[[:File:Discussion.jpg|thumb|200px|right|Just an example of some of the friendly debate found in Wookieepedia.]]

Messages

Blanked Talk Pages

If we don't blank talk pages, then why has my question (concerning Darth Bane), on your very own talk page, been removed?--Master Dakari 02:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Halagad's date of death

Hey Quent! Ages ago you put it down as 1 ABY, i just wanted to verify where that came from. Thanks. --Azizlight 04:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• Oooh, now that was a while back. It's definitely before 5 ABY - since Rahn knows about it. In fact, according to the Dark Forces Saga, it was even before Rahn met Morgan. The involvement of the Rebel Alliance means it must be later than 2 BBY. Beyond that, I can't remember. QuentinGeorge 06:23, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Cool, thanks man. --Azizlight 22:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Corpsey's Pic

I have cropped out the letterbox...and I have uploaded the new pic multiple times. Is there any particular reason it is still showing the old version? --School of Thrawn 101 07:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

• Ok, nevermind...the old one is now without the letterbox. How do I delete the new image I've uploaded? --School of Thrawn 101 08:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding C'baoth's Birthdate

You're absolutely right: the book does say he was 38 during the events of The Phantom Menace, establishing a birth year of 70 BBY. I apologize, I don't know how I missed that, especially when I was quite familiar with the rest of that section - I was using Dark Force Rising to subtract his age, based on the book's birthdate of 4/3/112, from the date of departure for Outbound Flight as given in that book - 4/1/64. Oh, how things have changed since. All I can use in my defense is the cliche "my bad." I maintain, though, that though the calendar and the year itself is inaccurate and superseded by later EU work, the day and month is probably still good. Simply subtract 35 from 70 BBY and you get the ReSynchronized Date: 35BrS:4:3. Would you agree? Erik Pflueger 20px 22:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Selkath

Hey QG. I made a number of changes to the Selkath articel, including placing Qual chronolically earlier as you suggested. I hope it addressed your objection. --Eyrezer 07:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the Venator-class Star Destroyer page.

Quentin, if I may suggest so, we should unlock the page to see if User:Darth Windu does anything to it. If he can't talk this out on the talk page and ends up reverting it on the actual page, he should be banned. In fact, shouldn't he have already been banned? He did break the 3-Revert-Rule already. If you could respond on my Star Wars Fanon wiki talk page, I'd appreciate it. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision) (Record of Imperial Service)} 20px 11:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• The discussion about the role is over, we voted on the matter and if you agree, the page can be unlocked.--Jedimca0 ^{(Do or Do Not, There is No Try)} 13:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

• Could you check the Venator page again, it appears that Darth Windu is unable to except the result of the vote and keeps changing the role. The page was locked yesterday, and unlocked after Windu had been warned, which had no effect. I see no way of resolving this edit war anytime soon, so any help you can offer will be welcome.
  Thanks --Jedimca0 ^{(Do or Do Not, There is No Try)} 07:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

The behind-the Scenes story of the Finis Valorum page

"Not for Valorum it didn't." That's what you wrote when you edited the Valorum page. What you may or may not know - and which I myself only just discovered - is that some yutz - I don't know who - was too lazy to write anything original about Valorum and just ported over everything I wrote about Palpatine and Valorum from my work on the Palpatine page - stuff that was all written from Palpatine's point of view, which was why it was said that the session went splendidly - it did for him. I see that quite a lot: people just aren't very willing to work, and just carry my stuff over to other subjects. I should be complemented, but I'm not. I hate it. I realize it may be part of the game on any Wiki, but that doesn't mean I have to like it. That's why you had to make the edits you made. Frankly, the whole thing should be edited, so that someone would get off their heinders and do some actual work. Erik Pflueger 20px 23:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Olana for FA

Hi QG. The infobox pic has been changed for Olana Chion has been changed as per your objection. Hopefully you'll be able to strike your objection. --Eyrezer 04:25, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

CIV souvenir

Hey.... is there anything you'd like from Celebration IV? I'll see if i can get it for you. --Azizlight 01:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

• Yeah cool, doesn't sound too hard. I'll try my best :-) --Azizlight 08:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

What is your problem?

