Forum:TC:Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:13, January 9, 2014 (UTC)

Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam (talk - history - links - logs)

I cannot think of any good reason to have this article. Just because someone takes content from Star Wars and puts in some obscure foreign movie does not mean that we should have an article on it; there are plenty of internet videos that do similar things. The sourcing in the article does really add anything in terms of notability and is almost nonexistent.

Delete

  1. As nominator.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:53, January 2, 2014 (UTC)
  2. I'd just like to point out—apparently, the guy melts his own brain (which is gold) into a pair of boots. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 05:04, January 2, 2014 (UTC)I'd
  3. Supreme Emperor (talk) 06:01, January 2, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Really? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 06:08, January 2, 2014 (UTC)
    Bo Shuda (talk) 09:19, January 2, 2014 (UTC) (Vote struck, reason: Per policy: User is blocked -- —MJ— Training Room 06:38, January 8, 2014 (UTC))
  5. Absolutely. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 13:29, January 2, 2014 (UTC)
  6. O_O—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 14:22, January 2, 2014 (UTC)
  7. JangFett (Talk) 15:07, January 2, 2014 (UTC)
  8. I think I got a little sick while reading that article. Definitely get rid of it. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 19:38, January 2, 2014 (UTC)
  9. Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:06, January 2, 2014 (UTC)
  10. No. Just no. —MJ— Jedi Council Chambers 00:39, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
  11. Manoof (talk) 11:38, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
  12. This site got rid of the fan films, why should it keep an article for this film that uses unauthorized footage? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:36, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
  13. Agreeing with everything said above. This isn't for fan films. LIGHTNING12345678910 (talk) 21:57, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
  14. Don't know why anyone would consider keeping this. Trip391 (talk) 22:04, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
  15. 501st dogma(talk) 15:13, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
  16. Jinzler (talk) 23:22, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
  17. 1358 (Talk) 01:00, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
  18. Ahem, per nominator, and also, "Woohooh!!" but for the opposite reason. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 06:12, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
  19. Ayrehead02 (talk) 04:03, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Woohooh!! KEJ (talk) 20:56, January 2, 2014 (UTC)
    • Reason? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:00, January 2, 2014 (UTC)
      • Is it required to provide a reason? Because several of the yes-votes do not provide any reasons. KEJ (talk) 21:23, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
        • You're not required, but in the collaborative interest that is this wiki, doing so for the community's benefit would be common courtesy. It'd be nice to know why you're inexplicably voting to keep something that the vast majority of this wiki, thus far, is determining to be, for lack of a better word, crap. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:31, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
          • Since it's not required, I don't see why my 'keep'-vote should be accompanied by a reason... especially when so many of the 'delete'-votes are not accompanied by any reasons either. I am against a deletion, and that's all. KEJ (talk) 21:41, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
          • You can't spell crap without rap. Fe Nite (talk) 21:43, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
            • Or without a 'c'. KEJ (talk) 21:47, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
            • "Delete" votes not accompanied by an explanation are inherently taken to mean that they agree with the reason provided in the nominator's proposal, so an explanation there is often unnecessary. Your initial voting comment, "Woohooh!!", coupled with the absence of a real explanation, suggests that you're not taking this vote seriously, so several users interested with this forum are wondering why exactly you're voting in this manner. Again, you aren't required to provide an explanation, but it would be courteous to do so for the sake of community discussion. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:52, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
              • RE: "so several users interested with this forum are wondering why exactly you're voting in this manner". I see no evidence or even indication that several users are wondering why. Anyway, I am against a deletion, and that is reflected in my vote. Also my vote itself indicates an interest in this vote, otherwise I would not have voted. I don't know if we should continue this discussion here, as it obviously will have no effect on the outcome of the vote, and it may be perceived as disruptive behavior... which I am obviously not interested in. KEJ (talk) 22:00, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
                • For the record, the users to whom I refer are among those who frequent our IRC channel, where discussions for this forum's creation began and continue to take place. I refrain from mentioning their names out of respect for them. If they wish to identify themselves, that is their choice, just as it is yours whether you believe me or not. As an elected representative of this wiki, I tried to see if I could get you to expound on your reasoning here for their benefit, since I know they are curious. These forums are designed for collaborative community discussion, after all. Since you insist on not elaborating on your voting decision, I have nothing more to say. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:16, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
                  • FWIW, I, too, was wondering why you, KEJ, seemingly voted in randomness for keeping this article. I didn't bother to ask the question since it seems obvious that it will be deleted. However, we do try to keep things proper here on the Wook, and so in an official vote, it is usually customary to be serious and vote in a way that reflects one's desire to see the Wook improve. I am not saying that your vote, KEJ, was against your beliefs for a better Wookieepedia, but it certainly looks as if you simply voted for personal reasons. To avoid repetition, I won't repeat what Tope said about courtesy for your fellow Wookieepedians and your right to remain silent. On the same note, though, (especially @ Fe Nite) Tope's request was indeed allowable and suitable for the reasons given above. KEJ, you asked who else cared how you voted, so I thought I'd let you know that Tope wasn't making it up.—Cal JediInfinite Empire(Personal Comm Channel) 06:54, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
                    • I actually didnt ask who else was wondering about my vote, I just said that I did not see any evience or indication that several people were wondering about my vote; also, I did not accuse T&R for making stuff up. That being said, I take my hat off to you for your effort to protect T&R's integrity. KEJ (talk) 12:22, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
              • Come on Tope. It is going to get deleted anyways. Let it go. Fe Nite (talk) 22:01, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
                • I will ask you to mind your own business. Your input here is unnecessary. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:16, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
                  • Tope, I really think that you should have directed this to his user talk page rather than calling him out here. Bo Shuda (talk) 12:30, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
                    • You, too, can mind your own business. There is no reason why this line of discussion should continue at this point. I will consider any further responses here not aimed at discussing the outcome of this thread as deliberate disruption and will handle the offender appropriately. You have been warned. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:22, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
                      • Sorry Tope, but if you're going to antagonise users over such trivial matters and then go on to threaten users with retribution for simply disagreeing with how you have handled a situation, then I believe it is you who are being disruptive. I'm not going to simply "mind my own business" when you've clearly made it everyone's business. You initiated this Tope, not us. The place for such a discussion should have been directed to the user on his user talk page; not here. But since you made the comments here this is where we are entitled to respond; out of "common courtesy" as you put it. I'm not making this statement to be disruptive but am simply responding to a perceived threat. I am however, willing to put this to rest now that I've said my piece. Bo Shuda (talk) 09:14, January 5, 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

Hi. So you're all aware, I've exported this article to Fanpedia since it's technically a fan project. The page can now be found here. - Brandon Rhea Alliance Starbird (talk) 18:24, January 5, 2014 (UTC)