some point when he was a Dark Lord. This does not mean that jedi Revan had no hair. Conjecture: Revan was not bald, but he simply shaved his head periodically; once he awoke as a jedi, his hair had began to grow again. Thus, we still don't know that. By the way, Hasbro's 1999 Nute Gunray figure suggested that his hairpiece covered the top of his head, while the movie shows that it does not - Thus, the canonicity of that figure is contradicted by a higher-level source. Let's be careful with this subject.--Skippy Farlstendoiro 09:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• untill a canon source comes out and says that a certain face is canon then he won't have a canon face so just deal with it and move on. there are more important things than what he looks like under his mask --Dark Lord Xander ^{(Embrace The Dark Side!)20px} 09:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • KAJ: Revan has no established canon face yet. In fact, since that figure is apparently a prototype, we can't even say that Revan was bald (or, to be more precise, had a shaved head). And FYI, Vader's hair didn't grow back because his entire body was mutilated, which would have prevented any hair from growing back. Skippy: Is the mask going to be removable? I don't remember hearing about that. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 20px 11:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Sorry I didnt know it was a prototype, I thought it was the finished product, secondly Skippy if the figure does have a certain face it wont recieve any contradiction from the game becasuse revans face is selected by the player, thirdly Xander fans have been debating on revans true apprerence for nearly four years I think that establashing a canon face is fairly important.--\\Captain KAJ// 16:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
      • Considering that the image is coming from a fan site and from their "personal" galleries, this is without a doubt, the finished product. The item was just released this month I believe so... --Redemption^20pxTalk 16:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
      • I thought the "removable mask" was a confirmed feature of the action figure, but I cannot find any absolute reference to it. Maybe I simply got confused and mistook that feature with the (confirmed) "removable hood". We can simply wait to see the final product and confirm if it is. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 15:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, I've often thought Darth Manchu looked the most "I used to be a head of state and top military leader"ish. Giving Revan a removable hood was a horrid idea, but it beckons back to this NPC model image of the NPC Revan's hood removed showing a weird, bald head, regardless of the face picked. However, during the Revelation in-game sequence, the nonbald Revans show hair. So if this is just a prototype and they change the hood to nonremovable, we can call it off. If it's the final product, then we should probably cautiously proceed and maybe contact Leeland Chee for info on Revan's possible canon face/colour/hair or lack of. Lord Patrick 03:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

What the fuck are you talking about, there is no character called Darth Manchu.--\\Captain KAJ// 12:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Try and keep it civil, KAJ. -- AdmirableAckbar ^[Talk] 12:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

• Well, I'd be satisfied if Malak was estabilished to be bald, 'cause I played him as the bald Asian guy with the goatee. He looked badass when he took the mask off. --Master Starkeiller 16:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • I think you mean Revan. Malak is canonically bald (although, due to the fact he is almost certainly Alek due to his clothes, appearance, talk of painting and shaving his head and babbling about the dark side, apprentice to a hooded, unseen leader of a Jedi Revanchism and military commander, he wasn't always bald). And KAJ, the reason I called that particular Revan head Darth Manchu is because of the uncanny resemblance between that Revan and the literary villain Fu Manchu;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1996finnishvidrelease.jpg

However, there is a more likely inspiration. George Lucas based Star Wars heavily upon the beloved Flash Gordon serials of his childhood, and the villain Ming the Merciless, who himself was probably based on Fu Manchu, looked like this; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ming.gif

On a final, more modern note, if this Revan is confirmed as canonical, he will also resemble Sao Feng; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sao_Feng_Pirate_China.jpg, Church of Satan founder Anton LaVey and Kane from Command and Conquer (who founded a religious cult and believed himself the saviour of humanity). So, there are a variety of possible inspirations. I just picked the most obvious and the oldest. Lord Patrick 03:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

• Funnily enough, the figure directly contradicts information from the game. Revan's mask was part of a *helmet*.

"Revan was known for wearing full helmet and cape", so sayeth Yuthura.

Basically, Hasbro didn't do their research when it came to sculpting the figure, which isn't exactly surprising. Really though, I don't think we're meant to read anything into the canonicity of "white and bald" just because his action figure is that way. I mean, his mask isn't even right if we go by the game, are we to assume that that's what it "really" looked like? Still, the Ming the Merciless head was one of my favourites... just not for light side games ;) (Ulicus 16:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC))

Seeing as both the suit, and the mask are wrong; we can't put much faith in Hasbro following canon. So, until another source says so, Revan was not bald at any point in his life. Jasca Ducato _{Sith Council} 18:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh yeah, Lord Patrick, I did mean Revan. All the baldness confused me... Well, I for one, am a big supporter of Darth Manchu, seeing how I'm emotionally connected to him. That bald guy with the goatee and epicanthal fold will always be Revan to me. I just need to remember what I had called him. I remember having named the Jedi Exile Domus Esterhazy, but Revan...?

And, concerning the discussion, seeing as how he's bald, if the figure has a removable mask, I see Darth Manchu becoming canonical... Toys are canonical when they show us something we haven't seen (like the back of an alien's head, a character's underwear, what some Jedi's boot looks like from behind etc), and if it shows Darth Manchu, mesa bein' mooie-mooie happy. Tis be bombad! --Master Starkeiller 22:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, actually we can only say that "Revan may or may not have been bald at any point of his life", due to the possibility of bald Revan being canon from the selectable heads. And it is strange. Revan, Malak, Bandon. If they were all bald, are we looking at some kind of freaky, heights out of order Mini-Me thing? Adding Nihilus and Sion to the mix just makes things even worse. Lord Patrick 05:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

• Well, clearly, having gone bald at an early age, Revan forced everyone who joined the Sith to shave off their hair out of vanity. (Ulicus 10:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC))
  • Or.. Revan decided to do "Heil Myself" and started a proto-Nazi cult billions of years before humans came to Earth. Anyhoo, can anyone who actually has the action figure confirm the authenticity (or lack of) of these images?

Lord Patrick 10:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

• • • Well as Jack Nebulax has said above every human is born with hair, Revan had hair at some point in his life, however the action figure establishes that he was bald during his tenure as sith lord (which means we can add it to the infobox, as is the case with Malak). Also just to poin out firstly that the action figure is not inacurate as there are two versions of the suit, also the mask was not part of a helmet as seen if you do play as the bald asian guy, when he takes it off you can see the brow of his skull, and there is no other attachment there.--\\Captain KAJ// 09:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
    • All we know is that Revan is male. Until LucasArts decide to discuss the hair color, then we should label this action figure as a "Possible Revan appearence. Darthan the destroyer 20:34, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

"Also just to poin out firstly that the action figure is not inacurate as there are two versions of the suit, also the mask was not part of a helmet as seen if you do play as the bald asian guy, when he takes it off you can see the brow of his skull, and there is no other attachment there."

Dude, it's called "limited graphics". No Jedi in KotOR wore lightsabers on their belts - is this because they didn't wear them on their belts canonically, or because the graphics engine was limited? Dozens of people througout the galaxy looked *absolutely identical*. Is this becuase they actually looked identical, or because the graphics were limited? Nearly every human in the game was the same height. Is this because everyone actually WAS the same height, or because the graphics were limited? Text > Graphics. Revan wore a helmet and the mask was but the front portion of this. I have absolutely NO problem with the Revan action figure being listed as "Hasbro's interpretation of Revan", but to say that it is flat out 100% canon seems a bit silly when it's contradicting information directly from the game.(Ulicus 00:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC))

