Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Torching of Nelgenam

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Torching of Nelgenam

  • Nominated by: Liverpool92Ackbar HS 00:19, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. AmazinglyCool CIS roundel (talk) 12:23, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Commander Code-8 Hello There! 04:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  3. Braha'tok enthusiast (Hello there) 08:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Nice work! Imperators II(Talk) 12:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
  5. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH(Talk) 15:53, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Object

AmazinglyCool
CC-8
  • The name of the comic should have quotation marks around it like the appearances section does
  • I just checked the comic and it seems to say that the library was thought to be destroyed
  • Since the High Republic era isn't named in the source you probably need another reference note to explain how we know the torching occurred in that era. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 05:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Kinda hard to word but did the best I could.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 14:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
      • I think the only thing you really need is to say that the Nihil were involved, and that they were active in the High Republic era thus placing the torching there. Big thing you need to adjust there is making sure the reference note is fully linked and that it states where its getting its information from. Also that reference should be used in the body. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 15:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
        • Now?Liverpool92Ackbar HS 15:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
          • Nearly there, it should still mention the comic, something like "thus placing the torching of Nelgenam as described in "The Lost Stories, Part 1" during this era." and the reference still needs to be fully linked as if it were an article. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  • think the last sentence should be spiced up a bit so it's not so repetitive, something like CR-8R informed him of the torching. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 14:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  • You can mention that it was between 34 ABY and 35 ABY in the body. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 14:16, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  • I think it would be cool to use an image of the ruined library in the infobox, formatted like this one.
    • Added.Liverpool92Ackbar HS 12:39, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
      • The main thing I wanted you to notice with that other article was the caption it uses for the infobox image. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:57, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • You should replace High Republic with centuries later, since that's what the source says. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 06:15, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Torch bearer
UberSoldat
  • Unfortunately, the note for the High Republic Era doesn't justify why this event takes place in that period. The Nihil could've been active before or after that point.
    • Should it be replaced with "centuries before 34 and 35 ABY" then?--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 14:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  • If the New Republic was dissolved before the comic, then mentioning the "New Republic Era" is not suitable here. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Library burner
  • In the pipelinked Wild Space date citation template, I'm not seeing an explicit connection between said comic "series" and this "The Lost Stories, Part 1" that you're mentioning here. Is the latter formally a part of the former? If so, can you specify that in the template? Imperators II(Talk) 19:52, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Fixed.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 11:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
      • Ref 1 actually suffers from a similar problem. You're sourcing the statement that "The Lost Stories, Part 1" is set in 34 ABY to a dating citation template which in fact only says that the story is set at some point by 35 ABY. Imperators II(Talk) 17:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Actually we're moving away from using images in infoboxes that do not directly depict the article's subject, as that's can just be confusing to readers. For instance, that is why several of my own sector status articles do not have infobox images, despite the fact that those sectors contain objects which are depicted visually. Imperators II(Talk) 12:44, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Has this been applied to event articles recently? I think there's a bit of difference between showing an image of one planet that doesn't show the full breadth of a sector compared to an image of an aftermath of a battle, which gives a fuller perspective of the event. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 13:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • There kind of is, yeah: Corellian Treaty (25,000 BBY). I don't think the difference is really that significant, and I'd rather go for consistency across the board with this. Imperators II(Talk) 13:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
      • Very well, I've removed the image but I know a handful of articles this effects so it might be a larger discussion. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 04:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Could you add something to the article that would support the "Events during the High Republic Era" category? Imperators II(Talk) 17:17, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Because we don't know if it took place during THR era or any other era I changed the category to events.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 18:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Is the order of the speakers in the quote attribution listed correctly? Because from the body it seems like CR-8R actually said the line currently attributed to Graf. Imperators II(Talk) 11:25, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Yeah the order of speakers was swapped.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 11:37, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 09:31, 18 June 2021 (UTC)