Talk: Jack Nebulax/Archive 12

< User talk:Jack Nebulax

PLEASE

Hey if at all possible please clean up my page I am new and dont know how to be fancy I really need help. My page name is user:yonatan. Yonatan 15:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

SORRY

Hey man, I hope you are not mad at me because of what happened the last couple of days. I was wondering if you knew what those small rooms to the side of the room where Han is in carbonite were. Thanks, Grand Admiral Nick Vos [Holonet] Republic Emblem

Voting

  • Normally I would ask Atarumaster88 but hes always working and I need an ansewer quick. How long do I have to be a Wookieepedian to be able to vote and when I can vote, how do I. Derek Yoda's friend 00:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
    • You can vote as soon as you become a Wookieepedian. And when you vote, you first put a "#" under your vote option, followed by an optional comment and then your signature. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 01:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Fett guy

Tell me if he does it again. Kuralyov 22:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

YV-series categories

I "dared" to change the category because I think is interesting that YV series and related articles could be found in a category or subcategory of "Corellian starships". If you think they would be in a subcategory there I agree with the name you have suggested.
I use to explain my editions, and I said "reverted vandalism" when you blanked the category in all articles because I read what you write in other article: 11:59 13 feb 2007 Jack Nebulax (Discusión | contribuciones) (?Fighter complement - Reverted - Windu, if you keep this up, you'll end up looking like a vandal.). I didn´t mean you were a vandal, only that deleting the category without giving explainations or classifying in a new one more precise could be vandalism, but it seems vandalism is deleting all the article, and not only a little.
There is no need for you to giving me advice like you suggest, I am learning from you myself. You have a great imagination finding things to correct on articles I or others have just edited, and if there are none you invent it. Coincidentally you always find them before others edit and not after, and most of the times you don´t change what the others just wrote, instead you change other things that you haven´t changed before, so your are correcting yourself too even changing your own words.
I´m very perfectionist and I like when you change things to improve articles, what I don´t like is the momment you do so: when others write, wanting to correct everyone else. The history of the articles can´t be followed because the last edition is always yours. Before hearing from you I thought that to patrol recent editions were to checked the style or the information was OK and if so leaving it that way, not to look desperately anything to change. Many times you change the sense of the article or the meaning, for example when you change blaster cannon for blaster only for making an edition and that remains bad and make wookiepedia poorest.
I didn´t know you were only the second biggest contributor to this site, I only knew the quality of your editions. I also know you are he here before me, I´ve read your pedigree: the death sentence in twelve systems, 3 times blocked and still here, etc. I only ask you from being careful with the articles. --Palpatine81 01:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1) As explained, "Corellian starships" was not the proper category. "Corellian starship classes" is.
2) People remove categories all the time. Why should I be any different?
3) Maybe you don't need advise, but the point is I was going to be friendly to you—but now, you're not being very friendly to me, so it seems that won't work anymore. In addition, I do not "invent" things to correct. And sometimes, I only spot a mistake by taking a glance at the article. Sometimes after I save, I find another, so I fix it. Nothing wrong with that. And if I make mistakes, I correct them—also nothing wrong with that.
4) So what you're saying is that when I find something to fix, you want me to wait a while to fix it. No way. If you don't like when I edit articles, that your problem, not mine.
5) Yes, I'm the second biggest contributor, and I've wasted days at a time to improve Wookieepedia. I deserve at least some respect around here. And FYI, just because I was blocked three times doesn't mean they were solely my fault. So, if you have any problem with me from now on, keep it to yourself and off Wookieepedia. I'm willing to start over as friends, but only if you want to as well. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 01:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
"Category:YV-series freighter classes" was a subcategory of "Category:Freighter classes", I have solved the problem adding it also to "Category:Corellian starships". If not all the YV-series are Corellian then delete it and discuss there.
Another thing about YVs, do you thing these articles are the same and one must redirect to another: YV-260 and YV-260 light freighter?
And about all the personal discussion sorry me too. You write in Wookipedia years ago, and I´m newbie. I only wish that the same criterion is used in all articles (I like order), not the one you prefer for making one edition more. For example, you have deleted a list of famous Kaminoans in the article about Kaminoans to change the article cos you say they are also in the "Category:Kaminoans". YV series article have a list of "Ships in the YV series" and you said nothing then. I have seen articles here with lists, like the list of novels, so I don´t know what is right.
So thanks for all your contributions and for sharing your experience. You arte doing a lot, I only request you to do the same in all articles.
You can revenge me voting against me there --Palpatine81 15:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Well, "YV-260" should redirect into "YV-260 light freighter". As for the list, the point you brought up is interesting to me—I don't know why we still have that list. Technically, when a certain article with a list (like the Kaminoan article, for example) gets a category that makes that list unnecessary, that list goes. Maybe it's different for a ship series, but I doubt it. And it's good to hear that we've put this behind us now. I look forward to working with you in the future. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 17:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
    • OK, I redirected "YV-260" should into "YV-260 light freighter" and other wookipedian merged the articles faster than me.
      • Good done changing it too in the list of YV Series. We have to find out what is the official policy about list and use it in all articles.
      • Sorry for all this confrontation, but if a make a categorization and someone don´t agree like you did when I made the other classification I don´t care my changes are reverted if other categorization is done or if it´s explained why I am wrong, but not only blanking it. Thanks and take care. --Palpatine81 23:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey, Fleet Junkie

I got into a discussion elsewhere over the power of the superlaser aboard the Elicpse-class Dreadnaughts. From what our article says, they were armed with only one of the cannons of which Death Star I had eight of, yet The Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels, pg 46, says the laser had 2/3 of the Death Star's power. First off, it seems strange to me that a single laser could produce 2/3 the power of what you otherwise need eight of them for, and secondly, my opponent claims it was able to sear the entire planet with one hit. None of the articles I've looked at mentions the 2/3 number, nor that the destructive power was great enough to take out more than a continent, let alone the entire surface of a planet. So what is the deal? Is he wrong, or have you gone lax in your efforts to keep everything related to starfleets around here in mint condition? DarthMRN 19:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

  • He's actually right. While essentially only one of the superlasers used in forming the Death Star's main one, it has 2/3rds of the Death Star's main superlaser. And yes, an Eclipse's superlaser can cause an entire planet to become unihabitable. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
    • How exactly is that possible Jack?--Herbsewell 21:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
      • I don't know. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 22:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
        • Okay, then how does that make sense?--Herbsewell 22:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
          • Hey, I didn't make it canon. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 22:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
            • Probably by boiling off the planet's atmosphere, to use another cooking metaphor. Don't forget, also that while the superlaser might have been the same, the power source supplying it would probably have been less (Death Stars being significantly larger than Eclipse-class Super Star Destroyers and requiring more powerful generators).Tocneppil 09:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
              • Jack: I wasn't questioning it's validity of being canon, I just wanted to know if there was a logical reasoning that I could abide by so it would make sense. Tocneppil: That's exactly why it makes no sense. It's illogical to say that a power source hundreds of times smaller than the Death Star could produce 2/3rds of the power.--Herbsewell 21:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
                • I agree; it doesn't make sense. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 23:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
                  • Are we talking about an Eclipse or the Eclipse? If it's the latter case I'd say that Palpatine had some extra punch packed in, insidious little Sith that he is. But if you're arguing from the point of the Eclipse-class, then I don't know, but I'd still put my money on boiling away the atmosphere (which might not require all that much power).Tocneppil 09:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
                  • Hang on, Darth MRN you were quoting from pg. 46 of the Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels. Has anyone checked if this information is repeated in the current NEGVV?Tocneppil 09:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
                    • No, it's not. The NEGVV says that it "had enough power to crack a planet's crust". No mention of it having 2/3s the power of the Death Star.--Dooku(Solar Sailer)17px 22:53, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
                • The only way that makes sence is if the lasers require exponential power supplies to increase power output. By the time you get a weapon as strong as the death stars, doubling the power only adds 5% or so. Therefore, increasing the power by 50% (from 2/3 to 1) requires 8X the input power. That's all I can think of. Rather Dashing 01:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

That theory also explains why most capital ships have hundreds of small weapons instead of one or two large weapons like (Tyber Zann's 'empire at war' ships) Rather Dashing 01:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

  • I assume the NEGVV renders the EGVV obsolete, then? Meaning that the 2/3 thing is non-canon, and only the Eclipse I had the power to bust an entire planet, while ordinary Eclipse-class Dreads could only scorch a single continent? Is all of this right? DarthMRN 02:01, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Can we take this somewhere else already? —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 02:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
    • I would like to put in that the NEGVV does make EGVV obsolete in a way, as it is more up-to-date. So yes, 2/3s probably is non-canon. Other than that, I agree with Jack, and I think that this conversation should be moved to the Eclipse Talk Page.--Dooku(Solar Sailer)17px 11:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
      • The LFL statements regarding canon says that in a conflict, more recent sources on the same level as the early ones take precedence. If the NEGVV says something different from the EGVV about the power of the superlaser, then that takes precedence, and that info needs to be in the article. We also need to resolve the conflict as it's noted bts. VT-16 13:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
        • Even though the discussion should take place somewhere else, might I add that even though the combined explanation is not logical, they separately still do not contradict each other.--Herbsewell 14:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Darth Windu

Alright Jack lets sort this out. For some reason, you don't like me. Now for most intents and purposes, I couldn't care less. However your actions, that is constantly trying to censor me, is both unfair and damaging to the articles in question and to wookipedia as a whole. So lets get it all out in the opne - what's your problem with me? All I want is to help out wookipedia by making it as fun and informative as possible, yet you always block me. An example of this would be the Imperial I article, where your basic attitude is 'its my way or the highway'. --Darth Windu 02:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

  • It's not that I don't like you. We're actually the same type of person. I just don't like your atitude toward editing. You don't discuss controversial changes before making them. That's why I revert them. The purpose of discussing these types of possible changes to an article is to show people why you think the changes should be made. Without discussing it first, and as shown by your edits to Venator-class Star Destroyer and Imperial I-class Star Destroyer, you start edit wars that are your fault. What's even worse is that you still change it back to your version without an actual discussion. Those are characteristics of a vandal. Edit wars get people blocked, and honestly, both of us should be blocked right now for those edit wars. That's Wookieepedian policy. Each of us think we're doing the right thing, but edits to the article alone can't convince others on who's right and who's wrong. In addition, these edit wars seldom go anywhere. So, I'm not doing this to be mean. I'm just trying to teach you a lesson that I myself am a poor example of following. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 13:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Well that sounds fair enough Jack. I'll definately try to be less rash with my edits, unfortunately pateince has never been one of my virtues, but I'll try to make sure I discuss possible changes before making them. --Darth Windu 01:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Novel Advice

Hey Jack. You seem to have wasted a good portion of you life reading star wars books/comics, or maybe youre just a fast reader. Either way I figured you'd be a good person to ask this: I'm very interested in the Vong invasion NJO series, but don't want to jump in with no EU background. I just completed the thrawn trilogy and DE. Zahn and Veitch really should have dont a better job with coordination. So I noticed that palpy dies around like 10 ABY (hopefully for really real this time) and NJO starts somewhere around 25 ABY. Can you recommend a few good novels to fill that 15 year gap, or direct me to someone who can? Thanx in advance - Rather Dashing 11:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC) PS: I'll overlook the fact that you ranked medstar higher than shatterpoint :-D

