Forum:TC:Template:Deployments of Clone Force 99

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Tommy-Macaroni 09:14, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:Deployments of Clone Force 99 (history - links - logs - delete - protect)

It's a nicely put together template. However, the category Category:Missions of Clone Force 99 already covers everything mentioned in the template. The other reason why this template is unnecessary is because the Batch's missions are all in service of various goals. It's not like the Partisans' campaigns, where they're all in service to the same goal. The missions included in this template range from Clone Wars missions to hired mercenary jobs to stuff where the guys had their backs against the wall like on Bracca and Kamino. Their missions are part of various "conflicts", so to speak, and the category is sufficient for this. SilverSunbird (talk) 03:25, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Delete

1. SilverSunbird (talk) 03:25, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
2. The category is enough to cover the Bad Batch's missions Lewisr (talk) 03:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
3. Wok142 (talk) 03:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
4. Just because the group is important OOU doesn't mean they should be exempt from the general rule that we don't do navboxes for individual groups, we do them for actual conflicts. Cade Calrayn 15:27, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
5. Death to navboxes. This one is completely redundant to the category. Tommy-Macaroni 15:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
6. The less of these, the better. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
7. Imperators II^(Talk) 16:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
8. OOM 224 ^{༼༽talk༼༽} 16:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
9. 01miki10 ^{Open comlink} 16:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
10. Was torn in this but voting delete on the grounds that we don't do missions for individual groups, otherwise we'd have navboxes for everything Din Djarin or the 501st of the Heroes of Yavin do. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 19:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
11. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 19:27, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
12. Per Cade. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
13. RogueWhistler (talk) 21:36, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
14. Per Nano. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 04:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
15. Per Cade and Commander Code-8 --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:57, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
16. Per Cade and Code-8. Fan26 (Talk) 09:57, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
17. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 10:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
18. Per Cade and Commander Code-8 and also because I feel this nav-box would get overpopulated rather quickly, basically turning into an episode list for TBB. --Jedimca0^{(Do or Do Not, There is No Try)} 13:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
19. DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
20. Per Cade and CC-8. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 12:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep

1. The template could use a new name, but I support keeping the navbox. Before I started editing, I had no idea that categories existed, and so I can see value in keeping a second, easier way for any reader to find any of the major events in TBB. VergenceScatter (talk) 03:43, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
2. I don't think the various conflicts argument holds up. It might cover missions from different conflicts but as Vergence said, it's an easier way for a random reader to navigate between the events from TBB. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{(Hello there)} 11:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments