Forum:TC:Window technician

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Window technician

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep and redirect to Technician. Imperators II(Talk) 21:04, October 25, 2017 (UTC)

Window technician (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)

Wookieepedia is not a dictionary. Imperators II(Talk) 14:57, October 18, 2017 (UTC)

Delete

Imperators II(Talk) 14:57, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
Lewisr(talk) 20:47, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
Brandon Rhea(talk) 20:49, October 18, 2017 (UTC)

Keep

Keep and redirect to Technician

  1. Imperators II(Talk) 21:36, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
  2. This is reasonable. It's a fair search term (hence the article creation) but can just be covered under the main article. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:41, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Brandon Rhea(talk) 21:54, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
  4. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:55, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
  5. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 22:00, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
  6. Exiled Jedi (talk) 22:03, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
  7. --Lewisr (talk) 22:44, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
  8. Green Tentacle (Talk) 23:18, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
  9. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:39, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
  10. 1358 (Talk) 17:42, October 19, 2017 (UTC)

Discussion

  • I have a few concerns with this TC nomination. Firstly, Imperators has confirmed for me that he has not checked the original source for this article subject. The problem there is that we really don't even know what we're voting to delete, because the anon's article description means absolutely nothing due to lack of credibility and verification. This could be a legitimate in-universe profession, in which case I might recommend redirecting the term to Viewport. There's also the possibility this term isn't even used as such in the source and the anon is just making a poor extrapolation from something. The point is, we don't know, so I don't feel comfortable applying a consensus-deletion to something that may need to be overturned in the event we find out that something here legitimately needs to be kept. It would be really nice if someone could check this source for us, which is rather obscure, as it is apparently UK-exclusive. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:01, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
    • Its mentioned only, Lando tries to get into a bulding, but he gets caught by some guards, Lando claims he's inspecting the windows to which a guard answers "Since when a window technician need a blaster" after Lando shoots the guards he just jokes about how window technicians doesn't like answering questions. Hope that can help--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:27, October 18, 2017 (UTC)