  • Let's see. The X-wing series was pretty good, and I'd strongly recommend Specter of the Past, Vision of the Future, and Survivor's Quest. Of course, there might be a few good novels in that time period that I haven't read yet. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 13:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Everybody likes Vision of the future. I'll check those out. Cloning old villans is kind of a cheap trick for an author who's out of ideas, but Timothy Zahn has been consistantly good, I say with a grimace while pursing my lips. Rather Dashing 00:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
      • Well, the Thrawn clones don't get very far, so it's not bad in regards to that. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 01:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
        • I agree, the best novels would be all of Zahns and then Stackpoles. Alstons are pretty good also. Thrawn would be a baddie i wouldn't mind seeing again, especially because he never seemed evil in my mind. -Eggzavier 04:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
          • I share that same opinion. He only thought what he was doing was necessary. Besides, just because he was with the Empire doesn't make him a Palpatine-level evil. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 15:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Reaching with an Appendage of Peace

Hello. This is the guy who likely ranks high on your hate list (Perplexed-4E-Turnitee). Now that our quarrel is forcibly ended I figure that our enmity is also outdated. What say we bury the blaster and move on? I still don't approve of your internet behavior but hey! that's my problem. Regardless of who was right, I was too harsh. Please forgive me. 72.64.108.154 22:47, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

  • I don't hate you. The only people I hate are the people who vandalize articles saying bad stuff about me. And this whole ordeal is partially my fault anyway. Please accept my apologies as well. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 01:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Done. Long live the Empire! Karohalva 02:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Troyb

Jack, this Troyb fellow keeps asking me to help him with his fanfic and such. Most of his ideas appear to be close to mine, especially the last part. He can't spell very well, since he appears to be foreign and english must be a new language. He keeps asking for help, but I don't want my ideas copied. What should I do?--Dooku(Solar Sailer)17px 16:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Anakin's Image

  • For Anakin, should we put his force ghost picture up?--Dooku(Solar Sailer)17px 18:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
    • No. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 19:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
      • I thought that for character articles you were supposed to use their last known appearance. Wouldn't Anakin's be Vader? If not, the true "last known" appearance he had was as a force ghost. I don't see why we use a picture that's 23 years outdated.--Dooku(Solar Sailer)17px 20:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Block

Jack, I have had to block you for 24 hours for violating the 3RR. That image is not modified. Please don't change it when you return. —Silly Dan (talk) 00:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


Image Request

Hi Jack, How's this...

File:Venator.jpg

Joker1138(Mandalore) 25px

Results

  • We decided that if a user feels he has been insulted, take it to the admin's noticeboard like we have before. Personal attacks are not tolerated. Complaints aren't defined to be a personal attack, but they could be depending on the nature of the language used. Atarumaster88 20px (Audience Chamber) 00:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Just to let you know...

There's someone on my Wiki (sw1mush.wikia.com/) putting up articles under your name that have nothing to do with that Wiki. It was a direct copy and paste of the Jedi Exile file here. Somehow I doubt it was you, but just letting ya know. --Danik Kreldin 03:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Edit Count

Psst, Jack...you've only got 40,000 edits. Kura still has more. On the edit counter, you've got to look under Main, not Total. Just thought I'd let you know. .... 22:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey Jack...Just Wondering

Hey, I'm just wondering, how do you decide when to change your sig? Or rather, get a "promotion". You've been at least a Commander, Admiral, Rear Admiral, and Grand Admiral. Just curious. Thanks. You might want to archive this page soon, BTW. Chack Jadson 22:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Block

30px You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list, along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified.

--Imp 21:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Referencing

I managed to reference some of the information for Dooku, but at the bottom reference section, for multiples of the same source, they are listed seperate, would you mind trying to fix this for me? I am not familiar with this new reference system we have now.--Dooku(Solar Sailer)17px 02:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Congradulations!

Congrats, Jack! Thanks to the new Edit count, it has been revealed that you have the most edits on this Wiki--nearly 60,000. You must have a lot of spare time. Unit 8311 08:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

congrats also Admiral this is great accomplishment for you—Troyb

Leaving, for good.

Recently, it was brought to my attention that a discussion took place behind my back, and I would not have learned of it had Jaymach not banned me for breaking the 3RR. Upon reading it, I've learned that I am no longer welcomed here. Therefore, after pressing the "Save page" button, I will no longer be contributing to Wookieepedia. It's as simple as that. If my cons must be emphasized on so much that my pros are basically just disregarded, I suppose that I, for these past twenty months, have done absolutely nothing to improve Wookieepedia. Even though that's completely wrong, the fact that it is disrespectful is enough to tell myself that I must leave this place for good. If anyone would wish to contact me, please do so by emailing me at [email removed], with "Wookieepedia" in the title so I don't mistake it for spam. So, with that, I say good-bye to all of you who have been my friends, and to those who see me as nothing more than a worthless contributor, thanks for absolutely nothing. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 22:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Sorry to see you leave, Jack. I hope you decide to return. --Imp 22:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
    • The stars will weep for the great loss it has just suffered.--Dooku(Solar Sailer)17px 23:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Well this sucks, I never really got to even say hi... I've always admired your moderator like devotion to this wiki and had always hoped we could've been friends some day.JethLordMaster 16:07, 1 March 2007 (GMT-8)
    • I know we've had our scuffles in the past, but I am really sorry to see you go Jack.--Herbsewell 00:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
      • What Herb said. Enochf 00:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I too am sorry to see you go, Jack. We've butted heads on a few issues, but I think that was probably because we're just a little too much alike. But I know you're a true Star Wars fan. I hope you'll bring your enthusiasm for Star Wars back to Wookieepedia. - JMAS 00:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  • please do not leave,Wookieepedia is nothing without you,please,please,please dont leave,your the person I look up to on wookieepedia you are(to me) the greatest star wars fan ever you have contributed so much.I can not picture wookieepedia without the ADMIRAL,IM about to go on vacation and all I can do is cry now.PLEASE DONT LEAVE',at least say good bye on my talk page,also I dont know what else to say but(cry,CRY,CRY)I dont know what you think of me but I hope you think of me as a friend.troyb (CIS shadow feed) 20px
    • Well, I hope certain people are happy. You took someone whom I believe to be a noble, honest, helpful, steadfast and principled person, who was a true friend to me, and called him a villain. I have said for some time that he flat-out did not, and does not, deserve the criticism that people deal out to him, and as he never once treated me wrongly, I will never understand just what bug people have in their butts about him. But let me repeat myself - JACK NEBULAX NEVER ONCE TREATED ME WRONGLY. EVER. His entire attitude to me was positive. He always treated me with respect and friendship. It wasn't just respect for my work - he respected ME. I believe strongly that he would be the same with anyone he ran across.

