Forum:CT:Family relationships in character infoboxes: Layout

Forums > Consensus track archive > CT:Family relationships in character infoboxes: Layout
This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was support option 2 (add new "Family information" infobox section). OOM 224 (he/him) 12:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The voting options

The voting options

The community recently voted in favour of including family relationships in character infoboxes, but did not reach a consensus on how they should be visually presented, which this CT is intended to resolve. We will be voting between the two popular options from the last vote. Option 1 involves changing the header of Chronological and political information to Family and political information, with all of the new fields documenting family members included in that section. Option 2 is to add a new section to the infobox just titled Family information and to include all of the new fields there. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 11:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Option 1

  1. OOM 224 (he/him) 16:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  2. 01miki10 Open comlink 17:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  3. Efe Önem (talk) 18:49, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Option 2

  1. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 11:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  2. Imperators II(Talk) 11:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  3. JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 12:20, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  4. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 12:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  5. AmazinglyCool Nightsisters symbol - JFO (talk) 13:16, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  6. Rsand 30 (talk) 13:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  7. —spookywillowwtalk 14:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  8. Bonzane10 Sabine Starbird (holonet) 17:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  9. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  10. Per miki, but let's hope this passes. :P LucaRoR Sigil of House Serenno (Talk) 20:18, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  11. Jarhead002 (talk) (he/him) 02:58, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Discuss

  • IMO this vote was slightly premature. We should've waited until reintroduction of the simple majority rule to eliminate the risk of another no consensus result. 01miki10 Open comlink 17:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)