Why the hell are you lashing out at me for trying to improve the K'Kruhk article? —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 20px 11:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Join the source Brija Kiall

I am recruiting people from all over Wookiepedia to help source Brija Kiall. Join Us....TheMasterDestroyer 9:40, May 17 2007

Major Spoilers

• I have no idea why you are adding major spoiler tags to the major character articles, so I've removed a couple. I've looked at the history, no spoiler material has been added, and Sacrifice isn't out for ten days, give or take. I'm a bit confused- could you explain? Atarumaster88 13:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Aah, I see. IIRC, official policy is to not add info about the work until it's released, but that's a good precaution. Thanks. Atarumaster88 13:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
• FYI, I think your Durge objection on the FAN page has been addressed. Atarumaster88 13:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

GA Nom

Hey QG, I just noticed that your vote to support Dace Diath on the GA page doesn't have your name attached to it. If you could post your name next to your comment and support, that would be great. Cheers! Greyman^(Paratus) 16:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

When did Giju join the Republic?

There's a contradiction over when Giju joined the Republic. I was wondering if you knew what to make of it. See Talk:Core Founder and Talk:Giju. ~ Jaywin

Congrats

On your newest WTS entry. I especially got a kick out of the "brush fires" comment. Glad to see someone there had brains. Kuralyov 05:24, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

• I'm sure I don't know what you mean....http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/13.gif QuentinGeorge 05:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
• Dude, you rule!!! Congrats! :-) --Azizlight (in New York)16:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
• That cracked me up. Good stuff, Quentin. -- Trip 14:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Humanocentrism

Why revert my edit? The previous version stated untrue facts. I maintain that the Old Republic was not Human-controlled. Palpatine's closest advisors were Aliens, as were the majority of the Senate. Sith, even the Jedi Council was Alien-dominated. Commander Daal 20px 09:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

• Palpatine's closest advisors were human or Near-human. The Senate was emasculated and robbed of its oversight of the war by Palpatine's decrees. The seeds for the Empire were planted -the actual declaration of a new order didn't actually change anything. Additionally, most of the paragraph you deleted had nothing to do with Palpatine specifically, it was talking about the Republic as a whole. QuentinGeorge 09:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • No, what I was talking about was whether the Republic was Human-dominated or not, which it emphatically wasn't. Aliens, including Mas Amedda, Sly Moore and others, were elevated to the Republic's highest offices. Palpatine was personally no Humanocentrist, and there is no evidence of such tendencies in the Republic system. On the contrary, the Separatist leader, Count Dooku, was a known speciesist. And as a sidenote, what says that, for example, the Youth movement was Humanocentric? Commander Daal 20px 10:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Known speciest my eye. The only place that EVERY appears is in an internal monologue in the ROTS novel, there's no evidence that anyone even SUSPECTED Dooku held these views. On the other hand, there is ample evidence of humanocentrism in the Republic (note, this is different to being "speciesist"), from the Cloak of Deception novel's remarks on the human-only satuary outside the Galactic Senate, to the accusations of pro-human bias in the Judicial Alliance, to the pro-human COMPOR forcing Tannon Praji to deport certain species of aliens. The list goes on. Palpatine was never a speciesist, but the article isn't about Palpatine, its about humanocentrism throughout the different time periods. The Empire inherited its attitude from the Republic, not from Palpatine. QuentinGeorge 10:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
      • OK, I admit you may be right on Dooku, since I can't remember exactly where it was stated, but I fail to see how a system that was basically governed by aliens could discriminate against them. Once again, proof that COMPOR et al were Humanocentric is requested. Commander Daal 20px 10:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you so much!

Thank you so much for helping me understand what all of those seemingly contradicting birthdates for Anakin Skywalker actually meant! I actually understand it now. (Amazing, isn't it, how thick I can be sometimes. :-P Bit sad, really...) Thanks again! --Crazy Jedi Girl 21:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fanon

There is no fanon that I am creating. I know the person writing the Darth Plagueis book. Jediknight19bby 15:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

• You know James Luceno personally? I doubt that. Besides, the book has been cancelled. QuentinGeorge 23:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Darovit

I just found your responce on the tfn thread:

Someone said: "Wouldn't it make sense for Tomcat to kill Zannah?"