So why the hell does he come in for all this criticism, so much so that he's dumped on, blocked for days at a time, and finally so utterly humiliated that he feels forced to leave? Because he always works to correct spelling errors, or format problems, and sets aside large blocks of his time to do so just so that errors on a given page are present as briefly as possible? Last I checked, that was something to be appreciated, not damned. Hell, he corrects my work, and I'm glad he does! Then people who simply can't accept that they can make a mistake, misspell something, report inaccurate facts, or just plain write badly, raise a stink instead of actually bothering to correct their own flaws so that Jack doesn't have to, and suddenly Jack's made the bad guy. And when the weight of that finally begins to tell on him, he gets attacked again for snapping at people. Then he's marginalized, and finally compelled to leave because people say he's "negatively impacting things," and that he slows things down rather than earnestly helps with the Wiki. It's just disgraceful. If I were him, I'd want to pull up my stakes and leave too. I just hope he doesn't.

I for my part feel very sorry Jack has had to go through this, and I feel I need to apologize to him on behalf of EVERY Wookieepedian for the shameful treatment certain members of this Wiki - far too many for my taste - have dealt to him. I would also ask him - nay, BEG him - to stay and continue to participate, partly to deny the scoundrels here their victory, and mostly because he has every right to be here, deserves to be here, and because his contributions are every bit as important as any other's, and in fact are far more valuable than most people's. He certainly has done more here than I have, and he's easily worth a hundred of me.

So if Jack is reading this: Jack Nebulax, Grand Admiral of the Fleet, I'm asking you to stay. I'd like you to stay, hell, need you to stay. You have a friend here, and far more than one, I suspect. Don't let the thugs that pile on you drive you away. Don't let them claim victory when they're the villains. Please, stay.

"Of my friend, I can only say this: of all the souls I have encountered in my travels, his was the most... human." Erik Pflueger 20px 05:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Come on back, Jack. The IRC here revolves around rudeness. That's what makes it survive. Every talks behind other folks' back. It is how the world works. It should not be taken seriously. Karohalva 05:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I hate to turn this into fight (especially after my rude comment - which I don't take back but still just for the record) but Jack did not under fire because of his work. Nobody denies he did good work. But he does step out of line and when proper action is taken and people notice the amount of times it's happened, those types of conversations occur behind our backs. I'm sorry, but if Jack can't handle this like a mature adult then maybe we'd all be better off with him silently leaving, not this whiny flounce crap. I mean, I read that conversation and Oblivion called me rude and narcissistic. Do I care? Of course not (though I'm curious as to why I even brought up and what FourDot meant by "Musn't touch." but whatever). This is number one, the Internet, nobody should ever take what someone says seriously. And number two, none of us are, nor should be, here to make friends. We're here to make the best damn Star Wars encyclopedia we possibly can. Unfortunately, some of us cannot see that is our job. Not this personal crap. If you can't deal with then your a busted leg on the centipede.

If Jack bothers to read this, then I have to say: grow up. This is business. Do not let anything interfere with business. Your job here was not to make anybody happy. Ignore all opinions. If they don't like you then that is their problem. --Redemption20pxTalk 05:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Good. Ya don't come back now, ya' hear? Darth Maddolis 05:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
    • You may have a point, Redemption - we are here to make the best SW Pedia - but I refuse to accept that somehow this means we should feel entitled to treat each other coldly or rudely. A lot of people have come through this site before saying "I'm not here to make friends." They learn quickly that making friends IS part of what we do here, because everyone here DESERVES respect. We're learning right now that when people AREN'T so treated, the business of this Pedia is interrupted and we need to deal with it. You would ask that nothing be allowed to interfere with business, and rightly so, but such behavior CAUSES the very interference you would have us refrain from. It's not just moral or proper that we treat Jack - or that Jack treat any of us - with dignity and respect. It's also common sense. If we're not capable of acting that way, then maybe it's not Jack that has to grow up; it's US. Erik Pflueger 20px 05:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
      • I'm going to agree with Redemption, and not because I've conflicted with Jack over the past few months, but simply because this, in itself is along the same lines of the childish stubbornness that got him in trouble in the first place. It almost reminds...one, of the scene in Futurama where Bender pulls out a note and checks the box for "I'm leaving", and then checks the box "And this time, it's for good". Or something like that. The reason, Erik, that you cannot comprehend is that, and I hope I don't sound rude in saying this, you are not a regular. That's not a problem, but if you were here on a regular basis, you would see that Jack gets involved in petty scrapes on almost a daily basis. Sometimes, it can be constructive, but most of the time...it is not. .... 06:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

No, fourdot, I'm not taking what you said as being rude. In fact, you prove my point by making an effort to be civil to me even if you don't always agree with me. Sometimes all one has to say to make things work between people is: I hope I don't sound rude in saying this. Rather than this being about how you said your point, it remains about the point itself. It really does work. To contrast that point, I am here every day, even if I don't type here every day. I'm not on every page every day, but I'm here. And I'd like to think I'm something of a regular. Most people seem to know who I am and what my work's like. And for all that, I STILL don't get it. Erik Pflueger 20px 06:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Well, I am sorry to see this, but as the last line in that log states, "Should we give him a serious warning to Change or Go Away? He really is negatively impacting things, even with all the good things he does." Though we didn't agree to make such an ultimatum, it seems you've made your choice anyway. I do stand by everything I said in that excerpt. In fact, I thought you *were* present, albeit lurking, for most of the conversation, as evidenced by line 01·07·58; at any rate, it was conducted during the course of the Mofference, and should've been documented (I'm not totally sure why the log ends before the Mofference did). I would've loved to see you temper your obstinacy as editor and thus remove all criticism from me, but you've chosen a different path, and so I wish you luck on your future endeavors. Your patrolling of Recent Changes will be missed. jSarek 07:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I'd never thought I'd live to see this day come...this truly is a momentous event in the history of Wookieepedia. I suppose we all have to work extra harder now to make this Wiki good, with Jack gone. Unit 8311 13:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  • It's sad to see you go, especially on such a negative note :-( For what it's worth, those comments in that meeting do not reflect the entire community. Anyway... I wish you luck in whatever activity you choose to replace the gap that was once occupied by time on Wookieepedia. You will be remembered. --Azizlight 14:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I have to echo both jSarek and Aziz. It's sad to see you go, but I'm not going to apologize for anything I've said. I completely stand by it. I'll take back calling you "crazy", if you seem to want to take that entirely serious. Did I mean that you belong in an insane asylum and yell obscenities at strangers? Of course not, but do you never back down from an argument even when you are clearly in the wrong, and do you continue to be insulting towards new users and take a decidedly petty attitude when authority has to step in? Of course you do. The definition of crazy is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results, and you characterize that personally. You maintain the same brusque and non-compromising attitude that you have from the start. That's now how this site works, that's not how it's supposed to work. Each time you were banned was for legitimate reasons, and to be honest there were several other incidents where you probably should have had a cool-off as well. The only reason you weren't is because of the respect we have given you for being the number one recent changes patroller. As has been seen, you revert legitimate info without checking or asking, you are rude to new users when they are only trying to help, and you defend defeated arguments to the end, never letting your opposition have the last word (even going so far as to type "Fine then" to end arguments). Have these behaviors changed? Have you treated your all of your fellow users with respect and courtesy? Is that behavior likely to be ridiculed and joked about behind your back?

Additionally, I don't see how you cannot surmise the joking tone throughout that conversation, many of those comments were made entirely in jest, but if you want to get all offended and leave then by all means, good luck in your next project. Finally, how easy is it to call the authority that has to make a judgment call the villain without understanding the situation. Cull Tremayne 16:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

    • Well, I know I can't stop you, but, you've contributed so much here, and even if some users don't take you seriously, you don't have to talk to them if you don't want to. But, anyway your welcome to contribute on the wikis I'm on, so, bye. User:Brain40/Sig.
      • I have so many thoughts about this that I don't know where to begin. First, let me say that I respect your decision and I will not try to dissuade you from leaving. This is not because I dislike you as a person, it's because I understand the amount of criticism and disdain you received by the community. I understand the reason why their attitude toward you was so negative. I also agree on SOME of the criticism you received. I agree that you tend to be excessively persistent about your beliefs and that annoys a lot of contributors. I don't know how often they brought their problems to your attention and I don't know how tactful or tactless they were when doing so.
        It would be a lie if I said I always considered you a friend. It would also be a lie if I said I had a constant opinion about you. I remember that when you were once nominated an admin, I even called you a "rather a vandal than a contributor." It would be too late to say sorry for that, and it wouldn't make much of a difference, no matter if you decide to return in the future or disappear for eternity. We humans tend to exagerrate when offended. When I wrote that on your nomination, I was maddened by some revert or edit you made shortly before that. I belive this "sudden overreaction" could be the current case with your decision to leave. However, let me add that in the past half a year, I considered you a friend, even if I did not indicate it very much. I personally asked your opinion on some things and I did that because I knew you would be the man to offer some insight in the matter.
        I must say that I have always admired you for the speed of your edits; how quickly you could spot and correct the least noticeable mistakes. I remember an IRC conversation when you were criticized for only having minor edits, and someone said you practically don't contribute with anything important. Let me tell you something: I consider myself the same kind of contributor. I know how unprofessional an article could look like with bad capitalization, grammar, and spelling/typos.
        As for Redemption's view: It's partially true that the purpose of this website is to make the finest online Star Wars source, but that would be a distant, nearly impossible endeavor without a stable community. Any project that includes a staff or a team, no matter of what size, requires harmony and mutual respect. That you disagree on many things is not a bad thing. This is the way humans are. If we always were on the same side, representing identical interests and goals, it wouldn't lead anywhere.
        If you are reading these lines, Jack, please drop a line on my Talk page. - TopAce 18:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
        • I'm just saying not to take anything personally, to put it in simplest terms. Don't let frivilous comments about your behavior interfere with business. I know I don't (and I'm sure most of us don't anyway). --Redemption20pxTalk 05:15, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
          • Well Jack, I've considered you a friend during my time here, and I hate to see you go. A great deal of what is said on the IRC is highly sarcastic in nature, and I don't recall anyone seriously suggesting that you should be permanently blocked or, at least, I did not interpret it as such.--Lord OblivionSith holocron20px 07:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I thought this day would never come. I have an incident with you like many people, but it was solved and I tried not to argue with you anymore.