• Any of the facial models from the character generation screen in the first game are possibly Revan, toys don't mean ANYTHING, because unlike the actual Revan, Revan's figure does not have a design on the figure's cape and unlike the actual Malak, Malak's figure has a full cape, the actual Malak has a full one. It's just a figure, and should not be taken as canon, otherwise, we should also say that Darth Vader has a pink lightsaber.--Jedi Kasra 22:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  • I might disagree with Kasra. As far as I understand the canon in figures, the differences between the figures and other sources are canon. My understanding (remember, IMHO): Darth Vader might have two lightsabers (notice that he lost his hand a few times) or perhaps he could change the color of its blade from red to pink. Nute Gunray had two similar headpieces: one of them covered the top of his head (TPM figure) and the other one did not (as in the movie). Finis Valorum had a scepter with the Chancellor symbol, he simply did not use it in TPM. About Revan, he might have two different capes. Nevertheless, apparently the figure does not show Revan's face (only his bald/shaven head top). This debate has turned to something of a certain importance if defining the politics of Wookieepedia: What's the canon value of the action figures?
  • "every piece of published Star Wars fiction is a window into the 'real' Star Wars universe. Some windows are a bit foggier than others."' (Steve Sansweet & Chris Cerasi, Ask the Jedi Council).
  • --Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
• But we can't say, "Oh, Revan is either the bald Asian guy or the bald Black guy", just because some figure has him bald. Like I said before, any of the faces from the Character Generation screen are potentially Revan. However it is worth noting that, excluding the blond white guy, all of the white facial models appear in the game. The white guy with the red goatee appears on Tatooine in the bar with Helena Shan, if you play Mullet white guy, Jedi with the 5th white guy's face appeare, if you play as the 5th white guy, vice versa. And lastly the 2nd weird looking white guy appears as a member of the Jedi Council when Vandar re-establishes your character's rank of Jedi Knight. Just something to think about.--Jedi Kasra 19:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Not to mention some of Revan's faces are on the Peragus miners floating in the kolto tank. DAWUSS 03:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Star Wars: Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy. Jaden Korr's existence is canon; Korr's sex and species are unknown. Potentially, Korr can choose either the light or dark side ending of the game (and he could even not end the game). A further source, in this case The Dark Forces Saga, provides further information about some of the details: Sex and species still unknown, but the light side ending is now canon - The dark side ending never happened. To me, this is similar: A further source, in this case an action figure, might provide further information about Vader's lightsaber properties, or about which of the potentially valid options in a game really happened (Kyle Katarn chosing the light in JK:DF2; Korr chosing the light in JK:JA). I never said that Revan was the bald Asian guy or anything; I care little about Revan's true face. I simply think that any new information provided by an action figure is as valid as Pablo Hidalgo's published articles: IMHO, action figures are canon, specially if they provide new information.

I personally don't the action figure provides any information about a different character such as the guy with Helena Shan. This character will have his own canon face when a new source solves his discrepancy. Although the programming of the game is obviously related to the discrepancy, the continuity isn't.

Nevertheless, Kasra, I am probably not convincing enough to make you change your mind. I am personally convinced myself, and I will keep an eye on this talk page in the future. Always a pleasure,--Skippy Farlstendoiro 08:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

• Or the top and back of the could helmet happen to be European Skin Tone. Haha. Darth Zaktius 01:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• I would like to point out that the Bald Black Male face also had a white skin tone when on the Dark Side, so it could be him too. And, I don't believe we should be taking this action figure too seriously...I mean, they didn't even get the mask to look right and he has no markings on his cape...I don't believe that this really canonizes anything... Revan211 03:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
  • I present to you Exhibit A-a reskinned Sith mask.

http://kotormods.t-k.ru/image/darth_revan_big.jpg No canon intended, just lazy research.--Sith Alchemy 101 10:46, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

One could also use the action figure picture to make yet another argument for Revan being a Jar'Kai user, as there are 2 sabers in his hand, one lit one not. JediGeneral

• Earlier in this discussion, it was mentioned that the action figures are not always directly canonical in appearance, which seems the render the entire subject a moot point, but, for the sake of argument, I shall register my opinions and hypotheses. Although the "shaved head" is a possiblity, any face could be the one, as the dark side indeed corrupts one's appearance, making one paler than in life, as seen with Darth Sidious, Darth Vader (after his mask has been removed, though his paleness is typically attributed to lack of exposure to light of any kind), Darth Sion (who is technically dead, and therefore bears the proper skin tone of a dead white male), and Darth Malak, to name a few. Any of the faces could well be that of Darth Revan, and it is doubtful that a canon face will EVER be established. The fact that the blond white male face does not appear on any NPC, however, could be of note. It is quite possible that the designers chose to use every face on other characters except the one they may have later been planning to declare canon. I merely wished to register my thoughts, and I probably stated the obvious far more than necessary, and if so, I deeply apologize. And please forgive my lengthy posts, it simply the manner of writing to which I am accustomed. Kriim Ianga 00:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Revan nearly died when Malak betrayed him. Even with Jedi healing, he'd take some time to recover from that kind of injury, not to mention his mind was severely damaged. He had the time to grow whatever color of hair the gamer decides. 70.59.196.213 09:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

For me Revan is the Mullet white guy, because all the heroes in Star Wars have one at one point or another. About the figure for me it is a bad rendition of Revan and if you take it into canon than what about the Bioware Screen Saver of the game, can it also be canon? Rs 17:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

→ I simply wish to point out that I believe that the Revan action figure was most likely based on this screen shot http://www.geocities.com/darthmalak10/darth_revan_big2.jpg As others have said, Hasbro probably didn't do the research. If it was based on the picture in the link, then it would be based on one player's character and would therefore be an uncanon appearence. Also, if Revan was white and bald during his time as a Sith, that doesn't mean he'd have to be bald in KotOR. The game takes place about a year after he was betrayed by Malak, so his hair would have grown. He could be the white guy with short hair, the soul patch, and a scar under his right eye ( which is my perfered face for Revan, but that's just me :D ) Andrea Kenobi 02:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Andrea Kenobi

• To contradict the "Jar'Kai user" statement is that all KOTOR figures come with two saber one lit and the other unlit so as to be able to represnt the character with a saber ingaged or with his saber closed down, as I posses both Revan and Malak I can say that Malak also has an identical unlit saber eventhough we know he fought with only one. The fact hat Revan's sabers are different was purely for the sake of saving money by hasbroRyan Fett ^{(For Mandalore!)20px} 16:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Non-Canon Stuff

I think that we should remove the non-canon stuff from the article, I mean, if it's non-canon, I don't know why we keep it here. Even if it's a possibility in the game, we should just keep what is canon. For example, does Carth really felt in love with Revan? No, he doesn't. But in the game it's an alternate possibility!! ---> Yes it is, but it's not canon, so it does not have any value. I think that it remove credibility to the article, and it should be remove. Even if it's an alternate possibility. 70.81.224.148 20:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)A-D.

It is supposed to be there. Aybfreak 22:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

• It's Behind the Scenes. If it's a possibility in the game, then that's where it goes. As long as it stays out of the main article body, then it's fine. --Redemption^20pxTalk 22:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• It's actually completely out of universe because it purposely goes against the continuum that it's in and is meant to be set in a separate universe.--User:Wiilover Nintendo Wii 23:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Length of time as Dark Lord

The reference to Revan being Dark Lord for "two years" should be changed to "at least two years" or removed completely. We do not know when he laid claim to the title. For example, if it was when he discovered Malachor, then he was the Dark Lord in secret for at least a portion of the Mandalorian Wars. (Ulicus 15:12, 2 October 2007 (UTC))

I've never heard that he was a dark lord in secret. Please, do tell where you heard that fascinating statement. Darthan the destroyer 20:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough.

First, the point is that we cannot rule out his perhaps having been the Dark Lord in secret. We DO NOT KNOW when he assumed the mantle, therefore we cannot state with canonical certainty that he held the post for "2 years" (and it was 2 1/2 years anyway if we're talking about the time from the start of the JCW and Revan's capture).

Secondly, the games themselves infer that Revan was a Sith Lord for at least the latter stages of the Mandalorian Wars... and the KotOR Chronicles (which, to be fair, are riddled with errors) flat out tell us that he was a Sith Lord for the majority of them.

Evidence #1: Immediately after Malachor, the Sith teachings spread through the ranks of Revan's fleet. We're told this by Atton. Would this be possible if Revan only became the Dark Lord after the war? No. It would only be possible if it was something planned for a fair bit of time.

Evidence #2: Kreia tells us that the Mandalorian Wars were, in truth, a war of "conversion", acting as the foundation for Revan's army. Revan's SITH army. This wouldn't be true if Revan was not a Sith Lord for at least a fair portion of the war.

