- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Companion Cresh
- Nominated by:ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 17:55, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
- WookieeProject (optional):Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Astrography
(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
(Votes required: 2 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)
Support
Object
Imp
I'm sorry, but this won't do. Please rephrase the article so that it's not a complete carbon copy of Companion Grek.Imperators II(Talk) 18:01, 15 June 2022 (UTC)- I've changed the wording. What is wrong with having to articles that are the same? Literally the same information is known about them, so why can't the articles be the same? Is there some sort of official policy that comprehensive articles can't be the same as other comprehensive articles? -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 18:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Firstly, just copying article text across different articles without attribution is technically a violation of the license you're submitting your edits under. Secondly, having identical content across multiple articles hurts the site's SEO. And last, but not least, is that having identical text on multiple articles is just plain boring - both for readers and the reviewers of those articles. Imperators II(Talk) 19:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- That all makes sense. (The article has been rephrased). Is there an official policy on "duplicate articles"? If there isn't I think one should be made, because I think that having it clearly written is better than an unofficial policy. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 20:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- As Imp pointed out, direct copies without attribution are a violation of CC BY-SA. The license is already pointed out to you at the bottom of the editing window, so putting it into wiki policy is redundant. UberSoldat93
(talk) 07:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- That makes sense. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 01:53, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- As Imp pointed out, direct copies without attribution are a violation of CC BY-SA. The license is already pointed out to you at the bottom of the editing window, so putting it into wiki policy is redundant. UberSoldat93
- That all makes sense. (The article has been rephrased). Is there an official policy on "duplicate articles"? If there isn't I think one should be made, because I think that having it clearly written is better than an unofficial policy. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 20:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Firstly, just copying article text across different articles without attribution is technically a violation of the license you're submitting your edits under. Secondly, having identical content across multiple articles hurts the site's SEO. And last, but not least, is that having identical text on multiple articles is just plain boring - both for readers and the reviewers of those articles. Imperators II(Talk) 19:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- I've changed the wording. What is wrong with having to articles that are the same? Literally the same information is known about them, so why can't the articles be the same? Is there some sort of official policy that comprehensive articles can't be the same as other comprehensive articles? -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 18:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Companion Kilji strikes back
Link to Gender, please.Please introduce variation: Companion Cresh, Companion Gresh, Companion Gresh… change to "the dwarf galaxy" in some occasions to avoid repetitive wording.Apply the above here (In addition, Companion Cresh) and remove the "in addition.""globular clusters, star clusters located far away from the galactic disk, and satellite galaxies, including Companion Cresh.[1]" What is the galactic disk? If I understood correctly, you refer to the galaxy, so I would just say to say "far away from the galaxy"Samonic
20:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Gender has been linked, "galactic disk" changed to "the galaxy". Good idea with "the dwarf galaxy", the article has been changed. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Missing link to Star.Samonic 17:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Done. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 01:53, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Actually I don't think mentioning globular clusters and star clusters is relevant.Samonic
19:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- I removed the mention. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 15:29, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Context for Besh.Samonic 15:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Provided. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 17:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Check your references: you're sourcing that the Empire classified this companion galaxy as part of the Unknown Regions to the hyperspace website. Please correct this. Samonic 09:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