Your reply: "Not considering he is a force-blind hermit with no lightsaber and missing one hand, and his cousin (not sister) Zannah is a Sith Lord who BLEW OFF HIS HAND WHEN SHE WAS AN UNTRAINED CHILD.

I'm sorry, but there's no way for that encounter to be anything but Tomcat=Pwned! The limbless bugger would be like Monty Python's Black Knight. "What are you going to do, bleed on me?"

Nice!! --Eyrezer 03:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

• Aaah...memories.... QuentinGeorge 03:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Vandal

Please block User:Xnotetoseifx. He is vandalizing articles. So far I reverted some of his vandalism, and Unit 1138 reverted the rest of it. Just thought I'd let you know. Victor (talk) 07:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Darth Zannah

Hey QG. Funny enough, Darth Zannah was on my list to source, cleanup and take to GA—but I sat down to work on it today and noticed that you had just recently did a lot of work on it! I expanded the intro today, but I was wondering what your plans are for the article? Would you mind if I nominated it for GA? Or did you have something else in mind for it? I don't want to step on anyones toes :D, Cheers. Greyman^(Paratus) 13:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

• Go right ahead. I was just doing a cleanup. QuentinGeorge 21:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Padmé Amidala article

Can I get you to protect the Padmé Amidala article from anon/new user editing. An anon keep adding nonsense. Thanks - JMAS 03:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Question

On the Jedi High Council talk page, you said: The New Essential Guide to Characters explicitly says that Rancisis did not join the Council until after 44 BBY. Could you give us a quote, as Cull Tremayne asked?

I can't check for myself, as I don't have the book, but the article on the book doesn't even say that Oppo Rancisis is in the book. He's not on the list of characters. Also, it says here that Oppo Rancisis was a lifetime member of the Council, and he was on the Council during the first section of Legacy of the Jedi, which took place in 89 BBY, as Dooku was thirteen. Did Jude Watson screw up again? Or did The New Essential Chronology screw up? It's been known to do that...

So unless Oppo Rancisis left the Council at some point and then was re-elected after 44 BBY as a lifetime member, it can't be true that he wasn't on the council until after 44 BBY. Well, that wouldn't work either, would it, because what you said that the book says would mean that he had not been on the Council at all before, right?

If it's in there, then we would have another wonderful conflict between two canon sources. Joy. If that happens, which book would override the other?

Okay, sorry about the rambling. Main point: Could you give us a quote? :-) --Crazy Jedi Girl 12:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

• To be honest, I don't have the JA books, so I can't confirm his appearance there. Oppo's in the NEGTC in the "Jedi Council members" section. QuentinGeorge
  • Actually, Legacy of the Jedi isn't part of the Jedi Apprentice series, even though it's by the same author. If you want to download it, or any other books, you can go here: [[1]] It's in the first section, the one about Dooku and Lorian Nod. I'll find the quote saying that he was on the Council, I just have to find the book as it's buried somewhere in the mess in my room. :-)

Unfortunately I don't think you can download the New Essential Guide to Characters from that website, so if you have the book, could you please tell me exactly what it said about Oppo Rancisis? Thank you! --Crazy Jedi Girl 15:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

• • All right, here's the quote from Legacy of the Jedi: ...The door suddenly hissed open. Oppo Rancisis, Jedi Master and revered member of the Jedi Council, stood in the doorway. And this bit of the book took place in 89 BBY, like I said.

Could you please give me a quote from the NEGTC?

Thank you! --Crazy Jedi Girl 14:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

• I have the book, though it's not with me atm, and I'll get the exact quote a little later. Oppo appears under the heading of Jedi Council members, which is why he doesn't show up on the Table of Contents. Atarumaster88 20px ^{(Talk page)} 13:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Ooooh, thank you! :-) How'd you stumble across this anyway? :-P --Crazy Jedi Girl 00:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
    • The exact text:

Source: The New Essential Guide to Characters	Attribution: Del Rey
Following his role as a fleet battle strategist during the Stark Hyperspace Conflict, Rancisis received a position on the Jedi Council.
This work is copyrighted. The individual who uploaded this work asserts that this qualifies as fair use of the material under United States copyright law.

