Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Kuna's Eye

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Kuna's Eye
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Imperators II
        • 1.1.2.2 Kilson
        • 1.1.2.3 Prepare to be savaged…
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Kuna's Eye

  • Nominated by: —TK-999 Era-imp(Rise of the Empire) 16:09, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Began as a redirect. No joke.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. You must be my lucky star, ‘cause you shine on me wherever you are... ~SavageBOB sig 16:42, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ACvote You should do Kuna's Eye system after this passes. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 16:44, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Per Kilson. Imperators II(Talk) 16:58, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 18:55, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 16:46, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Imo, it should be added that the Tulgah and the Jinda were sentient species. Imperators II(Talk) 20:47, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
    • Indeed, but what should I source that to?—TK-999 Era-imp(Rise of the Empire) 12:17, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
Kilson
  • I'm curious as to why you ref the first part of the Bts, "Kuna's Eye and its system were introduced" to the Atlas when in the sentence it seems you're referring to the "Endor and the Moddell Sector" article.
    • Relic removed.—TK-999 Era-imp(Rise of the Empire) 12:17, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • If you're going to ref the first paragraph of the Bts, then you need to ref the second paragraph as well to be consistent.
    • Done.—TK-999 Era-imp(Rise of the Empire) 12:17, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • Otherwise nice job. I don't think I've ever seen a User write a star article before TK. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 11:24, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
    • So it's precedent?—TK-999 Era-imp(Rise of the Empire) 12:17, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
Prepare to be savaged…
  • The sources for Tulgah and Jinda sentience can probably be removed if you want to simplify, since the whole statement would then be sourced to "Castaways of Endor," which notes that these are sentient species. At any rate, I'm not sure the physical descriptions of the two species are needed; it should be necessary to note simply that the Tulgah and the Jindas were sentient species, sourceable to CoE, for a star article.
    • Hope what is left is enough context.—TK-999 Era-imp(Rise of the Empire) 16:27, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • "Another mention was in..." I'm always uncomfortable when our articles use such terminology; I don't think a print encyclopedia would say something like that. This is just my preference, so I guess not a real objection, but it might read better to say, "The star was mentioned again..." or something like that. ~SavageBOB sig 16:00, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
    • Rephrased.—TK-999 Era-imp(Rise of the Empire) 16:27, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 10:33, June 28, 2011 (UTC)


  • Here's link to the article's failed comprehensive article nomination.—TK-999 Era-imp(Rise of the Empire) 20:16, June 21, 2011 (UTC)