- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
DS-3-12
- Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: A product of what happens when people don't realize subjects already received different names...
(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
Fan26 (Talk) 21:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)- UberSoldat93
(talk) 14:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC) 
Imperators II(Talk) 21:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Object
UberSoldat
Link to the card is nonexistent. Can you use another link?- Currently archive.org doesn't seem to work when I tried. Here is another link for reference, which is active but I am having difficulty with saving in archive.org. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Working archive link made to a different url now. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Currently archive.org doesn't seem to work when I tried. Here is another link for reference, which is active but I am having difficulty with saving in archive.org. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Just checking, is the pilot mentioned in multiple entries of CSWE?UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nope, only single entry. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Imp
"Identified as the TIE fighter designation by the card,[4] 2008's The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia would instead identify DS-3-12 as the call sign of the TIE pilot." — right now, it isn't clear whether the subordinate clause here is meant to apply to "The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia" or "DS-3-12". Please rewrite this.Imperators II(Talk) 00:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)- Done. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 00:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
I'd also like for you to move the very last sentence of the BTS over to the first paragraph, since it really belongs there.Imperators II(Talk) 09:15, 14 January 2021 (UTC)- Done. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 12:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Comments
- Note that I believe DS-73-5 is the exact same scenario of a misidentified Black 4/DS-61-4, meaning clearly Wizards dropped the ball by not just initially missing the Black 4/DS-61-4 names, but then making 2 different characters out of the same TIE pilot, however I'm not 100% sure if I am right with my identifying the DS-73-5 image as such. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 21:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)