• • • • Ah. Thank you! --Crazy Jedi Girl 19:37, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

ITS NOT FANON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Greedo the Elder and Darth Vader sense thing was expressed in an interview in the unaltered edition commentary in A New Hope.

• Post proof or retract. QuentinGeorge 07:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Ephant Mon Objection

hi, you posted an objection to Ephant Mon on the FA nom page awhile back. Could you look over it and see if your objection still stands? it's been proofreaf by several inqs and your objection is the only thing stopping it from becoming FA. Thanks, 20px TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar ^{(It's A Trap!)} 21:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

• Also, I believe you have an objection to Tavion Axmis that has been addressed. Thanks. Atarumaster88 20px ^{(Talk page)} 14:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Kee

My fault, QuentinGeorge. I'm assuming that it was revealed that she was Devaronian in Legacy 14? Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles 03:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

• You got it. QuentinGeorge 04:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Bane FA Objection

Hey, just letting you know that the Darth Bane edit conflict has been resolved. Chack Jadson 19:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

• I think your objections regarding Darth Bane have been corrected. I tried to add an expanded section on Bane's inconsistencies in different sources. If you feel it is not thorough enough (and it certainly may not be, I don't know a ton about the differences) I would appreciate any suggestions. Thank you. Chack Jadson ^Talk 22:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Winter Celchu FA Objection

I've believe we've come to a conclusion about sourcing Winter's birthdate. Please let me know if you have any other thoughts! - breathesgelatin^Talk 22:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

• pokes - breathesgelatin^Talk 08:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Reverting

hi there i was just wondering why you reverted all my edits on A'sharad Hett as i was just trying to expand it and make it easyer to see which comics he appears in though seeings how you are admin you probably had good reasons why i was just interested and while i am here maybe you profered it the way it was and i understand that a few of my edits were pontless (sorry hit Save Page instead of Show Preview) but there were a few things that in my opinon improved the artical such as listing all his appearances Because he doesnt appear until half way through Outlander and is absant during a few other issues of comics that is listed there also i re wrote part of the last part of the Seige of Saleucami because i just didnt sound right (winning the Battle, Which he did) (parraphrasing). once again could you please explain why and or let me re edit it without reverting it, it would be most appreciated thank you (sorry to cause such a fuss but A'Sharad is my Favourite Character) thanks again The Dark Lord ^{(Embrace The Dark Side!)20px} 10:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

• Hello again i noticed that you still havent replyed to my question and was just hopeing you would reply and therefore put to rest the issue that has been bothering me the past few days i understand as a admin you are very busy but would be very grateful if you could reply to this thanks for understanding Dark Lord Xander ^{(Embrace The Dark Side!)20px} 05:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Gank

• Why did you revert my edit to Gank? If you have a source for that, by all means add it, but otherwise it has no place in an article I'm trying to get to GA. Also, that wasn't all I'd done, in case you hadn't noticed. -- 40pxdmirableAckbar ^{(It's A Trap!)} 12:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Sorry, didn't see you'd added it. Thanks, -- 40pxdmirableAckbar ^{(It's A Trap!)} 12:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

A'Sharad

If you're going to move a page, make sure to move all of it over. You left out something I said and then deleted the old page on which it was on.Anzati02 21:39, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

• That's not my fault, that's yours. You added it after I moved the page. QuentinGeorge 23:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Bane

Hey Quen. I know you're big on the New Sith Wars period and all. Are you satisfied with how the discrepencies and contrdictions are dealt with on the Darth Bane page? --Eyrezer 04:22, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• I'll try to have a good look at it today. QuentinGeorge 04:23, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Cool. I'm not really well versed in it to ensure the quality. --Eyrezer 04:25, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Yuuzhan Vong?

