Forum:TC:Unidentified Imperial officer (Ithorian Jedi)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Unidentified Imperial officer (Ithorian Jedi)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. OOM 224 17:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Unidentified Imperial officer (Ithorian Jedi) (history - links - logs - delete - protect)

One of the many articles that were created when standards for notability weren't as clear cut. A lot of precedence with similar subjects being deleted from pretty much all means of licensed media.

Delete

  1. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  2. Being unique individuals confirmed to have done things IU isnt really good notability critera-there are dozens of Unidentified battle droids and Unidentified clone troopers we've spent years TC'ing that are wholly unnotable but would be kept if that were our notability criteria. Fan26 (Talk) 01:40, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  3. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 04:36, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  4. JMAS: This isn't the first time a CA has been TC'd. Just this year there's at least this one, this one, and the first one here. OOM 224 05:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  5. Lewisr (talk) 10:58, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  6. Rsand 30 (talk) 12:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  7. Per FAN and OOM. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 17:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  8. Huh? How could an individual not be unique? That's clearly not a measure of notability. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 18:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  9. Wok142 (talk) 19:38, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  10. Per JMM. Imperators II(Talk) 06:40, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
  11. Basic inclusionism for the sake of it, from my perspective. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 14:42, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
  12. RogueWhistler (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
  13. Hk 47 (talk) 12:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
  14. Per Macaroni: the Keep reasoning falls apart under even cursory scrutiny. 02:47, 29 July 2022 (UTC)—Unsigned comment by Asithol (talk • contribs)
  15. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 22:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
  16. KingWookiee (talk) 03:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Keep

  1. The cards wording is clear that both depicted individuals are unique and the situation happened IU. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 01:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  2. Gonna side with Manoof here. Adding to it that it was granted CA status, so the EduCorps deemed it notable enough to be grated status. - JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 02:28, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  3. A comprehensive article nomination of mine was deleted, sadly, and I think another one is going to be. Being a CA/CAN does not make an article notable. But an Imperial officer confronting a Jedi himself is nice, they are usually sending stromtroopers for that stuff, so I vote keep. Samonic ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol 19:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  4. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 02:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
  5. Character traits are given on the card VergenceScatter (talk) 20:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
  6. NBDani (talk) 11:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments