Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Kay's Lucky Chip

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Kay's Lucky Chip

Nominated by: BreadyBird (talk) 02:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Nomination comments:
Date Archived: 12:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Final word count: 194 words (0 introduction, 160 body, 34 behind the scenes)
Word count at nomination time: 140 words (0 introduction, 118 body, 22 behind the scenes)
WookieeProject (optional): WP:VG

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Nice work on your first go Lewisr (talk) 00:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Skifffy (talk) 01:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
—spookywilloww^talk 01:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Nicely done! --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Looking forward to seeing more nominations from you! OOM 224 12:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

~~Add creation date to infobox.~~
~~There is more you could add about the confrontation, like the place, the lockpick, etc. Skifffy (talk) 02:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)~~

Addressed, anything else I should add? BreadyBird (talk) 02:50, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

- That the interrogation happened some point after the Revelator Battle, that Kay was disguised and Riko was captured by the empire, and adding that it was gold-colored in the body. Also, is this your first CA nom? If so, good job! Skifffy (talk) 02:57, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I've added the information requested BreadyBird (talk) 01:52, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

(Review note) Welcome to the CAN! Lewisr (talk) 06:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
~~There's currently some information that is only mentioned in the infobox that needs to be mentioned in the body portion as well, that it was round and flat~~ Lewisr (talk) 06:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
I think the created by date should be removed, or at least be changed to say it was created by that year. If it's only stated it's at least 10 years old then it could have been created at any point before 7 BBY, so putting 'by 7 BBY' seems more appropriate Lewisr (talk) 06:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
~~'then implying that she had noticed the identity of the chip and had forgiven her' This reads as a bit speculative, so I think it should be tweaked a little~~ Lewisr (talk) 06:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
~~Just a note that the references go after the punctuation, rather than before~~ Lewisr (talk) 06:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I've made the changes as requested BreadyBird (talk) 01:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

The note for the created by date needs to include the Outlaws note for how we can say the game is in 3 ABY. So if you put the Outlaws template in front of what you've written that should solve that Lewisr (talk) 06:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

The referencing needs a little work so that information not citable to date notes isn't cited to it. I would recommend moving your reference currently after Chip to after 'created by Riko Vess' and I would suggest to move the one after Bram Shano to after 'keep this chip with her' Lewisr (talk) 06:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
~~You'll need to find a way to include a link to Kay Vess' crew as well per it being in the infobox, though I'm also curious if that could be removed? I'll leave you to choose~~ Lewisr (talk) 06:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
~~The BTS can use a slight rewrite to remove some unneeded info, if you look at this example of a status article from the game (except using appeared instead of mentioned of course)~~ Lewisr (talk) 06:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

This is getting out of hand, now there are four of them! Ahem, any ways...I've been improving the overall referencing based on your suggestions, as well as removing the affiliation status and rewriting the BTS. Anything else? BreadyBird (talk) 20:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Trying to not overwhelm haha, since I understand it's your first nom! But the date one above still needs to be addressed. Quick question on this btw, is it 10 years before that Riko leaves Kay? Just i noticed the second mention of the year later Lewisr (talk) 20:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

So, based on your early suggestions, I took a more simple way of directly removing the "created by" date, considering that "at least 10 years old" can be a bit inaccurate. I mean, based on the game, Riko did indeed leave Kay 10 years before 3 ABY(therefore 7 BBY), and the statement is likely Kay's assumption rather than the fact. BreadyBird (talk) 19:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Okay thanks for removing and confirming. Then we need to use a date note to indicate how she left Kay in 7 BBY since the game itself can't be cited for the date. If you use the current Outlaws date for the 3 ABY reference and then put that Riko left Kay ten years before therefore meaning she left her in 7 BBY. And then move the add that as a reference after the 7 BBY date that should be fine. Hopefully this makes sense? Lewisr (talk) 22:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

I've added the note. I tried placing the referencing in the template for the note but that doesn't seem to work, so I assumed what you meant was to place the references for the date together as one? BreadyBird (talk) 21:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

I probably didn't explain it well so my fault, I've implemented what I meant here, hopefully you can see what I was trying to get at Lewisr (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the advice. Is there still anything else? BreadyBird (talk) 21:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, just noticed this. The infobox image is marked with {{Imagequality}}; should be fixed before this is passed. Ideally, it would need to be at least 400px wide per policy, to make it fill the infobox's width and display properly on mobile, even if that means a little bit of background space is present on the sides.—spookywilloww^talk 00:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Ok, I've uploaded a new version of the image of the chip.BreadyBird (talk) 03:44, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 12:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)