The user proud to be the second Wookiepedia contributor have lasted 20 months here. You wanted to be admin but it was difficult because some people say you were more a vandal than a contributor for your polemic recent changes patroling. No one is indiferent about you: people like you or hate you. But talking any problem can be solved, so your enemys are very few, because people like me, after solving a problem are gained by you (and I have learned many things of you like you say). Only Redemption here is completly against you, I don´t know if it´s him or the people in that conversation who made you leave, but it´s a strong victory for them and you know you cannot be fired from Wookiepedia and perhaps you were near to be admin and reaching your objectives.

You can return like Napoleon for 100 days or the Jedi for telling us what you have made (if you don´t go back someone who writes with you can tell us). I hope you leave for good like you say and not for entering a scholl with a blaster rifle and killing all people. I suggest you coming back, a girlfriend, starting your own wiki to be admin bringing people to correct or an online game. You will be remembered here always and the fanons will make you a star --Palpatine81 09:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Well, I've officially changed my mind. For those of you who knew I'd return, congratulations. For those of you who didn't, I'm back for good and hopefully completely reformed. I've realized that despite all the hardships, Wookieepedia is my life, and I can't just throw it away. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 12:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
    • I thought you will read this, but I wasn´t sure if you will return (your words and a lot of time without writing were incredible). Generales like Peron or Napoleon returned, and now you came back (your fanon character will suffer something similar, an exile or some years away like Thawn).
    • This holidays have been good for you, but there are a lot of editions and changes that were waiting for you. Both your supporters and critics missed you. You are a master in marketing with all of this maneuver, but I´m not think it will have any banning consequences to your enemies for their words. But your popularity and moral have grown. Welcome back. --Palpatine81 12:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
      • "Master of marketing"? How about "Master of Melodramatics"? :P --Azizlight 13:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Glad to see you back! hopefully some people will be a lot more considerate of people on a wiki. RC-1187 13:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

thank goodness jack Welcome back Im so,so,so glade you changed your mind,please visit my talk page.Thank the force your back—Troyb

  • Knew you couldn't stay away, Jack. Welcome back. Green Tentacle (Talk) 14:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  • "I've realized that despite all the hardships, Wookieepedia is my life, and I can't just throw it away." Do not make the same mistake twice. When you start making a website your life then you start taking things personally on the site and then we go right back to square one...Just get back to work. --Redemption20pxTalk 20:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Uh, leave me alone. I can't take people like you and your "no need for emotions" attitude seriously. It's like talking to a computer. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 20:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
      • Over the top emotions is exactly what put you into this mess in the first place. If you want to continue embarrassing yourself then that is your decision. I'm only here to give you some advice. You aren't here to be popular - which apparently you need to be since you "left" (didn't even last a week...) you are here as a "worker". Nothing more. Nothing less. --Redemption20pxTalk 20:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Welcome back, Jack. jSarek 12:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Welcome Jack. We missed you. It would not be the same without you. This Wiki would not be as impressive without your help. Chack Jadson 12:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Glad you decided to stay despite the cowardly slander about you that took place in the conversation you linked to. You take no sh*t from anyone, and that's admirable. Welcome back. KEJ 12:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Welcome back Jack, after your unimaginably long absence of a few days. Glad to see that you could put aside the words of whoever made you leave. Now at least we'll see your fanfic finished. Unit 8311 13:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
      • Thanks. And I am working on my fanfic, and when that's finished, more will come. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 15:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
        • Lol, my jaw dropped when I saw you've made 4 pages in the new pages page. I'm like WTF? User:Bly1993/sig
          • Jack, I couldn't be more happy to have my best friend and ally on the Pedia back at his desk. At least I don't have to trim the Palpatine page alone; since you and I are among its biggest contributors, we can do it responsibly.

If I may, though, Jack, I'd like to concede that though his delivery may have been off, Redemption does have a point. I don't know if it comes from being 35, or from having taken more than my share of criticism and insults, but I've learned that a thick skin is necessary, both here and in life. He also paid you the complement (subtle as it may have been) that you don't deserve to be held down by being too concerned about what other people think; you are better than that, much better. Just be yourself, as I try to be, and you have the satisfaction that you kept your integrity; if you pick up fans or friends, like myself, that's gravy. But our first duty is to make this the best and most reliable source of Star Wars info anywhere, and I look forward to us continuing to do that together.

That doesn't mean I'm reversing myself on my belief that we are a kind of family and we do need to treat each other with proper respect and civility. We can't get our first duty done without carrying out that equally important second duty that is good behavior. But if we can't expect everyone else to behave according to the standard - and we can't - we still must do so ourselves, even towards those that we think aren't worthy of it. If to you that means Redemption or anyone else, it's still a necessity. Others may intend to rub our noses, but that doesn't mean we have to take it that way.

As to how some people say you always want the last word on things: I can't say you've been like this everywhere, with everyone, but I can say that it happens sometimes. It's not at all limited to you; it's a common human trait, lots of people do the same thing. I don't know if I was the same way myself before Yvette came into my life, but I probably was. It may just mean that having more than one source of happiness in my life matters; Wookieepedia is my life too, just as it is yours, but it is not my only life. That points to Redemption's other valid point: never hang your hat strictly on this site. You may already have that game covered, I don't know, and I'm sorry if my words are out of place, but the less investment one has just here, the less personal one takes things here.

It is still just a job, neither more nor less, but in my ideal world, it's a job in an office where everyone gets along. They all have lunch together at the local Fatburger, they occasionally have games of hackysack, they stay after work and work on cars together, or talk about comics or who Jack Bauer tortured on the last episode of 24. Why not? We did that at my office for seven years. We can all do it here. We're not "shiny, happy people," but we can all be friends. You're certainly mine.

