- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
The Ring
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
Aww yeah astrography Imperators II(Talk) 06:06, May 17, 2017 (UTC)- Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:31, May 18, 2017 (UTC)
- Sol PacificusFirestorm 17:04, May 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Corellian Premier
The Force will be with you always 23:27, May 29, 2017 (UTC) - Cevan
(talk) 15:58, May 30, 2017 (UTC)
Object
Ayrehead
Is there any reason to call it an anomaly in the title? I feel like having Anoat sector or astronomical object there would make more sense.Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:39, May 17, 2017 (UTC)- The Legends counterpart was initially titled "The Ring (anomaly)," so that's why the canon page is there. I suppose that "The Ring (Anoat sector)" would make the most sense, so I'll move it if no one objects. - Cwedin(talk) 18:33, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
- Why not just The Ring, then? "Anoat sector" could also apply to the Legends one. The way I see it the case is similar to that of Rill, Rill (species), Rill (bounty hunter). Imperators II(Talk) 19:14, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, the Naming policy basically tells us it should be just The Ring. Imperators II(Talk) 19:46, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
- And it's been moved. Imperators II(Talk) 06:35, May 18, 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, the Naming policy basically tells us it should be just The Ring. Imperators II(Talk) 19:46, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
- Why not just The Ring, then? "Anoat sector" could also apply to the Legends one. The way I see it the case is similar to that of Rill, Rill (species), Rill (bounty hunter). Imperators II(Talk) 19:14, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
- The Legends counterpart was initially titled "The Ring (anomaly)," so that's why the canon page is there. I suppose that "The Ring (Anoat sector)" would make the most sense, so I'll move it if no one objects. - Cwedin(talk) 18:33, May 17, 2017 (UTC)