Evidence #3: We're told that Revan learned the location of Korriban from Malachor. We're also told that Revan embraced the Sith cause on Malachor. Since the Star Map on Dantooine had Korriban's location in it, this means Revan MUST have been to Malachor before he searched for the Star Maps. Since Dantooine was the *first* star map he found, Kashyyyk's map must have been found afterwards. KotOR 1 tells us that Revan last accessed Kashyyyk's Star Map "no less than five standard years" before 3956 BBY - that would be in 3961 BBY, a whole YEAR before the end of the Mandalorian Wars. The smart money is on the post-Malachor Revan being a Sith at this point. (Ulicus 00:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC))

Good call. I agree with you, now that you have a significant amount of proof. Darthan the destroyer 01:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

• Well, Revan could have just been a Dark Jedi when he found the Star Maps the first time.--Jedi Kasra 13:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  • So he went to Malachor, a bastion of Sith teachings, turned to the dark side and... didn't become a Sith? I can't rule it out I suppose, but it's rather unlikely don't you think? (Ulicus 20:19, 30 October 2007 (UTC))

Revan as an Author

I think we should add the fact that Revan was an author to his "Abilities" section. In Darth Bane: Path of Destruction, it says that Revan wrote a book called The Rakata and the Unknown World, and I think it also mentions that Revan wrote other books. Anyone else agree?--Jedi Kasra 06:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

No. First of all, all he does is talk. Bane writes all of Revans information down. That is why it's a Hologram.Darthan the destroyer 00:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

He's not on about his Holocron, in POD Bane reads a book from the Korriban archives that is explicitly stated (in POD) to be written by Revan. We're talking pen and paper (or flimsi which is the SW equivalent IIRC), not Revans Holocron, which Bane finds on Lehon. DAcheron 03:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Jesus. So I forgot one friking little thing. Put it in something other that "abilities." I think everyone can write. Darthan the destroyer 22:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

• Yes, but the one little thing you forgot was the whole point of Jedi Kasra's question. Jasca Ducato _{Sith Council} 09:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Everyone (excluding infants, toddlers, and the uneducated) can probably write, but the questions is, "how good can they write?". If Revan was a good author when he wrote those books, then I think that it should be added.
  • I've read POD. Bane wasn't interested in what Revan even wrote. But that's beside the point. What about Obi-Wan? He wrote that Journal and the paper on how to build a lightsaber. If Revan is an author, then so is Obi-Wan. Darthan the destroyer 18:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

TFU Miniature

Should we mention somewhere that he will have his own miniature in the "Force Unleashed" miniature set coming in November? --Sith Alchemy 101 15:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

• Do you have a source for this information? Because I find it hard to believe that Revan would have a minature in a TFU set, especially considering he lived 4,000 years beforehand. Jasca Ducato _{Sith Council} 22:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • He's being made for the Sith faction.

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=starwars/article/FUpreview3 --Sith Alchemy 101 10:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Possible appearances?

I see that there is a list of 'possible' appearances among the appearances. I think it deserves some mentioning in the 'Behind the scenes' section that there are several occasions in the KOTOR comics which are suspected appearances of him. (Not to mention including those certain pictures with the 'suspicious' figures). As far as I remember there was a section for this purpose in this article or in one of the KOTOR comics' articles, but they all disappeared. Domlith 16:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

• Wookieepedia articles are not for fan speculation. --Imperialles 17:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  • That is ok, I just tried to call attention to this dubious list (I know that this is no place of speculations, nevertheless, I am curious of the suspected scenes). Domlith 14:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
    • If this isn't for fan speculation, why is the 'possibility' of the source for his name still up? It can just as likely be suggested that it's 'possible' for it to come from the implied 'fact' that he (re)started a Revalution withen the Jedi order. Just take out the 'lutio' and you've got his name. (source: the new Kngts of The Old Republic comic line. "Mysterious cloaked figure is the leader of the Revanshist (revalutionist) Movement, whose self named apprentice is a red armoured Jedi Knight named (M)Alek)

There really could be room for speculation, so long as it's properly tagged. That way people will know what's what, until things are proven, then they can be edited out/into the main canon. --Draconic_Vamp 22:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Fact check

I think that we need to do a lot of fact checking on this article (again). Lets start with this chunk of text:

Though the exact details of what transpired in that ancient Sith bastion would remain unknown, the most commonly accepted theory was that Revan discovered the continued existence of the "True Sith", long thought vanished, and the threat that they still presented to the galaxy. Coming to the conclusion that the Republic, as it stood, was ill-equipped to defend the galaxy from such a potent enemy, he decided that a new government would need to rise in its place; an empire founded upon the Sith teachings. He would attempt to save the galaxy through conquest. In that moment, Revan fully abandoned the teachings of the Jedi, taking the title of Dark Lord of the Sith and adding Darth to his name.

It may have been during his studies on Malachor V that Revan uncovered historical traces of the Star Forge. A relic of the Infinite Empire of the Rakata, it was an instrument of the dark side capable of producing vast fleets by harnessing the power of the stars. Though it had the dangerous potential to consume those who drew upon it too heavily, Revan soon concluded that he had discovered the means by which he would rapidly conquer the Republic and prepare it for the coming attack of the ancient Sith.

I don't think that we should be stating much of this information as fact. I would like to see much of it either verified or removed. I have been working on phasing this sort of speculative fluff out of the other KotOR articles and I think it needs to be removed here also. Let's try to migrate this sort of thing towards the 'Behind the scenes' section and reserve the main article for concrete facts. A lot of this is merely Kreia's opinion about Revan's actions, and according to her own dialogue, she was not always in a position to know what Revan was thinking.

For the record, here is a partial list of things we don't know about Revan. We don't know for certain:

1. exactly when he fell to the dark side
2. when he embraced Sith teachings
3. when he became the Dark Lord of the Sith
4. when he first heard of the Star Forge
5. when Revan and Malak found the first Star Map on Dantooine
6. exactly why Revan fell to the dark side
7. whether "Revan" is even the character's name or merely an alias

Since we don't know any of this stuff, we should be more careful about what we write about such subjects.–Sentry^Talk 01:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

• Absolutely. Unfortunately, I don't have boatloads of free time, so i might not be able to help much beyond small edits. Admiral Carth Onasi 15:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

I agree that BtS is a better place for the stuff you've highlighted - though neither paragraph really states anything as fact. The first one outright admits that the exact details are unknown and that what follows is merely "the most commonly accepted theory", whilst the other uses the weasel-like: "It may have been".

As for your list:

exactly when he fell to the dark side

Hmmmm. The Chronicles state (or at least heavily, heavily imply) that Revan embraced/turned to the dark side on his first visit to Malachor. So whether this is true or not depends on whether we can count the Chronicles as proper canon sources or not.

when he embraced Sith teachings

See the above

when he became the Dark Lord of the Sith

See above the above

when he first heard of the Star Forge

True

when Revan and Malak found the first Star Map on Dantooine

True, but we can say that it must have been after Revan's discovery of Korriban's location on Malachor V and before the activation of the Kashyyyk starmap in 3961 BBY. So some time between 3963 and 3961. So actually (and annoyingly, in terms of splitting the article into sections) the "Search for the Star Forge" stuff begins during the Mandalorian Wars.

exactly why Revan fell to the dark side

True.

whether "Revan" is even the character's name or merely an alias

True

--

Anyway, unless you're already on it, I'll have a look at how best to prune/remove the non-confirmed stuff from the posted text sometime tommorrow. Would simply stating the extent of Kreia's involvement be enough for the first? Something along the lines of: "Though the truth of what transpired in that ancient Sith bastion remains unknown, Kreia would later suggest..."

Flat out removing it seems to hurt the article's flow, though that might just be me.

(Ulicus 23:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC))

• As always, you make good points, Ulicus. Adding the phrase "Kreia would later suggest" would be a good starting point. Some of this has to be said, I just think that we need to be more careful about how it is written.
  As far as my point about not knowing exactly when Revan fell to the dark side, I agree that we can pretty much definitively state that Revan fell to the dark side by the year 3,963 BBY when he visited Malachor; however, we do not know for sure if he had fallen before that point in time. Master Vrook seemed to be convinced that he was a dark sider before the war.
  
  Anyway, her are the specific sections that I think need some tender loving care:

the most commonly accepted theory was that Revan discovered the continued existence of the "True Sith", long thought vanished, and the threat that they still presented to the galaxy. Coming to the conclusion that the Republic, as it stood, was ill-equipped to defend the galaxy from such a potent enemy, he decided that a new government would need to rise in its place; an empire founded upon the Sith teachings. He would attempt to save the galaxy through conquest. In that moment, Revan fully abandoned the teachings of the Jedi, taking the title of Dark Lord of the Sith and adding Darth to his name.

The most commonly accepted theory

• What does that mean? POV much?

Revan discovered the continued existence of the "True Sith", long thought vanished, and the threat that they still presented to the galaxy. Coming to the conclusion that the Republic, as it stood, was ill-equipped to defend the galaxy from such a potent enemy, he decided that a new government would need to rise in its place...

