Wookieepedia:Requests for removal of review board membership/Archive/AnilSerifoglu

< Wookieepedia:Requests for removal of review board membership | Archive
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for removal of review board membership that was successful. Please do not modify it.

AnilSerifoglu

Two-week deadline from first request. Voting ends March 7, 2025. (0 users/0 users)

Support

  1. For all three boards; pursuant to review boards' bylaws (Inq example). Upon a member reaching five strikes, it's the responsibility of the issuer to start a removal vote for inactivity/not meeting reviewing responsibilities. As I issued the fifth strike, this is being forwarded due to that. Obviously, Anil's the best of us and he's welcome back if he ever returns to the site. That said, he's been out of touch since July (seven months ago), and things must move onward. But do hope Anil comes back 'round soon.—spookywillowwtalk 02:22, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  2. Unfortunate to have to do this, let's hope he'll be back Lewisr (talk) 02:29, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  3. Anil, come back to us. :'( Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 02:44, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  4. CometSmudge (talk) 02:55, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  5. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:54, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  6. Please come back AnilSerifoglu!SaintSirNicholas (talk) 10:15, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  7. Rsand 30 (talk) 14:18, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  8. Imperators II(Talk) 14:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  9. Bonzane10 Bonzane10-Sig 14:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  10. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 14:46, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  11. OOM 224 18:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  12. Wok142 (talk) 18:45, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  13. 01miki10 Open comlink 19:24, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  14. Yasen Nestorov (talk) 19:25, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  15. :( Fan26 (Talk) 05:14, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Oppose

Discussion

  • It is worth noting that we did vote through a new clause for the future allowing for removal without a vote if someone hasn't made any edits (at all) in a 6 month period. However, as also noted on that CT, no such thing like that can ever be retroactive because that'd be unfair. Thus, while we won't have to vote out someone who drops off so sharply again in the future, it is needed in this case since the strikes were issued pre-CT.—spookywillowwtalk 02:22, 21 February 2025 (UTC)