Forum:TC:Unidentified Inquisitor (Burnin Konn)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Unidentified Inquisitor (Burnin Konn)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:08, November 20, 2019 (UTC)

Unidentified Inquisitor (Burnin Konn) (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)

Because we have no specifics on the appearances or characteristics of this Inquisitor, nor any information that makes it unique, nor specific time that can help eliminate candidates for which this Inquisitor is or isn't, I believe that it is extremely likely that this Inquisitor could be a known one.

While it's true that any unidentified individual could in fact be known, I believe that given that the Inquisitorius is a relatively small organization with a small number of members, it would be different if it was per say an unidentified stormtrooper or etc since they come in abundance and since if it was the latter they would have more specific information that makes them stand out. With this article, it's very possible that any known Inquisitor, such as the Second Sister, Fifth Brother, etc could be the Inquisitor this article highlights.

As such, I recommend that this article be trash compacted, and that all information in this article be merged with the Inquisitorius article.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 22:21, November 12, 2019 (UTC)

Delete

  1. As nominator--Vitus InfinitusTalk 22:21, November 12, 2019 (UTC)
  2. CIS roundel OOM 224 {talk} 22:40, November 12, 2019 (UTC)
  3. --Lewisr (talk) 22:58, November 12, 2019 (UTC)
  4. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:48, November 13, 2019 (UTC)
  5. Cwedin(talk) 00:56, November 13, 2019 (UTC)
  6. Zed42 (talk) 01:12, November 13, 2019 (UTC)
  7. Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:19, November 13, 2019 (UTC)
  8. Imperators II(Talk) 10:54, November 13, 2019 (UTC)
  9. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:20, November 13, 2019 (UTC)
  10. Canon doesn't deserve Burnin Konn anyways. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 13:59, November 13, 2019 (UTC)

Keep

  1. From what I understand, we're voting to delete the article simply based on the fact that the "Inquisitors aren't that many" (yet their exact numbers isn't known). As you point out, many unidentified can be known characters however, unless we can connect them to one they still remain different characters. From what I'm reading about this inquisitor, they seem notable enough to warrant an article. This vote might not make much of a difference, but I can't support it based on that argument. Winterz (talk) 16:24, November 13, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

  • It is also highly possible that this Inquisitor is another individual. However, no matter who or what this individual is, treating an unknown as a separate person, and listing them as another member of the Inquisitorius would render it as unconfirmable information. Instead, transferring this article to the main one would be true to the sources, where notably, "an Inquisitor" went to Burnin Konn. --- CIS roundel OOM 224 {talk} 18:21, November 13, 2019 (UTC)
    • Again, we don't know how many the Inquisitors are. There is nothing to connect this individual to any of those we know of, therefore we should (and have in most cases) treat him as a different entity until we know more. I feel writing this "unidentified Inquisitor" story in the Inquisitorius article would warrant for an article, or create a precedent that would apply to many other organization-related unidentified invidivuals. That's my opinion, but I see your point. Winterz (talk) 18:32, November 13, 2019 (UTC)