• I haven't played KotOR:TSL for a while. I know that some of this info comes from Kreia's dialogue, but I am not sure how clear she was about it all. Worse, I am not at all certain that she was in a position to know any of this.
  At one point, Kreia states: "perhaps Revan never fell. The difference between a fall and a sacrifice is sometimes difficult, but I feel that Revan understood that difference, more than anyone knew. The galaxy would have fallen if Revan had not gone to war. Perhaps he became the dark lord out of necessity, to prevent a greater evil." The problem is that we don't know what she meant by the words "the galaxy would have fallen". Is she talking about the Mandalorians? The Sith? The Sith through the Mandalorians? It would be great if we could find some quotes to back this up…

In that moment, Revan fully abandoned the teachings of the Jedi, taking the title of Dark Lord of the Sith and adding Darth to his name.

• K, we get into a lot of trouble here. "In that moment, Revan fully abandoned the teachings of the Jedi", is a dubious passage. I don't think that is something we can prove.
• We don't know when Revan first became Dark Lord of the Sith.
• Since we don't know that "Revan" is Revan's name, we should avoid saying that he added "Darth to his name"

It may have been during his studies on Malachor V that Revan uncovered historical traces of the Star Forge. A relic of the Infinite Empire of the Rakata, it was an instrument of the dark side capable of producing vast fleets by harnessing the power of the stars. Though it had the dangerous potential to consume those who drew upon it too heavily, Revan soon concluded that he had discovered the means by which he would rapidly conquer the Republic and prepare it for the coming attack of the ancient Sith.

It may have been during his studies on Malachor V that Revan uncovered historical traces of the Star Forge.

• K, this one is at least partially my fault. I made the error of adding something similar to the old version of the Jedi Civil War article. Unfortunately, it is pure speculation at this point.

Revan soon concluded that he had discovered the means by which he would rapidly conquer the Republic and prepare it for the coming attack of the ancient Sith.

• I don't think we can for sure that there is a "coming attack of the ancient Sith"

–Sentry^Talk 05:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

• Alright, I re-read this quote here:

"After Malachor, after the Mandalorian Wars, that's when the Sith teachings started spreading throught the ranks. We knew where our loyalties lay - to the Jedi who came to help us, no the ones who sat back on Dantooine and Coruscant, watching us die." -Atton Rand

So I came to the conclusion that we should re-write the part in Revan's article that says that the Sith teachings were being spread during the Mandalorian Wars. and why I think he was not Sith, at least until after he first found the Star Forge, remember; in the first game, even if your character turns to the Dark Side and you side the Sith during most of your adventure, you are not truly Sith until you defeat Malak.--Zhran 19:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Looks like I'm not going to get round to doing anything here soon. Uni calls again. Sorry Sentry. Of course, I've just come straight to the discussion page, so maybe the stuff has already been pruned....

And, Zhran, in regards to Revan being a Sith only after he finds the Star Forge I'm afraid that you're almost certainly wrong. I've responded to similar stuff many times before. Revan uncovered Sith teachings at least two years-or-so before he discovered the exact location of the Star Forge, and every indication from every source is that he embraced those teachings.

I don't see how "dark side game Revan" has any bearing on the discussion, really. He'd have no right to call himself a Sith until after the Korriban Academy anyway. *Shrug*(Ulicus 18:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC))

• But, we don't know for sure if Revan immediately accepted those teachings, even you, Ulicus, are not sure on whether we can count on the Chronicles as a reliable source or not. I really don't.--Jedi Kasra 20:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Unless contradicted in game, we pretty much have to accept the Chronicles. Chee has said that they're a legitimate source. Well, actually, someone told me that Leland said they were a legimate source and I took them at their word. They might have provided a link too, but I have no recollection of which page that was on.

I feel I need to make something clear here, however, since I didn't before. I don't disagree with what Zhran says about the Sith teachings being spread through the ranks during the Mandalorian Wars. As far as Atton knows, they were spread only after the Mandalorian Wars, so he's correct to raise the point. (My guess would be that he spread them to his closest followers prior to the end of the Mandalorian Wars, then spread them to everyone else following their conclusion)

All I'm saying is that, in regards to when Revan became a Sith, every single indication in the games is that he was a Sith Lord during the later stages of the Mandalorian Wars and that he was planning on spreading the Sith Teachings beyond himself and Malak as soon as he was able. One of the points of Malachor V was to drive a considerable number of Jedi to the dark side precisely so they would be susceptable to the Sith teachings.

Can we say for certain that he was the Dark Lord of the Sith in secret? I guess not, though where there's smoke, there is usually fire. The problems I had here were that there was a point where people were stating in the article - as fact - that Revan was a Dark Lord for only two years. The evidence suggests not. (Ulicus 16:10, 11 November 2007 (UTC))

Uh, though having just read the relevant section... there ISN'T a part where it says the Sith teachings are spread during the Mandalorian Wars. So I'm not sure what Zhran was talking about.

"Such a total victory over their adversaries, despite the Republic casualties, saw Revan hailed as a savior. Yet unbeknownst to those praising him, the Sith teachings were already sweeping through the ranks of those who had followed him to war"

That's in keeping with what Atton says. He says "After the Mandalorian Wars", which could in fairness be ANY POINT after the Mandalorian Wars, but then clarifies further with "after Malachor".

If he meant "any time after Malachor", it would have been an unnecessary addition, since he had that covered with "After the Mandalorian Wars", so it must be taken as an addition that provides a greater chronological context. He didn't say, "After the Mandalorian wars, just after Revan led us to the Star Forge, that's when the Sith teachings began to spread..." (Ulicus 16:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC))

Ok, so I said I wasn't going to do it... but hey, it wasn't hard. Here's my suggested replacement for the section that Sentry highlighted:

Soon thereafter, he stumbled upon the Trayus Academy, an abandoned training center built by a mysterious Sith faction known as the "True Sith". While unearthing the planet's buried secrets, Revan learned the exact location and immense significance of the planet Korriban, the homeworld of the Sith species. (PRUNING BEGINS HERE) Though further details of what transpired in that ancient Sith bastion remain unknown, Kreia would later imply that it was there that Revan discovered the continued existence of the “True Sith” and, “to prevent a greater evil”, would embrace the Sith teachings himself. (Canderous Quote) Returning to the wars (PRUNING ENDS HERE) Revan forced...

(I've edited out "the so-called" bit from the version I posted on your talk page, Sentry. It seemed out of place)

That cool with everyone? It's short, sweet, sticks to the facts, identifies Kreia's theory as what it is and doesnt make any assumptions as to what the "greater evil" actually is. To cater to the crowd that refuse to believe a dark Jedi would embrace Sith teachings (:P) I've removed the bit that says Revan returns to the wars whilst "hiding his teachings", since - whilst incredibly likely - I suppose it isn't certain that he's a Sith at that point.(Ulicus 16:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC))

• Yeah, that looks good to me :)–Sentry^Talk 05:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Cool. It's in. (Ulicus 15:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC))

Queedle instead of Hukta Jax

Since the light side version of the game is considered canonical, shouldn't we put Queedle as the Manaan sector champion that Revan beat instead of Hukta Jax?--Jedi Kasra 17:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

We shouldn't really have either imo. The light side ending is canonical. Aside from knowing that Revan redeemed Ajunta Pall (since it's referenced in TSL), nothing else about the light side game is neccessarily canonical. Though it's certainly likely to be.

It's not even confirmed that Juhani survives in the grove.(Ulicus 18:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC))

Not confirmed, but it should be assumed that Juhani did survive. This has been said in Jedi vs. Sith as well, when it explains force camouflage. Darthan the destroyer 02:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

New Great Image

Did anyone else see the awesome image of Revan and Malak as dark lords on starwars.com? It is going to be included in the New Essential Guide to the Force and shows them as being on a mission of some sort. Perhaps looking for the Star Maps...could we put this in the article somewhere? [2] Revan211 03:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Revan's name - possible origin

I hope the article is not locked for very long, as it currently is, because I wanted to add a possible inspiration for the name 'Revan'. When I first played KOTOR I thought it probably came from Revenant, which I understood to be someone/thing that came back from the dead. Two definitions given here are 'one that returns after a lengthy absence' or 'one who returns after death' http://www.answers.com/topic/revenant

Both of these would be apt for Revan, would they not? He is presumed dead but actually returns with a new personality. He also returns to the Jedi after a lengthy absence.

