Forum:TC:Unidentified Inquisitor (Karalle)

This page is an archive of the Trash compactor discussion about the future of Wookieepedia's coverage of the topic(s) listed below, including whether or not to delete or redirect the relevant page(s). This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the relevant talk pages or in the Senate Hall forum rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. —spookywilloww^talk 16:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Unidentified Inquisitor (Karalle) (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)

There is no reason to suppose this is a separate inquisitor from any of the existing ones. Jarhead002 (talk) (he/him) 22:52, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Delete or redirect

Keep

1. there's also no reason to assume it is one we know either. Mor9347 ^(Talk) 23:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
2. If this were from a purely, verifiably canonical source, I would be more inclined to agree, but because Fantasy Flight Games' Star Wars: Force and Destiny occupies this weird limbo ground where we technically call it within continuity but I believe even Leland Chee has mentioned that they might not truly classify it as such BTS (if anyone remembers where he mentioned that, I think on Discord, let me know), I just don't know... they tend to usually create brand new characters like Jerserra and her master, another Inquisitor who they mentioned who doesn't seem to fit the profile of any we're aware of at the moment. - MTrac1000 (talk) 00:08, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
3. Until it is proven to be an existing character, we should treat them as separate. We did the same for Jod Na Nawood and Silvo, as well as Cyrus Vuundir and Taborr Val Dorn. Bonzane10 00:19, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
4. JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 00:27, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
5. Per above. Rsand 30 (talk) 01:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
6. Yasen Nestorov (talk) 04:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
7. I would say this is noteworthy enough to keep.DaRealDarkLord (talk) 04:15, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
8. Fan26 (Talk) 05:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
9. As promised, I fleshed out the contents of the page a lot more to show the actual actions of the Inquisitor. Very notable. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 12:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
10. We have articles for stormtroopers and battle droids with barely any dialogue but show some personality or make a significant contribution to events. An Inquisitor? Definitely keep. OOM 224 14:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
11. CometSmudge (talk) 15:16, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
12. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 10:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
13. Labyrinthine G0B-L1N (talk) 12:48, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
14. あざした (talk) 08:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• Tomorrow morning I plan to prosify (shittily) the history of his Inquisitor to better help people make their decisions. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 00:12, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
• While I personally agree that it is notable, I will point out there is precedent for deletion, a previous TC for deleting the Inquisitor mentioned in Star Wars: Uprising. Rsand 30 (talk) 01:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Probably worth considering the article's return to notability. Bonzane10 01:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
    • Agreed. Rsand 30 (talk) 06:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
    • I was already looking into it. :P NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 10:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)