Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Adner

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Adner

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 09:13, August 31, 2020 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:09, September 2, 2020 (UTC)
2. Fan26 (Talk) 17:25, September 3, 2020 (UTC)
3. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
4. Supreme Emperor (talk) 00:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
5. MasterFred(talk) 02:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat

• Unsourced information in Inhabitants. UberSoldat93 (talk) 13:16, September 2, 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Imperators II^(Talk) 15:07, September 2, 2020 (UTC)

Toprawa

• I think this missing New Republic agent probably meets about the bare minimum of what would be needed for an article. We know both that he's male and a not-insignificant bit of history about him.
  • Sure, created. Imperators II^(Talk) 08:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• If "Information Age" is capitalized like that as a formal thing in the source, that should definitely have an article
  • It is capitalized, but the term also exists in real life. Does that change anything? Imperators II^(Talk) 08:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• Remind me again why we're not mentioning Airen Cracken's writing in the History? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Per this. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 02:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)