That was actually already in the article not too long ago - with the very same definitions you mentioned. I think they were removed following the confirmation that "Revanche" was the inspiration for Revan's name. The definitions for "revenant" certainly work, but Leland Chee has stated that Revan's name was derived from "revanche". In universe it seems even more explicit, since there is a character in the KotOR comics - almost certainly Revan - who has been dubbed "The Revanchist" by the Republic media. [ Uli Talk 01:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)]

New image

I wish to see if there is room to add a new image into the article, although there seems to be no room for it. It's from the upcoming Jedi vs. Sith: The Essential Guide to the Force from StarWars.com. Victor (talk) 00:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

File:DarthRevan DarthMalak EGF.jpg|Darth Revan and Darth Malak

• I agree with Victor. We need to add this to the article.--Jedi Kasra 19:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Revan Drove the Sith from Korriban

In KotOR II, Kreia says:

"It was said that Revan intended to return to Korriban to subdue any potential Sith insurgents. But Revan disappeared."

And, in PoD, Bane reflects:

"Nearly three thousand years had passed between the time the Sith had been driven from Korriban by Revan, and the day Kaan's Brotherhood of Darkness officially reclaimed this world for the order."

Taken together, the quotes seem to confirm that immediately prior to his disappearance, Revan went to Korriban (which was presumably in the midst of the First Sith Civil War) - and routed the Sith that remained there. This should, I feel, be included in the article. ( Uli Talk 02:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC))

• No. That confirms that Revan, by killing Uthar Wynn, started the First Sith Civil War which drove the Sith from Korriban. So you could say Revan drove the Sith from Korriban, though no one actually made sure they were completely gone until two years later, but Kreia plainly states that Revan disappeared before he could return to Korriban.--Jinger 23:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

The Sith weren't "driven from Korriban" at all when Revan killed Uthar Wynn. He killed a lot of them, sure, but after Malak's defeat there were still Sith on Korriban.

Kreia does not "plainly" say that Revan disappeared before he could return to Korriban. She says: "This is what I heard Revan was going to do but no-one knows what went down because he disappeared."

Path of Destruction then confirms that, yes, Revan DID rout the Sith before he vanished.

I would agree that if we took Kreia's statement on its own then things would be ambigious, but Path of Destruction flat out states that Revan was directly responsible for "driving the Sith from Korriban", not "starting the Sith Civil War which resulted in the Sith being driven from Korriban". Short of being unneccessarily obstinate, I do not see how this is refutable. Sorry.

That's not to say Revan did this on his own. There's a part in the book where it refers to the "Jedi" in the plural as the ones who kicked the Sith off Korriban.( Uli Talk 13:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC))

• It's not refutable, it's fine, it may be a distinction without much difference but I felt that was important. Now it best reflects canon sources.--Jinger 13:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Revan the Revanchist.

So, according to Jedi vs. Sith: The Essential Guide to the Force, it is now clear that the Revanchist is, in fact, Revan. Shouldn't this article have the information from The Revanchist merged into it as is the case with Darth Malak's and Alek Squinquargesimus's.--Master Dakari 07:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

• So, shouldn't they have merged the Revanchist's page with Revan? User: Atrulean Starkiller December 7 2007
  • Not until the spoiler period is over. jSarek 07:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Revan's mother

Couldn't we mention Revan's mother in this article? Revan said that his mother died a long time ago, but he didn't say anything about his dad. We have to mention something about his parents someday, don't we? - Will Karner, 10:11 A.M., 28 November 2007

• Not really. Or, at least, not while we have absolutely no information about them. What was said in the game, if the player chose to say this, is something that is part of his programmed identity, give to him by the Enclave—or High—Council when they restored his wounded mind. I doubt this was a legitimate reference to Revan's actual mother.--Master Dakari 21:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

New main image

Who thinks we should change this thumb|left|250px| to the main image. As we know now The Revanchist and Revan were the same man, which means this is the only decent canocial image of him we have. - Lord KAJ ^{– Company Office} 10:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

• I'm 50/50 on this one. This picture is the best one we have of him as a Jedi, but most people would recognise his Sith gear. In any case, I think I refer it over the one of him as a vision to the Exile on Korriban.

So was Revan a nickname taken from his media identity? I imagine people would grow tired of always referring to him as the Revanchist, so maybe they shortened it to Revan (or he did)?--Sith Alchemy 101 10:31, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

• • I have never liked the image we currently have, and as I have said many times it is not Revan its merely a hullucination created by the dark side energy of the tomb. As for the name its most likely he derived his title of Darth Revan from the nickname the media dubbed him. - Lord KAJ ^{– Company Office} 10:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
    • I don't think this image is at all better than the one we already have. If anything, it's infinitely worse. It shows no detail whatsoever, whereas the one we already have shows what he actually looked like during his time as a Sith Lord. The one we have up remains. Jasca Ducato _{Sith Council} 22:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
    • Well technically he spent the vast majority of his life as a Jedi, and was redeemed before he left for the unknown reigons. Therfore I think its more appropriate to depict him as a Jedi. - Lord KAJ ^{– Company Office} 07:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
      • Right. It would be like if we switched Anakin Skywalker's image to one of Hayden Christensen as soon as we got the first promotional images of him. The fact that he's more notable in and out of universe as Vader is not important. People too often forget the dialogue line "My name isn't Revan. It's [player name]." So, I agree with KAJ.-LtNOWIS 09:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
        • While I understand the points of KAJ, and I acknowledge them as technically correct...that's a set of robes. It doesn't tell us anything at all. Besides, it's possible that Revan donned the Sith robes in his time as a Jedi, as per Shadows and Light. I'd say keep a Revan as Sith Lord image. I'm not really a fan of the current one either. Thefourdotelipsis 09:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
          • While thats true I think the brown robe image adds to the mystery surrounding the charcter. Also im not sure about the canocial status of Shadows and Light, but I think that depiction of him in his sith robes was just a genrelization as we had no canocial dress sense for him other than that, until now. - Lord KAJ ^{– Company Office} 12:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
            • It's a vision, but it's still a possibility. Infobox images aren't supposed to project mystery, they're supposed to illustrate the character's appearance. Thefourdotelipsis 03:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
              • This is a tad tangential, but I believe that, while the Sith Robes version of Revan should be preserved as the main image, perhaps the image of him wielding his lightsaber on his ship's bridge in preparation for his duel with Bastila Shan may be more evocative of his power and more suitable than the image of the vision that the Exile had in the tomb of Ludo Kressh. It is a vision, after all, not Revan himself, and, while it does offer one of the clearest looks at Revan, an image from his actual life might be better suited for a page about his life. Another good choice may be the one of Revan on (is it Lehon or Korriban? I can't quite tell. Looks like Korriban's sky, but the architecture...), just before removing his mask in the memory montage. Please, please don't kill/flame me for this suggestion. Kriim Ianga 01:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
                • Maybe someone could mod their character in KOTOR to have Revan's model and take a picture of him on Lehon or somewhere? That, or even use the portrait of his on his action figure's card.Sith Alchemy 101 12:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
• I'm against the Revanchist image for two reasons: It's dull with no detail. But also the Revan in Sith Armour is a more familiar representation of Revan. Though I don't actually like the current main image because it's a vision. If we could get a modded image of Revan (in Sith Armour) on Korriban or Dantooine, or somewhere where we know he's been. But the Sith Armour would have to be exact to what it actually looks like in KotOR's cutscenes, no dodgy failed attempts at Revan's armour. -TheLostJedi 13:57, 04 January 2008 (UTC)

thumb|left|250px|

How about a shot of Revan on the Star Forge, like this? I'm sure someone could probably catch a better shot than I can then brighten it up with photoshop. --Kessel 19:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The current one is fine, in my opinion. And that one is way too dark. Drewton 02:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Controversy On Revan that I think that can be fixed

[removed long boring letter]

• May I ask why you have written this here? QuentinGeorge 07:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Because he's spamming it everywhere it isn't relevant, such as Wikipedia. The only place where it is relevant, the StarWars.com forums, redirects people here. -- I need a name (Complain here) 11:41, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
• Nevermind, but thanks for deleting this. :) I regret posting this up in the first place. Anyways, thanks! :) —Unsigned comment by Cheaster (talk • contribs)

Date of turning to the dark side

I'm a little bit confused here. When did Revan turn to the dark side? I know he and Alek started the dark path on Dantooine, but when did that happen? Was that when they've learned of the Star Forge or when they've started the Jedi Crusaders after so many defiances? - Will Karner 1:36 P.M., 2 December 2007

• According to Master Dorak, Revan and Malak sought out the star maps after the Battle of Malachor V. After the end of the Mandalorian Wars, Revan and Malak were sighted on different worlds, but none of these reports were confirmed until months later, when they came back from the Outer Rim with their new star fleet. However, Revan is said to have fallen to the dark side on Malachor V… and he is also said to have used the Mandalorian Wars as a means of converting Jedi, so he must have got to Trayus Academy before the wars.--Jinger 22:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Hold on, I thought that Revan fell during the war not before it, further more, his article clearly states that Revan fell to the Dark Side when he discovered Malachor sometime around 3961 BBY. We also know that Revan isn't his original name so what is? User: Atrulean Starkiller 2 December 2007 (UTC)

• That's what the Council claimed. Revan took up the mantle of Dark Lord of the Sith only some time later the end of the Mandalorian Wars. Unknown to the Council, however, all along he was trying to convert Jedi using the teachings of Trayus Academy, so he basked in the power of the dark side before he went to war, or at least before he led the Jedi into the conflict.--Jinger 06:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• I still think that he fell during the war and no one has yet considered trying to find out if the guys that are making the series are going to reveal Revan's true name? User: Atrulean Starkiller December 7 2007
• We don't know that Revan isn't his true name. He could have just named the movement after himself. Why should Zannah be the only Sith to use her original name?--Jedi Kasra 19:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
• I never said that Zannah was the only Sith to add to Darth to her name and I doubt she is but I just want to know whether Revan is his real name or not. User: Atrulean Starkiller December 9 2007 (UTC)

Redeemed or not Redeemed: For God's sake, Revan was redeemed!!!