Welcome back, pal. Erik Pflueger 20px 01:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Thanks. But while Redemption may have a point, there sure are better ways of saying it. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 02:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Being a nasty SOB is quickest, most effective way. *smirk* --Redemption20pxTalk 02:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
      • That may be, but it sure doesn't get you anywhere in life. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 02:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
        • Granted, he could have done better. But just try to keep in mind the point itself, and discard the rest. Don't let your past differences make you predisposed to assume he means everything as a burn. If he does - and he may not necessarily mean to - then you don't have to take it as a burn. Just take the advice, thank him for his concern, and move on. By doing that, you're proving you're a better man than he is, if he's doing wrong. And if you actually see something in his point, and act on it, you'll be defusing him as a matter of course, since he'll be happy that you actually took what he had to say seriously, regardless of how he said it. I know those qualities are in you in abundance, because that's how you made a friend out of me. You'll recall we didn't see eye-to-eye on the way I did things on the Palpatine page, but you conceded some of my points and backed me in some crucial votes, and as a result, I gave you some of what you wanted too. Now who gets your back for people like I do? That's a perfect example, and the more you show these qualities to others, the more genuine respect you earn. Erik Pflueger 20px 02:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
          • No need for a speech, Erik. I get it. ;) —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 02:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
            • Of course, Jack. ;) Just know that I do it from care and concern for you, is all. Oh, and Redemption? I'm trying to help make your points and smooth things over between the two of you. But, with all due respect, if you're proudly boasting that you're a nasty SOB and smirking about it, you're not helping me calm things down. Jack needs to see you as something other than an SOB, not have that perception reinforced. Erik Pflueger 20px 02:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
              • Also, Redemption, I still view you as a living computer. A little bit of emotions every so often won't kill you. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 02:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
              • Just a little tibit about myself: business hours, I'm nasty, rude and opinionated. Any other time, I'm not such a bad guy. I direct you to TSL RP forums. --Redemption20pxTalk 02:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
                • Yeah, you're right. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 02:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
                  • It's okay, Jack. No matter what you think Redemption is, just move on and let him continue to be the HAL 9000, if that's what you see him as. :) And notice he's being a little self-deprecating, and by extension granting you some of your points. But if you stay on top of him, he won't to be able to get up and do better by you, and nothing will smooth over. If he says he's not such a bad guy off of work, he needs to prove that to you, but by all means give him the chance to do so. Diplomacy must resume, folks, and it won't kill either of you. ;) Erik Pflueger 20px 02:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
                    • I'm giving Redemption a chance, all right. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 12:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
                      • Wait, wait. What am I given a chance at? --Redemption20pxTalk 21:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
                        • If you read above, Redemption, you'll see that I told Jack that if, as you say, you're not such a bad guy when you're not at work, he needs to give you the chance to demonstrate that to him. I think that you two have had such a contentious relationship in the past that, rightly or wrongly, he assumes everything you say to him is intended and should be construed as a slam. If, now that Jack's back, we are trying to start over here, two things must happen. 1.) You need to demonstrate to Jack that you're not a bad guy, and 2.) Jack needs to climb off your case so you can do so without getting slammed yourself. It's just a matter of going back to your corners and resuming on a different foot, and that's all it is. I hope you don't take offense. Erik Pflueger 20px 21:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Categories

Please do not make new articles without any categories. Kuralyov 21:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Legacy 9

I see you have Legacy 9. Does it mention anywhere what Pol Temm's species is? Or is he only in the first two pages? Cull Tremayne 23:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Well, I'll start by saying that the preview pages are deceptive. What is shown as the first page in the preview is practically the middle of the comic. Anyway, I don't think it does. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 23:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Wow, weird. My edit summary was in response to The Koon going and changing his species back to Kel Dor after we had already talked about why we couldn't be sure of his species on the talk page and subsequently removed it. Cull Tremayne 23:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

What?

Hey jack,Im just wondering why you changed the quotes back,If I did something wrong,please tell.—Troyb

  • O.K.,also take a look at my fictional bio and tell me what you think,I need someones opinon.One more thing,do you now where to get awsome confederacy pics?—Troyb

O.K. also post the comments on my talk page If thats not to much a problem?—Troyb

Categorization issues

Welcome back, Jack. Sorry to be ragging on you about this, but shouldn't the "blaster weapons" category be before the "blaster rifles" or "blaster pistols" category? As far as I know there is nothing about the order the categories are. Let's agree on which order. "Blaster weapons" first or "Blaster rifles/pistols/carbines?" --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)12:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

What is the problem?

There was absolutely nothing wrong with the way the article was for the Hailfire droid article. The caption was perfectly fine, as was the placement of the image. Much as you may not like it, this is not "Wookieepedia according to Jack." - JMAS 20:39, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

New Face

Hello Admiral, CountDooku13 is no more. I have taken his place instead. You may not understand why I wanted to change, but I just didn't want CountDooku13 as a profile anymore. I have decided to concentrate on articles like Selkath, they are interesting, yet small, unappreciated, and in serious need of expansion. I have already started a new fanfiction. It is much better, and far more interesting than the old one. Also, it gives me more room to act independently from a pre-established character. If you don't mind, I'd like you to take a look at it, it's not too long, and I vaule your opinion over... pretty much everybody else. Thanks.--Shaelas(Ahto City)Czerka 13:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi There!

