Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Question of Master Jrul

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Question of Master Jrul

• Nominated by: Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 17:14, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: More such stuff

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. NaruHina ^Talk 00:18, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
2. Hanzo Hasashi 19:28, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
3. —Axinal ^{Convocation Chamber} 10:21, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
4. Imperators II^(Talk) 17:59, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
5. ~Savage 05:19, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object

1. I wanted this one. >.<
   • You need to state what the question is in the article itself. Be as literal as possible and don't get into interpereting it, though. Some context on why Obi-Wan considered the question in regard to Grievous. NaruHina ^Talk 22:08, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
     • Context for the question added, but I fear there is no info why OWK considered this thing. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 17:18, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
       • I think it may have something to do with Kenobi not wanting to approach the situation aggressively, but its rather ambiguous. Yay insignificant name drops... NaruHina ^Talk 00:18, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
         • Mention Grievous at least. NaruHina ^Talk 00:19, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
           • Done. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 13:18, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
2. Hanzo Hasashi
   • Fix the sources section, get rid of The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia, just keep the {{CSWECite}} template. You got Jrul right. Hanzo Hasashi 18:37, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
     • Done. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 17:55, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
3. Axinal
   • As I believe we established in the Jrul article, Jrul's gender is unknown, so the phrase "his Question" is not canonical. I suggest "the Master's Question" or something of the like, but how it is written is, of course, up to you.
     • Changed.
   • Why is the first sentence of the BTS sourced, but not the second? It makes sense to me to source the second one with CSWE.
     • Sourced.
   • Otherwise, very good.—Axinal ^{Convocation Chamber} 00:08, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
     • Thank you. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 17:55, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
4. Imperators II
   • Era tag? Imperators II^(Talk) 21:03, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
     • Done. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 07:52, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
   • Please add the publication date for TCSWE. Imperators II^(Talk) 17:53, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
     • Done. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 17:55, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

• Be sure to use CSWECite in both the sources and the reflist. The reflist includes the page number. I fixed the ref for you this time. Hanzo Hasashi 19:28, June 3, 2011 (UTC)