Why is it that books like Jedi vs. Sith: The Essential Guide to the Force say stuff like it's unknown whether Revan was redeemed or not? It is considered canon that he was redeemed, so what the heck is the big issue? He turned back to the Light Side, redeemed Bastila, and killed Darth Malak. That obviously means HE WAS REDEEMED, people.--Jedi Kasra 19:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Ask the guy who made the DAMN book! User: Atrulean Starkiller December 7 2007

• The book is written in-universe, at a point in time when information on early periods was scarce. And try not to shout. -- AdmirableAckbar ^[Talk] 11:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
  • I vaguely remember a part in KOTOR 2 where Kreia suggests that it wasn't Revan's choice to return to the light side. Whether Revan's decision to turn back to the light was based on the memories he regained with time, or because of his reprogramming isn't entirely clear. Sith Alchemy 101 00:29, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Height?

So far as I'm aware there's never been anything stating any physical characteristics of Revan, beyond his gender. What's the source for the height listed? Vryce 07:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• I believe there is no source for the height, which is probably why it got reverted. --Jedimca0^{(Do or Do Not, There is No Try)} 09:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • All right, so there's technically no "gospel" source, but it can be determined mathematically. The screenshot below shows the in-game models of Revan and Malak standing beside each other (granted it's obviously from a modded game to achieve the shot, but so is the article's main image of Revan holding one saber in Ludo Kresh's tomb). Since we know Malak is two meters tall, we can compare the number of pixels tall he is in the image to the number of pixels tall Revan is and thereby find Revan's height. If you find my method a bit too Saxtonesque or that Revan's model is the same height as every other character model in the game and wish to disregard this reasoning completely, that's fine by me. Shock Wave 23:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
    Screenshot
    • I should note that it's impossible, no matter what mathematical calculations you come up with, to determine a characters height in KOTOR, or 99% of games out there. All the models are exactly the same height....Malak and some others (like Wookiees) are just exceptions. --Redemption^25px(Talk) 02:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
    • I would like to add/clarify that this screen shot is not a canon source. Unless an official source states Revan's height, there is no way to know how tall he was. --Jedimca0^{(Do or Do Not, There is No Try)} 15:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
      • It should also be noted that the height of the Revan model varies slightly depending on what class you select. For example, as a Soldier, you are the same height as Carth. As a Rogue, however, you are shorter than he. So there seems to be no good way to determine his height. -Israi (not logged in, apparently)

Big Edit

If anyone has any queries about sources or whatnot, ask away. :) ( Uli Talk 20:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC))

• Yeah...whats the line that says Arren Kae was Revans first master? We know for certain that she taught him at some point but I don't quite recall it ever being said that she was the first. I believe this might just be fanwank to further the theory of Kreia and Kae being one in the same...--Redemption^25px(Talk) 02:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  • It ain't. While Mical's references to Kae are arguably open to debate, Starwarsknights interviewed Avellone and asked about this. He wasn't allowed to provide an answer on the matter (possibly because of the incoming Dark Horse comic issues) but he didn't say "what are you talking about, it is never said that they're both Revan's first and last teacher".--Jinger 03:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Then take it out. This "ain't" a place for speculation. Keep that Kae was his master but the part about Kae possibly being his first must go. --Redemption^25px(Talk) 03:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
      • So Avellone is wrong, and Mical is ambiguous. A simple statement like "as a Padawan, Revan was trained by Master Kae […] I do not recall who Revan's master was after that."--Jinger 04:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
        • Actually, the line was "Revan had many Masters. Zhar, Dorak, Master Kae before Kae left for the Wars. Towards the end of his training, he sought out many to learn techniques. It is said that he returned to his first master at the end of his training, in order to learn how he might best leave the order. I do not recall who Revan's master was... strange." There isn't any ambiguous about that. Kae was simply a master before she left for the War. Simply put. And all Avellone said was that he couldn't comment on the Kae/Kreia speculation. Take it out. --Redemption^25px(Talk) 04:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
          • Dialog.tlk line#119463, there is mention of Revan's masters in more than one conversation with Mical, that one you quoted was from the first encounter with the Exile in the Enclave sublevel. The words also differ depending on whether Kreia is near. Had it never been said, Avellone would have just said so, and most certainly h wouldn't have said "good catch though". Nevertheless, it should be "they are said to be" not "they are Revan's first and last teacher."--Jinger 05:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, this is almost certainly a mistake on my part. My apologies. Whilst I do believe Kreia/Kae to be one and the same (since it was quite clearly developer intent), after re-scouring through the dialog files, I appear to have misremembered the quote that I thought backed me up on the "Kae as first teacher" thing. Though there is evidence pointing towards Kreia and Kae being one, there is no single quote – that I can find – where a character directly suggests that Kae was Revan’s first master.

There are certainly quotes that can be interpreted in such a way, but we must take them literally until otherwise informed.

I shall remove the "there are sources that state Kae was Revan's first master" immediately.

Now that's to one side, are there any other problems folks would like to raise? ( Uli Talk 12:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC))

• And, before anyone asks (since I know the time of Revan's "Sithdom' is so often disputed) about the "Alek - by this time, Darth Malak - blah blah" thing, I should like to point out that Jedi vs. Sith: The Essential Guide to the Force states that they became the Sith Lords "Darth Revan and Darth Malak" in 3961 BBY, one year prior to the Mandalorian Wars' conclusion. ( Uli Talk 12:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC))
  • Of course, flicking through it again, it also states that the Jedi Civil War began in 3961 BBY... one year prior to the Mandalorian Wars' conclusion so... yeah. :S Madness. I guess we're just going to have to wait for more information from the comics, or the KotOR RPG guide that's coming out next year. ( Uli Talk 13:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC))

Revan and Malak being Dark Jedi

Shouldn't we put the fact that they were Dark Jedi in their respective articles since it says that they were in the Essential Guide to the Force?--Jedi Kasra 19:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• I'm confused. A Sith, by definition, has to be a Dark Jedi. (A Dark Jedi doesn't have to be a Sith, mind you) Why would we need to "put the fact that they were Dark Jedi" in? It already is. If you're implying that JvS says that Revan and Malak weren't Sith, then you're wrong. Uh, unless you're not. What page from JvS.TEGTTF are you referring to? (86.1.172.34 13:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC))

That was me, damned login. ( Uli Talk 13:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC))

A Dark Jedi is, by definition any force sensitive who wields the Dark Side but is NOT a Sith. Master Vrook says that Revan first began to embrace the dark side when he discovered the crystal cave on dantooine, and that both he and Malak had long sort out knowelede of Sith alchemy. I dont know the exact date that Revan and Malak took up the mantle of Dark Lord but from that point on they cant be considered Dark Jedi, before that I dont know, I guess it would depend on how corrupted they were. - Lord KAJ ^{– Company Office} 19:45, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

"A Dark Jedi is, by definition any force sensitive who wields the Dark Side but is NOT a Sith"

Incorrect (and the article here doesn't help matters). All Sith are Dark Jedi. Not all Dark Jedi are Sith. It has been that way since the beginning. Well, since Leland said that's the case.

Leland: "Dark Jedi still refers to any dark side user"

Yes, I know it's stupid when some Sith were never ever Jedi, but that's just... well, that's the way the cookiee crumbles. Since Rev and Al were Jedi, however, they must be both Dark Jedi and Sith Lords simultaneously -even if you don't like Leland's take on things. You'll recall that many of the Sith you fight in KotOR are actually entitled "Dark Jedi", 'n all. All you can say is that someone who wields the dark side (lose the caps! :P) but is not a Sith is only a Dark Jedi.( Uli Talk 01:40, 14 December 2007 (UTC))

...