• Thanks for removing the fan criticism section in the Yuuzhan Vong article. I wanted to, for a long time. --Elmira Val 00:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Another Question

So now we have the lovely conflict between Legacy of the Jedi and The New Essential Guide to Characters. So what do we do with LotJ? Do we write it off as a screw-up and pretend she never wrote that particular sentence, or do we say that it was the NEGtC that made a mistake, or do we try to figure out a way for both to be true, or do we just grab our aching heads and scream in agony? --Crazy Jedi Girl 13:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

• <sarcasm> Don't worry, I enjoy being ignored for ten months. Thanks. </sarcasm> --Crazy Jedi Girl 18:22, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Inq memo

• Just to let you know, we haven't forgotten about K'Kruhk and we aren't holding it on the FAN page for no reason. Havac has requested some expansions on various sections further up on the objection section. Once that's taken care of, I believe the article can be moved to the queue unless more objections arise. Cheers. Atarumaster88 20px ^{(Talk page)} 14:30, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Omas

Certain recent *ahem* spoilers have prompted me to attempt to get the Cal Omas article into shape, and I've noticed that you've been cleaning up and adding a lot of them...I'm just curious though...on what planet does Omas, well...kark it? Coruscant? Thefourdotelipsis 10:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Darth Bane

Hey, I hate to be an ass about this, but could you please check out Darth Bane? Your objections were addressed weeks ago, and I was wondering if you thought the additions were good enough for you to scratch your objections. If not, then I would like to hear any suggestions. Thank you. Chack Jadson ^Talk 00:29, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• Ditto with Tannon Praji's nom. Cheers. Atarumaster88 20px ^{(Talk page)} 17:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Hi, bit busy with RL at the moment, but should get a chance on the weekend. QuentinGeorge 21:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

K'Kruhk

• You should know that K'Kruhk's Featured Article nomination is up for removal. If you're still pursuing Featured status for him, you might want to speak up. jSarek 19:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I don't know if you ever saw it, but Havac did leave some more feedback on the Inq page. Personally, I've never had a problem with the article and won't be voting to remove it, but I would like to see this fixed so we can finally get it on the queue. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 08:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
    • If you're unlikely to be able to address the objections in the foreseeable future, then yes, kicking it to GA and coming back to it later when you have time is probably the best solution. That way, the article at least gets SOME recognition for the work already put into it, rather than languishing on the FA page or being removed and forgotten. At any rate, best of luck with your Real Life concerns. :-) jSarek 09:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Jedi Grand Master 130 ABY

I just saw your ideas on the Jedi Grand masters, and I have a question. Who do you think the Grand Master would have been during the Sith-Imperial War, or maybe even into the Fel Insurgency? The only ideas I have of now are K'Kruhk and Kol Skywalker.

Barriss Offee

Did you read the comment I left in the edit summery? First, Barriss' views of the force are clearly stated in Jedi Healer, where Barriss herself says that she believes that "light side" and "dark side" are nothing but words, and that the force itself is not good or evil. Those views certainly don't seem to be an orthodox Jedi view. And Barriss' beliefs and views about the Force deserve to be mentioned in her article. Hell, that paragraph has been in the article for months and no one else ever saw any reason to remove it. Barriss' personal views and perspectives of the force should be mentioned in her article. 70.17.129.60 04:17, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

• Your summary was inaccurate. Such a belief is not the Potentium, nor is it related to the beliefs of the Gray Jedi. QuentinGeorge 04:38, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Perhaps you are right, but her beliefs still aren't exactly orthodox. And her perspective of the Force should still have some mention in the article. How about I simply add this sentence into the article "Barriss once stated that she believed that "Light side" and "Dark side" were only words, and that the Force was neither good nor evil" or something like that. I don't see any reason to ignore Barriss' own statements about her views of the Force, and the article should at least mention those views. 70.17.129.60 05:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

You don't happen to know

Where my I suck. I can't find a good S-canon tag thread went? DarthMRN 10:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

• Ask Ozzel. He seems to have locked it. QuentinGeorge 10:42, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanks. DarthMRN 10:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Beru

I realize this was forever ago, but I was wondering if you could tell me where this circa 48 BBY birth year for Beru came from. Thanks. -- Ozzel 18:55, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

• Also, what about Cliegg's year of death (20 BBY)? -- Ozzel 22:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Images

There are some unsourced images that you uploaded on User:Eyrezer/Inq duties|this page. If you can provide a source for them that would be great. If so, please remove them from the page as well. --Eyrezer 22:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Anakin's Friends

