Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Eliminator (Acclamator-class)

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Eliminator (Acclamator-class)
    • 1.1 (1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Anil
        • 1.1.2.2 Hk 47
        • 1.1.2.3 Imp
        • 1.1.2.4 Ayrehead
      • 1.1.3 Comments
      • 1.1.4 Vote to remove nomination (EC only)

Eliminator (Acclamator-class)

  • Nominated by: OtterSurf (talk) 17:47, April 13, 2020 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I wasn't lying!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 11:20, May 2, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Anil
  • Have you checked Star Wars: Empire at War: Prima Official Game Guide and Star Wars: Empire at War: Forces of Corruption Expansion: Prima Official Game Guide for possible appearances or mentions? TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:19, April 15, 2020 (UTC)
    • No mentions in either. OtterSurf (talk) 08:34, April 16, 2020 (UTC)
  • As Eliminator is just a "name that can be randomly applied to an Acclamator-class assault ship," I believe you should specify the default technical specifications of an Acclamator in the game. I mean, even just based on the infobox image, you can say that the ship was equipped with engines. You can refer to this and this nominations as precedent. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 16:45, April 16, 2020 (UTC)
    • Once I've done the infobox for Drakmha, I'll copy it here and change the name. OtterSurf (talk) 18:18, April 16, 2020 (UTC)
    • Done. Article body copied over as well. OtterSurf (talk) 19:30, April 16, 2020 (UTC)
      • As I've said in the other nomination, you should fix your formatting of the links. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:54, April 16, 2020 (UTC)
        • Fixed. OtterSurf (talk) 17:50, April 18, 2020 (UTC)
          • No, they are not. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 18:52, April 18, 2020 (UTC)
            • Copied over the Drakmha info which should have fixed the mistakes. If there are any more, please point them out. OtterSurf (talk) 11:03, April 21, 2020 (UTC)
              • As I've said numerous times, just reading Wookieepedia:Manual of Style#Linking should make all your formatting mistakes clear. For example, almost all your link brackets are misplaced for plurals and possessives. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 16:40, April 21, 2020 (UTC)
                • Fixed. OtterSurf (talk) 18:44, April 21, 2020 (UTC)
Hk 47
  • I would remove the number of weapons, or just mention it in the BtS section. It's clearly game mechanisms and do nor rely with the numbers of weapons we can find in any guides ans sourcebooks.Hk 47 (talk) 20:02, April 16, 2020 (UTC)
    • Done. OtterSurf (talk) 17:42, April 18, 2020 (UTC)
      • I think you can leave the types of weapons but just remove the numbers. Same thing for the complements. Just leave the TIE and remove the number of squadron. Finally, you may mention that the ship was in service by the time of the Battle of Yavin because the game is centered around this time. Hk 47 (talk)
        • Done. OtterSurf (talk) 11:03, April 21, 2020 (UTC)
Imp
  • Please try and paraphrase the article. It's almost identical to the Drakmha one, and the fact that we have a list of randomly-applied names doesn't mean we can have twenty copy-pasted articles. Imperators II(Talk) 14:48, May 6, 2020 (UTC)
    • I don't think I can present the information any differently since it's the exact same information. Does it matter, so long as it's correct? OtterSurf (talk) 19:41, May 11, 2020 (UTC)
      • Yes, it matters. As I said, we're not going to have twenty copy-pasted articles. And yes, you can paraphrase the article. Both the first and second sentence of the article can be reworded. Try it. Imperators II(Talk) 19:49, May 11, 2020 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • You refer to the ship as just Eliminator in the body, but "the Eliminator" in the BTS. I'm assuming the source doesn't show which of these correct, so please pick on and be consistent (you should also make this consistent in other articles of this type like Drakmha). Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:43, May 12, 2020 (UTC)
  • In the BTS I think you should specify that it can be randomly applied to ships built by the player across multiple missions. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:43, May 12, 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (EC only)

  1. ECvote Unaddressed objection by Imperators, over a week old. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 19:55, May 18, 2020 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 19:56, May 18, 2020 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Zed42 (talk) 19:57, May 18, 2020 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 19:58, May 18, 2020 (UTC)