((A second non-canon romance was available to female players. If the player turned Juhani back to the light side and continued to build her trust and friendship along their journey, Juhani slowly develops feelings towards Revan. After Revan rejects the dark side and former identity on the Rakatan temple, Juhani will shyly admit her feelings. This is all that happens between them for the remainder of the game, and what happens for them, regardless if Revan rejects or returns her feelings.))

Er- did you say romance? I have KotOR I, and I can tell you that Juhani is a female Cathar. (Feel free to call me ignorant for saying this) If the option is only available to female characters, then wouldn't that be interspecies lesbianism? That's kinda gross if you ask me. Please, please, please tell me I'm wrong.

Ethmi 01:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)There is no knowledge- there is ignorance

• Well, it's actually a bug reported by the game developers... it has since been corrected. As for the option, no, it's not only for the female characters - males could do the same. Juhani's page explains it a bit further. ^Jorrel 20px _Fraajic 07:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
  • I believe he was simply referring to the fact that it was an interspecies lesbian relationship &mdash which he found "gross". To that I must say: grow up and get out more, kid. --Redemption^25px(Talk) 08:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Uh, actually, I think that the bug made it available to male characters. Then again, what do I know? And I get out plenty ya Lobotomized Gamorrean! Ethmi 01:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)There is no knowledge- there is ignorance

Revan's Fall

I can't guarantee this is right or not, but I seem to remember Kreia saying something to the Exile in KOTOR2 to the effect of: "Revan never fell to the dark side; he went, carefully and deliberately." This is in reference to Revan starting the Jedi Civil War to prepare the galaxy for the threat from the "True Sith." Again, I'm not sure if this is right, or if it's Kreia who said it, but if someone finds that, I think it should be a quote for the article--maybe even the first one. --Discar 20:13, 28 December 2007

• Kreia does say that it is her belief that perhaps Revan never fell to the dark side, and she also said it was something the council would never understand, what with him waging war to the Jedi and all. Canon sources say he fell though, and Kreia is partial to both Revan and the dark side.--Jinger 07:52, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • I just think it would be a good quote, sort of explaining how he saw his own actions. My impression from KOTOR2 was that Revan was intended to be more of a tragic hero (like Vader) than a redeemed villain. --Discar 14:21, 29 December 2007

Quote in article

Couldn't we add this quote somewhere?

Perhaps we could add this under the Force adept paragraph. It, in my opinion, is a better quote than the current quote. Any thoughts?--Jedi Kasra 00:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I like the quote. It shows that Revan is far stronger on the light then he ever was on the dark--74.142.85.101 09:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Revan in kotor 2

Is it possible to find Revan (or his remains) on malachor V??

• Erm, no, considering he went off into the Unknown Regions. Jasca Ducato _{Sith Council} 21:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Marriages

I've been thinking of something that might be crazy, but have either of you thought that Carth would want marry to the female Revan? That would mean Dustil would have a former Dark Lord of the Sith as his stepmother! WHAT!?!? Could you imagine that? I mean, it couldn't have been forbidden to be a stepparent or to adopt a child and take him/her into the old Jedi Order, would it? 68.228.149.192 20:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

GOSHDARNIT, HOW CRAZY!

/sarcasm off

Dustil trusted his father's judgement and Revan's integrity on Korriban. If they wanted to get married, as a former Sith himself he likely wouldn't object. As it never happened, it is therefore a null point. Also, this page is for argument concerning the page itself. I'm not sure whether baseless speculation which has no bearing on the direction of the page really has a home here. --Kessel 20:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

You have a good point on that one. The female Revan would have to be as old as Carth so they'd get married, but that mean she would be as if she was Malak's master. Crazy, isn't it?

Anyway, let's move on to Revan's canon gender. Could it be possible that before he left to find the True Sith into the Unknown Regions, he secretly had sex with Bastila so they could have a child? If so, then their children would be anxious to see what their dear old daddy looks like when he gets back. We'd better make a note of this.

And one more thing: There's no "e" in judgment. You guys have got to be check into the thesaurus for your spelling. 68.228.149.192 01:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I've always had odd spelling because of my mixed heritage. Either way, I'm not incorrect: "judgement" is the original English spelling. Furthermore, to check spelling I would recommend using a dictionary rather than a thesaurus. Booyah, sir. --Kessel 19:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

• Dude, your in no position to lecture someone on "judgment" considering your past offenses and this current one. I'm not sure how many times someone has to tell you to stop posting irrelevant (speculation and such) shit on talk pages. --Redemption^25px(Talk) 05:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Over twenty times. He is obviously doing it on purpose. Either because he is a sad lonely person, or he is just trying to be annoying. Either way I suggest we just ignore all his messages from now on, with no responses he might get bored. - Sheriff Vaysey ^{– Talk} 07:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

• This discussion is pointless. Why would we even want to know if Revan and Bastila "wink-wink"ed. I mean, sure, Revan is pretty much anybody who played the first game and Bastila is hot, but this? And besides, Kreia says "It would have helped, had he (Revan) made her (Bastila) understand, but she was always strong-willed, that one, and did not understood war as Revan did." So, no, they {most likely} didn't get married, or have kids, etc. So to whoever posted this subject in the first place, be satisfied with this answer and don't start any topics like this one again.--Jedi Kasra 22:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Revan as Jedi Knight

Was Revan already a Jedi Knight during his Revanchism? Or he was granted with Jedi Knight title after he defeated Malak? In Kotor comics he is called just Knight not Jedi Knight. Also he must be at about 17 y.o. as Revanchist and I don't think that someone that young can be titled with Jedi knight.P.S Jacen Solo was already a Jedi knight at 15?!...

• Yse, Revan was a Jedi Knight when he was know as the Revanchist. And there is no guarantee that he was 17, just like there is no guarantee that he isn't 30. But anything is possible. Please sign you comments next time.--Jedi Kasra 22:24, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Revan was a Jedi Knight during his Revanchism. He was also granted Knighthood after kicking Malaks ass back to last week. But is this another age question? I mean, we could go on for hours arguing over this question. Darthan the destroyer 04:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Darthan has a point, it is easy for people like Revan to pwn Malak's sorry ass! --Darth Revan200 00:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Jedi Exile and Revan

Isn't it amazing how this page has both genders for revan and a picture of female revan? Especially when put next to the Jedi Exile article...where a menntion of a male exile is just asking for a ban...anyway...p28 of Star Wars A Visual Guide Special Edition shows "A Jedi Knight wearing Baragwin Shadow Armor" ...and it is quite obviously male...for those who know the game...this image can only be revan...mebbe this book is canon (very sure it is)--Anon 68.62.26.48 14:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

• Yes, the book is canon. The picture, however, does not mean that the Jedi wearing Baragwin Shadow Armor is Revan's canon appearance.--Jedi Kasra 22:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Source for Date of Capture

Until recently I took the 3957 BBY date as a matter of course (don't remember where I got the date from though). However, I've discovered this isn't necessarily the case and someone told me that Revan was actually captured about two years before the game takes place (3956), which would mean he was captured around 3,958. To me, the date made more sense considering Malak was supposedly inept compared to Revan and it seemed he'd made slightly more progress in one year than Revan had in three. However, I was unable to confirm or disprove the date due to not having the TLK files on hand. So that's the reason I put the sourcing up, so that someone would notice and grab whatever piece of dialogue it is that supposedly confirms Revan's date of capture. I don't actually remember the date being mentioned in the game but I'm told Dorak does and he follows the date of 3,958 BBY. Anyhow, just interested in seeing what turns up. --Niirfa-sa 17:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

• According to Master Dorak in the game, Revan was "killed" almost a year prior to the events of the first game, making that 3957 BBY. As for the 3959 BBY date, Dorak said that he assumed the title of Sith Lord when they first invaded the Republic. Go ahead and add this source if you want.--Jedi Kasra 22:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Specifically I was looking for an exact quote that can be verified. Nothing personal but I've heard two arguments that Dorak said one thing or that he said another. Just need to see which one is correct. --Niirfa-sa 22:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
• Oh I know you don't mean anything personal. Everything should try to have a source. Here are a couple of quotes.

