Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Athio III

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Athio III

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Oh mighty future Atlas, I beseech the to give context for this place
  • Date Archived: 17:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 129 words (0 introduction, 69 body, 60 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
  2. OOM 224 (he/him) 20:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 11:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Lewisr (talk) 17:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Object

Lew
  • The fact it says Tide hid on Athio III, means we're able to refer to it as a terrestrial astronomical object at the least Lewisr (talk) 00:13, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
    • I think that's extrapolating a lot from the word on, you could hide on a mountain which wouldn't be an astronomical object, or a space station, which I don't think we'd call terrestrial. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
      • While true, that's the long standing precedent, Thannt and Qieg are just two that come to mind immediately Lewisr (talk) 02:01, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
        • I would disagree with the assumption on those as well. If it were on a galactic map or something that'd be different, but since there's no additional context here using the word on in the article gives the reader the same amount of information that we have in order for them to make their own assumptions rather than making an assumption for them with no additional info. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:31, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
        • Still not sure I agree with this, but not going to hold up this nom for over something that's a wider precedent discussion so changed to match precedent. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
          • Thanks, I was informed that a message was left on the Wook server about this point so I was just waiting for some outcome to come of it before going forward, so I wasn't not replying for no reason Lewisr (talk) 17:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 17:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)