Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Bulwark

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Bulwark
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 A planet, and not from the Shadows of the Empire? You've caught me unprepared
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Bulwark

  • Nominated by: Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 06:40, February 3, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Ride, Freedom Train!

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote This reminded me of Sanctuary, and, sure enough, it was you who wrote up that, as well. :P Imperators II(Talk) 20:26, February 3, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 00:00, February 4, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 17:47, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
  4. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:10, February 13, 2016 (UTC)
  5. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 20:32, February 20, 2016 (UTC)

Object

A planet, and not from the Shadows of the Empire? You've caught me unprepared
  • Please mention information about the planet's grid square in the BTS. Imperators II(Talk) 10:13, February 3, 2016 (UTC)
    • I'm sorry to be disagreeable, but the Layout Guide stipulates that Atlas map coordinates are one of the few things that don't need to be mentioned within the article (per here), which is why I don't add them. I haven't done so for any of my other planet articles (see Sinton, Ione, Hefi, Tokmia, and Kammia as several examples) because I don't really think it's necessary. It feels like it's just saying it for the sake of saying it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:54, February 3, 2016 (UTC)
      • Fair enough, thanks for pointing out to me that it was an exception in LG. Although don't we say a lot of stuff "for the sake of saying it" :) Imperators II(Talk) 20:26, February 3, 2016 (UTC)
        • To be fair, we do, and it's something I try to remain conscious of. For example, starting every character article with "[Subject] was a [Species] [Sex]..." After a while, it just becomes a stylistic nuisance, to use jSarek's wording from that CT, and I try to at least vary things from time to time. Anyways, thanks for the review. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:31, February 3, 2016 (UTC)

Comments