• That might clear up some things.--Jedi Kasra 22:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank-you, it does. Will add. --Niirfa-sa 23:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
• No problem.--Jedi Kasra 23:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Duel Champian

It says that he was succeded by twitch, but wasn't twitch killed during the bombing of taris--User:admiral James Kaizer

It's a diffrent Twitch. the guy who succeded Revan was a Gungan. - Nerfry^{Talk|Contribs} 18:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Where does it say this? Darthan the destroyer 02:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Why dont you just read the article? - Nerfry^{Talk|Contribs} 09:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

• Twitch was a Rodian, not a Gungan. Besides, Gungans weren't ever known for getting out much.--Jedi Kasra 04:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Which arcticle. There are like 10 on Twitch. I agree with Kasra. Twitch is a Rodian. How many Gungans do you honostly think are on Taris, an extremely biased planet. The Rodian was INSANE. No way a Gungan could beat an insane rodian.Darthan the destroyer 23:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
  • This is a completely different Twitch. -- I need a name (Complain here) 23:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Previous Bastila Fight

In the Essential Guide to the Force, there is a picture of Revan and Bastila dueling, and it doesn't appear to be on Revan's flagship. They possibly could have dueled earlier, and Bastila's dialogue seems to hint that they confronted each other more than once.Drewton 01:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

• Is it possible that it is the star forge duel? i do not have my copy of that book on my person at the moment so ill have to check the picture
  • It doesn't look like it, because Bastila has a yellow lightsaber and isn't in Sith robes. Drewton 23:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Quotes

O.K. I don't see any problem with putting a "possible" by the quote by Revan which says:

Is there any source that says that for sure that he said that? If not, why not keep the "(possible)" by it? Just like the quote when he says something like, "Great. A Wookiee and a snot-nosed punk." We can't be entirely sure he said that, either. Any thoughts?--Jedi Kasra 17:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

• Sorry for the late response but...I'm pretty strongly opposed to this. One, (possibly) will just confuse people; does it mean it was possibly Revan, or possibly said (rhetorical question)? Two, if we did things like this the article would be plastered with (possibly)s and (maybe)s and (may have)s. -- AdmirableAckbar ^(Talk) 15:40, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
• Oh, O.K. No problem, then.--Jedi Kasra 15:47, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Why is this page locked?

Damn, I wanted to put that Revan was also good at negotiations, but I guess that's not happening now. --Darth Revan200 21:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

• If you're a new user, simply wait a few days. It's locked because people keep vandalizing it. BTW, I don't recall that Revan has to be good at negotiation- depends on your persuade skill. Atarumaster88 20px ^{(Talk page)} 22:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• You'll probably be able to edit by the 12th or 13th. Drewton 23:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Female Revan and Juhani!?

Whoa, whoa, whoa! Did it say a female Revan + Juhani romance? Like, homo? Or, or did I read this wrong? Plz say I read that wrong. --—Unsigned comment by The Wolfe22 (talk • contribs)

Bigot. And no, you read it right. So far it's really the only lesbian, well... "semi-romance", I suppose, in the Star Wars universe. As far as I know, anyway. --Kessel 10:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

• Well, it is possible in the game, but the Bastila romance in KotOR is verified as canon. --Darth Revan200 00:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Grow up. - KAJ ^{– Talk} 09:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
• Ughhh!!! Why does a lot of people's writing, typing, etc. have to be so atrocious? I almost cried when I saw the first paragraph.--Jedi Kasra 21:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Revan - Reprogrammed Republic Soldier

Quote: "Revan, under an implanted name and with no recollection of his real history or of his former mastery of the Force, was enlisted as a common soldier in the Republic army and placed under Bastila's command on the Republic warship Endar Spire."

Technically this is untrue, since you can choose between being a soldier, a scout, or a scoundrel. You are still technicaly a soldier, I suppose, but not a common soldier.

Thoughts? Holokin 12:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

• In the Essential Guide to the Force, Revan is called a soldier. You don't have to sign your name after you use the four tildes.--Jedi Kasra 21:46, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Here's the exact quote from the book, written (in universe) circa 3951 BBY by Deesra Luur Jada--Jedi Kasra 21:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, good to know. Holokin 12:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Female Revan's Voice

I've been trying to figure out who did the voice for female Revan. After looking at the end credits and writing down all of the names of females in the additional voices, I started looking them all up. I think it's possible that April Stewart did the voice for female Revan, but I'm not sure. Does anybody know, who did the voice? LadyFey 19:31, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

• I'm not sure. I'll be sure to ask next time I'm on the Bioware forums.--Jedi Kasra 22:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
• Jennifer Hale. --Redemption^25px(Talk) 22:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

New Infobox Image

I just wanna say that I like the new infobox image. Good job to whoever made it that way.--Jedi Kasra 15:49, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

• Redemption made it, and it is very good. Much better than the old one! Drewton 17:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

What happened with Revan and the True Sith?

Does anyone knows if there is going to be a Kotor 3 or a book or something that shows what happens with Revan and the Exile when they fought against the True Sith, and what are they? I find this a very interesting subject for a comic series or a novel. 190.196.32.68 04:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Anakinskysolo

• Nothing has been released yet, nor has any information on a KOTOR III or anything of the sort been released, either. It is entirely possible for LA or LFL to make a continuation; however, it is also entirely possible for them not to. It hasn't been said officially either way. ^Jorrel_Fraajic 04:32, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
  • To answer your question in other words, no one knows who or what the true sith are. However, try to think of KotOR 2. T3 was only supposed to come back 'If something happened to Revan.' Therefore, Revan could've been wounded or killed in action. Or he could've told T3 to go back. No one knows. Darthan the destroyer 21:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Rank

In Darth Bane: Path of Destruction, Revan was described to be a Jedi Master when he dueled Malak on the Star Forge, but in the game, he is only a Padawan. Is it a mistake, or something people in the galaxy believed because he possibly became a Master after defeating Malak? Drewton 20px ^{(Drewton's Holocron)} 03:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

• In the game you remain a Padawan all the way through, desptie your obviously growing Force powers. In all likely hood the comics will attempt to retcon this, perhaps hinting that the rank given in PoD was a term of speech only, or that Revan was unoficially assigned the rank of Master. Either way, a retcon is needed, and until it happens, its just a continuity problem. Jasca Ducato _{Sith Council} 10:54, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Perhaps it was used to describe his power in the Force, which would equal that of a Jedi Master (remember, Malak even says that Revan was more powerful than he was as the Dark Lord). Grand Moff Tranner 20px ^(Comlink) 14:07, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• In the first game, every non-Jedi that wasn't a party member referred to the player character as "Master Jedi". Yes, the rank of Jedi Knight was re-bestowed on Revan at war's end, we'll never know whether he achieved the rank of Master, unless the third game comes out or another source says he became an actual Jedi Master. But I think that Bane was just thinking of Revan as one would respectfully call a Jedi that wasn't a learner, "Master". Of course, I'm not saying that Bane had any respect for the Jedi Revan.--Jedi Kasra 16:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Heritage of the Sith info on Jedi Civil War

In Star Wars Insider #88, in the Heritage of the Sith article written by Drew Karpyshyn, it says that Revan and Malak began a 20 year campaign to end the "tyranny" of the Jedi council once and for all. Seeing as how articles like these are considered canon, shouldn't this be added to this, Malak's and the respective articles this effects?--Jedi Kasra 07:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

• Hold up! 20 years!?! And since when did any of Revan's reason stem from a tyrannical Jedi Council? I don't see why these authors have to keep screwing everything up. Jasca Ducato _{Sith Council} 10:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
• Well, as far as the "tyrannical Jedi Council" goes, the article was written from the Sith's point of view, since the particular issue was dedicated to the Sith. As for the 20 year thing, I don't know, but since it's in the article, and it is written by the one of the lead writers of Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic, it's considered as canon as everything else.--Jedi Kasra 04:13, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
  • The 20 year thing may mean they anticipated it would take 20 years. -- I need a name (Complain here) 11:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
    • I agree...'began' is the key word. Otherwise, it would be impossible. They became the Dark Lords of the Sith in 3959 BBY, and Malak died three years later in 3956 BBY. Drewton 20px ^{(Drewton's Holocron)} 12:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
• That's what I meant, it should be mentioned in all related articles (this one, Jedi Civil War, Darth Malak, etc.) that Revan and Malak began the 20 year campaign, then of course, Revan was betrayed, and Malak must have intended to carry the campaign out, then got killed by Revan.--Jedi Kasra 22:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
  • The destruction of the Jedi Enclave was likely part of the campaign. Drewton 20px ^{(Drewton's Holocron)} 22:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
• So it's OK if I add some of this info to the article?--Jedi Kasra 04:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)