Forum:TC:Unidentified pudgy species

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Unidentified pudgy species (history - links - logs - delete - protect)

• Per here.

Delete

1. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 00:51, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
2. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
3. Looks like everything here is covered in Fud Sang, actually, making a separate article redundant. OOM 224 (he/him) 08:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
4. This was CSDable because it's clearly covered by existing policy. Imperators II^(Talk) 08:50, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
5. Seems like a case pretty clearly covered under the policy. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:53, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
6. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 16:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
7. Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 16:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
8. Per CSDable.—spookywilloww^talk 16:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
9. Per above. Rsand 30 (talk) 00:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
10. Asithol (talk) 19:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
11. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 23:32, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
12. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 15:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Keep

The entire BTS section satisfies the BTS requirement. Cade Calrayn 01:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

1. JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 01:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
2. Per Cade, this warrants notability Fan26 (Talk) 01:59, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

   OOM 224 (he/him) 08:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments

• Is the Fud Sang behind the scenes alone enough, without a species article? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
  • I'd say yes. Also, about the BTS requirement, the notability policy states "a species may only receive an article based on [the BTS] clause if no corresponding character article exists for that species." Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
    • I interpret that clause to mean no second corresponding character. It makes no sense any other way because this clause is only necessary if there is only a single character of the species. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 01:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
      • That clause does not refer to a second character article at all. What it says is "significant BTS info lets a species have an article of its own only if we don't have an article for a character of that species". Imperators II^(Talk) 08:50, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
• For the record in case of deletion, all information from the species article is covered in Fud Sang. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)