- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Grievous's frigate
- Nominated by: Erebus Chronus (Talk) 16:24, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: First Munificent nom!
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- DFaceG (talk) 15:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- D MCCG
(chat) 00:13, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Imperators II(Talk) 20:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Magnificent Munificents OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 22:12, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:05, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Object
Enthusiast of the Braha'tok
First paragraph of the history section should be tweaked to be more centred around the frigate rather than Grievous and his fleet as a whole. Something like, …the Munificent-class star frigate served under the Kaleesh separatist General Grievous as part of a fleet of… and so on."resulting in his Padawan Ahsoka Tano ordering a force of All Terrain Tactical Enforcers that had been positioned throughout the asteroid field to reveal themselves. As a result, the frigates, which had directed all power to their forward deflector shields, were destroyed by the Republic walkers" I think it'd be worth mentioning that the walkers opened fire.Is Skywalker's fleet and the fleet of three Venators the same? They are introduced as if they're different fleets.- I believe I have addressed all of these. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 18:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Just to check you're fine with these the changes I made on my copy-edit?Braha'tok enthusiast (Hello there) 07:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)- Yeah, those changes are fine. Thanks for checking! I'll look over the objections more thoroughly when I'm at my computer again. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 15:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- How about this? I'm assuming this is the flow you were looking for. Braha'tok enthusiast (Hello there) 07:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yep. That's fine. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 14:18, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- How about this? I'm assuming this is the flow you were looking for. Braha'tok enthusiast (Hello there) 07:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, those changes are fine. Thanks for checking! I'll look over the objections more thoroughly when I'm at my computer again. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 15:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
DFaceG
Instances of simply "Munificent," "Munificents," or "Munificent's" should be changed to "Munificent-class," "Munificent-classes," or "Munificent-class's" respectively for formality. DFaceG (talk) 15:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Battle droid enthusiast
Episode guide reveals that Grievous's decision to move through the asteroids is an unusual tactic, I think that is relevant to this pageThe ship moves through Zone six all the way through zone three, may be worth notingUnidentified OOM command battle droid (Bothawui) taking control of the ship after Grievous begins to flee should be mentionedI think you should note that Grievous took on control of another Munificent after its destructionYou should note that wreckage of the battle was left to float in spaceEditoronthewiki (talk) 21:27, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Build falcon 75 says Grievous needed to use Munificents as his flagships because he lost the MalevolenceEditoronthewiki (talk) 21:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)- All done. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 22:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
You can move the "move our ships" quote to the flagship subsection, while another quote can be fit into destruction. maybe the "get us out of here" quote or ahsoka telling anakin that the fleet is destroyedEditoronthewiki (talk) 22:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)- Done.
Build falcon 75 also notes that the frigates used by Grievous were "endlessly disposable"Editoronthewiki (talk) 22:30, 13 June 2021 (UTC)- This is unnecessary in my opinion. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 22:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Wait, never mind that. I'll add it. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 22:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Added :P Erebus Chronus (Talk) 22:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Wait, never mind that. I'll add it. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 22:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- This is unnecessary in my opinion. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 22:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Imp
I believe what Tano says in the article's quote is significant to the subject and so should be incorporated into the body. Same goes for that quote's caption, and the caption of the forward shields quote.Imperators II(Talk) 19:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)- How does that look? Erebus Chronus (Talk) 19:59, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
UberSoldat
Looking at Tyrant, there are Munificent specifications that can be documented here.UberSoldat93(talk) 09:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm assuming you're referring to the length, engines and weapons? Erebus Chronus (Talk) 17:26, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Basically anything that is consistent with the linked example. UberSoldat93
(talk) 17:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- How's that? Erebus Chronus (Talk) 20:41, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Basically anything that is consistent with the linked example. UberSoldat93
- I'm assuming you're referring to the length, engines and weapons? Erebus Chronus (Talk) 17:26, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Comments
Review note, all instances of Munificent should be italicized. DFaceG (talk) 15:06, 7 June 2021 (UTC)- That's against WP:MOS. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 15:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 10:05, 8 July 2021 (UTC)