Yep. They're not his friends at all. Thefourdotelipsis 07:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

• She secretly had a crush on him. Seek is the neighbourhood bully, per the Databank, and Melee teams up with him. Never is it stated that they're friends. They live in the same area, sure, but they're not friends. Thefourdotelipsis 07:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Whatever. I see no reason for you to butcher my work over it, though. Thefourdotelipsis 07:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
    • No need for that. Frankly, I hate the template wholesale. Thefourdotelipsis 07:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
• QG, are you aware that the rollback function affects all consecutive edits of a user, not just their last one? -- Ozzel 07:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I just realised that. Sorry Fourdot. QuentinGeorge 07:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Bane's Masters

Why not list Revan among Darth Bane's masters? Revan's holocron was one of the single most important instructors to Bane. Bane himself felt that the one holocron alone was more valuable than the entirety of archives of the Sith Academy on Korriban. And to quote the book directly:

It is made clear, by this excerpt from the book, that even Bane himself considered Revan his Master, albeit through the programmed personality of the holocron. Notice the use of his and the capitalization of Master. They place a special emphasis on the importance Bane placed on the holocron and its creator.--Master Dakari 01:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

• That's all very nice, but that doesn't make Revan Bane's master. Revan is dead, Bane is listening to a recording. A recording he heard ONCE. If I read Wealth of Nations, I'm now a student of Adam Smith. If I read Das Kapital, have I studied under Karl Marx? No. There's your answer. I don't care what ridiculously narrow interpretations you choose to pull out of the novel, add it again and I will ban you. QuentinGeorge 02:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Bane

Hey QG. Thought you might like to see this (decided via IRC), if you already hadn't → [2] That, plus your talk page warning, should hopefully get the point across and prevent it from happening again. Cheers, Greyman^(Paratus) 01:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks. QuentinGeorge 02:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Fetus

It was, but the other article was a lot, lot better. Feel free to move it, the existence of the previous article was my only problem with it. :P Thefourdotelipsis 10:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

• Of course, #1.0. ;) Thefourdotelipsis 10:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  • May I ask why it was moved? I've read 4dot's talk page, and there doesn't seem to be a good reason. According to Wiktionary [3] (yes, I know- a Wiki dictionary, but I don't want to get into an argument over dictionaries)- the definition is "An unborn or young person, a minor, especially one who has not yet entered into puberty." As "Lando Calrissian's child" is much, much closer to the original term used in Fury, I would like either the article moved back to the original title, or a decent explanation on an otherwise pointless move. As I was the one who wrote the article, I found it somewhat annoying to not be consulted on the matter. Atarumaster88 20px ^{(Talk page)} 01:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

I just wanted to say, thanks for the quick fix and I really hope I'm doing this correctly =P

Kalisa 15:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Kalisa

Accusation

[Redacted by administration] 06:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[Redacted by administration] QuentinGeorge 07:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[Redacted by administration] 20:00, 13 February 2008 (EST)

[Redacted by administration] 19:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

• • What is going on here? User, abstain from threats within your user name towards QuentinGeorge, or you will be blocked. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Thank you Silly Dan. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Isard

Hey, your objection on Ysanne Isard's FAN has been dealt with. Thanks, -- AdmirableAckbar ^(Talk) 18:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:Revelation

Yeah, I think I may have lost all faith in continuity. We have a Trek fan trying to explain our own continuity to us. Surely the apocalypse must be upon us. Cull Tremayne 05:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

• Worse yet, they are deriving that characterization from the Wook, an article that I wrote, and then throwing it back in my face... It's surreal. :-P Cull Tremayne 06:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Request

Please contact me via IRC or e-mail as soon as possible. Thanks. Graestan^(Talk) 00:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Mailing list

