- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Darth Drear
- Nominated by: Grand Moff Tranner
(Comlink) 01:52, July 18, 2013 (UTC) - Nomination comments: Here's an interesting one: a former GA stripped of its status because some guy added information that turned out to be fanon, information that has since been removed. The current version of the article is almost identical to the version that passed back in 2011, but I wouldn't mind having a few nice folks give it a quick review just to make sure everything's up to par.
(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)
Support
Cade 
Calrayn 02:54, July 18, 2013 (UTC)- I just added a couple of links. It's a shame it lost its status before.--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 03:16, July 18, 2013 (UTC) - Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:04, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
- 501st dogma(talk) 15:15, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
- IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 00:21, July 23, 2013 (UTC)
- JangFett (Talk) 00:44, July 23, 2013 (UTC)
Object
Jangeth
Can you reload the infobox please? :P JangFett (Talk) 17:45, July 18, 2013 (UTC)- Got it in my review. :P Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:04, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Bah! I always forget the little things these days. :p Thanks Tope. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 19:12, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Bah! I always forget the little things these days. :p Thanks Tope. Grand Moff Tranner
- Got it in my review. :P Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:04, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
501st
Article for the Jedi whose heart they used? Otherwise, spotless.501st dogma(talk) 00:42, July 19, 2013 (UTC)- Honestly, I don't see the need for such an article. Very little information is given on the Jedi; certainly, if we had a notability policy, the Jedi would not pass it. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 03:01, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
- I'd say that guy has quite a bit of information on him; I've had to make articles based on less. Cade Calrayn 03:10, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Very well. The article has been created. I hardly approve of this trend, however. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 15:03, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Very well. The article has been created. I hardly approve of this trend, however. Grand Moff Tranner
- I'd say that guy has quite a bit of information on him; I've had to make articles based on less. Cade
- Honestly, I don't see the need for such an article. Very little information is given on the Jedi; certainly, if we had a notability policy, the Jedi would not pass it. Grand Moff Tranner
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:44, July 29, 2013 (UTC)
- This appears to be eligible for AC approval for several days now. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 00:43, July 29, 2013 (UTC)