Forum:TC:Unidentified mouthless alien species

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Redirect to Unidentified mouthless alien. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Unidentified mouthless alien species (history - links - logs - delete - protect)

We have enough info to justify one of the these two articles existing Unidentified mouthless alien and Unidentified mouthless alien species but not both in my opinion. As we have personal information on the individual (pronouns/actions) I think the species should redirected to his article.

Here's the relevant info:

• Bucket's List: "Bibo" - Star Wars Resistance on StarWars.com (backup link)
  • "A green alien in a red spacesuit can be spotted throughout the series. This was a new species that was created for the show. He doesn't have a mouth and is fed from hoses and tanks in his suit."
• Bucket's List Extra: 9 Fun Facts from "Bibo" – Star Wars Resistance on StarWars.com (backup link)
  • Section 9

Redirect to Unidentified mouthless alien

1. With the heaviest of hearts. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 15:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
2. —spookywilloww^talk 15:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
3. OOM 224 (he/him) 15:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
4. To go a bit further, as long as people are in agreement that the character is notable enough for an article (I personally do), then the Notability policy's section "A species may only receive an article based on this [Significant development/behind the scenes information] clause if no corresponding character article exists for that species" even explicitly says the species doesn't get to have an article. :P Imperators II^(Talk) 15:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
5. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 15:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
6. Sanathestarr (talk) 15:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
7. Hey at least that's one less Resistance article to worry about status-ing. Rsand 30 (talk) 16:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
8. NanoLuuke^{Cloning Facility} 16:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
9. Wow Dani, very cruel of you. Bonzane10 (holonet) 16:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
10. Cade Calrayn 16:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
11. Lewisr (talk) 16:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
12. Per Imp. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 16:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
13. Wok142 (talk) 17:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
14. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
15. Zed42 (talk) 21:53, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
16. Per Imp. Resistance characters tend to be more unique with rare instances of reuse, unlike TCW and Rebels, so the individual alien being notable is fine. Given the lack of plurality, the species would additionally be non-notable. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 23:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

    Loki-Is-Cool (talk) 15:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC) (Vote struck, reason: Per policy: General rules #3 -- Imperators II^(Talk) 15:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC))

17. 01miki10 ^{Open comlink} 15:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Keep

Comments