Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Attack on the Ciutric system

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Attack on the Ciutric system

• Nominated by: OtterSurf (talk) 10:14, June 15, 2020 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. QuiGonJinn ^(Talk) 09:17, June 30, 2020 (UTC)
2. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:45, July 7, 2020 (UTC)
3. Imperators II^(Talk) 09:56, July 21, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Fan

• This article refers to the Argazziis system as surrendering, while the Argazda/Legends article says it was "conquered" by the Vong. Both of these contradicting facts are sourced to the Atlas-which does the source itself indicate as actually being correct? Fan26 (Talk) 13:23, June 15, 2020 (UTC)
  • It surrendered according to the Atlas. OtterSurf (talk) 13:33, June 15, 2020 (UTC)

Anil

• Please make sure that all links are for Legends articles.
• A category for the battle's location should be added.
• Please link Yuuzhan Vong empire in the article. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:24, June 15, 2020 (UTC)
  • All done. OtterSurf (talk) 09:42, June 16, 2020 (UTC)

HK

• For me, it's incorrect to say in the Behind the scenes that the attack is "mentioned" in the book while there is just a picture.
• I would add one or two sentences of context to mention that the system contains an important planet, Ciutric IV, capital of the Ciutric Hegemony...
• Also for context, it should be worth mentioning that the Vong launched a campaign to conquer the entire galaxy.
• Please add this: {{Otheruses|Battle of Ciutric}}. Hk 47 (talk) 22:31, June 15, 2020 (UTC)
  • All done, except for the second objection. I see no way to add that in. OtterSurf (talk) 09:42, June 16, 2020 (UTC)
    • You have to, in order to make a link between this article andh the rest of the expended universe. Otherwise your article is just a picture description and without any interest.Hk 47 (talk) 11:55, June 16, 2020 (UTC)
  • If I may butt in here-the first objection is actually incorrect. The Atlas is a work that goes under "Sources", not "Appearances", so the article treats something as being mentioned in it regardless of how the topic was depicted. Please alter the article so the BtS and the Sources section note it as being "first mentioned" in the Atlas and not as first appearing. Fan26 (Talk) 17:16, June 16, 2020 (UTC)
  • Done. OtterSurf (talk) 19:50, June 19, 2020 (UTC)
    • Please fix this so the article treats its subject as being first mentioned in the atlas, not first appearing. Fan26 (Talk) 23:52, June 22, 2020 (UTC)

Toprawa

• This nomination is never going to pass until you can upload a sufficiently high-quality version of the infobox image. That means physically scanning the page with a quality scanner and not taking the image from the poor-quality PDFs that are out there. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 09:38, June 16, 2020 (UTC)
  • Culator's taken care of it. OtterSurf (talk) 08:52, June 18, 2020 (UTC)

Imperators

• I completely disagree with HK's second objection. The bit about Ciutric IV and the Ciutric Hegemony quite simply has completely nothing to do with the Yuuzhan Vong attack on the system, and there's no status article precedent for including such irrelevant background in battle articles. Please remove it. Imperators II^(Talk) 20:28, July 18, 2020 (UTC)
  • Hey, I'm with you on this one, Imp. Done. OtterSurf (talk) 09:13, July 19, 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 09:56, July 21, 2020 (UTC)