- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article that passed review. Please do not modify it.
Executor/Legends
- Requested By: Imperators II
- Date Requested: 18:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Date Archived: 17:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Object
- Missing many date refs. Ones that I know require further citation are ref 147-1, ref 100, ref number 36 in the "droid pool" and "bridge officers and crew" sections. I'm not that familiar with legends source material, but I'm pretty sure ref 13-2, ref 31-1, ref 32-1 require a date ref. I'm pretty sure this list is a massive understatement, as it appears almost all the dates are uncited, exept for a few that I put in." As in the past, these sorts of things went unaddressed for just being put on the wrong meeting page, pasting here. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:22, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Looked through it again, ref numbers 15-38, 99, 114-1 and 177 also require more detailed references. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 02:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note that with this edit, while not being exposed to the source material, the Fondor shipyard assault article has a note about how it could only be before the Terror was destroyed, and evidently The Essential Guide to Warfare says this was in 3 ABY. As I can't exactly tell how, granted only from reading the articles alone, that needs to be the case, I wrote a vague time of after the Battle of Hoth. Anyone who knows more can feel free to edit if anything different is known. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- With this edit, I couldn't tell exactly IU year, other than between 2 ABY (Rebels are in Echo Base) and 3 ABY (preceding Battle of Hoth) for The Final Trap. If anyone else has a better understanding of IU date, perhaps related to other things, then can be edited. As is, got all the dates. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- It looks like the page Mission to Talay provides an explanation of the date of Star Wars: Dark Forces. I saw in one of your edits you added a less specific date. Could you possibily revise and use the explanation to more accuratly date the events of Dark Forces. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 17:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'm for now keeping this as is. Someone who can personally verify can either edit with something different, or share the information with me. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:39, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- It looks like the page Mission to Talay provides an explanation of the date of Star Wars: Dark Forces. I saw in one of your edits you added a less specific date. Could you possibily revise and use the explanation to more accuratly date the events of Dark Forces. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 17:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- With this edit, I couldn't tell exactly IU year, other than between 2 ABY (Rebels are in Echo Base) and 3 ABY (preceding Battle of Hoth) for The Final Trap. If anyone else has a better understanding of IU date, perhaps related to other things, then can be edited. As is, got all the dates. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note that with this edit, while not being exposed to the source material, the Fondor shipyard assault article has a note about how it could only be before the Terror was destroyed, and evidently The Essential Guide to Warfare says this was in 3 ABY. As I can't exactly tell how, granted only from reading the articles alone, that needs to be the case, I wrote a vague time of after the Battle of Hoth. Anyone who knows more can feel free to edit if anything different is known. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Looked through it again, ref numbers 15-38, 99, 114-1 and 177 also require more detailed references. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 02:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
In-universe mention in The New Essential Chronology (in-universe). -ThrawnChiss7
Assembly Cupola 21:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)- Added. VergenceScatter (talk) 19:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
And in The Essential Chronology, Jedi vs. Sith: The Essential Guide to the Force. ThrawnChiss7
Assembly Cupola 16:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)- For second, failed to see anything other than pictures, but I can look again. Updated for first. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Found in second, updated. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:58, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- For second, failed to see anything other than pictures, but I can look again. Updated for first. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
LEGO Star Wars (Set: 10221 Super Star Destroyer) should be added. I'm not sure if its counts as non-canon or not; WP:LEGO says "LEGO media is typically treated as non-canon unless explicitly stated", but articles such as Behold-Urwar Droid Concepts violate that, so I'm unsure on the canon status of LEGO sets. Brickpedia also says that the little ship in 
LEGO Star Wars (Set: 10143 Death Star II) is the Executor, I'm not sure if thats right. In addition I think this may need to be noted in the bts. -ThrawnChiss7 Assembly Cupola 02:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)- A note that with Brickipedia, for one, the page in question for the Death Star II set doesn't say the pictured ship is the Executor, and for the other, you're right that if the wiki page is the only thing saying it, it's not a source as it's fan edited. Actual objection pending. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Fixed. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:24, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Just as an aside, LEGO media is considered non-canon as are LEGO sets based on them, but LEGO sets are generally considered canonical sources. 132.241.18.200 15:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- This was me that said this, didn't realize I was logged out. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 15:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Also meant canonical in regards to information explicitly conveyed. LEGO sets aren't literally canon and we can't pull every detail from them, but many sets (mostly the UCS ones) have special plaques that have in-universe information, and we do consider those to be canon. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 15:56, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- A note that with Brickipedia, for one, the page in question for the Death Star II set doesn't say the pictured ship is the Executor, and for the other, you're right that if the wiki page is the only thing saying it, it's not a source as it's fan edited. Actual objection pending. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Two unsolved {{Fact}} tags.—spookywillowwtalk 01:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC)- Thankfully The Essential Reader's Companion mentions the book was in 0 ABY. In light of the question about the exact date on talk page, I made it just 0 ABY. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:47, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Comments
- Here is the review page under the previous reviewing system. I've copied over the outstanding objections from that as well as the comments from that page. Imperators II(Talk) 18:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Does anybody know what the mention in Mirror, Mirror is and if it needs to be documented? -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 18:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Whatever was its mention, listed already as an appearance before the article passed its nomination. Not an answer, only saying the nominator knew about it, and didn't have anything beyond a listed appearance. I can't talk about if there's any information not already in the article, however. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- I checked, and the only information is related to authors discussing a fanmade set of crossover cards for Star Wars and Star Trek. The authors analyzed a Picard fanmade card, saying Enterprise is a juggernaut second only to the Executor. This is entirely fan analysis of a crossover set of cards and their gameplay statistics. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:40, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Whatever was its mention, listed already as an appearance before the article passed its nomination. Not an answer, only saying the nominator knew about it, and didn't have anything beyond a listed appearance. I can't talk about if there's any information not already in the article, however. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Is there a reason for all the double-reffing in the infobox? ThrawnChiss7 (talk)-22:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- A point is being raised on the talk page about there potentially being a need to address some apparent chronological contradictions. Imperators II(Talk) 15:38, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- It seems that Hanzo has addressed this, for the record. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 01:32, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Vote to retain Featured status
- Imperators II(Talk) 17:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 17:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- —spookywillowwtalk 17:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
