- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Switchmount
- Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 10:06, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Digging the name again.
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS
(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
UberSoldat93 
(talk) 18:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)- Imperators II(Talk) 08:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
OOM 224 11:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Object
UberSoldat
I would like to see the long date note pipelinked.UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:38, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- This wasn't an objection in my other Shadow Fall noms, why is this case different? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 12:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- After discussing with other editors, the practice is generally employed whenever the date note's length exceeds pipelinking it. It's not very intuitive when the reader opens the reference and is only greeted by a big block of text. It would be appreciated if you could retroactively do this for your previous noms as well. UberSoldat93 (talk) 13:59, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Very well, they have all been changed. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 15:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. UberSoldat93
- Very well, they have all been changed. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 15:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- After discussing with other editors, the practice is generally employed whenever the date note's length exceeds pipelinking it. It's not very intuitive when the reader opens the reference and is only greeted by a big block of text. It would be appreciated if you could retroactively do this for your previous noms as well. UberSoldat93
- This wasn't an objection in my other Shadow Fall noms, why is this case different? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 12:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 11:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)