- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Haneli
- Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 15:18, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Originally Zed's, went over with a two sources' worth of updates.
- Date Archived: 06:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Final word count: 499 words (118 introduction, 365 body, 16 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:GEWP:NOVELSWP:AST
(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 03:12, 27 December 2023 (UTC)- Lewisr (talk) 05:46, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Imperators II(Talk) 13:29, 27 December 2023 (UTC)- Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 06:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Object
Anil
About the (tea name only) notes in Appearances, I believe there's a precedent about their format per Budhila Hestilic Amura, Gamor, and Tierfon. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Fixed.—spookywillowwtalk 20:23, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Formatting works, but I think it implies that the name "Haneli Flower Tea" is used in the novel, which is not the case as far as I can see: "Drinking tea of haneli flowers, […]" Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Admittedly, that's primarily why I do prefer the original formatting of (tea name only), mainly because it doesn't use only "haneli tea" or "Haneli Tea" either and is entirely conjectural, but was going to defer to precedent to match the others.—spookywillowwtalk 20:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry to interject, but the book does say 'Drinking tea of haneli flowers'. With this could it not be that it uses that it's mentioned in haneli flowers name in line with the above precedents? Lewisr (talk) 20:56, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- That's what I had in mind as well. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Admittedly, if possible, it would be much preferable to find a way to reflect that the Convergence mention is regarding the tea. Within its proper context, the mention (in which 'haneli' is used to indirectly refer to Haneli, is about the tea he drinks as part of his routine, and not really the flowers. Relegating the mention to be reflective of only the flowers somewhat misses the intent of the passage, which was to refer to the tea itself.—spookywillowwtalk 06:38, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- On second though, actually, I think {{ID}} may be a better fit here since this is an indirect mention of "haneli" as opposed to the examples above, and indirect appearances and mentions are among the template's common usages. So what do you think about {{ID|tea of haneli flowers}}? Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 15:13, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Fair point, done.—spookywillowwtalk 01:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- On second though, actually, I think {{ID}} may be a better fit here since this is an indirect mention of "haneli" as opposed to the examples above, and indirect appearances and mentions are among the template's common usages. So what do you think about {{ID|tea of haneli flowers}}?
- Admittedly, if possible, it would be much preferable to find a way to reflect that the Convergence mention is regarding the tea. Within its proper context, the mention (in which 'haneli' is used to indirectly refer to Haneli, is about the tea he drinks as part of his routine, and not really the flowers. Relegating the mention to be reflective of only the flowers somewhat misses the intent of the passage, which was to refer to the tea itself.—spookywillowwtalk 06:38, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Admittedly, that's primarily why I do prefer the original formatting of (tea name only), mainly because it doesn't use only "haneli tea" or "Haneli Tea" either and is entirely conjectural, but was going to defer to precedent to match the others.—spookywillowwtalk 20:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Formatting works, but I think it implies that the name "Haneli Flower Tea" is used in the novel, which is not the case as far as I can see: "Drinking tea of haneli flowers, […]"
- Fixed.—spookywillowwtalk 20:23, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 06:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)