- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Obri
- Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 16:01, December 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: WP:AST!
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
- Good work. Winterz (talk) 01:11, December 20, 2012 (UTC)
IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 02:08, December 26, 2012 (UTC)- Nice. --Jinzler (talk) 13:55, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Cavalier One
(Squadron channel) 09:42, January 8, 2013 (UTC) 
CC7567 (talk) 23:18, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
Object
Attack of the Clone
Article for the Giants? Sounds like they're significant enough to warrant an article, rather like the Triad of Evil.- Done. Imperators II(Talk) 11:46, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
Per this thread, we don't yet know the in-universe canonical significance of the grid coordinates from the Atlas maps because we're waiting on word from Jason Fry, and even after he responds, we would need to come to community consensus to determine how we should be treating them. Please therefore remove the coordinates from the body of the article until we have a better idea of what they're meant to be, IU-wise.CC7567 (talk) 19:20, January 8, 2013 (UTC)- Done. Imperators II(Talk) 11:46, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
- CC, I know we're undecided on this issue, but current status articles include the coordinates, and the mandate is that all info in the infobox is repeated in the body, I've been asking for them to be added to maintain consistency until a solution is reached. If they're in the infobox, then they must be in the body to conform to the LG/MOS in this instance regardless of the doubt currently hanging over it. - Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 12:25, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, I understand. Imperators, I'll leave it up to you on what you feel is best to do (also applies to Starswarm Cluster) regarding the coordinates; hopefully we'll have a response from Jason Fry soon. CC7567 (talk) 18:51, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
- OK, I've put the coordinates back in the body. Imperators II(Talk) 22:25, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, I understand. Imperators, I'll leave it up to you on what you feel is best to do (also applies to Starswarm Cluster) regarding the coordinates; hopefully we'll have a response from Jason Fry soon. CC7567 (talk) 18:51, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
- CC, I know we're undecided on this issue, but current status articles include the coordinates, and the mandate is that all info in the infobox is repeated in the body, I've been asking for them to be added to maintain consistency until a solution is reached. If they're in the infobox, then they must be in the body to conform to the LG/MOS in this instance regardless of the doubt currently hanging over it. - Cavalier One
- Done. Imperators II(Talk) 11:46, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:18, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
I've got to be honest with you, Imperators. I really think you shouldn't be working on the Dawn of the Jedi articles...I mean it's still ongoing and so far it's rather incomplete. Also we can already guess that in the next comic issues, Daegen Lok and Xesh will be visiting several planets to gather support against the Je'daii, which will bring new info that will compromise your recently promoted articles. Still, go Astrography! I'll be reviewing this soon enough. Winterz (talk) 03:00, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
- I think it should be OK, since as of now, we only know that Nox and Krev Coeur could be featured in the next issues. And if any new info apppears on the planets whose articles I've nominated, I'll simply update them, as I have done with Ashla. Imperators II(Talk) 09:11, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
- I believe in your capability to update them however, remember that a lot of new info in the article will most likely deliever it to the ACs to be reviewed again. If I was you, I'd wait at least until the Novel is released, before nomming any other planets, but anyway that's your choice. Winterz (talk) 15:33, December 6, 2012 (UTC)