Wookieepedia:Wookieepedian of the Month/June 2007

< Wookieepedia:Wookieepedian of the Month

Nominations for June, 2007

Note: I would usually have declared this a draw between Eyrezer and Havac but Havac said on IRC that, since he won't be around for the summer, he didn't see any point in being joint-WOTM when Eyrezer could have the month to himself. Green Tentacle (Talk) 10:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Admiral jolyon

Support

  1. He has been extraordinarily thorough in going through stuff from the X-wing games. Kuralyov 15:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Havac

Support

  1. He's good. And FWIW, I had him in mind for this before he was nominated for adminship. --Azizlight 22:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 06:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Stake black msg 16:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Skippy Farlstendoiro 17:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. He helped promote 10 articles to good and featured status!--Windu223 22:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. I've seen Havac before, and he's actually really handy. I vote for 'im. TheNewDarthMalevlent(The Sith shall rise to power!) 02:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. Extremely helpful around the site. Greyman(Paratus) 02:24, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. RushinSundaws 19:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. Humbone 13:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. Adamwankenobi 19:09, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. User:Adacka Ocaref
  12. --Eyrezer 23:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

  • What the hell? No one tells me anything. Havac 22:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Redemption

Support

  1. Thefourdotelipsis 23:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Darth Culator (Talk) 00:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Imperialles 00:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 00:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Darth Seth 18:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. School of Thrawn 101 10:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Objections

  1. Nothing personal, I just don't like the way he treats some confused new users Stake black msg 23:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. I don't uderstand why the most consistently rude member of the community would even be considered regardless of his hard work. Sheesh, what the heck is going on around here… I mean, the guy was blocked yet again today for flaming and personal attacks.–SentryTalk 00:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
    Call me old fashioned, but I'd prefer to see this award go to someone much, um, nicer. Sorry. -Azizlight 00:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)In retrospect, perhaps this was a bit too harsh. Sorry Redemption. --Azizlight 10:03, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. I understand that he works hard but if you're not nice to people, especially the new people, then the pool of creative talent will get smaller and smaller as people are scared off. I agree with Stake black and Azizlight. Mrobviousjosh 00:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Same reasons as last month. Chack Jadson 00:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Unfortunately, for the personal attacks, that pushes it too far. TheNewDarthMalevlent(The Sith shall rise to power!) 02:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. I agree with Stake and Darth! This user is just to rude.--Windu223 21:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. Per Sentry. Atarumaster88 20:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. Redemption is undoubtedly a great contributor, but, as others have said, he doesn't exactly show the exemplary attitude we should expect from Wookieepedians. -- Ozzel 20:52, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. Never let it happen,he curses too much.TroybTalk contribs[[File:Troyb.jpg|20px]] 18:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. Never heard nor seen the guy, but he sounds like a n00b. KKR 00:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)KKR
    • And that's grounds for voting against him? If you don't provide a legitimate reason, your vote will be declared null and void. Chack Jadson 00:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
      • He's already disqualified per the Single Issue Voters policy. Havac 02:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Same reasons as last month. Thefourdotelipsis 23:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Don't get me wrong. As far as contributions are concerned, Redemption has easily earned this award. Sometimes it seems like he has uploaded half the images on the wiki, but IMHO, his vicious attitude towards newcomers and anyone who disagrees with him nullifies his accomplishments and makes this wiki a much less enjoyable place to volunteer.–SentryTalk 17:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Solus

Support

  1. Sikon 14:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Jaina Solo(Talk) 22:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. PinkyTalk
  4. Robert.com 01:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. NighthawkLeader 06:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Same reasons as last month, plus WC9. - Sikon 14:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

  • I'm up again? Wow. Thank you, Sikon. And I was hoping that WC9 was okay. Thank you. -Solus (Bird of Prey) 22:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

RushinSundaws

Support

  1. Same reasons as last time. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Eyrezer

Support

  1. Cull Tremayne 07:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. QuentinGeorge 10:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Green Tentacle (Talk) 10:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Havac 18:12, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Adamwankenobi 20:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. Tough call this month, but I gotta go with Eyrezer. -- Ozzel 20:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. JMAS 00:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. Chack Jadson 23:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. absolutely!Darth Nospher 13:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. Joker1138(Mandalore) Neo-Crusader emblem 23:35, 22 May 2007 {UTC}
  11. Gonk (Gonk!) 21:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. Volemlock 19:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  13. Close vote this month, but I have to go with Eyrezer. Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 19:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

  • Top ten contributor disregarding bots. Also, he takes time to write out expansive articles and has several FAs and GAs under his belt. Incredibly thorough and knowledgeable as well as an often looked over contributor who should be recognized as one of the most valued on the site. Cull Tremayne 07:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Wow. There are some great candidates out here this month. Atarumaster88 20:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
      • I agree with Cull. I've just been looking at the FA and GA nom pages, and Eyrezer has taken the time to look articles over extensively, from what I've seen. Very thorough indeed. Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 05:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Now I realize I nearly copied Ozzel verbatim. Oh, well.Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 23:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)