Hi Jack you probobly dont know me, Im very a new member to the site, but I'v read your comments and such since I found this site, which was a while ago. I read all your comments regaurding the Inquisitorius and things like that on the Palpatine talk page. I think that you are completly right and after all the work you've done for everything on this site I wanted to give you a Wookieecookie, but.. im not sure how... or even if new users can give Wookieecookies... so if you can tell me what to do I would love to give you one.Dark Lord Trayus 22:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Oh, that's okay. I'll just add it to my user page when I get the chance. ;) —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 00:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm sort of new as well, and to tell the truth I'm still trying to figure a few of the most basic things out, I joined after using Wookieepedia everyday and decided to sign up after I made a few minor edits, but anyway, I wanted to say hello and tell you that I appreciate your work here. I have a good chance of clicking the Random Article link and finding some of your work on the first try. If I have any questions, do you mind if I come to you for a good answer? From what I've seen, you'd probably have them. A little edit, I have read some of your fanon biography. It's good, I'd join your Empire. Adenn 06:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Fanfic request...

Hi there, Jack. I just started work on my fanfic, and I'm asking for your permission to put your character in a cameo role. Oh, and keep up the good editing work. Thanks! Unit 8311 13:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Shock trooper capture of Prosperous

  • You'd have to watch carefully. You should see red clone troopers in the background. I believe you can see one when they're raiding the bridge. User:Bly1993/sig

File:Impavidclonecommander.jpg User:Bly1993/sig

It is a shock trooper. http://www.starwars.com/hyperspace/about/news/news20050503.html User:Bly1993/sig

Request

Would you mind reading over the Selkath Corporation part of my fanfic and its gallery when you have the time? Thanks. Also, you don't think I spend to much time on this stuff do you?--Shaelas(Ahto City)Czerka 14:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Sure thing. As for spending time on your fanfic, just try to edit articles a bit more than you do your fanfic. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 14:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Well I do, it's just that it's hard for me to find things to do that I have information on. I don't like to make small edits, only big ones, which is part of my problem. I had a good number of article edits with my previous user, but now I have to start all over again. Plus, the way I see it, my fanfic is a way to guide me, so that I edit content that is related to content within my fanfic. Though your right, I should spend a little more time on articles.--Shaelas(Ahto City)Czerka 14:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
      • I think some people were discussing a policy that users had to contribute more to actual articles than to their fanfics or action would be taken... I'm not sure, though. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 15:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
        • Hmm... I'll have to check so I know how much I need to improve. Is there a place with a list of Wookieepedia policies somewhere?--Shaelas(Ahto City)Czerka 15:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  • It's actually on CT right now. Forum:Excessive useless edits, if I may butt in. Oh, and Jack, I'll have to e-mail you the file tomorrow- it's on a different computer than what I'm using today. Atarumaster88 20px (Audience Chamber) 23:38, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

User page fanon

Hello, Jack. You currently have fan fiction on your user page, as well as on a subpage. This is a violation of the user page policy. I urge you to merge your fanon pages. --ATATatarismall.png 20:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Could you give me a day? —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 23:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Of course. =) --ATATatarismall.png 23:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
      • It's been a week. Please merge them. --ATATatarismall.png 23:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
        • Your subpage has been deleted. --ATATatarismall.png 15:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Block

30px You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list, along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified.

--ATATatarismall.png 13:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey

Hey jack,just woundering if I could use that userbox that has a pic of you,the gray one and say this user support's Jack Nebulax and you still haven't taken a look at my fanon bio.Maybe your just doing something else but please take a look. Troyb 18:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

  • The image was made by Solus. I don't think he would have any problems with you using the image. I'm sure Jack doesn't mind if you state your support for him either now that he's been unfairly blocked... again. KEJ 18:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • O.K. thank's.Also don't forget to look at my Fanon bio Troyb 22:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

wat up

wat up jack, i'm back. this is crumb. i haven't been here for a long time. it seems like i already knew enough about star wars so i din't have to look up stuff much. Repoo 03:31, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Fanon bio

Hey jack I was woundering if you wanted to be in my fanon bio?We could meet during the clone wars and during the new republic or something. Troyb 17:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Also Jack I was thinking of starting my own wiki,a wiki about starwars book's,comic's and novel's.But I will need help and need permission.But if they agree do you want to be an admin? Troyb 17:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Ok, irrelevant q for you first, Troyb: aren't books and novels the same thing? But onto the subject of your wiki, you probably will need an admin to help you, and a great as Jack is, I'm not sure if he can create a new wiki. And before you create it, what kind of wiki are you talking about? For the books do you want a basic plot summary or a full summary of the story? Things to chew on. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)23:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Edited your subpage

Just letting you know out of courtesy that I edited one of your subpages. The purpose of this was to remove a link to a recently deleted user page that was clogging up Special:Wantedpages. Nothing important, but figured since it was in your user space I'd let you know. Wildyoda 02:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

About the "please don't restart old topics" sentence

Hi there. About this sentence you use a lot. I was just wondering if it was part of the Wookieepedia policy, a Wikipedia or general Internet common policy or just an obsession of yours. Just enlighten me. Best regards, Klow 23:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Tyber Zann

Why is a picture of Malfoy not necessary? I just thought it be would relevant to provide the exact picture taken for model for comparison... Klow 16:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Galaxies

For what it's worth, I'm with you when it concerns Galaxies. Time and time again, SOE (Sony Online Entertainment) has screwed up the SW universe. I mean seriously, Jedi starting with a stick? And being able to chose Jedi as a starting class in the Galactic Civil War. Just because LucasArts supports the game as a franchise, doesn't mean that it's considered a part of the actual canon. It's an MMO for goodness sakes. It's not meant to have a storyline at all. I feel (as do you) that Galaxies should be in it's on subcategory. Thanks for making me realize I'm not the only one who despises what Galaxies has done lol. O-ChampionOfTheForce-o 05:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)