Forum:TC:Dark Falcon

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Dark Falcon

This page is an archive of the Trash compactor discussion about the future of Wookieepedia's coverage of the topic(s) listed below, including whether or not to delete or redirect the relevant page(s). This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the relevant talk pages or in the Senate Hall forum rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Redirect to Millennium Falcon. —spookywillowwtalk 18:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Dark Falcon (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)

Just as the alternative versions of other subjects in LEGO Star Wars: Rebuild the Galaxy do not have their own articles, I do not feel the Dark Falcon qualifies for its own article. Information regarding this version of the Millennium Falcon should be covered in the Behind the Scenes section of that article as is the norm for any non-canon appearances of fully canon subjects, and as has, again, been the case for the other alternative versions of subjects in Rebuild the Galaxy.

Delete

Redirect to Millennium Falcon

  1. As nominator. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 00:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  2. If it's explicitly the Falcon, then yeah, precedent is to merge and cover in the real article. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 01:05, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  3. No doubt. Wok142 (talk) 01:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  4. CometSmudge (talk) 01:52, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  5. OOM 224 02:38, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  6. Bonzane10 Bonzane10-Sig 02:42, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  7. —spookywillowwtalk 02:42, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  8. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 04:32, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  9. Fan26 (Talk) 04:46, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  10. NanoLuukeCloning Facility 10:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  11. Xd1358 (Talk) 10:28, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  12. StarWarsFan327 (talk) 16:05, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  13. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 12:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
  14. Lewisr (talk) 06:06, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Keep

  1. I'm pretty sure we should keep this. Elijah Palmer (talk) 01:02, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Comments

  • I think it is another argument for a Millennium Falcon/NonCanon, with a section for it. ThePedantry (talk) 03:06, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
    • The only wholly non-canon subpages we do are the /LEGO ones which are by policy reserved for subjects that originated in LEGO material, which the Falcon did not. It is precedent to have non-canon information in the Behind the Scenes section, and currently the Falcon's page in particular doesn't appear to have any non-canon history there anyway, so it's not like it's bloated. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 04:14, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
      • Yep that's the current policy, just something I've suggested on the discord about combining all the NonCanon content of a subject into one page instead of being spread out. Also putting it in the behind the scenes section does make it less likely that people will put full information from non canon stores in that section ThePedantry (talk) 06:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)