Hey, QG. I've set up a private administrator mailing list to help coordinate the current administrators of the site, and I am attempting to contact each administrator to get them to subscribe. You can subscribe here. My point with setting up this mailing list to get all of the administrators of Wookieepedia operating on the same page, and in a more unified fashion. Regardless of any personal differences that may exist between some members, I still feel that it is important that we are all operating on the same level, with regards to knowledge of the site, and new/upcoming stuff that is going to happen—so, basically, this is an attempt to coordinate us all in an effort to help keep us on the same page with regards to new policies, new ideas, announcements, discussions, etc. In my opinion, we're all on the same team and this will only help us to be a more organized and cohesive working unit—even more so than we currently are. I've already spoken with a few admins via IRC, and they have liked my point of this whole thing, and have thus signed up—I would really appreciate it you could do likewise :) Any questions about this, you know where you can reach me. Cheers, Greyman ^(Talk) 16:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Just a reminder

Please remember to leave the {{Goodnom}} template on articles you wish to nominate for Good Article status. I wouldn't have thought you'd forgotten, but you did it twice. :P Thefourdotelipsis 12:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks ^^

Thanks for the section-dividing-header-thingie fixing on the Neela article. Eventually I'll figure out the WikiCode proper! XD Trak Nar 07:15, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Hetton FAN

Hey. You left an objection to Hetton's FAN which we're all assuming was meant for Dooku's but are too polite to strike. Could you take a look. Thanks. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 20:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

• Along those lines, I've addressed your Dooku objection (though P&T more than Bio)- can you take a look? Yrfeloran 17:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Sarcev Quest

I'm thinking of bringing Sarcev Quest to FA status soon, and I was just wondering if you were the person who brought it to GA status? If so, I just wanted to know if you had your own plans for the article. Cheers, Thefourdotelipsis 13:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Togruta Nomination

Would you be interested in adding anything to the Togruta page or nominating it? Xzylongann 02:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

1sr Ruusan

Good day,

I've addressed your objection on the First Battle of Ruusan nom to the best of my abilities. If the result is still deemed unsatisfactory by you, I am requesting your assistance in rectifying it. Thank you.—Tommy9281 20px ^{(Peace is a lie)} 01:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Leia's memory of Breha or Padmé

This has been discussed and debated quite a bit, but no solid resolution has really come of it. Please give direct reference from Lucas that Leia is thinking of Padmé when she said this. Additionally, the article itself describes that it isn't clear how Leia could be remembering Padmé as her real mother, and that attempts to make Padmé fit the 'memories' are speculative. Besides, a quote of Leia only promotes that line of thought, and although could possibly describe her emotional makeup, does not sufficiently fully describe what kind of person Padmé really was. Gethralkin 15:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

• It was established long ago on the official site. For the purposes of this site, we do not need a direct Lucas quote to establish something as canon. QuentinGeorge 01:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Abyss

• Hi Quentin, im Darth Revanon and I was wondering why you reverted my edit on the article for Abyss? The reason why i deleted the amazon summary was because the new plot summary has all of the same info and theres really no need to have that info twice. Plus, if you check the source for the first look of the Abyss cover, youll notice that it tells you that the summary posted with the cover is the summary that is on the jacket of the book, and thats really the only summary that we need on the page. Thank you for taking the time to read this!--Darth Revanon 20:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

• Ok. Will leave both there until Abyss is released. Thanks again for your time.--Darth Revanon 20:48, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Legacy

Hey, QuentinGeorge :-). I've noticed your recent edits to Legacy era articles (including the great coding for Roan Fel's ancestors), and was wondering if you would be interested in joining the Legacy Project? Thanks, QuentinGeorge :-). Grunny ^(Talk) 05:50, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Fel dynasty

You're the royal subject, so I'll defer to you in asking whether there's a particular convention by which we ought to capitalize the "dynasty" in "Fel Dynasty", or is the capitalization of that page's title just an oversight? Havac 06:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• Looks good. Havac 08:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

RFB

Thank you for your support of my nomination. To have members of the administration come out to show their confidence in me and their acceptance of the site's need of another active BC in the eleventh hour means much to me. if you ever need any assistance, just let me know. Graestan^(Talk) 17:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Darth Bane

I know Darth Bane was your FA, so I thought I'd run this by you. The new image of Bane from The Essential Atlas is a very high quality image by Chris Trevas and seems ideal for the infobox. Take a look, if you don't like it, just revert my edit. All I edited was swapping the two images locations in the article. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 22:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)