Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Ch'hodos

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Ch'hodos

(4 ACs/4 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:53, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Did a copy-edit. Trak Nar Ramble on 06:51, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Winterz (talk) 14:18, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 10:56, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ACvote JangFett (Talk) 22:17, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  6. ACvote—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 01:19, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
  7. —Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 23:33, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
  8. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:01, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Floyd
  • First, that image has to get sorted out.
  • Also, can we get an image of the planet's place in the Sith Worlds? Something like the Krayiss Two main image. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:47, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • ...and put it where exactly? Do you really think the article is large enough for an additional image? Imperators II(Talk) 08:22, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
Jangeth
  • Nitpicky, but in the intro you said "its sky was red in color," but in the description you said appeared to be. The former sounds like it's confirmed while the latter seems like it's an assumption, if you could see what I mean. Perhaps you could tweak the wording a bit.
    • Fixed.
  • Connecting with the first objection, the description mentions it was a red, rocky planet. The intro just says rocky. Does the redness of the world have anything to do with the redness of the sky? I am just curious since these seem to be different in wording. JangFett (Talk) 22:01, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • This part comes off as rather redundant in light of the beginning of the first sentence, which pretty much says the exact same thing. Try excising one of them: "and its sky was red in color."
    • Well, personally I'm not so sure about this one, since the comic provides a visual proof that the planet's sky was red, while the CSWE states that the planet is red. But I've removed the first one, anyway.
      • I'm ok if you want to keep that part in the body of the article. I just felt like it came of as kind of redundant in the intro as it was. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:56, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
      • I'm not sure what has happened here, but I want to clarify that I still intend this point as a formal objection, which has been sitting here for quite a while. I would like to see this bit worked back into the body. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:16, March 8, 2013 (UTC)
  • The fact that the planet's atmosphere is Type I is currently exclusive to the infobox and should be detailed in the Description section.
    • Done.
  • Additionally, regarding the infobox and Description's mention of its atmosphere being "breathable," I find it's best to specify exactly who it was breathable for, since there are multiple variations in canon and that can be a very open-ended statement. For example, simply saying "breathable for Humans" would suffice. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 06:37, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
Stake
  • The grid coordinates have to go, per this recent CT.
    • Removed.
  • "A planet that was considered to be ambitious". This is a bit confusing. How can a celestial body have ambition? Perhaps you mean its government, right? A little clarification would be in order.
    • "ambitious Ch'hodos" is exactly how TEA refers to the planet.
  • You could probably be more specific as the what exactly the CSWE and TEA said in regards to this planet. Stake black msg 16:15, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
    • I really don't see that as necessary, since both the CSWE and TEA provide extremely little information on Ch'hodos (for example, the CSWE only provides a single new adjective describing the planet, i.e, "rocky"). Imperators II(Talk) 17:20, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 22:01, March 10, 2013 (UTC)


  • Quick note: The main image will need a re-scan with the bubbles intact per the Image policy. Menkooroo (talk) 15:45, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
    • I'm afraid I'll need assistance on this one, since I do not have access to a scanner. Could someone please help me out? Imperators II(Talk) 16:09, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
      • Luckily, I've managed to get the image myself. Imperators II(Talk) 09:49, January 21, 2013 (UTC)